12 multiple-choice questions, progressively harder.
Round 0.799510.799510.79951 to the nearest hundredth.
Solution
Correct answer: D
The hundredths digit is the second 999 in 0.799‾510.79\underline{9}510.79951, and the deciding digit, the thousandths 999, is 555 or more, so round up. Raising 999999 hundredths carries.
0.79951≈0.800.79951 \approx 0.800.79951≈0.80
The ten hundredths become one tenth, so 0.790.790.79 rolls up to 0.800.800.80. Keep two decimal places.
A number rounds to 5.05.05.0 when rounded to the nearest tenth. Which of these is NOT such a number?
Correct answer: B
A number rounds to 5.05.05.0 to the nearest tenth when it lies from the midpoint 4.954.954.95 up to (but not including) 5.055.055.05.
4.95≤x<5.054.95 \le x < 5.054.95≤x<5.05
The values 4.964.964.96, 5.045.045.04, and 4.994.994.99 fall in this band, but 5.065.065.06 is past 5.055.055.05, so it rounds to 5.15.15.1 instead.
Round 56=0.8333…\tfrac{5}{6} = 0.8333\ldots65=0.8333… to the nearest hundredth.
Correct answer: A
Write 56\tfrac{5}{6}65 as the repeating decimal 0.8333…0.8333\ldots0.8333…. The hundredths digit is 333, and the deciding digit, the thousandths 333, is less than 555.
3<5 ⇒ round down3 < 5 \;\Rightarrow\; \text{round down}3<5⇒round down
Keep the hundredths digit, giving 0.830.830.83. The repeating 333s never reach the midpoint 0.8350.8350.835.
How many whole numbers round to 300300300 when rounded to the nearest hundred?
A whole number rounds to 300300300 to the nearest hundred when it lies from the midpoint 250250250 up to (but not including) 350350350.
250≤n<350250 \le n < 350250≤n<350
That band runs from 250250250 through 349349349, which is 349−250+1=100349 - 250 + 1 = 100349−250+1=100 whole numbers.
Round 0.49‾=0.4999…0.4\overline{9} = 0.4999\ldots0.49=0.4999… to the nearest tenth.
The tenths digit is 444, and the deciding digit, the hundredths 999, is 555 or more, so round up.
9≥5 ⇒ round up9 \ge 5 \;\Rightarrow\; \text{round up}9≥5⇒round up
Raise the tenths from 444 to 555 and keep one decimal place, giving 0.50.50.5. The endless 999s push the value past the midpoint 0.450.450.45.
Rounding 0.84620.84620.8462 to the nearest tenth, a student rounds up to 0.90.90.9 by reasoning that 462462462 is large. What is the correct answer and the error?
Correct answer: C
Rounding to the nearest tenth, only the single digit just to the right of the tenths place decides it, which is the hundredths digit 444.
4<5 ⇒ round down4 < 5 \;\Rightarrow\; \text{round down}4<5⇒round down
So 0.84620.84620.8462 rounds to 0.80.80.8. The student's error was reading the whole tail 462462462; the digits past the hundredths place cannot move the rounding up.
Round 2,349,5002{,}349{,}5002,349,500 to the nearest hundred thousand.
Rounding to the nearest hundred thousand, the deciding digit is the ten-thousands digit, which is 444.
The digits past the ten-thousands place do not matter, so 2,349,5002{,}349{,}5002,349,500 rounds down to 2,300,0002{,}300{,}0002,300,000.
Estimate 612×0.49612 \times 0.49612×0.49 by rounding each factor to an easy value, then say which side of the estimate the exact answer is on.
Round each factor: 612≈600612 \approx 600612≈600 and 0.49≈0.50.49 \approx 0.50.49≈0.5.
612×0.49≈600×0.5=300612 \times 0.49 \approx 600 \times 0.5 = 300612×0.49≈600×0.5=300
Here 612612612 rounds down and 0.490.490.49 rounds up, so the rounding directions disagree and you cannot tell the side from them alone. Computing exactly, 612×0.49=299.88612 \times 0.49 = 299.88612×0.49=299.88, which is less than 300300300, so the estimate is 300300300 and the exact value is less.
What is the smallest whole number that rounds to 707070 when rounded to the nearest ten?
A whole number rounds to 707070 to the nearest ten when it lies from the midpoint 656565 up to (but not including) 757575.
65≤n<7565 \le n < 7565≤n<75
The smallest whole number in that band is 656565, which rounds up to 707070 by the round-half-up convention.
A shopping total is 19.95+4.89+12.1019.95 + 4.89 + 12.1019.95+4.89+12.10 dollars. Estimate it by rounding each price to the nearest dollar.
Round each price to the nearest dollar: 19.95→2019.95 \to 2019.95→20, 4.89→54.89 \to 54.89→5, and 12.10→1212.10 \to 1212.10→12.
20+5+12=3720 + 5 + 12 = 3720+5+12=37
The total is about 373737 dollars. The exact total is 36.9436.9436.94 dollars, so the estimate is within a few cents.
A recipe scaled up needs 777 batches using 1.851.851.85 cups of flour each, and a note says the total is 1.2951.2951.295 cups. Using estimation, what is wrong?
Estimate the total before trusting the note: round 1.851.851.85 to 222 cups, with 777 batches.
7×1.85≈7×2=147 \times 1.85 \approx 7 \times 2 = 147×1.85≈7×2=14
The true total is 12.9512.9512.95 cups, close to the estimate of 141414. The note's 1.2951.2951.295 is ten times too small, so the decimal point landed one place too far left.
Estimate 7,812÷387{,}812 \div 387,812÷38 by rounding each number to one nonzero digit.
Round each number to one nonzero digit: 7,812≈8,0007{,}812 \approx 8{,}0007,812≈8,000 and 38≈4038 \approx 4038≈40, since 8,0008{,}0008,000 divides nicely by 404040.
7,812÷38≈8,000÷40=2007{,}812 \div 38 \approx 8{,}000 \div 40 = 2007,812÷38≈8,000÷40=200
The answer is about 200200200. The exact quotient is about 206206206, so the estimate is in the right ballpark.
Reset this practice set?
This clears every answer you have given and starts the set again from question 1.