Rational Expressions and Functions: Chapter Test
20 multiple-choice questions and 12 core practice problems, drawn from across the chapter and mixed together.
Multiple choice
20 questions, 100 points in total, 5 points each. Answer in any order and change your mind as often as you like. When you submit, your answers lock and every question shows its worked solution.
Core practice
12 problems from across the chapter. Work on paper, use hints when you need them, and check the answer or the full solution when you are ready.
Difficulty: Core (core-course level)
0 of 12 completed · 0 skipped
Progress saved in this browser.
Progress can't be saved in this browser, so your choices last for this visit only.
-
Problem 1 A reduced formula
Write in lowest terms for real . State the original domain and identify which exclusions remain visible in the final denominator.
- Hint 1
The linear expressions in opposite orders differ by a minus sign.
- Hint 2
Reduce the numerical coefficients as well as the shared polynomial factor.
Answer
, with ; the exclusion remains visible.
Full solution
The original denominator excludes .
Since , the numerator is .
On , one factor cancels and reduces to , giving
The numerator quadratic has no real zero and is nonzero at , so no further polynomial factor cancels.
The final denominator still enforces the only original exclusion.
Answer
, with ; the exclusion remains visible.
Key idea
Opposite factors and numerical coefficients both matter when reducing a rational expression.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 2 A quotient with exclusions
Simplify for real . Give every original restriction and distinguish those visible in the final denominator from those retained only in writing.
- Hint 1
Check both printed denominators and whether the divisor is zero.
- Hint 2
After taking the reciprocal, remove just the shared copy of .
Answer
; ; visible: ; retained only in writing: .
Full solution
The dividend denominator excludes and the divisor denominator excludes .
The divisor is zero at , so that input is also excluded.
On this domain, the quotient is
Cancel one nonzero copy of to obtain .
The restrictions at and appear in its denominator.
The one at does not, though the original divisor was undefined there.
Answer
; ; visible: ; retained only in writing: .
Key idea
A rational quotient needs the divisor to be defined and nonzero before any cancellation.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 3 A combined expression
Write as one fraction in lowest terms. Show the denominators used to combine it, and state the original domain.
- Hint 1
Equivalent fractions need a shared denominator before their numerators can be combined.
- Hint 2
Keep the subtraction attached to every term of the second numerator.
Answer
; common denominator ; domain .
Full solution
The original denominators exclude .
Their least common denominator is .
Rewriting the first fraction multiplies its numerator and denominator by ; rewriting the second multiplies both by .
The combined numerator is
so the result is .
It has no common factor with the denominator.
The final denominator still enforces the only original restriction.
Answer
; common denominator ; domain .
Key idea
A numerical least common multiple and careful subtraction produce a correct combined rational expression.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 4 Behavior of a rational graph
For , identify every hole and vertical asymptote and determine its horizontal or oblique asymptote. Include the height of each hole.
- Hint 1
First decide which denominator factors vanish completely after cancellation.
- Hint 2
Then compare the leading terms of the reduced numerator and denominator.
Answer
Hole ; vertical asymptote ; horizontal asymptote ; no oblique asymptote.
Full solution
The original denominator excludes and .
On that domain,
The factor disappears completely from the denominator, so gives a hole, at height
Both copies of survive, and the reduced numerator is not zero at , so is a vertical asymptote.
The reduced numerator and denominator both have degree , with leading coefficients and .
Division gives
The correction is not the zero expression and tends to zero far out, so the horizontal asymptote is .
There is no oblique asymptote.
Answer
Hole ; vertical asymptote ; horizontal asymptote ; no oblique asymptote.
Key idea
Separate canceled denominator factors from surviving ones before reading the end behavior.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 5 A counting fraction
A box contains 7 red counters and blue counters. After 5 more blue counters are added, the fraction of the counters that are red is . Write and solve a rational equation for , name the domain filter and the context filter, and decide whether can be a valid count.
- Hint 1
The fraction that is red is the number of red counters over the total number of counters.
- Hint 2
Test the root against the domain first, then against what a count of counters can be.
Answer
; the root passes the domain filter and fails the context filter. No valid count exists.
Full solution
After the addition there are counters, so
The domain requires .
Clearing the denominators gives
This root is allowed, and it satisfies the equation:
A number of counters must be a whole number, so the context rejects .
No starting number of blue counters makes the red fraction exactly .
Answer
; the root passes the domain filter and fails the context filter. No valid count exists.
Key idea
A root can pass the domain filter and satisfy the equation, yet be rejected because the situation allows only whole numbers.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 6 Two equations on one domain
Let and . Solve and over the real numbers. State the original excluded inputs and classify any excluded candidate.
- Hint 1
The original denominator restricts both of its factors.
- Hint 2
Keep the domain list even if an algebra step removes one factor.
Answer
: no solution; its candidate is extraneous. : all real ; the excluded candidates and are extraneous. Both original expressions exclude and .
Full solution
Both original denominators exclude and .
For , multiplying by gives
The only candidate is , which is excluded and extraneous.
Thus this equation has no solution.
For , the cleared equation is
It is true at every candidate input, leaving every value in the original domain.
Thus the solution set is all real except and .
Answer
: no solution; its candidate is extraneous. : all real ; the excluded candidates and are extraneous. Both original expressions exclude and .
Key idea
A rational equation can have no solution or hold throughout its original domain, depending on the relation its numerators impose.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 7 Two missing graph points
Let , where are real. The graph has a finite-height hole at each excluded input and no vertical asymptote. Find , the lowest-terms formula with its domain, and both hole coordinates.
- Hint 1
A finite hole requires the denominator factor to disappear completely from the reduced denominator.
- Hint 2
Evaluate the numerator at each excluded input to obtain two equations in the constants.
Answer
, ; for ; holes and .
Full solution
The denominator has simple zeros at and .
For both graph features to be holes, the numerator must vanish at both.
Substitution gives
Adding gives , so and then .
Let denote the resulting numerator.
It factors as
Thus the lowest-terms formula is on the original domain .
Its reduced heights are at and at , giving the two requested holes.
Multiplying the three factors confirms every original coefficient.
Answer
, ; for ; holes and .
Key idea
Two finite holes can impose enough numerator conditions to determine two unknown coefficients.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 8 A fraction over a fraction
Simplify for real , giving its exact domain.
- Hint 1
The main fraction bar represents division, so its divisor must be defined and nonzero.
- Hint 2
Combine the top over , then multiply by the reciprocal of the bottom.
Answer
, with .
Full solution
The quadratic has discriminant , so it is never zero.
The top excludes .
The bottom fraction exists for every real but is zero at , which adds that exclusion.
Over , the numerator of the top is
so
Multiplying by the reciprocal of the bottom gives
with
At , the original top is and the bottom is , giving , as does .
Answer
, with .
Key idea
A complex fraction is a division, so its main divisor adds a nonzero restriction of its own.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 9 A line, or a line approached
For , a student says that canceling removes every break in the graph and that the graph is the line . Assess both claims, and give every hole, vertical asymptote, and horizontal or oblique asymptote.
- Hint 1
Polynomial division distinguishes an exact quotient from one with a nonzero remainder.
- Hint 2
At an originally excluded input, a nonzero fully reduced denominator gives a hole; a zero fully reduced denominator gives a vertical asymptote.
Answer
Both claims are false. Hole ; vertical asymptote ; oblique asymptote ; no horizontal asymptote.
Full solution
The original denominator excludes and .
Canceling gives
for .
At the reduced denominator is , so there is a hole at height
At the reduced denominator is zero and the reduced numerator is , so is a vertical asymptote.
Canceling removes the factor from the formula, but both excluded inputs remain breaks in the graph: a hole at and a vertical asymptote at .
Division gives
The remainder is not zero, so the graph is not the line .
It approaches that line far out, which makes an oblique asymptote, and there is no horizontal asymptote.
Answer
Both claims are false. Hole ; vertical asymptote ; oblique asymptote ; no horizontal asymptote.
Key idea
A nonzero remainder makes the quotient line an asymptote rather than the graph itself, and only a fully canceled factor leaves a hole.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 10 A meter's valid range
A light meter reads units at a distance of meters from a lamp, and its readings are valid only for . Write and solve a rational equation for the distance at which the meter reads 4 units, name the domain filter and the context filter, and classify each root.
- Hint 1
Set the reading formula equal to the required reading.
- Hint 2
Clear the denominator, then test each root against the domain and, separately, against the meter's valid range.
Answer
; roots and . Both pass the domain filter ; the context filter rejects , so meters.
Full solution
The equation is
Its domain requires .
Multiplying by gives
so the roots are and .
Both roots are allowed, and both satisfy the equation, since as well.
The meter's valid range requires , so the context rejects and keeps : at meters the reading is
Answer
; roots and . Both pass the domain filter ; the context filter rejects , so meters.
Key idea
A root that solves the equation and passes the domain filter can still fall outside the range a model is valid for.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 11 A cancellation proposal
A student reduces to and states the domain as , and . Assess both the formula and the domain, giving a corrected final statement.
- Hint 1
Check the factorization and the numerical reduction separately from the restrictions.
- Hint 2
Find every real input that makes the original denominator zero.
Answer
Formula correct; domain wrong. for only.
Full solution
The original denominator is .
The factor is at least , so it is never zero, and only can vanish, at .
On that domain, canceling and reducing to gives
so the formula is correct.
The inputs are zeros of , not of .
At them the factor equals , so the original denominator is not zero there and both are allowed.
The corrected statement is the same formula for
Answer
Formula correct; domain wrong. for only.
Key idea
A canceled factor excludes exactly its real zeros, so a factor with no real zero excludes nothing.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 12 A far-out description
For , state the original domain and its horizontal or oblique asymptote. A student says that canceling makes allowed and changes which degree is larger. Assess both claims.
- Hint 1
The original formula decides which inputs are allowed; end behavior depends on how fast the numerator and denominator grow.
- Hint 2
Decide whether either quadratic factor can vanish at a real input.
- Hint 3
List the numerator and denominator degrees in each form, then compare the two lists.
Answer
Domain ; horizontal asymptote ; no oblique asymptote; both claims are false.
Full solution
The original denominator is zero only at .
On , cancellation gives
The original restriction remains visible in the denominator.
The original degrees are and , and the reduced degrees are and .
In both forms the denominator is one degree larger, so the function approaches far out.
Canceling neither restores nor changes that comparison.
Answer
Domain ; horizontal asymptote ; no oblique asymptote; both claims are false.
Key idea
Canceling a common factor changes neither the domain (the original exclusions still apply) nor the difference between the degrees.
- Hint 1