Rectangles, Rhombi, and Squares
Progress can't be saved in this browser, so this lesson's status can't be set.
Watch the video explainer
Learning goals
- Prove the special diagonal properties of rectangles and rhombi using triangle congruence
- Calculate lengths and angles by combining special properties with parallelogram properties
- Choose sufficient classification tests and state their required hypotheses
- Explain the square hierarchy and disprove unrestricted converses with counterexamples
Special members of one family
A rectangle is a parallelogram with four right angles. A rhombus is a parallelogram with four congruent sides. A square has both features, so every square is both a rectangle and a rhombus.
These definitions keep rectangles and rhombi within the parallelogram family. Their right-angle and equal-side conditions add structure without removing any parallelogram property.
Every parallelogram has congruent opposite sides, supplementary consecutive angles, and diagonals that bisect each other. The parallelogram properties lesson proves these facts; here we use them to investigate the extra conditions imposed by right angles or equal sides.
Throughout this lesson, quadrilaterals are convex and their names list vertices in boundary order. An intersection named lies on both diagonals.
Why a rectangle has congruent diagonals
A rectangle’s two diagonals have equal lengths. For example, a rectangle with adjacent sides cm and cm has a cm diagonal, by the Pythagorean theorem; the other diagonal crosses a right triangle with the same two leg lengths, so it also measures cm.
The common side and equal opposite sides give a proof that works without choosing side lengths.
A rectangle has congruent diagonals#
Let be a rectangle. Compare triangles and .
Their sides and are congruent because the rectangle is a parallelogram. Side is common, and the included angles at and are right angles. SAS gives
The corresponding third sides are the diagonals, so
Nothing in this argument depended on the particular side lengths and .
This adds a new fact to diagonal bisection. Bisection compares the two halves of each individual diagonal; congruent diagonals compare one whole diagonal with the other.
Check your understanding
Why can the rectangle proof compare triangles and by SAS?
The common side AB and congruent opposite sides AD and BC supply two side pairs. The included angles at A and B are both right angles.
SAS therefore gives the congruence. Diagonal congruence is the conclusion, so it cannot be assumed as a premise.
Worked example 1 Using two descriptions of the diagonals
Problem. Rectangle has diagonals meeting at . The lengths, in centimeters, are
Find , the length of , and the length of .
Solution. The whole diagonals are congruent, so equate their expressions.
Substitute into either whole-diagonal expression.
Since a rectangle is a parallelogram, bisects . Therefore
Check your understanding
A rectangle's diagonals meet at . If is cm, how long is ?
The diagonal AC is twice its half AO.
A rectangle has congruent whole diagonals, so BD also measures 22 cm.
What equal sides do to the diagonals
A rhombus’s diagonals cross at right angles and bisect its vertex angles. These are different statements: one describes the intersection, and the other describes how a diagonal splits an angle at an endpoint.
If two equal adjacent angles together make a straight angle, their common measure is , or . We will find that situation inside a rhombus.
A rhombus has perpendicular diagonals#
Let the diagonals of rhombus meet at . Since the rhombus is a parallelogram, and are congruent. Also, and are congruent by the rhombus definition, and is common.
SSS gives
Corresponding angles and are congruent. Since are collinear, these adjacent angles add to a straight angle. Each is , so the diagonals are perpendicular.
For angle bisection, consider a rhombus with a angle at . The two triangles on either side of have matching side lengths, so they split that angle into two parts. The same matching argument proves the result for every rhombus.
Each rhombus diagonal bisects its endpoint angles#
In rhombus , triangles and share . The other two corresponding side pairs are congruent because all four sides of a rhombus are congruent. SSS gives
Corresponding angles show that bisects the angles at its own endpoints:
Likewise, SSS gives congruence of triangles and . Thus bisects the angles at and . The example uses this side matching; that particular angle measure was not needed.
Worked example 2 Finding a diagonal and a side
Problem. Rhombus has diagonals meeting at . The lengths and are cm and cm. Find and .
Solution. The diagonals bisect each other, so the whole diagonal is twice .
The diagonals are perpendicular, making triangle a right triangle with hypotenuse .
Check your understanding
In rhombus , diagonal splits the angle at into two equal parts. One part measures . What is the measure of the whole angle at ?
The whole angle at P is twice 34 degrees.
Consecutive angles of a parallelogram are supplementary.
Tests that identify special parallelograms
A property starts with a shape’s name and draws a conclusion. A sufficient test starts with evidence and guarantees the shape’s name. The previous lesson proves tests for establishing that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram; establish that fact before using the tests below.
A parallelogram with congruent diagonals must be a rectangle. For instance, if two consecutive angles are proved equal and their sum is , both are .
Congruent diagonals identify a rectangle among parallelograms#
Suppose is a parallelogram with congruent diagonals. Compare triangles and again. Their third sides and are now given congruent, rather than obtained as a conclusion.
Opposite sides and are congruent, and is common. SSS gives congruent triangles, so the consecutive angles and are congruent. They are also supplementary because is a parallelogram.
Each of those angles is . Their opposite angles are congruent to them, giving four right angles, so is a rectangle.
A parallelogram with perpendicular diagonals must be a rhombus. Perpendicularity supplies the included angles needed to compare two small triangles.
Two diagonal tests for a rhombus#
First suppose parallelogram has perpendicular diagonals meeting at . Side is common to triangles and . The sides and are congruent because parallelogram diagonals bisect each other, and the included angles at are right angles.
SAS gives congruent triangles, so and are congruent. Together with the two congruent opposite-side pairs of a parallelogram, this makes all four sides congruent. Thus is a rhombus.
Now suppose instead that is a parallelogram and bisects angle . The bisector gives
Since is parallel to , alternate interior angles give
Thus triangle has congruent angles at and , so their opposite sides and are congruent. Equal adjacent sides, together with equal opposite sides, make the parallelogram a rhombus.
These tests require the whole angle at a vertex to be bisected. Splitting an unrelated angle somewhere on a side is different evidence.
Two simpler tests follow from earlier properties. A parallelogram with one right angle has four right angles, because consecutive angles are supplementary and opposite angles are congruent. A parallelogram with one pair of congruent adjacent sides has four congruent sides, because opposite sides are congruent.
Worked example 3 Putting classification evidence in order
Problem. Convex quadrilateral has diagonals and meeting at . You know
Prove that is a square. Explain which evidence establishes the parallelogram first.
Solution. The first two equalities say that the diagonals bisect each other. The converse parallelogram test therefore makes a parallelogram.
Its congruent diagonals now prove that it is a rectangle.
Its perpendicular diagonals now prove that it is a rhombus.
A quadrilateral that is both a rectangle and a rhombus has four right angles and four congruent sides. It is a square.
Check your understanding
You know only that is a parallelogram. Which additional fact guarantees a rhombus but does not by itself guarantee a square?
Perpendicular diagonals identify a rhombus among parallelograms. A rhombus can have unequal diagonal lengths, so it need not be a square.
Congruent diagonals or one right angle would identify a rectangle. Diagonal bisection is already true in every parallelogram.
Why the hypothesis cannot disappear
Congruent diagonals alone do not identify a rectangle among all quadrilaterals. Perpendicular diagonals alone do not identify a rhombus either. The following construction satisfies even both diagonal conditions and still fails both conclusions.
The four rays from form right angles, with the given lengths shown. The polygon is convex. Its diagonals have lengths
They are congruent and perpendicular. But does not bisect , so this is not a parallelogram; therefore it is neither a rectangle nor a rhombus. This uses the necessary diagonal-bisection property, not any trapezoid or kite theorem.
Even a diagonal that bisects an endpoint angle is insufficient without the parallelogram hypothesis. In this same figure, right triangles and are congruent by SAS, using the equal -unit legs and their common . Thus bisects angle , yet the shape is not a rhombus.
Squares combine the two conditions
Within parallelograms, the two special diagonal properties work independently: congruent diagonals give a rectangle, and perpendicular diagonals give a rhombus. A square belongs to both families, so its diagonals are congruent, perpendicular, bisect each other, and bisect the vertex angles.
For a square, each vertex angle is , so each part cut by a diagonal is . A rotated square keeps all these properties.
Worked example 4 What can the given facts guarantee?
Problem. In each case below the quadrilateral is a parallelogram. State the strongest classification guaranteed by the givens, and decide whether a square is guaranteed.
Case A. The whole diagonals are congruent.
Case B. The whole diagonals are perpendicular and have different lengths.
Case C. One angle is right, and a diagonal bisects that whole angle.
Solution. Case A guarantees a rectangle. A rectangle with unequal adjacent sides satisfies the evidence, so a square is not guaranteed.
Case B guarantees a rhombus. Its unequal diagonals rule out a rectangle and therefore rule out a square.
Case C gives a rectangle by the right-angle test and a rhombus by the angle-bisector test. It guarantees a square.
Check your understanding
A convex quadrilateral has congruent, perpendicular diagonals. Which further fact guarantees that it is a square?
Diagonal bisection first proves that the quadrilateral is a parallelogram.
Among parallelograms, congruent diagonals prove rectangle and perpendicular diagonals prove rhombus. Both classifications together prove square. Merely intersecting inside the quadrilateral does not supply midpoint information.
Predict which conditions will make the diagonals equal or perpendicular. Try each control separately, then combine the right-angle and equal-side conditions. Use the earlier proofs to justify what appears.
Change one condition and watch the diagonals
The shape always stays a parallelogram
Scroll sideways to see the whole diagram.
Classification within parallelograms: general parallelogram. Diagonal AC: about 5.59 units. Diagonal BD: about 4.33 units. Angle AOB: about 106.8°.