This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly. Contact us
Free response · work it on paper ← Back to lesson

Introduction to Logarithms: Free Response

5 questions in parts, 63 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.

Free response · work it on paper Question 1 of 5
  1. 1. Evaluating a logarithm, and what its base is not allowed to be . Foundational, 16 points. Question 1 of 5.

    Every logarithm answers one question: this base raised to what power gives that number? The base itself is restricted before the question is even asked. This question checks a direct evaluation and then checks the restriction on the base itself.

    1. Part A.

      Evaluate log6216\log_6 216 and log328\log_{32} 8, asking the defining question each time. Give exact values, not decimal approximations.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points

    2. Part B.

      Three numbers are proposed as the base of a logarithm: b=1b = 1, b=9b = -9, and b=0.4b = 0.4. For each, decide whether it is an allowed base, and justify your answer using what the definition needs from the function bxb^x.

      Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 6 points

    3. Part C.

      A classmate says logb1\log_b 1 and logbb\log_b b are "basically the same fact." Using the definition, state precisely what each one equals and why, then explain why the two are easy to mix up despite being different statements.

      Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 5 points

    Hints

    One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.

    Answer and solution

    Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.

    Rubric

    Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.

    Part A 5 points

    Converts each logarithm into the exponential question it is really asking, rewriting to a common base where the answer is not a whole number. . Worth 2 points.

    Evaluates both logarithms correctly. . Worth 2 points.

    Reports the second result in exact fractional form, not as a decimal. . Worth 1 point.

    Part B 6 points

    Classifies all three proposed bases correctly as allowed or not allowed, including stating why b=0.4b = 0.4 qualifies (positive and not equal to 11). . Worth 2 points.

    Justifies rejecting b=1b = 1 by tying it to 1x1^x failing to be one-to-one, rather than only asserting the rule. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Justifies rejecting b=9b = -9 by tying it to a fractional power of a negative number not being real. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Part C 5 points

    Justifies logb1=0\log_b 1 = 0 by connecting it to b0=1b^0 = 1, rather than only stating that it holds. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Justifies logbb=1\log_b b = 1 by connecting it to b1=bb^1 = b, rather than only stating that it holds. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Explains what the two statements have in common that makes them easy to confuse, not only that they differ. . Worth 1 point.

  2. 2. Sizing a single-elimination bracket . Application, 12 points. Question 2 of 5.

    A single-elimination bracket eliminates half the field each round, with byes to cover an odd count, until one champion remains. A bracket built for exactly 2k2^{k} players needs exactly kk rounds, because finding that kk is asking a logarithm's defining question.

    1. Part A.

      A chess club runs a knockout event with exactly 512512 players, a power of two. Write the number of rounds needed as a logarithm, and evaluate it from the definition.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points

    2. Part B.

      A regional event has 200200 players signed up, not a power of two. Trap log2200\log_2 200 between two consecutive integers using powers of 22, and use the trapped value to say how many rounds the bracket needs.

      Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 6 points

    3. Part C.

      Explain why, whenever the trapped logarithm is not already a whole number, the number of rounds must be found by rounding UP to the next whole number rather than to the NEAREST whole number, even when the trapped logarithm sits closer to the lower integer than to the upper one. Then explain why an exact power of two, like the field in part A, needs no rounding at all.

      Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points

    Hints

    One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.

    Answer and solution

    Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.

    Rubric

    Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.

    Part A 3 points

    Writes the number of rounds as log2512\log_2 512 before evaluating anything. . Worth 1 point.

    Evaluates the logarithm correctly. . Worth 1 point.

    Reports the result as a whole number of rounds, matching what a round of a bracket actually is. . Worth 1 point.

    Part B 6 points

    Traps 200200 between two consecutive powers of 22. . Worth 2 points.

    Uses the fact that log2\log_2 is increasing to turn the trapped powers into a trapped logarithm. . Worth 2 points.

    Interprets the trapped value to conclude 88 rounds are needed, rather than rounding to the nearer integer. . Worth 2 points.

    Part C 3 points

    Explains that kk rounds cap the field at 2k2^k players, tying the rounding rule to that capacity fact rather than asserting it. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Explains why nearness to the lower integer is irrelevant: it answers a different question than whether every entrant is seated. . Worth 1 point.

  3. 3. The two cancellation laws, and which one needs a domain check . Foundational, 14 points. Question 3 of 5.

    The two cancellation laws look almost identical on the page but carry different fine print: one holds for every real exponent, and the other needs a positive argument. This question applies both, then asks for the difference.

    1. Part A.

      Simplify log5 ⁣(59)\log_5\!\left(5^{-9}\right) and 6log6416^{\log_6 41}.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points

    2. Part B.

      Evaluate 16log2316^{\log_2 3} by rewriting 1616 as a power of 22 first.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points

    3. Part C.

      Using the definition of a logarithm, explain why blogbx=xb^{\log_b x} = x needs x>0x > 0, while logb ⁣(bt)=t\log_b\!\left(b^{t}\right) = t holds for every real tt with no such restriction.

      Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points

    Hints

    One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.

    Answer and solution

    Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.

    Rubric

    Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.

    Part A 5 points

    Identifies which cancellation law applies to each expression before simplifying anything. . Worth 2 points.

    Applies both cancellation laws correctly. . Worth 2 points.

    Reports both results as plain numbers, with no leftover exponent notation. . Worth 1 point.

    Part B 5 points

    Rewrites 1616 as 242^4 and reorders the two exponents so the cancellation law can act. . Worth 2 points.

    Applies the cancellation law and finishes the arithmetic correctly. . Worth 2 points.

    Reports a single exact number as the final result. . Worth 1 point.

    Part C 4 points

    Explains that blogbxb^{\log_b x} requires logbx\log_b x to exist first, which fails for x0x \le 0. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Explains that btb^{t} is always a positive input for the logarithm, whatever real value tt takes, so no restriction is needed there. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

  4. 4. Three places an unknown can hide . Reasoning, 12 points. Question 4 of 5.

    An equation built from a logarithm can trap its unknown in three different spots: the argument, the base, or the exponent. Switching between exponential and logarithmic form frees it, and the base and the argument each carry a restriction that must be checked afterward.

    1. Part A.

      Solve logx49=2\log_x 49 = 2 for xx, and state why one algebraic root must be rejected.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points

    2. Part B.

      Solve 9x=17299^{x} = \tfrac{1}{729} for xx by switching to logarithmic form.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points

    3. Part C.

      Solve log2 ⁣(x2+x)=1\log_2\!\left(x^{2} + x\right) = 1 for xx. Check both roots against the domain restriction, and explain why NEITHER root can ever be thrown out for an equation of this same shape, a logarithm of a polynomial expression set equal to a fixed constant, no matter what specific numbers appear in it.

      Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points

    Hints

    One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.

    Answer and solution

    Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.

    Rubric

    Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.

    Part A 4 points

    Switches the equation to exponential form correctly. . Worth 1 point.

    Solves the resulting equation for both algebraic roots. . Worth 1 point.

    Rejects the negative root specifically because a base must be positive, not for an unrelated reason. . Worth 2 points.

    Part B 4 points

    Switches the equation to logarithmic form to free the exponent. . Worth 1 point.

    Evaluates the logarithm correctly, recognizing the reciprocal as a negative power of the base. . Worth 2 points.

    Reports the exponent as an exact integer, not as a decimal approximation. . Worth 1 point.

    Part C 4 points

    Switches to exponential form and sets up the quadratic x2+x2=0x^2 + x - 2 = 0. . Worth 1 point.

    Solves the quadratic and finds both roots. . Worth 1 point.

    Checks both arguments and explains, in general terms, why an equation of this same shape, a logarithm of a polynomial expression set equal to a fixed constant, can never produce a root that fails the domain check. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

  5. 5. Reading the logarithm's graph off its exponential twin . Reasoning, 9 points. Question 5 of 5.

    A logarithm's graph needs no table of its own. Every point, intercept, and asymptote is an exponential's own feature with input and output swapped by the reflection across the line y=xy = x.

    1. Part A.

      The graph of y=9xy = 9^{x} passes through (1, 19)\left(-1,\ \tfrac19\right), (0, 1)(0,\ 1), and (2, 81)(2,\ 81). State the three points that must lie on the graph of y=log9xy = \log_9 x, using the reflection alone, with no logarithm computation.

      Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points

    2. Part B.

      State the domain, range, and vertical asymptote of y=log9xy = \log_9 x, derived from the domain, range, and horizontal asymptote of y=9xy = 9^{x}.

      Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points

    3. Part C.

      The graph of y=7xy = 7^{x} is strictly increasing everywhere. Using ONLY the reflection across y=xy = x, not the definition directly, explain why the graph of y=log7xy = \log_7 x must also be strictly increasing, and why every logarithm's graph, whatever its base, passes through (1, 0)(1,\ 0).

      Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points

    Hints

    One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.

    Answer and solution

    Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.

    Rubric

    Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.

    Part A 3 points

    Swaps the coordinates of all three points correctly. . Worth 2 points.

    Reports the three resulting points clearly, without recomputing any of them from the definition of a logarithm. . Worth 1 point.

    Part B 3 points

    States the domain and range correctly, as the swap of the exponential's own domain and range. . Worth 2 points.

    States the vertical asymptote correctly, distinguishing it clearly from the exponential's horizontal one. . Worth 1 point.

    Part C 3 points

    Explains why reflecting an increasing curve across y=xy = x produces another increasing curve, in terms of how the swap reorders the points. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Connects (0,1)(0, 1) on every exponential to (1,0)(1, 0) on every logarithm through the same coordinate swap. . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer