Angle Pairs
Progress can't be saved in this browser, so this lesson's status can't be set.
Watch the video explainer
Learning goals
- Classify angle pairs using their positions and the sums of their measures
- Justify linear-pair sums and prove that vertical angles are congruent
- Explain why complements or supplements of congruent angles are congruent
- Solve angle equations using justified relationships and complete turns around a point
Position and measure describe different things
Two angles can touch without adding to a special total. Two other angles can add to a special total while sitting far apart. Keep these two kinds of information separate.
Adjacent angles share a vertex and a side, and their interiors do not overlap. For example, if a ray inside an opening splits it into and parts, those parts are adjacent. Angle addition gives . Sharing just a vertex is not enough, and one angle lying inside another is not adjacency.
Two angles are complementary when their measures add to . Angles measuring and are complementary because . The definition concerns the sum; they do not have to be adjacent.
Two angles are supplementary when their measures add to . For example, and are supplementary. Their positions do not enter that test.
Unless a reflex opening is specified, named angles here are non-reflex. When we split an angle into parts, the parts have positive measures and nonoverlapping interiors. Write for the measure and for the angle itself. Angles are congruent when their measures are equal.
Check your understanding
Two angles have different vertices and measures and . Which description must hold?
The measures add to , so the angles are complementary. Different vertices rule out adjacency and a linear pair; the sum is not .
A linear pair earns a straight-angle sum
When adjacent angles have opposite noncommon rays, they fill a straight angle. Imagine a ray standing inside a straight opening. If one part measures , the other measures . Their total comes from the straight opening, not from their sizes in the sketch.
A linear pair is a pair of adjacent angles whose noncommon sides are opposite rays. Every linear pair is supplementary. Angle addition proves the claim: the two parts exactly fill a straight angle, whose measure is .
The reverse statement without a position condition is false. The separate and angles above are supplementary but are not a linear pair. If supplementary angles are also adjacent, however, their combined opening is , so their outer rays are opposite.
Worked example 1 Use the rays to justify a subtraction
Problem. Points lie on one line with between and . Ray is not on that line. Given , find and explain the relationship used.
Solution. The rays and are opposite because is between and . The angles share ray and have no overlapping interiors, so they form a linear pair. Their measures add to .
The check is . The betweenness and shared-ray information justify that sum even if the sketch is inaccurate.
Check your understanding
Which information guarantees that two angles form a linear pair?
A linear pair requires both adjacency and opposite noncommon rays. A sum of alone gives supplementary angles, which can be in separate places.
Why vertical angles are congruent
Opposite angles at the crossing of two distinct lines have the same measure. Here is a numerical reason before the general proof. Suppose one angle at a crossing is . A neighboring angle forms a linear pair with it, so it measures . The angle opposite the first also forms a linear pair with that same angle. It therefore measures .
Vertical angles are the opposite angles formed by two distinct intersecting lines. Their sides come in pairs of opposite rays. The word refers to a shared vertex; the lines need not point up and down.
Vertical angles are congruent#
Let be the measures of the sectors labeled in the figure. The line through makes and a linear pair, so . The line through makes and a linear pair, so .
Both sums equal , so . Subtract the shared measure from both sides to obtain . Thus .
For the other pair, and . Equating the sums and subtracting gives . Thus .
The particular measurement was not used in the proof. Each opposite angle is what remains after removing the same neighboring angle from .
Worked example 2 Translate a position into an equation
Problem. Two distinct lines intersect at . One pair of vertical angles has measures and . Find , the measure of each of these angles, and the measure of each remaining angle at .
Solution. Vertical angles are congruent, so their measures are equal.
Subtracting and adding gives the second line; dividing by gives the third. Substitution gives and . Each angle in the named vertical pair is .
Each remaining angle forms a linear pair with a angle, so each measures . Opposite angles agree, and each neighboring pair sums to .
Check your understanding
In the vertical-angle proof, and . Which step proves ?
Both sums equal the same number, so . Removing the same measure from both sides leaves . The three sectors do not together fill a straight angle.
Equal angles leave equal complements and supplements
Equal amounts removed from equal totals leave equal remainders. For example, two angles each measuring have complements measuring . Their supplements each measure . The partners are congruent because both calculations use the same total and remove the same amount.
Congruent complements and supplements#
Suppose angles and are congruent, so . If complements and complements , then and . Substitution makes the two right sides equal, so .
If and instead supplement and , replace in both equations with . The same substitution proves . This includes two complements, or two supplements, of the very same angle.
Use the same kind of partner on both sides. A complement and a supplement of one angle differ by , so this rule does not make them congruent.
Worked example 3 Use a shared relationship instead of a shared vertex
Problem. Case A: and complement congruent angles. If , find .
Case B: and are congruent, with . Angle supplements , and angle supplements . Find and .
Solution. Case A: complements of congruent angles are congruent, so . The angles being complemented each measure .
Case B: congruence gives . Since supplements , its measure is
Supplements of congruent angles are congruent, so . Both supplementary pairs check with .
Check your understanding
Angles and are congruent acute angles. Angle complements , and angle supplements . Which statement is justified?
Let each given acute angle measure . Then and . Subtracting cancels and leaves . Different partner totals do not give congruent partners.
Account for a complete turn
Consecutive sectors that fill one turn around a point have measures adding to . For example, sectors measuring , , and fill a turn because . This is the angle-addition foundation from lesson 1.3 applied to a full turn. Check that every sector is counted once, with no gap or overlap.
Worked example 4 Keep track of every sector
Problem. Four distinct rays from occur in the cyclic order . The consecutive sectors , , , and fill one complete turn and measure , , , and , respectively. Find and the two unknown sector measures.
Solution. Adding all four sectors gives the complete-turn equation.
Thus , and . Checking the geometry, all four measures are positive and less than , and . We have not assumed any opposite rays or equal angles.
Check your understanding
Three consecutive nonoverlapping sectors fill one turn around . Two measure and . What is the third measure?
The total is a full turn, so the missing sector measures . The two given sectors already total more than a straight angle, so is not the appropriate whole.
The working order is to identify the geometric relationship, write its equation, solve, and then check the measures against the stated configuration. Algebra can produce a number even when an incorrect geometric equation was used.
| Status | Relationship available after this lesson |
|---|---|
| Accepted foundation from lesson 1.3 | Consecutive nonoverlapping parts add to the selected opening or complete turn |
| Definition | Complementary measures total ; supplementary measures total |
| Proved here | A linear pair is supplementary; vertical angles are congruent |
| Proved here | Complements of congruent angles are congruent, and supplements of congruent angles are congruent |