12 multiple-choice questions, progressively harder.
Using the self-similar move, what does 0.9‾=0.9999…0.\overline{9} = 0.9999\ldots0.9=0.9999… equal exactly?
Solution
Correct answer: D
Let x=0.9‾x = 0.\overline{9}x=0.9. Then 10x=9.9‾=9+x10x = 9.\overline{9} = 9 + x10x=9.9=9+x.
9x=9⟹x=19x = 9 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x = 19x=9⟹x=1
The repeating decimal 0.9‾0.\overline{9}0.9 is exactly 111, not a hair less.
Applying the self-similar move to 1+3+9+27+⋯1 + 3 + 9 + 27 + \cdots1+3+9+27+⋯ gives S=1+3SS = 1 + 3SS=1+3S, so S=−12S = -\tfrac{1}{2}S=−21. What is wrong?
Correct answer: B
The algebra is correct, so the flaw is assuming a value exists. With r=3≥1r = 3 \ge 1r=3≥1 the terms grow.
1, 4, 13, 40, … grow without bound1, \ 4, \ 13, \ 40, \ \ldots \ \text{grow without bound}1, 4, 13, 40, … grow without bound
There is no number SSS, so −12-\tfrac{1}{2}−21 is meaningless.
The golden ratio satisfies φ2−φ−1=0\varphi^2 - \varphi - 1 = 0φ2−φ−1=0. Therefore φ2\varphi^2φ2 equals:
Correct answer: A
Move the constant and linear terms to the other side.
φ2=φ+1\varphi^2 = \varphi + 1φ2=φ+1
So squaring the golden ratio is the same as adding 111 to it.
The partial values of 2+2+⋯\sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2 + \cdots}}2+2+⋯ are 1.41,1.85,1.96,1.99,…1.41, 1.85, 1.96, 1.99, \ldots1.41,1.85,1.96,1.99,… Why can none of them reach 222?
Correct answer: C
Each new value is the square root of 222 plus the previous value.
value<2 ⟹ 2+value<4=2\text{value} < 2 \ \Longrightarrow \ \sqrt{2 + \text{value}} < \sqrt{4} = 2value<2 ⟹ 2+value<4=2
Starting below 222, the tower stays below 222, so it rises toward a ceiling and closes in on it.
What is the value of 3+13+13+⋯3 + \cfrac{1}{3 + \cfrac{1}{3 + \cdots}}3+3+3+⋯11?
Self-similarity gives x=3+1xx = 3 + \tfrac{1}{x}x=3+x1, so x2−3x−1=0x^2 - 3x - 1 = 0x2−3x−1=0. The quadratic formula gives
x=3±132.x = \frac{3 \pm \sqrt{13}}{2}.x=23±13.
The fraction is positive, so x=3+132≈3.30x = \tfrac{3 + \sqrt{13}}{2} \approx 3.30x=23+13≈3.30.
For which expression does the self-similar move return a false answer because the expression has no value?
The first three all settle on numbers (222, 32\tfrac{3}{2}23, and 13\tfrac{1}{3}31). The last has ratio 222.
1+2+4+⋯ ⟹ S=1+2S ⟹ S=−11 + 2 + 4 + \cdots \ \Longrightarrow \ S = 1 + 2S \ \Longrightarrow \ S = -11+2+4+⋯ ⟹ S=1+2S ⟹ S=−1
A sum of positive numbers cannot be −1-1−1, so the move lied: the series has no value.
The product tower 22⋯\sqrt{2\sqrt{2\cdots}}22⋯ gives x=2xx = \sqrt{2x}x=2x, with candidates 000 and 222. Why is 000 rejected?
The innermost visible factor already gives 2≈1.41\sqrt{2} \approx 1.412≈1.41, and the tower only grows from there.
x ≥ 2 > 1x \ \ge \ \sqrt{2} \ > \ 1x ≥ 2 > 1
Since the value clearly exceeds 111, the candidate x=0x = 0x=0 cannot be it, so x=2x = 2x=2.
For 1+r+r2+⋯1 + r + r^2 + \cdots1+r+r2+⋯ with r=32r = \tfrac{3}{2}r=23, does 11−r=11−3/2=−2\tfrac{1}{1-r} = \tfrac{1}{1 - 3/2} = -21−r1=1−3/21=−2 give the sum?
The formula 11−r\tfrac{1}{1-r}1−r1 only applies when ∣r∣<1|r| < 1∣r∣<1. Here r=32>1r = \tfrac{3}{2} > 1r=23>1, so the terms grow.
1, 52, 194, … grow without bound1, \ \tfrac{5}{2}, \ \tfrac{19}{4}, \ \ldots \ \text{grow without bound}1, 25, 419, … grow without bound
The series has no finite sum, so the −2-2−2 is a false answer from the same self-similarity trap.
Write 0.27‾=0.272727…0.\overline{27} = 0.272727\ldots0.27=0.272727… as a fraction in lowest terms.
Let x=0.27‾x = 0.\overline{27}x=0.27. The block is two digits, so 100x=27+x100x = 27 + x100x=27+x, giving 99x=2799x = 2799x=27.
x=2799=311x = \frac{27}{99} = \frac{3}{11}x=9927=113
Reducing 2799\tfrac{27}{99}9927 by 999 gives 311\tfrac{3}{11}113.
What is the value of 110+110+110+⋯\sqrt{110 + \sqrt{110 + \sqrt{110 + \cdots}}}110+110+110+⋯?
Set x=110+xx = \sqrt{110 + x}x=110+x, then square and factor.
x2−x−110=0⟹(x−11)(x+10)=0x^2 - x - 110 = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad (x - 11)(x + 10) = 0x2−x−110=0⟹(x−11)(x+10)=0
The value is the nonnegative candidate, x=11x = 11x=11.
Consider the descending tower x=2−xx = \sqrt{2 - x}x=2−x (positive value). What is xxx?
Square both sides and rearrange into a quadratic.
x2=2−x⟹x2+x−2=0⟹(x+2)(x−1)=0x^2 = 2 - x \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x^2 + x - 2 = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad (x + 2)(x - 1) = 0x2=2−x⟹x2+x−2=0⟹(x+2)(x−1)=0
The candidates are −2-2−2 and 111; the value is nonnegative, so x=1x = 1x=1.
In the false derivation S=1+2SS = 1 + 2SS=1+2S giving S=−1S = -1S=−1 for 1+2+4+⋯1 + 2 + 4 + \cdots1+2+4+⋯, exactly where is the flaw?
Every algebraic step is valid; only the premise fails.
write S= ⟹ assumes a value exists\text{write } S = \ \Longrightarrow \ \text{assumes a value exists}write S= ⟹ assumes a value exists
The series has none, so the flaw is committed before any algebra, at the moment of naming SSS.
Reset this practice set?
This clears every answer you have given and starts the set again from question 1.