12 multiple-choice questions, progressively harder.
A calculator shows 24.6×0.48=1.180824.6 \times 0.48 = 1.180824.6×0.48=1.1808. A quick estimate suggests the answer should be about which value?
Solution
Correct answer: A
Round each factor to an easy nearby number: 24.624.624.6 rounds to 252525 and 0.480.480.48 rounds to 0.50.50.5.
24.6×0.48≈25×0.5=12.524.6 \times 0.48 \approx 25 \times 0.5 = 12.524.6×0.48≈25×0.5=12.5
The answer should be about 12.512.512.5, so the calculator's 1.18081.18081.1808 is ten times too small, signalling a misplaced decimal point. The correct product is 11.80811.80811.808.
Round 89,50089{,}50089,500 to the nearest thousand using the round-half-up convention.
Correct answer: D
Rounding to the nearest thousand, the deciding digit is the hundreds digit, which is exactly 555.
5≥5 ⇒ round up5 \ge 5 \;\Rightarrow\; \text{round up}5≥5⇒round up
By round-half-up the exact half goes up: raise the thousands from 999 to 101010, which carries, so 89,50089{,}50089,500 rounds to 90,00090{,}00090,000.
Estimate the total cost of 191919 items priced at 4.954.954.95 dollars each by rounding each value to one nonzero digit (front-rounding).
Round each value to one nonzero digit: 191919 rounds to 202020 and 4.954.954.95 rounds to 555.
19×4.95≈20×5=10019 \times 4.95 \approx 20 \times 5 = 10019×4.95≈20×5=100
The total is about 100100100 dollars. The exact total is 94.0594.0594.05 dollars, so the estimate of 100100100 is close and quick.
A calculator shows 0.62×48=297.60.62 \times 48 = 297.60.62×48=297.6. A quick estimate suggests the answer should be about which value?
Correct answer: B
Round each factor to an easy nearby number: 0.620.620.62 rounds to 0.60.60.6 and 484848 rounds to 505050.
0.62×48≈0.6×50=300.62 \times 48 \approx 0.6 \times 50 = 300.62×48≈0.6×50=30
The answer should be about 303030, so the calculator's 297.6297.6297.6 is about ten times too large, signalling a misplaced decimal point. The correct product is 29.7629.7629.76.
Round 8.68.68.6, 8.48.48.4, and 8.58.58.5 each to the nearest whole number, then add the three results. What is the total?
Round each number to the nearest whole number first. The tenths digit decides each: 8.68.68.6 rounds to 999, 8.48.48.4 rounds to 888, and 8.58.58.5 is a tie that rounds up to 999.
9+8+9=269 + 8 + 9 = 269+8+9=26
The sum of the rounded values is 262626. Note 8.58.58.5 rounds up by the round-half-up convention.
Round 7.967.967.96 to the nearest tenth, then round that result to the nearest whole number.
Correct answer: C
First round 7.967.967.96 to the nearest tenth. The hundredths digit is 666, so round the tenths up; the 999 tenths carry.
7.96≈8.07.96 \approx 8.07.96≈8.0
Now round 8.08.08.0 to the nearest whole number. The tenths digit is 000, so it stays at 888. The two results are 8.08.08.0 then 888.
Round 199.97199.97199.97 to the nearest tenth.
The tenths digit is 999, and the deciding digit, the hundredths 777, is 555 or more, so round up. Raising 999 tenths carries, and the ones and tens are also 999, so the carry ripples up.
199.97≈200.0199.97 \approx 200.0199.97≈200.0
The ten tenths become one whole; 199.9199.9199.9 rolls all the way up to 200.0200.0200.0. Keep one decimal place.
Estimate the total of 4.8+5.1+6.2+4.94.8 + 5.1 + 6.2 + 4.94.8+5.1+6.2+4.9 by rounding each number to the nearest whole number.
Round each number to the nearest whole number: 4.8→54.8 \to 54.8→5, 5.1→55.1 \to 55.1→5, 6.2→66.2 \to 66.2→6, and 4.9→54.9 \to 54.9→5.
5+5+6+5=215 + 5 + 6 + 5 = 215+5+6+5=21
The estimate is 212121. The exact total is 21.021.021.0, so rounding each to the nearest whole number was right on the mark here.
Rounding 6.2496.2496.249 to the nearest tenth, a student looks at the digits 444 and 999 and rounds the tenths place up to get 6.36.36.3. What is the correct answer and the error?
Rounding to the nearest tenth, only the single digit just to the right of the tenths place decides it, which is the hundredths digit 444.
4<5 ⇒ round down4 < 5 \;\Rightarrow\; \text{round down}4<5⇒round down
So 6.2496.2496.249 rounds to 6.26.26.2. The student's error was looking past the hundredths digit; the 999 in the thousandths place cannot push the rounding up.
Estimate 418+1922.9\dfrac{418 + 192}{2.9}2.9418+192 by rounding every number to an easy value first.
Round each number first: 418≈400418 \approx 400418≈400, 192≈200192 \approx 200192≈200, and 2.9≈32.9 \approx 32.9≈3. Add the top, then divide.
418+1922.9≈400+2003=6003=200\frac{418 + 192}{2.9} \approx \frac{400 + 200}{3} = \frac{600}{3} = 2002.9418+192≈3400+200=3600=200
The estimate is about 200200200. The exact value is near 210210210, so the estimate is in the right ballpark.
A receipt lists 777 books at 12.5012.5012.50 dollars each and rings up the total as 8.758.758.75 dollars. Using estimation, what is wrong?
Estimate the total before trusting the receipt: each book is about 131313 dollars (or round 12.5012.5012.50 to 131313), and there are 777.
7×12.50≈7×13=917 \times 12.50 \approx 7 \times 13 = 917×12.50≈7×13=91
The true total is 87.5087.5087.50 dollars, close to the estimate. The rung-up 8.758.758.75 is ten times too small, so the decimal point landed one place too far left.
Round 3.4953.4953.495 to the nearest hundredth, then round that result to the nearest tenth. (Round each step using the round-half-up convention.)
First round 3.4953.4953.495 to the nearest hundredth. The thousandths digit is 555, so round the hundredths up.
3.495≈3.503.495 \approx 3.503.495≈3.50
Now round 3.503.503.50 to the nearest tenth. The hundredths digit is 000, so the tenths digit stays.
3.50≈3.53.50 \approx 3.53.50≈3.5
The final answer is 3.53.53.5. Rounding step by step matters here: it is the two-step process the question asks for.
Reset this practice set?
This clears every answer you have given and starts the set again from question 1.