Completing the Square: Free Response
5 questions in parts, 62 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.
-
1. The one constant that fits . Foundational, 12 points. Question 1 of 5.
Completing the square rests on a single choice: the constant you add. Exactly one number turns into a perfect square, and this question is about producing it, using it, and saying why no other number could have worked.
- Part A.
Rewrite in completed-square form, that is, as a squared binomial plus a constant. Then expand your form back out to check it.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Solve by completing the square, and report both solutions exactly (no decimals).
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Explain why the constant that completes the square on has to be . Your explanation should make clear why the obvious guess cannot work.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
Everything here comes from one identity you already know: squaring a sum produces three terms, and the middle one carries a factor of two. Write that identity down first, and read it from right to left.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part B
An odd middle coefficient makes the half a fraction, and that is fine. Put the right-hand side over the denominator before you combine anything, and the arithmetic stays clean.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
Ask what value of would make have the middle term you were handed. There is only one, and once you know it the last term of the square is no longer yours to choose.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
- is the same expression; the sign inside the binomial follows the sign of the linear coefficient
Part B
and , usually written together as .
- is the same pair, written before the two fractions are combined over the common denominator
Part C
Squaring DOUBLES in the middle term, so matching against forces , and the constant is . The guess means , whose middle term would be , twice what is there.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
No equation here, so no second side to balance: add the completing constant and subtract it in the same line, which changes nothing but lets you regroup.
The linear coefficient is , so half is and the completing constant is :
The bracket is a perfect square; the loose constants combine to :
Expanding back checks it:
Part B
Move the constant to the right so the left side holds only the terms:
Here is odd, so half is the fraction and the completing constant is . Add it to BOTH sides, writing as so the right side combines:
The left side is now the square of . Take the square root of both sides, keeping BOTH signs, and use , since the denominator is a perfect square:
Subtract and combine over the common denominator :
Part C
Start from the pattern. Squaring a binomial always produces
For to BE such a square, the middle terms must agree: . That fixes with no choice left,
and once is pinned down the last term of the square gives the constant:
So the halving is forced by the in , itself produced because squaring generates the cross term twice, once from each bracket.
The sign takes care of itself too. If is negative, is negative, the binomial reads , and is still positive, as with the in part A.
In one line
; the solutions of are ; and the completing constant must be because forces , so and the last term is .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Adds the completing constant and removes it again in the same line, so the expression's value is untouched. . Worth 2 points.
Collapses the perfect-square trinomial into a squared binomial whose inner sign matches the sign of the linear coefficient. . Worth 1 point.
Expands the completed form back out and lands on the original expression. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Adds the completing constant to BOTH sides of the equation and carries the fraction exactly rather than rounding it. . Worth 2 points.
Takes the square root of both sides with a , and simplifies the root of the fraction correctly. . Worth 1 point.
Reports BOTH solutions in exact form, not one of them and not a decimal approximation. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 4 points
Derives the constant by matching the given quadratic against the expansion of a squared binomial, rather than restating the halve-and-square recipe as a rule. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Disposes of the rival guess by working out what square it would produce, rather than asserting that it is wrong. . Worth 1 point.
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
Rewrite in completed-square form, then solve exactly.
The answer
, and has the solutions .
For the rewrite, , so half is and the completing constant is . Add and subtract it:
For the equation, move the constant across, then add to both sides:
The left side is , so take the root of both sides with a :
-
-
2. Clearing the leading coefficient, and the floor it reveals . Foundational, 11 points. Question 2 of 5.
Every step of the method assumes the term stands alone. When it does not, the first job is to make it so, and how you do that depends on whether you are holding an equation or an expression. The completed form you end up with then tells you something the original never showed: the smallest value the expression can ever take.
- Part A.
Solve by completing the square, and report both solutions exactly.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part B.
Now rewrite the EXPRESSION in the form . Note that you may not divide here: explain in one line what you do instead, and why.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
Using your form from part B, state the smallest value can take, and the value of at which it takes it. Justify both claims from the completed form alone, without testing values.
Carry your own answer forward Argue from the completed form YOU produced in part B. The credit here is for the reasoning about the square, not for reproducing one particular pair of numbers.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
The first move is always to get a bare . Whether you may divide to do it, or must factor instead, depends on one thing: whether there is a second side of an equals sign to keep the division honest.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part B
Once the leading coefficient is outside a bracket, complete the square on what is inside it. Then watch what happens to the leftover constant as it comes back out through the multiplication.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
You know the sign of any square of a real number, whatever is inside it. Turn that single fact into an inequality about the whole expression, and then ask what would have to be true for the inequality to be an equality.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
and , that is, .
- listing the two roots separately is the same answer as writing ; what is not the same is reporting only one of them
Part B
. The is factored out of the terms, not divided away, because an expression has no second side to balance the division against.
- is the same expression
Part C
The smallest value is , reached only at . A square of a real number is never negative, so is at least , with equality exactly when .
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
The term does not stand alone, so nothing can complete yet. This is an EQUATION with right side , so divide every term by the leading coefficient (dividing by leaves ):
Move the constant across, halve to get , and add to both sides:
Take the square root of both sides, keeping both signs, and isolate :
Since is between and , the roots are roughly and , straddling as a quick check.
Part B
Dividing an expression by gives a DIFFERENT expression, one third as large. No equals sign means nothing to balance, so the leading coefficient must be factored out, not divided away.
Factor the out of the two terms, leaving the constant alone:
Complete the square inside the bracket. Half of is , and , so add and subtract INSIDE it:
Distribute the and combine constants:
Expanding back confirms it: .
Part C
The completed form mentions exactly once, inside a square, whose sign you already know.
For every real , is never negative, so multiplying by the positive keeps it that way:
Add to both sides and the expression is bounded below:
So it never drops below . A bound must also be attained to be the minimum: equality holds exactly when , that is, at , and substituting confirms it:
The minimum is , taken at and nowhere else.
In one line
gives ; , factoring the out rather than dividing by it, since an expression has no second side; and the expression's smallest value is , taken only at , because with equality exactly when .
Another way: Complete the square without ever leaving the bracket
Pull the completed square out in one step by matching, instead of adding and subtracting inside the bracket. Any expression expands to , so matching coefficients against gives at once, then , so , and finally
The same three numbers, produced by comparison instead of manipulation.
When it is worth it When you trust the shape of the answer and want the constants quickly, or as an independent check on a rewrite done by hand: the two routes are different enough to be unlikely to fail the same way.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Makes the leading coefficient before attempting to complete anything, by dividing every term of the equation by it. . Worth 2 points.
Completes the square on the resulting monic quadratic and takes the square root of both sides with a . . Worth 1 point.
Reports both solutions in exact form. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Factors the leading coefficient out of the terms instead of dividing it away, and says why an expression forbids the division. . Worth 2 points.
Carries the constant that was subtracted inside the bracket back out through the leading coefficient, multiplying it by that coefficient. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
Argues from the fact that a real square is never negative, and does so on the completed form rather than by trying out values of . . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Establishes the equality case as well as the bound, so that the value claimed as smallest is shown to be reached. . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
Solve exactly, then rewrite the expression in the form and state the smallest value it can take.
The answer
; and , whose smallest value is , taken at .
For the equation, divide every term by , then complete the square:
so and .
For the expression, factor the out of the terms rather than dividing, complete the square inside, and scale the leftover constant on its way out:
Since for every real , with equality exactly at , the smallest value is , taken at .
-
-
3. The path around the pool . Application, 12 points. Question 3 of 5.
A rectangular swimming pool measures metres by metres. A path of uniform width is to be laid all the way around it, and the club has enough paving for the path to cover exactly square metres. The question is how wide the path can be.
- Part A.
Let be the width of the path in metres. Write an equation in that says the path covers square metres, and simplify it to a quadratic with a leading coefficient of .
Model the situation Name your unknown first, then write every other quantity in terms of that one letter. 4 points
- Part B.
Solve your quadratic by completing the square. Give both solutions exactly, and then give a decimal value to the nearest centimetre for each.
Carry your own answer forward Complete the square on the equation YOU wrote in part A. The credit here is for the completing-the-square work and for an exact answer honestly rounded, not for arriving at one particular pair of numbers.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part C.
Only one of your two solutions answers the club's question. Say which, explain what disqualifies the other, and confirm your width by checking it against the paving budget.
Carry your own answer forward Work with the two solutions you obtained in part B. What is being assessed is the rejection of a solution the situation cannot admit, and an honest check of the one that survives.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
Nothing here is new mathematics; the difficulty is entirely in the translation. Draw the two rectangles, one inside the other, and ask what the paved region is the difference of.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part A
A border of the same width runs along both ends of every dimension, so each side of the pool grows twice. Work out the outer rectangle's length and width in terms of the unknown before you multiply anything out.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
A quadratic returns every number that satisfies it, including numbers the situation cannot use. Ask what physically measures, and whether both of your answers are things that quantity is allowed to be.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
, which simplifies to and then, after dividing by , to .
Part B
metres and metres.
- and are the same two numbers, and is the same as
Part C
The path is about metres wide. The other solution is negative, and a width cannot be negative: it solves the equation but not the situation, because the algebra knows nothing about what was chosen to measure.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
The path is the region between two rectangles, so its area is the outer rectangle's area minus the pool's.
The path adds width at each end of each dimension, so the outer rectangle measures by . The pool itself is square metres, so the path's area is
Expand and collect:
The leading coefficient is and the right side is , so divide every term by :
Part B
Start from the monic equation and move the constant across:
Half of is , so the completing constant is . Add it to BOTH sides:
Take the square root of both sides, keeping both signs, and simplify the radical by pulling out the perfect square :
Since , , so the two solutions are
both in metres, to the nearest centimetre.
Part C
The equation was built from the geometry, but cannot remember that: it returns every number that satisfies it, and one of the two the situation has no room for.
A path's width is a length, so must be positive. The solution is negative, so it is discarded: a perfectly good root of the quadratic and a perfectly impossible path. The surviving solution is
Check it against the budget rather than the algebra, so a modelling slip would still be caught. With , the outer rectangle measures by metres, so the paved region covers
exactly the paving available. The width stands.
In one line
The path's width satisfies , which reduces to ; completing the square gives and so . The negative root cannot be a width, so the path is metres wide.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Builds the outer rectangle's dimensions with the path's width counted at each end of each side, and expresses the path's area as a difference of two areas. . Worth 3 points.
Expands and collects into a quadratic set equal to zero, then divides through so the squared term stands alone. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 5 points
Completes the square on the equation, adding the completing constant to both sides, and takes the square root with a . . Worth 2 points.
Simplifies the radical exactly, and only then converts to a decimal. . Worth 2 points.
Attaches the unit of length to the numerical answers and rounds to the requested precision. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Rejects the inadmissible solution with a reason drawn from what the unknown was chosen to measure, rather than dropping it without comment. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Checks the surviving width back against the original situation, not merely against the quadratic it came from. . Worth 1 point.
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
A rectangular garden measures metres by metres. A gravel border of uniform width is laid around it, using exactly square metres of gravel. Find the border's width, exactly and to the nearest centimetre.
The answer
The border is metres wide; the other root, about , is rejected because a width cannot be negative.
Let be the width in metres. The outer rectangle is by , and the garden itself is square metres, so
Expanding and collecting gives , that is, . Divide every term by :
Complete the square: half of is , so add to both sides.
Since , the two roots are about and . A width cannot be negative, so the border is metres wide.
-
-
4. Two flaws, one wrong answer . Application, 11 points. Question 4 of 5.
A student is asked to solve by completing the square, and hands in this work.
Line 1:
Line 2:
Line 3: half of is , and , so
Line 4:
The student concludes that the equation has no real solutions. It does have two.
- Part A.
The work contains two separate errors, in two different lines. Identify both, name the line each sits in, and write each line as it should have been.
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 4 points
- Part B.
Solve correctly, and report both solutions exactly.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
The student's line 3 added a number to one side of an equation and not to the other. Explain what that does to the set of solutions, and why adding it to both sides instead leaves the solutions untouched.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
Read the work as a chain and test each link separately, asking of every line whether it follows from the line above it. Two links break here, and neither of them is the last one, which merely reports what the broken links imply.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part A
Look hard at the step that clears the leading coefficient, and count how many terms actually got divided. Then look at what happened to the right-hand side when a constant appeared on the left.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
An equation asserts that two quantities are the same. Ask what survives that assertion when you change one of the quantities and not the other, and whether the step can be undone.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
Line 2 divides only the by and leaves the other terms alone; every term must be divided, giving . Line 3 adds the completing constant to the left side only; it must be added to both, giving .
Part B
and , that is, .
- is the same pair, before the root of the fraction is simplified
Part C
Adding to one side only makes a different equation: its solutions have no reason to match the old ones, since it claims two quantities that were equal are still equal after only one changed. Adding to both sides changes each side equally, so exactly the same values of satisfy it, and the step is reversible.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Test each line on its own terms.
Line 1 is sound: subtracting from both sides moves the constant across, treating both sides alike.
Line 2 is the first error. The student divides by to isolate , but only the actually gets divided; the and the are left as they were, so line 2 is not equivalent to line 1. Dividing every term gives
Line 3 is the second error. The completing constant is added to the left side only, which changes the equation. (The constant is also computed from the wrong , but that follows from the first error: with the corrected line 2, half of is and the constant is .) Added to both sides, the line should read
Part B
Divide EVERY term by the leading coefficient :
Half of is , so the completing constant is . Add it to both sides:
The right side is POSITIVE, so the roots are real: the student's no-real-solutions verdict was an artefact of the two errors. Take the square root of both sides with a , and simplify the root of the fraction over the perfect square :
Adding finishes it:
Numerically the roots are about and ; substituting either into returns .
Part C
An equation claims two quantities are equal. A step is legitimate exactly when it preserves that claim, so ask what it does to each side.
Add to the left side alone and the equation changes. If satisfied , the left side was ; after the addition it is , not . The new equation demands something FALSE of the old solutions, and its own solutions are a different set with no obligation to overlap. The student's line 3 secretly moved the equation by .
Adding the constant to both sides is different: it changes both quantities by the same amount, and equality survives that:
Every solution of the old equation is a solution of the new one, and since subtracting undoes the step, every solution of the new equation is a solution of the old. The two equations have exactly the same solution set, which licenses the move.
In one line
Line 2 divides only the leading term by (it should read ), and line 3 adds the completing constant to the left side only (it should read ). Solved correctly, , so , two real solutions.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Names TWO distinct erroneous lines and clears the lines that are in fact correct, rather than objecting to a step that follows validly from what precedes it. . Worth 2 points.
Says for each error what rule of equation handling it breaks, and rewrites both lines correctly. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 4 points
Divides every term by the leading coefficient before completing anything. . Worth 1 point.
Adds the completing constant to both sides, isolates the square, and handles the fractional right-hand side and its square root correctly. . Worth 2 points.
Reports both solutions exactly, and notes that they are real, contrary to what the student concluded. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Explains the failure in terms of what happens to the equality itself when only one side is changed, rather than citing a rule that both sides must be treated alike. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Says why the two-sided move is safe, in terms of every solution of one equation being a solution of the other. . Worth 1 point.
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
A student solving writes , then adds to the left side only, and reports . Find both errors, and solve the equation correctly.
The answer
The student divided only the leading term and added the completing constant to one side only; the correct solutions are .
The first error is dividing only the leading term: every term must be divided by , which gives , that is, . The second is adding the completing constant to one side only.
Solve it properly. Half of is , so add to BOTH sides:
Take the square root of both sides, keeping both signs:
-
-
5. When the square lands on a negative . Reasoning, 16 points. Question 5 of 5.
Completing the square always reaches the same crossroads: an isolated square on the left, and a single number on the right. Everything about the roots is decided there, and this question is about the case in which that number turns out to be negative.
- Part A.
Solve by completing the square, and report both solutions.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part B.
Verify by direct substitution that satisfies the equation, and then use the sum and the product of the roots to check the pair against the coefficients.
Carry your own answer forward Check the pair YOU found in part A. The credit is for carrying out an honest substitution and an honest coefficient check, not for the pair turning out to be the expected one.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part C.
Explain, using only your completed-square form and without solving anything again, why no REAL number satisfies .
Carry your own answer forward Argue from the completed form you produced in part A. If your isolated square came out different, run the same argument on whatever number your square landed on, and say what you would conclude if that number were not negative.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 4 points
- Part D.
A classmate looks at your work and claims: 'For , the solutions are a complex conjugate pair exactly when .' Decide whether the claim is true, and argue your verdict for every value of , not just for a few.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Every part of this question lives at the same moment of the method: the instant the square stands alone and a single number faces it across the equals sign. Get to that moment, then read the sign of that number.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part B
Squaring a complex number produces three terms, not two, and the middle one is where the check usually goes wrong. Expand carefully, then collect what is real and what carries an into separate piles.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part C
Suppose for a moment that some real number did satisfy the equation, and follow the consequence: it would make a certain square equal to a certain negative number. Ask whether any real number is capable of that.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part D
Keep as a letter and run the method once. Everything then turns on the sign of the number left facing the square, and there are only three possibilities for that sign.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
and , that is, : a complex conjugate pair.
Part B
Substituting gives . The roots also sum to and multiply to , matching and for and .
Part C
Because the equation is equivalent to a square equal to a negative number, and a real square is never negative: a real solution would have to make a nonnegative quantity negative, which nothing real can do.
Part D
True. Completing the square turns the equation into , negative exactly when , forcing the roots to carry an . When the roots are real and distinct; when they collapse into the single repeated root .
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Move the constant across and complete the square. Half of is , so the completing constant is , added to both sides:
The left side is a perfect square, and the number it landed on is NEGATIVE:
Take the square root of both sides with a , converting the root of the negative with : .
The two solutions differ only in the sign of their imaginary parts.
Part B
Square the root first, using and the binomial-square expansion:
Substitute into the left-hand side and collect real and imaginary parts separately:
Both parts cancel, so is a root.
The coefficient check runs on both roots at once. For a monic quadratic , the roots sum to and multiply to ; here and , so they must sum to and multiply to . The pair delivers exactly that, the imaginary parts cancelling in the sum and producing a real product through :
Both match: the product is a difference of squares in disguise, which is why the imaginary part disappears.
Part C
The completed form is an equivalent equation, not merely a convenient one, so anything true of the original is true of it:
Suppose some real satisfied it. Then is real too, and a real square is never negative: whether is positive, negative, or zero, its square is at least .
So the left side would be at least while the right side is :
which cannot hold. No real satisfies the equation, and the argument covers every real number, since the three sign cases exhaust them.
That is not a claim that the equation has no solutions: part A produced two. It is a claim about where they live, outside the reals, which is exactly what the in records.
Part D
Do not test values of . Complete the square once, with left as a letter, and every value is settled at once.
The linear coefficient is whatever is, so the completing constant is , and adding it to both sides gives
The roots' behaviour is now controlled by the sign of , the number whose square root is about to be taken. Three cases exhaust every real .
If , that is , the square root is a nonzero real and the produces two distinct REAL roots, .
If , that is , the root is , so the two roots collapse into the single repeated real root .
If , that is , the square root of a negative is times a positive real, and the produces the conjugate pair
whose imaginary part is nonzero precisely because . So the roots form a conjugate pair in this case and no other: the claim is TRUE.
Check it against part A, where : since , the claim predicts imaginary part , matching the roots .
In one line
becomes , so ; the pair checks by substitution and against the coefficients, summing to and multiplying to . No real number can satisfy the equation, because a real square is never negative. And the classmate is right: is negative exactly when , precisely when the roots form a conjugate pair.
Another way: Read the pair off the sum and the product instead
Suppose you already believe the roots are a conjugate pair and . The coefficients then pin the pair down with no square root taken. The sum must be , and the imaginary parts cancel in it, so
The product must be , a difference of squares, so , giving and . The pair is , as before.
When it is worth it As an independent check on a complex pair already found, since it uses the coefficients rather than the algebra that produced the roots. It is not a substitute for completing the square: it ASSUMES from the start that the roots form a conjugate pair, a fact completing the square establishes rather than presumes.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Completes the square correctly, adding the completing constant to both sides, and isolates the square. . Worth 2 points.
Converts the square root of the negative number into a real multiple of , rather than into a negative real number. . Worth 1 point.
Reports BOTH members of the conjugate pair, not just the one the radical sign hands over. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 3 points
Squares a complex number correctly, keeping the cross term and evaluating , and collects real and imaginary parts separately in the substitution. . Worth 2 points.
Computes the sum and the product of the pair, compares them with what the coefficients predict, and says what the agreement licenses. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 4 points
Argues from the fact that the square of a real number is never negative, applied to an equivalent completed form, and covers every real number rather than a sample of them. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Distinguishes having no real solution from having no solution at all. . Worth 1 point.
Part D 5 points
Completes the square with left as a letter, so that the argument covers every value of at once rather than a sample of them. . Worth 2 points.
Settles BOTH directions of the exactly when, by showing what happens in the remaining cases as well as in the claimed one. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
States a verdict on the claim as it was made, rather than describing the three cases and stopping. . Worth 1 point.
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
Solve by completing the square, verify one root by substitution, and state for which values of the equation has a complex conjugate pair of roots.
The answer
; substituting returns ; and has a complex conjugate pair exactly when .
Half of is , so add to both sides after moving the constant across:
Since , taking the root of both sides with a gives , so
Verify : , so
For the general case, the same completion with as a letter gives . The roots form a conjugate pair exactly when that number is negative, that is, when .
-