Radicals and Rational Exponents: Star problems
Ten optional challenges to stretch your reasoning. Work on paper, use hints when you need them, and check the answer or full solution when you are ready. You can skip these problems and continue the course.
- 1 of 3 stars: Stretch
- 2 of 3 stars: Challenge
- 3 of 3 stars: Deep challenge
Stars indicate difficulty within this set.
0 of 10 completed · 0 skipped
Progress saved in this browser.
Progress can't be saved in this browser, so your choices last for this visit only.
-
Problem 1 Reversing a rational exponent
Difficulty: 1 of 3 stars, Stretch
Let be relatively prime positive integers. For real inputs, define : when is even the root is the nonnegative real root and requires ; when is odd it is the unique real root. Use the same convention for the reduced exponent .
For exactly which pairs does hold for every real for which the inner power is defined? Prove your classification. When it fails, give the correct formula and its real domain.
Builds on Rational Exponents
- Hint 1
Write using the permitted real th root, and examine the th root of .
- Hint 2
The th root of is for odd , but for even . Relative primality rules out both being even.
Answer
The identity holds exactly when is odd. Its domain is all real if is odd, and if is even. If is even, then is odd and the composition equals on all of .
Full solution
Let according to the stated convention.
Then and
If is odd, the unique real th root of is .
Raising that result to the power gives .
The outer power is defined for every permitted inner input.
The inner domain is all real numbers when is odd and the nonnegative real numbers when is even.
If is even, relative primality forces to be odd.
Thus the inner power is defined for every real , and can have either sign.
The nonnegative th root of is , so the outer operation gives .
In particular, at any negative it differs from , disproving the proposed identity for these pairs.
This exhausts the parity cases.
It also explains the failure of simply multiplying the two rational exponents: an even principal root discards a sign that a later power cannot recover.
The conventions and the domain are part of the identity, not optional annotations.
Answer
The identity holds exactly when is odd. Its domain is all real if is odd, and if is even. If is even, then is odd and the composition equals on all of .
Key idea
Exponent multiplication must respect the real-root convention, especially when an even principal root appears.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 2 Spacing between nearby square roots
Difficulty: 1 of 3 stars, Stretch
For a real number , define . Prove that , and explain what this says about the gaps between the three square roots.
By rationalizing twice, prove the quantitative bounds
- Hint 1
Write as and rationalize each difference.
- Hint 2
After combining the two fractions, rationalize the new numerator . Bound each of the three resulting denominator factors between and .
Answer
, so . The two strict bounds hold for every .
Full solution
All square roots and the proposed bounding denominators are positive because .
Rationalizing the two successive differences gives .
The second denominator is larger than the first, so .
Thus moving one unit to the right produces a smaller increase in the square root.
Combining these fractions leaves numerator .
Rationalizing it gives the exact identity .
Every factor in this denominator is strictly larger than and strictly smaller than .
The product of the three positive factors is therefore strictly between and .
Taking reciprocals reverses the inequalities, and multiplying by yields exactly the claimed bounds.
These estimates quantify the shrinking gap using only conjugates and order comparisons; no approximate square-root values are needed.
Answer
, so . The two strict bounds hold for every .
Key idea
Rationalizing more than once can expose both the sign and the size of a small difference of radicals.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 3 An inequality with two radical sides
Difficulty: 1 of 3 stars, Stretch
Find all real for which
Identify every equality case. In your proof, state why each squaring step preserves equivalence, rather than just producing a necessary condition.
- Hint 1
First determine the common domain. Both sides are then nonnegative, so the first squaring is reversible.
- Hint 2
After the first squaring, isolate the remaining radical. On the domain, the other side is , so a second squaring is also reversible.
Answer
The solution set is , with equality at and .
Full solution
The three square roots are defined together exactly when .
On this domain both sides of the original inequality are nonnegative.
Squaring therefore preserves their order and gives , or
The left side is nonnegative, and the right side is nonnegative because .
Consequently, squaring this inequality is again reversible.
It becomes
Simplifying gives , equivalently
Its real solutions are exactly , all within the original domain.
Because every step was an equivalence on that domain, the interval is both necessary and sufficient; no extraneous candidates remain.
Equality in the last factored inequality occurs at and .
Substitution confirms at the first, and at the second.
The sign check before each squaring is what allows a whole interval to be recovered safely.
Answer
The solution set is , with equality at and .
Key idea
Squaring an inequality is reversible only after the signs of both sides are controlled.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 4 A nested radical that levels off
Difficulty: 2 of 3 stars, Challenge
For real for which it is defined, let
Find the exact real domain and a piecewise formula for . For every real , find all solutions of . Explain why one output has infinitely many preimages.
- Hint 1
Set , so . Both outer radicands become perfect squares.
- Hint 2
The square roots simplify to and . Separate from .
Answer
Domain ; for , and for . For : ; for : all ; otherwise no solutions.
Full solution
The inner radical requires .
Set , which is nonnegative, and write .
The two outer radicands become and
They are nonnegative for every , so no further domain restriction is needed.
Principal square roots give
If , this equals ; if , it equals .
Translating to gives the stated piecewise formula, with both branches agreeing at .
Omitting the absolute value would incorrectly make equal to even at , where its actual value is .
Thus no output below or above is possible.
For , only the first branch can apply, and gives the unique permitted input .
For , every works, including the shared endpoint.
The infinite preimage occurs because beyond both outer roots increase by exactly the same amount, leaving their difference constant.
Answer
Domain ; for , and for . For : ; for : all ; otherwise no solutions.
Key idea
Denesting a radical may reveal an absolute value and a constant branch, not a single algebraic formula.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 5 A shortest three-stage path
Difficulty: 2 of 3 stars, Challenge
Real numbers satisfy . Find the minimum possible value of
and every pair attaining it. Prove your result without calculus. You may interpret the terms as lengths of consecutive line segments whose vertical rises are .
Schematic; and are variable. Text description of this figure
A horizontal axis labeled X and a vertical axis labeled Y meet at the point A. A path of three straight segments, with a dot at each corner, climbs from A to a point B, from B to a point C, and from C to a point D. B is at height 2 above the horizontal position x, C is at height 5 above the horizontal position y, and D is at height 10 above the horizontal position 8. Dashed guide lines run from B, C and D across to the Y axis, where the heights 2, 5 and 10 are marked, and down to the X axis, where the positions x, y and 8 are marked. The drawing is schematic, and x and y are variable.
- Hint 1
Place consecutive vertices at . The expression is the length of the resulting broken path.
- Hint 2
Compare this path to the straight segment from to . Equality requires the three positive vertical rises to have the same horizontal-to-vertical ratio.
Answer
Minimum , attained only at .
Full solution
Let , , , and .
By the distance formula,
The straight segment joining the endpoints has length
A broken path cannot be shorter than the straight segment, so
An algebraic justification of the two-segment inequality uses horizontal and vertical displacements and .
The identity implies
Adding to twice this inequality and taking nonnegative square roots shows that the length of the combined displacement is at most the sum of the two lengths.
Applying this twice proves the bound.
Equality requires all three segments to point along the same straight line.
Since their vertical rises are positive, their horizontal displacements must be in the ratio .
Their total horizontal displacement is , so and
This pair obeys and makes all four vertices collinear in order, so equality is attained.
The fixed rises force these displacements uniquely.
Answer
Minimum , attained only at .
Key idea
A sum of square roots may encode a broken path whose shortest configuration is forced by collinearity.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 6 A system with negative cube roots
Difficulty: 2 of 3 stars, Challenge
Find all ordered pairs of real numbers satisfying
Here and cube roots are real. Your solution must allow negative inputs and justify the rejection of every other algebraic candidate.
- Hint 1
Set and then . The square-sum condition gives both and .
- Hint 2
Use to obtain . Check the bound before recovering .
Answer
Exactly and .
Full solution
Let , both allowed to be negative.
Then and .
Put .
We have , while gives
The cube identity yields , or
Besides , the algebraic candidates are and
Since , we have and .
The negative candidate has square greater than , violating .
The positive candidate satisfies , also violating it.
Thus is the only feasible sum, giving .
The numbers are the zeros of , so they are in either order.
Cubing gives the two listed pairs.
Directly, and
These checks confirm that the negative input is essential and valid.
Answer
Exactly and .
Key idea
A substitution may create algebraic candidates that violate the bounds inherited from real variables.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 7 An inverse hidden in two cube roots
Difficulty: 2 of 3 stars, Challenge
For every real , define
using real cube roots. Prove that is strictly increasing and takes every real value exactly once. Find an explicit formula for its inverse function, and evaluate without decimal approximations.
Builds on Inverse Functions
- Hint 1
Call the two cube-root terms . Their product is particularly simple, even though one term is negative.
- Hint 2
If , expand . To prove uniqueness, compare and by factoring their difference.
Answer
for every real , and .
Full solution
The square root is defined for every real , and both real cube roots are defined even though
Let their values be .
Then and , so .
For , the cube identity gives , or .
The function is strictly increasing without needing derivatives: for , , because
Consequently, the identity implies that is strictly increasing.
To prove that every output is attained, choose any real and put
The already-defined value satisfies
Strict increase of forces .
Thus the proposed inverse works for every real input and each output occurs once.
In particular, , so .
Answer
for every real , and .
Key idea
An intimidating radical formula may be understood by deriving the much simpler equation it inverts.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 8 Sharp bounds for three coupled radicals
Difficulty: 3 of 3 stars, Deep challenge
Nonnegative real numbers satisfy . Find the least and greatest possible values of
Give every equality case and prove both bounds. If you use an inequality involving sums of products, derive the needed version from nonnegative squares.
- Hint 1
For the lower bound, , with two analogous comparisons.
- Hint 2
For the upper bound, use and . Expand into three squares.
Answer
. The minimum occurs exactly at ; the maximum exactly at .
Full solution
The constraint implies , so every radical is real.
Since , its nonnegative square root is at least .
The analogous bounds give
Equality requires , so at most one variable is positive.
The sum constraint then gives exactly the three listed vertices, each of which attains .
For the upper bound, let and
Expanding shows .
The two squared sums are and , so , hence
Equality above requires the two nonzero vectors to be proportional.
Their squared lengths force , giving , , and .
Solving yields .
Conversely, at this triple each term is , giving .
This also proves uniqueness of the maximum, including all possible zero-variable boundary cases.
Answer
. The minimum occurs exactly at ; the maximum exactly at .
Key idea
Choose a representation that makes both a square-based bound and its equality conditions transparent.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 9 How much degree does a radical require?
Difficulty: 3 of 3 stars, Deep challenge
Let . Find the monic polynomial with rational coefficients of smallest possible degree having as a zero. Prove that no nonzero rational-coefficient polynomial of smaller degree can vanish at , and list all the zeros of your polynomial.
For the degree proof, first show that cannot equal for rational . You may use the elementary fact that the prime exponents in a nonzero rational square are even.
- Hint 1
Squaring isolates a single square root; square once more to construct a quartic.
- Hint 2
Prove that have no nonzero rational linear relation by grouping a relation as . Then expand a general cubic expression in .
Answer
The unique monic polynomial of smallest degree is , of degree . Its four distinct zeros are .
Full solution
Since , squaring gives
The quartic factors as , giving the four listed distinct real zeros.
For minimality, suppose with rational .
Squaring gives , so irrationality of forces .
Either or would follow, impossible for a rational square by prime exponents.
Now suppose with rational coefficients.
If , division and rationalization would express as , just ruled out.
The rationalizing denominator cannot vanish unless .
Therefore , and then irrationality gives .
Finally,
A relation becomes
The independence just proved forces and , hence .
So no nonzero polynomial of degree at most works.
The quartic is minimal; another monic quartic with the same zero would differ from it by such a polynomial of degree at most , proving uniqueness.
Answer
The unique monic polynomial of smallest degree is , of degree . Its four distinct zeros are .
Key idea
Constructing an equation gives an upper bound on algebraic degree; proving minimality requires ruling out every lower-degree relation.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 10 A nested equation with a changing number of solutions
Difficulty: 3 of 3 stars, Deep challenge
For every real parameter , find the exact real domain of the expression and every real solution of
Give a complete classification of the number of distinct solutions. Identify which solutions also satisfy , and explain the extra solutions when they occur.
- Hint 1
Set . At a solution, both are nonnegative and satisfy and .
- Hint 2
Subtract these equations to obtain . In the unequal case, impose nonnegativity on both roots of .
Answer
Domain . There is always the solution . For , there are also , giving three distinct solutions; otherwise is the only one. Only solves .
Full solution
The inner radical requires .
The outer radical requires ; because , this is equivalent to
Thus the expression has domain
At a solution, set
The outer equality also gives , and squaring the two nonnegative equalities is equivalent to and .
Subtraction gives
If , then , whose unique nonnegative root is
If , then , so both numbers are roots of
They are real when , nonnegative when , and distinct when .
This produces the two additional formulas precisely for .
At they coincide at , adding no new solution.
Conversely, the fixed pair and every stated unequal pair have nonnegative entries and satisfy both squared equations.
Taking principal square roots recovers and , so all candidates satisfy the original nested equation and its domain.
An unequal pair is swapped by one application of and returns after two; it is not a fixed point.
Thus there are exactly three solutions in the specified interval of parameters and one in every other case.
Answer
Domain . There is always the solution . For , there are also , giving three distinct solutions; otherwise is the only one. Only solves .
Key idea
Turn a nested radical into a symmetric system, then check the sign conditions that make squaring reversible.
- Hint 1