Graphs of Rational Functions: Core practice
10 practice problems for this lesson. Work on paper, use hints when you need them, and check the answer or the full solution when you are ready.
Difficulty: Core (core-course level)
0 of 10 completed · 0 skipped
Progress saved in this browser.
Progress can't be saved in this browser, so your choices last for this visit only.
-
Problem 1 Reading excluded inputs
The figure shows a rational function with exactly the two displayed excluded inputs. Read its real domain from the graph.
The graph of the rational function. Text description of this figure
A grid with the x-axis from -8 to 4 and the y-axis from -5 to 7, both ticked and labeled at every integer. A dashed vertical line stands at x equals -3. Left of it, a curve comes in from the left edge a little above the x-axis, crosses the x-axis, and falls ever more steeply, running down alongside the dashed line and off the bottom of the frame. Right of the dashed line, a second curve comes down from the top of the frame alongside the dashed line and levels off toward the right edge; it has an open circle at the point x equals -1, y equals 4. Arrows at all four ends of the two branches show them continuing beyond the window. No equation is shown.
- Hint 1
Both an open circle and an unbounded break represent missing inputs.
- Hint 2
Read their horizontal locations, not their heights.
Answer
All real except and .
Full solution
The open circle has horizontal coordinate , so that input is missing.
The two branches approach the vertical line without including any point on that line.
Thus the domain is
The statement guarantees that the figure displays all excluded inputs, so there are no further restrictions to infer.
Answer
All real except and .
Key idea
Both holes and vertical asymptotes exclude inputs from a rational function's domain.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 2 A line approached far away
A real function satisfies . Name its horizontal asymptote and explain how the distance to that line behaves for large .
- Hint 1
The constant part identifies a candidate line.
- Hint 2
The remaining positive fraction can become as small as desired as the denominator grows.
Answer
Horizontal asymptote ; the distance approaches .
Full solution
The vertical distance to is
This positive quantity becomes and stays smaller than any chosen positive distance when is sufficiently large.
It is never zero.
Thus the curve approaches the horizontal line from above.
Answer
Horizontal asymptote ; the distance approaches .
Key idea
An asymptote describes a line that the curve approaches arbitrarily closely far along its path.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 3 Choosing a coefficient
Find the real number for which has horizontal asymptote .
- Hint 1
When the degrees match, the far-out ratio is the ratio of leading coefficients.
- Hint 2
The linear numerator term prevents exact division into a constant.
Answer
.
Full solution
For a nonzero , the two degrees match and the horizontal asymptote is .
Thus
At that value, subtracting leaves , which tends to zero far out but is not the zero expression.
If , the numerator would have lower degree and the asymptote would instead be .
Answer
.
Key idea
A required horizontal asymptote can determine a leading coefficient.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 4 A missing zero
For , identify the domain, every hole and vertical asymptote, and every x-intercept. Explain why an input that zeros the reduced numerator may fail to be an intercept, and decide whether changes sign across its hole.
- Hint 1
Compare how many copies of each denominator factor remain after cancellation.
- Hint 2
An intercept must be a point in the original domain.
Answer
Domain ; hole ; vertical asymptote ; no x-intercepts. The function changes sign across the hole: negative just left, positive just right.
Full solution
The original denominator excludes and .
Removing two copies of gives
for allowed inputs.
The reduced denominator is at , not zero, and the reduced height there is , giving a hole at .
The factor remains, so is a vertical asymptote.
The reduced numerator vanishes only at the excluded input , so no x-intercept exists.
Near the denominator is positive, so has the sign of : negative just left of and positive just right of it.
The graph passes from below the axis to above it through a point that is missing, without ever touching the axis.
Answer
Domain ; hole ; vertical asymptote ; no x-intercepts. The function changes sign across the hole: negative just left, positive just right.
Key idea
A zero of the reduced numerator is an intercept only if the original domain includes that input.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 5 An end-behavior calculation
Find every horizontal or oblique asymptote of , and give a decomposition that explains the end behavior.
- Hint 1
Compare degrees to determine which type of line is possible.
- Hint 2
Divide the numerator by the denominator and retain the nonzero remainder.
Answer
Oblique asymptote ; no horizontal asymptote; for .
Full solution
The numerator degree exceeds the denominator degree by one.
Taking times the denominator and subtracting leaves the remainder , so
with .
The remainder is nonzero and has lower degree than the denominator, so its quotient tends to far out.
The graph approaches .
Its growing linear part rules out a horizontal asymptote.
Multiplying the decomposition by the denominator reproduces the original numerator.
Answer
Oblique asymptote ; no horizontal asymptote; for .
Key idea
When the numerator's degree is one more than the denominator's and the remainder is nonzero, the linear quotient from polynomial division is the oblique asymptote.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 6 When the line is the graph
For a real constant , let . Using the convention that an asymptote is approached rather than coincided with, find every for which has no asymptote at all, and describe the graph for those and for all other .
- Hint 1
Decide first whether the denominator can ever be zero.
- Hint 2
Divide: write as plus a correction, and ask when the correction is the zero expression.
Answer
Only : then for every real , and the graph is the whole line , with no hole and no asymptote. For every other , is a horizontal asymptote the graph never meets, and there is no vertical asymptote.
Full solution
The denominator is positive, so every is defined for all real : there is no hole and no vertical asymptote for any .
Dividing,
If , the correction is the zero expression and at every real input.
The graph coincides with the line , so under the stated convention that line is not an asymptote, and there is none.
If , the correction is never zero but tends to as grows, so is a horizontal asymptote that the graph approaches from above when and from below when , without meeting it.
Answer
Only : then for every real , and the graph is the whole line , with no hole and no asymptote. For every other , is a horizontal asymptote the graph never meets, and there is no vertical asymptote.
Key idea
Exact polynomial division makes the function equal to its polynomial quotient throughout its original domain.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 7 Crossing a horizontal line
Let . Determine its horizontal asymptote and every point where it crosses that line. Explain why these crossings do not conflict with the definition of an asymptote.
- Hint 1
The added fraction has lower numerator degree than denominator degree.
- Hint 2
Its denominator is positive, so the numerator decides both the meeting points and the side of the line.
Answer
Horizontal asymptote ; crossings at and ; the crossings do not conflict with the definition.
Full solution
The correction tends to zero for large , so is the horizontal asymptote.
Its denominator is positive everywhere.
The correction vanishes at and .
For the correction is positive, for it is negative, and for it is positive.
It changes sign at both meetings, so both are crossings.
These finite crossings do not affect the required far-out approach to the line.
Answer
Horizontal asymptote ; crossings at and ; the crossings do not conflict with the definition.
Key idea
A rational function may cross its horizontal asymptote before approaching it at large inputs.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 8 A factor that survives
A student says that must have a vertical asymptote, because a denominator factor survives after the common factor cancels. Is the claim true? Give the domain, every hole, and every asymptote.
- Hint 1
A vertical asymptote needs an excluded input where the reduced denominator is zero.
- Hint 2
Find every real zero of the factor that survives.
Answer
False. The domain is ; there is a hole at ; the horizontal asymptote is ; there is no vertical or oblique asymptote.
Full solution
The factor is positive, so the original denominator excludes only .
Canceling gives
for .
At the reduced denominator is , not zero, so the graph has a hole at .
The surviving factor has no real zero, so no input makes the reduced denominator zero, and there is no vertical asymptote.
The numerator has lower degree than the denominator, so the values tend to far out: the horizontal asymptote is , and there is no oblique asymptote.
Answer
False. The domain is ; there is a hole at ; the horizontal asymptote is ; there is no vertical or oblique asymptote.
Key idea
After all common factors cancel, each real zero of the remaining denominator gives a vertical asymptote, and a surviving factor with no real zero gives none.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 9 An added point
A student draws a rational function with vertical asymptote and then adds a solid point , saying the graph can cross the asymptote there. Is this a valid graph of the same rational function? Explain.
- Hint 1
A vertical asymptote of a rational function occurs at an excluded input.
- Hint 2
A solid point asserts an actual function value at its horizontal coordinate.
Answer
No; is not a point of the graph of this rational function.
Full solution
The vertical asymptote means the reduced denominator vanishes there, while the numerator does not.
The original rational formula is undefined at that input.
A solid point would instead assert
That would define a different function with an extra assigned value.
It does not create a crossing point for the original rational function.
Answer
No; is not a point of the graph of this rational function.
Key idea
An excluded input supplies no point through which the original rational graph could cross a vertical asymptote.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 10 Reading a finite window
The figure shows part of a rational graph close to the horizontal axis near the window edges. A student says this picture alone proves the horizontal asymptote is . Is that conclusion justified without the formula or information about behavior beyond the window? Explain.
Part of the graph of a rational function. Text description of this figure
A grid with the x-axis from -5 to 5, ticked and labeled at every integer, and the y-axis from 0 to 1.2, ticked and labeled every 0.2. A smooth, symmetric, bell-shaped curve reaches its highest point, height 1, above x equals 0, and falls on both sides. At both edges of the window, x equals -5 and x equals 5, the curve is only a little above the x-axis. The curve simply stops at the window's edges: no arrows on it, no asymptote line and no equation are drawn.
- Hint 1
An asymptote describes behavior arbitrarily far out, not only at the displayed endpoints.
- Hint 2
Compare the interval covered by the x-axis labels with the inputs the definition of a horizontal asymptote is about.
Answer
No; the finite window alone does not establish a horizontal asymptote.
Full solution
The visible curve being close to at the edges establishes only a finite collection of visual observations.
A horizontal asymptote requires the distance to stay smaller than every positive target distance sufficiently far out.
That stronger statement needs a formula or explicit far-out information.
The plot is suggestive, but it does not by itself establish the claim.
Answer
No; the finite window alone does not establish a horizontal asymptote.
Key idea
A finite graph window suggests end behavior but does not prove an asymptotic statement.
- Hint 1