12 multiple-choice questions, progressively harder.
Solve the parameter inequality ax≥bax \ge bax≥b (non-strict) when a=0a = 0a=0 and b=0b = 0b=0. How does the boundary differ from the strict case?
Solution
Correct answer: A
With a=0a = 0a=0 the inequality is 0≥b0 \ge b0≥b, and here b=0b = 0b=0.
0≥0 is true ⇒ all real numbers0 \ge 0 \text{ is true} \;\Rightarrow\; \text{all real numbers}0≥0 is true⇒all real numbers
Unlike the strict 0>00 > 00>0, which is false and gives no solution, the non-strict 0≥00 \ge 00≥0 is true, so every real number is a solution.
Consider bx>b2bx > b^2bx>b2 with bbb a nonzero parameter. Solve for xxx in the case b>0b > 0b>0.
Correct answer: D
Divide both sides by the positive number bbb, keeping the direction.
bx>b2 ⇒ x>b2b=bbx > b^2 \;\Rightarrow\; x > \frac{b^2}{b} = bbx>b2⇒x>bb2=b
So the solution is x>bx > bx>b.
Solve 5x≥1\dfrac{5}{x} \ge 1x5≥1 using sign cases. Solution set?
Exclude x=0x = 0x=0 and split on the sign of xxx.
x>0: 5≥x ⇒ 0<x≤5x<0: 5≤x ⇒ no negative xx > 0:\; 5 \ge x \;\Rightarrow\; 0 < x \le 5 \qquad x < 0:\; 5 \le x \;\Rightarrow\; \text{no negative } xx>0:5≥x⇒0<x≤5x<0:5≤x⇒no negative x
The positive case gives 0<x≤50 < x \le 50<x≤5; the negative case asks for x≥5x \ge 5x≥5, impossible for x<0x < 0x<0. The solution set is (0,5](0, 5](0,5].
Two solution sets are A=(−∞,2]A = (-\infty, 2]A=(−∞,2] and B=[2,∞)B = [2, \infty)B=[2,∞). What is their intersection A∩BA \cap BA∩B (the 'and')?
Correct answer: C
The intersection keeps only what both sets contain.
(−∞,2]∩[2,∞)={2}(-\infty, 2] \cap [2, \infty) = \{2\}(−∞,2]∩[2,∞)={2}
The only number that is both at most 222 and at least 222 is 222 itself, so the intersection is the single point x=2x = 2x=2.
Two solution sets are A=(−∞,2)A = (-\infty, 2)A=(−∞,2) and B=(2,∞)B = (2, \infty)B=(2,∞). What is their union A∪BA \cup BA∪B (the 'or')?
The union sweeps together everything in either set.
(−∞,2)∪(2,∞)={x:x≠2}(-\infty, 2) \cup (2, \infty) = \{x : x \ne 2\}(−∞,2)∪(2,∞)={x:x=2}
Every number except 222 lies in one of the two open rays, and 222 is in neither, so the union is all real numbers except 222.
You reduce a one-variable inequality and reach 0>−30 > -30>−3, with no variable left. What is the solution set of the original?
A leftover with no variable is judged outright.
0>−3 is true0 > -3 \text{ is true}0>−3 is true
Because the statement is true, the original held for every xxx, so the solution set is all real numbers.
You reduce a one-variable inequality and reach 0>30 > 30>3, with no variable left. What is the solution set of the original?
The leftover has no variable, so its truth decides everything.
0>3 is false0 > 3 \text{ is false}0>3 is false
Because the statement is false, no value of xxx works, so the solution set is empty.
A classmate multiplies both sides of 3x<2\dfrac{3}{x} < 2x3<2 by xxx and writes 3<2x3 < 2x3<2x, so x>32x > \dfrac{3}{2}x>23. Which solutions does this miss?
Correct answer: B
The single step assumed x>0x > 0x>0. Redo the negative case with the flip.
x<0: 3>2x ⇒ x<32, true for all x<0x < 0:\; 3 > 2x \;\Rightarrow\; x < \tfrac{3}{2}, \text{ true for all } x < 0x<0:3>2x⇒x<23, true for all x<0
Every negative number satisfies the original, so the honest answer is x<0x < 0x<0 or x>32x > \frac{3}{2}x>23. The naive step lost the whole negative ray.
For which values of the parameter aaa does ax≤0ax \le 0ax≤0 hold for every real number xxx? (Note the non-strict symbol.)
Check each sign of aaa. A nonzero aaa makes axaxax take both signs as xxx varies, so ax≤0ax \le 0ax≤0 cannot hold for all xxx.
a=0 ⇒ 0≤0 for every xa = 0 \;\Rightarrow\; 0 \le 0 \text{ for every } xa=0⇒0≤0 for every x
Only a=0a = 0a=0 makes the left side 000 for all xxx, which always satisfies ≤0\le 0≤0.
The inequality x2<3xx^2 < 3xx2<3x (from multiplying x<3x < 3x<3 by xxx) is solved by 0<x<30 < x < 30<x<3. Why does this not match the original x<3x < 3x<3?
The multiplier xxx has no fixed sign, so a single step cannot serve every xxx.
original (−∞,3) → new (0,3)\text{original } (-\infty, 3) \;\to\; \text{new } (0, 3)original (−∞,3)→new (0,3)
Writing x2<3xx^2 < 3xx2<3x for all xxx silently used the x>0x > 0x>0 branch, which is invalid for x≤0x \le 0x≤0, so those solutions were dropped.
Solve xx−1>0\dfrac{x}{x - 1} > 0x−1x>0 by considering the signs of the numerator and denominator. Solution set?
A quotient is positive when its two parts share a sign.
both positive:x>1both negative:x<0\text{both positive}: x > 1 \qquad \text{both negative}: x < 0both positive:x>1both negative:x<0
Numerator xxx and denominator x−1x - 1x−1 are both positive when x>1x > 1x>1 and both negative when x<0x < 0x<0; between 000 and 111 they differ in sign. So the solution is x<0x < 0x<0 or x>1x > 1x>1.
Solve xx+2<0\dfrac{x}{x + 2} < 0x+2x<0 by considering signs. Solution set?
A quotient is negative when its two parts have opposite signs.
x>0 and x+2<0 is impossible;x<0 and x+2>0⇒−2<x<0x > 0 \text{ and } x + 2 < 0 \text{ is impossible}; \quad x < 0 \text{ and } x + 2 > 0 \Rightarrow -2 < x < 0x>0 and x+2<0 is impossible;x<0 and x+2>0⇒−2<x<0
The only region where numerator and denominator disagree in sign is −2<x<0-2 < x < 0−2<x<0, so that is the solution set.
Reset this practice set?
This clears every answer you have given and starts the set again from question 1.