Rational Exponents: Free Response
5 questions in parts, 53 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.
-
1. Reading the fraction, then reversing it . Foundational, 9 points. Question 1 of 5.
A fractional exponent hides two separate instructions: an index to find a root by, and a power to raise the result to afterward. This question asks you to read that pair off correctly, then reverse the reading to move the other way, between a power and a radical.
- Part A.
Evaluate and , taking the root of the correct index before applying the power or the reciprocal.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part B.
For , write as a single power of . Then, for , write as a radical expression.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part C.
Both values in part A could instead be computed by raising the base to the power first and taking the root last. Compare the size of the intermediate numbers each order produces, and use that to explain why taking the root first is the better strategy. Then state in one sentence which part of a fractional exponent names the root and which part names the power.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
Every exponent that is a fraction is really two instructions stacked on top of each other. Separate them before you compute anything: one number tells you which root to take, and the other tells you what power to raise the result to.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part A
Handle a negative exponent before anything else, since it turns the whole expression into a reciprocal. The fraction underneath it is still read the same way, root first.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part B
Work one feature of the notation at a time. First decide which number becomes the index of the root, then decide which number becomes the power, and only then deal with any minus sign.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
and .
Part B
, and .
Part C
Rooting first keeps every intermediate number small, while powering first produces a large number before any root is taken, such as . The exponent's denominator names the root's index; its numerator names the power applied afterward.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
The denominator of each exponent names the index of the root, and the numerator names the power applied afterward.
For the index is , and , so
For , deal with the minus sign first: it asks for a reciprocal, not a negative value. The remaining exponent has index , and , so
Part B
Translate one feature at a time: the index of the root becomes the denominator of the exponent, and the power inside becomes the numerator.
The fifth root of has index and inside power , so
Running the dictionary the other way, the minus sign in asks for a reciprocal first, and the exponent that remains is a ninth root carrying the power :
Part C
Compare the two routes for . Root first: , then , arithmetic that never leaves single digits until the last step. Power first, the base is cubed before any root is taken:
and only then would a fourth root of that nine-digit number need to be taken.
Both routes must agree, since names one number, but one of them is far easier to carry out by hand.
The rule read off the notation itself does not depend on which route is taken: in , the denominator is the index of the root and the numerator is the power, and computing the root first is simply the version of that instruction that keeps the arithmetic small.
In one line
and ; and ; and taking the root first keeps every intermediate number small, since the exponent's denominator is always the root's index and its numerator is always the power applied after.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Reads each exponent's denominator as the root index and its numerator as the power, taking the root before the power in both cases. . Worth 2 points.
Handles the negative exponent as a reciprocal of the positive-exponent value, not as a source of a negative sign. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 3 points
Reads the index of the root as the denominator of the exponent and the inside power as the numerator, in both directions. . Worth 2 points.
Keeps the reciprocal separate from the root and the power, so the minus sign lands in exactly one place. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Compares the size of the intermediate numbers under both orders and uses that comparison to justify rooting first. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
States correctly which part of the exponent gives the root's index and which gives the power. . Worth 1 point.
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
Evaluate and , then write (for ) as a single power of .
The answer
, , and .
Since ,
Since ,
The sixth root of has index and inside power , so .
-
-
2. Combining rational exponents, one law at a time . Foundational, 10 points. Question 2 of 5.
Every law you used for whole-number exponents extends to a fraction, as long as the base stays positive. This question applies the product, quotient, and power-of-a-power laws in turn, then asks exactly why one of them adds exponents while the other multiplies them.
- Part A.
For , simplify . For , simplify .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
For , simplify , writing the result with no negative exponents.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
Part A added exponents for a product and part B multiplied them for a power of a power, both with fractional exponents. The lesson opens by pointing out that a fractional exponent is not a literal count of copies of a base, so 'the product rule counts two groups of factors' cannot literally be why it still works here. Using the lesson's own well-definedness idea, rewrite every exponent in the part B bracket as an integer power of one common root for a shared denominator , and explain why the addition-for-product, multiplication-for-power pattern survives once you pass to that root. Then confirm your answer to part B is unchanged if the outer power is distributed across the numerator and denominator first, and only then combined with the exponents already there.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Every rule here is the same integer-exponent law you already know, just applied to a fraction instead of a whole number. Convert exponents to a common denominator before you add or subtract them.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
A quotient subtracts the exponent in the denominator from the one in the numerator, and subtracting a negative number is the same as adding its opposite.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Simplify everything inside the parentheses into a single power of and a single power of before the outer exponent of ever touches anything.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Go back to the well-definedness idea from earlier in the lesson: any rational exponent can be rewritten as an integer power of one common root. Ask what plain integer-exponent fact is doing the real work once you make that substitution.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
, and .
Part B
.
Part C
With , every exponent in part B becomes an integer, where combining and repeating exponents is literal counting; dividing back by recovers the same fractional pattern. Distributing the outer power first still gives .
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Multiplying same-base powers adds the exponents, and dividing subtracts them, exactly as for whole numbers.
For the product, put both exponents over the common denominator :
For the quotient, dividing by subtracts , and subtracting a negative adds:
Part B
Combine what is inside the parentheses first. Dividing by subtracts that exponent from 's:
The term has nothing to combine with, so the bracket is . Raising to the multiplies every exponent by :
Clearing the negative exponent moves that factor to the denominator: .
Part C
The lesson is explicit that is not a count of copies of ; it is the single number forced by the power rule and positivity. So a picture of 'groups of factors' cannot be the literal reason the fractional laws hold. What actually licenses them is the well-definedness argument from earlier in the lesson: any rational exponent can be rewritten as an integer power of one common root.
Every exponent in part B's bracket, , has a denominator dividing . Let and , both positive real numbers since . Multiplying each fractional exponent by recovers an integer exponent on or :
Now the bracket is , and every exponent in sight is a whole number: combining copies of and removing more really is subtraction, and raising to the outer really is integer repetition, . Translating back, and , matching part B.
So the addition-for-product, multiplication-for-power pattern is not a separate rule invented for fractions; it is the ordinary integer pattern, true by literal counting on and , translated back through the division by that defined them.
Distributing the outer power first confirms the same answer without appealing to or at all: , , and in the denominator. Dividing by multiplies by , so the two powers of combine as , leaving once again.
In one line
and ; the bracketed expression simplifies to ; and the addition-for-product, multiplication-for-power pattern survives for fractional exponents because every rational exponent is an integer power of one common root, so it is ordinary integer counting on that root, translated back through the division that defined it, with distributing the outer power first giving the same .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Adds exponents for the product and subtracts them for the quotient, converting to a common denominator before combining. . Worth 2 points.
Correctly turns subtracting a negative exponent into addition. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Combines the exponents inside the parentheses before applying the outer power. . Worth 2 points.
Multiplies every exponent inside by the outer power correctly, including its sign, and clears the resulting negative exponent. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
Explains that the fractional laws are not literal counting on , but the ordinary integer counting pattern applied to a common root and translated back by dividing by , rather than describing itself as counting groups of factors. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Re-derives part B's result by distributing the outer power first, confirming the two orders agree. . Worth 1 point.
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
For , simplify and (for ). Then, for , simplify .
The answer
, , and .
Inside the parentheses, , so the bracket is , and raising to the fourth power gives
-
-
3. How far, how long: a power law for orbits . Application, 12 points. Question 3 of 5.
For a planet orbiting the Sun, measuring distance in astronomical units (AU, with Earth's average distance set to ) and time in years, the orbital period and the average distance are tied together by the rational-exponent relationship . This question uses that one formula in three directions: forward, backward, and as a scaling rule.
- Part A.
An asteroid orbits at an average distance of AU. Find its orbital period , in years.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part B.
Solve for in terms of . Then use your result to find the average distance, in AU, of a comet whose orbital period is years.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Planet X orbits three times as far from the Sun as planet Y. Using , find the exact factor by which X's orbital period is longer than Y's (leave it as a radical or a single power, not a decimal), and explain in one sentence why that factor is not simply .
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Every part of this problem uses the same relationship, , read one of three ways: forward to find a period, backward to find a distance, or as a scaling rule for how one changes when the other is multiplied by a factor.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
The exponent's denominator is the index of the root and its numerator is the power, exactly as with any rational exponent. Apply that here to .
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
To undo an exponent of , raise both sides to its reciprocal, and remember that multiplying the two exponents together must give .
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Substitute the scaled distance into the formula as a product, then let the exponent split across that product the way it split across a product elsewhere in this lesson.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
years.
Part B
, and for , AU.
Part C
The factor is , about . It is not because the exponent is applied to the distance factor itself, not just carried along, so tripling the distance more than triples the period.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
The exponent has index , so take the square root of the distance first, then cube the result:
Part B
Raise both sides of to the power that undoes , which is its reciprocal :
So . For , the index is , and :
Part C
Replace with in the formula and pull the constant factor of out through the power, which is what licenses:
So X's period is times Y's, and
The factor is not because the same exponent that acts on the whole distance acts on the scaling factor as well; a distance three times as large produces a period more than three times as large, since the exponent exceeds .
In one line
years; solving for gives , and AU; and tripling the distance multiplies the period by , not by , because the exponent acts on the scale factor too.
Another way: Scale through the same formula, symbolically
Part C can also be reached without picking a value of at all. Write and , then divide:
using the quotient rule for the same exponent before any factor of is cancelled.
When it is worth it Whenever only the scaling factor matters and the actual distance is never given, dividing the two formulas is faster than substituting and expanding.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Substitutes the given distance into . . Worth 1 point.
Takes the square root before cubing, and evaluates the result correctly. . Worth 2 points.
Reports the period in years, matching the units the formula is stated in. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Isolates by raising both sides to the reciprocal exponent . . Worth 2 points.
Evaluates correctly by rooting before squaring. . Worth 1 point.
Reports the distance in AU, matching the formula's units. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 4 points
Pulls the scale factor of out of the power correctly, using . . Worth 2 points.
Explains why the resulting factor exceeds , referring to the exponent acting on the scale factor itself. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
A dwarf planet orbits at AU. Find its period. Then find the distance of an object whose period is years, and find the factor by which the period changes if the distance is multiplied by .
The answer
years for ; AU for ; and multiplying the distance by multiplies the period by .
Solving for gives , so for :
Multiplying the distance by multiplies the period by
-
-
4. Three routes, and only one hypothesis decides them . Reasoning, 12 points. Question 4 of 5.
A student sets out to evaluate and tries three routes that this lesson's rules seem to allow. Only one hypothesis, standing behind every rule this lesson proved, decides which of the three can be trusted.
- Part A.
Carry out these two routes for and report both results. Route 1 (reduce the exponent first): rewrite in lowest terms, then evaluate. Route 2 (apply the power first): compute , then take the root the remaining exponent asks for.
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 4 points
- Part B.
A third route takes the tenth root of directly, without reducing the fraction or squaring first. Carry it out, or explain why it cannot be carried out, and then identify the one hypothesis, printed alongside every rule in this lesson, that all three routes were relying on and that fails here.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points
- Part C.
State a general rule, for a negative base and a rational exponent written in lowest terms, that decides whether names a real number at all, regardless of whether is even or odd. Then use it to decide whether is a real number.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Whenever a negative base and a rational exponent meet, the laws this lesson proved simply do not apply, because every one of them assumed a positive base. Watch for where each route quietly leans on that assumption.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Carry out each route exactly as instructed, one full computation at a time, before comparing the two results.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Ask what a tenth root of a negative number would have to satisfy, and whether any real number could possibly satisfy it.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Reducing the fraction first is what removes the ambiguity: once is in lowest terms there is exactly one route left, root then power, and its existence depends on only one fact about .
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
Route 1: , and . Route 2: , and . The two routes disagree: versus .
Part B
The direct tenth root fails: is even, and no real number raised to an even power is negative, so names no real number. Every rule used in Routes 1 and 2 assumed a positive base, and is not one.
Part C
For and in lowest terms, is real exactly when is odd, since only then is itself a real number to raise to the power . Since has , it is not a real number.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Route 1 reduces the fraction before doing anything else. Since , , and a fifth root of a negative number is a perfectly good real number, negative, since is odd:
Route 2 leaves the fraction as it is and squares the base first, an even power that erases the sign:
and a tenth root of a positive number is the positive number that raises to it:
The two routes, both built from rules used elsewhere in this lesson, hand back different numbers: and .
Part B
A tenth root of would be a real number solving
An even power of any real number, positive or negative, is never negative, so no such exists. This route hands back nothing at all, not even a candidate.
So the three routes give three different outcomes: , , and no real number. Every manipulation used to reach the first two, rewriting a fraction, moving a power inside a root, was proved in this lesson only for a positive base. With that hypothesis fails, and once it fails there is no longer any guarantee that different legal-looking manipulations land on the same answer; here they demonstrably do not.
Part C
With already in lowest terms, there is no fraction left to reduce and no ambiguity about which route to take:
If is odd, is a genuine real number for any real , negative included, and raising a real number to the integer power stays real, so the whole expression is real.
If is even, is not real when , since no real number raised to an even power is negative. There is then nothing for the outer power to act on, so the expression fails to exist before is even considered.
The rule: for and in lowest terms, is real exactly when is odd.
For , the fraction is already in lowest terms and is even, so is not a real number, whatever value itself takes.
In one line
Route 1 gives , Route 2 gives , and the direct tenth root gives no real number at all; all three manipulations relied on a positive base, which is not. In general, for and in lowest terms, is real exactly when is odd, so is not a real number.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Correctly evaluates Route 1 by reducing the fraction first, obtaining . . Worth 2 points.
Correctly evaluates Route 2 by squaring first, obtaining , and states plainly that the two routes disagree. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 4 points
Recognizes that an even root of a negative number is not a real number, and applies that fact here. . Worth 1 point.
States that every route's legitimacy depended on a positive base, and explains that this is exactly the hypothesis that fails for . . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part C 4 points
States the general rule in terms of the parity of once is in lowest terms, and grounds it in whether an odd or even root of a negative number is real. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Applies the rule correctly to . . Worth 1 point.
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
Evaluate two ways: by reducing the exponent first, and by squaring the base first and taking the remaining root. Then decide whether is a real number, and if so, find its value.
The answer
gives by one route and by the other; , a real number, since its lowest-terms denominator is odd.
Reducing first, , and
Squaring first,
The two disagree, versus , for the same reason as in the main question.
For , the fraction is already in lowest terms and its denominator is odd, so it is real:
-
-
5. Why $a^{1/4}$ cannot be anything else . Reasoning, 10 points. Question 5 of 5.
The definition was not a free choice in this lesson: it was forced by two demands already made of integer exponents. This question runs that forcing argument for the specific case , then asks how far the argument reaches.
- Part A.
Assume only two things about for : (i) the power rule gives , and (ii) a positive base raised to any power stays positive, so . Using only these two facts, together with the result that a positive number has exactly one positive fourth root, explain why must equal , with no other real number possible.
Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 4 points
- Part B.
Use the forced value from part A to evaluate and , taking the root first in each case.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part C.
Explain specifically where the argument in part A breaks down if is allowed to be negative: say which of assumptions (i) or (ii) becomes impossible to satisfy, and state how many real solutions the equation has when .
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
Nothing here is a new definition to memorize. Every claim comes from applying the power rule to and then asking what real number could possibly satisfy the equation that results.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part A
Name the unknown value first. Turn both assumptions into two separate facts about , and then ask how many real numbers could satisfy both facts at once.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
Try to solve for a specific negative value, such as , before worrying about the sign of at all.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
Write . Fact (i) gives , and fact (ii) gives , so is a positive fourth root of . A positive number has exactly one positive fourth root, so can only be ; no other value satisfies both facts.
Part B
and .
Part C
Assumption (i) is what breaks first: the equation has zero real solutions altogether when , since a fourth power is never negative. There is no real candidate left over for assumption (ii) to apply to.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Let , whatever that value turns out to be. Assumption (i) says
so is some fourth root of . Assumption (ii) says , so is specifically a positive fourth root of .
The result already established in this lesson is that a positive number has exactly one positive th root, for any index , included. So there is exactly one positive number whose fourth power is , and its name is . Since is a positive fourth root of and only one exists, , and no other real number could have satisfied both assumptions at once.
Part B
Since , the fourth root of is , so
For , take that same fourth root first, then cube it:
Part C
The equation
is what assumption (i) forces to satisfy. When , that equation has no real solution whatsoever, since a fourth power of any real number, positive or negative, is never negative. So it is not that assumption (ii) rules out a negative candidate for ; there is no real candidate at all, positive or negative, for assumption (ii) to apply to.
The breakdown happens one step earlier than it might seem: assumption (i) alone already has nothing real to hand over once , so nothing is left for the uniqueness lemma to identify. That is exactly why this lesson restricts to before any of its results are stated.
In one line
For , satisfies and , and since a positive number has exactly one positive fourth root, is forced; hence and . For the equation has no real solution at all, which is where the argument breaks down, one step before the sign condition even comes into play.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Writes and derives from assumption (i) alone. . Worth 1 point.
Combines with the uniqueness of a positive fourth root to conclude can only be , rather than merely checking that works. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 3 points
Evaluates correctly as the fourth root of . . Worth 2 points.
Extends that value to by cubing it, rather than recomputing from scratch. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Correctly identifies that has zero real solutions for , so the breakdown is not merely about the sign condition (ii). . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
States clearly that the count of real solutions to for is zero. . Worth 1 point.
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
Run the same forcing argument for instead of : assuming and for , explain why must equal . Then evaluate and .
The answer
is forced by the same argument with ; and .
Let . The assumed power rule gives , and positivity gives , so is a positive sixth root of . A positive number has exactly one positive sixth root, so is forced.
Since ,
Rooting first and then raising to the fifth power,
-