Inverse Functions: Free Response
5 questions in parts, 55 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.
-
1. The inverse and the reciprocal go different places . Foundational, 10 points. Question 1 of 5.
Let . This question builds the inverse of and then checks that it is NOT the same thing as , the reciprocal of the output.
- Part A.
Find . Write , swap and , and solve the new equation for .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Using and your inverse from part A, evaluate and , and state whether the two results are equal.
Carry your own answer forward Use whatever formula for you found in part A, even if it is not the one above.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Explain, in general terms that do not depend on the specific numbers above, why and measure two different things, tying your explanation to what each one is defined to undo.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
The method for finding an inverse is always the same: write , swap the two letters, then solve for . Keep that separate in your head from the reciprocal, which never swaps anything.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
After writing , treat it as an ordinary equation to solve for : move the first, then undo the multiplication by .
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Compute the two quantities from two different starting points: one from your part A formula, the other from finding first and only then flipping it.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Ask what equation defines , and separately what equation defines a reciprocal. One is about undoing ; the other is about undoing a product.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
and . They are not equal.
Part C
undoes composition, since , while undoes multiplication, since . Composition and multiplication are different operations with different identities, versus , so the object that undoes one has no reason to match the object that undoes the other.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Write the rule as an equation in :
Swap and , so the letter that was the output now plays the input:
Solve for by adding and dividing by :
So .
Part B
Evaluate each quantity on its own. For , substitute into the formula from part A:
For , first find , then take its reciprocal:
The two results, and , are not equal.
Part C
Compare what each symbol is built to reverse. is defined by the equation
which says undoes composition: composing it with returns the input unchanged, the identity for composition. The reciprocal instead undoes multiplication: it is the number that multiplies with to give , the identity for multiplication,
Composition and multiplication are different operations, with different identities ( for one, for the other), so the object that undoes one has no reason to match the object that undoes the other. Part B confirmed this on one pair of numbers; this argument is why it holds for at every input, and for any function with a nonzero output.
In one line
; while , so the two are not equal; and in general undoes composition while undoes multiplication, two different operations with two different identities.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Swaps and before doing any solving, rather than rearranging the original equation for . . Worth 2 points.
Solves the swapped equation correctly for , isolating it completely. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Correctly evaluates using the formula from part A. . Worth 2 points.
Correctly evaluates first, then takes its reciprocal, rather than the reciprocal of itself. . Worth 1 point.
States plainly whether the two results are equal or different. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Names the operation each symbol reverses, composition for and multiplication for the reciprocal. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Connects the difference in operations to the difference in their identities, and uses it to explain why there is no reason for the two rules to agree. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
2. The swap that trades domain for range . Reasoning, 12 points. Question 2 of 5.
Let be any one-to-one function with domain and range . Its inverse is built by taking each pair that belongs to and swapping it into the pair . Work directly from that swap, without picking a formula for , to pin down exactly what 's domain and range must be.
- Part A.
Argue directly from the swap described above that a number is a legal input to if and only if belongs to . Cover both directions: show that every number in is a legal input, and that every legal input lies in .
Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 4 points
- Part B.
The swap that builds from is its own reverse: applying it twice returns every original pair. Use that fact, together with part A's argument, to show that the range of is exactly , the domain of .
Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 3 points
- Part C.
Let , with domain every real number except and range every real number except . Using only the general result from parts A and B, no new algebra, state the domain and range of . Then find explicitly by swapping and solving, and confirm it matches what you stated.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 5 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Do not reach for a formula. Every fact you need here comes from one sentence: the inverse's pairs are the original's pairs with the two entries swapped.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
To show a number is a legal input, produce the actual pair of that has it as a first entry. To show the converse, start from an assumed pair of and track back to where it came from in .
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
You do not need a new proof. Notice that is what you get by swapping 's pairs, which means part A's whole argument applies again with the names and exchanged.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
The theorem tells you the answer before you touch the formula. Write that answer down first, and only then invert the rational expression to check it.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
Both directions hold. If belongs to then for some , giving the pair of , so is a legal input. If is a legal input, its pair came from in , so , which belongs to .
Part B
Swapping twice recovers , so . Applying part A's result with in place of the original function says the legal inputs of equal the range of . Since and the legal inputs of are , the range of is .
Part C
By the theorem, the domain of is every real number except and its range is every real number except . Direct computation gives , and its own domain and range match both statements.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Take the two directions in turn.
If belongs to , then is a legal input. By the definition of range, for some in , so is a pair of . Swapping that pair, as the inverse is built to do, gives as a pair of :
A function has a defined output exactly at the inputs that appear as the first entry of one of its pairs, so is a legal input to .
If is a legal input, then belongs to . If is a legal input to , then has some pair . By the swap that defines , that pair came from the pair of , which means for the input in . An output produced by some input of is exactly what belongs to , so belongs to .
Both directions hold, so the legal inputs of are exactly .
Part B
Notice that swapping every pair of recovers every pair of : swapping to and then swapping again returns . So is built from by exactly the same swap that built from ; in symbols, .
Part A proved a general fact about ANY one-to-one function and its inverse: the legal inputs of the inverse equal the range of the original. Nothing in that argument used any property specific to ; it only used the swap. So the same argument applies with playing the role of the original function and playing the role of its inverse:
But , whose legal inputs are by definition. So
Part C
State the answer first, from the theorem alone. Since domain of is and range of is ,
Now check it with algebra. Write , swap the letters, and solve for :
So . This formula is undefined only at , matching the stated domain, and its output can equal every real number except (since is never ), matching the stated range.
In one line
For any one-to-one with domain and range , the swap that builds forces its domain to be and its range to be , proved directly from the swap and then again by applying the swap to itself. For this predicts domain and range for , and the explicit inverse confirms both.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Proves the forward direction, that every number in is a legal input to , by producing the swapped pair that shows it. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Proves the reverse direction, that every legal input to must lie in , arguing from where that input's pair came from. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 3 points
Establishes that swapping twice recovers the original function, giving . . Worth 1 point.
Applies part A's general result with the roles of and exchanged to reach the conclusion about the range of . . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part C 5 points
States the domain and range of directly from the general theorem, without doing any algebra on 's formula first. . Worth 2 points.
Finds explicitly by swapping and solving. . Worth 2 points.
Confirms that the explicit formula's own domain and range match the two values stated from the theorem. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
3. A classmate's one-sided check . Application, 10 points. Question 3 of 5.
A classmate is checking whether is the inverse of , defined on all real numbers. They compute , get , and conclude that and are inverses of each other. Every number in their computation is correct.
- Part A.
Redo the classmate's computation: find for and , and state the values of for which it is valid.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Now compute , the direction the classmate never tried, and evaluate it at . Does it equal ?
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part C.
Explain what the classmate's check left untested, and state precisely why confirming alone can never be enough to conclude that two functions are inverses.
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
An inverse is defined by two equations, and a computation that only ever produces one of them has settled half the question. Ask which direction was never tried here.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Drop the entire rule for into in one substitution, square the root, and watch the constants cancel.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Build the same way as part A, but the other way around, and then plug in the specific negative number before deciding whether it matches.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Squaring destroys the sign of a negative number, and taking a square root afterward has no way to recover it. Ask which of the two composition directions runs into that exact problem.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
, valid wherever itself is defined.
Part B
, not .
Part C
The classmate never tested , the other direction the definition of an inverse requires. Both and must hold; here , which is not for any negative input, so and are not inverses of each other on all reals.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Substitute the whole rule for into :
Squaring undoes the root here, but only where the root is defined, so this holds for every , the domain of .
Part B
Substitute the whole rule for into :
Evaluate at :
The result is , not , so this direction fails at .
Part C
An inverse pair is defined by two equations, not one:
The classmate confirmed only the first. Part B computed the second and found , which does not simplify to : squaring first and then rooting recovers only the SIZE of a number, not its sign, so it returns when but returns when , as the case showed. Checking one direction can therefore pass by coincidence at every point where the two directions happen to agree, while the other direction is where the failure would show up. Only checking both closes off that possibility, which is exactly why the definition asks for both.
In one line
for , exactly as the classmate found; but , which gives rather than at . Since an inverse pair requires BOTH compositions to equal , and this one fails in the untested direction, and are not inverses of each other on all reals.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Substitutes the whole rule for into and simplifies to . . Worth 2 points.
States the domain restriction that makes the computation valid, tied to the domain of . . Worth 1 point.
Part B 3 points
Builds by substituting the whole rule for into and simplifies it correctly before evaluating at . . Worth 2 points.
States plainly whether the computed result matches the input , rather than leaving the comparison unstated. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 4 points
Identifies that only one of the two required compositions was tested. . Worth 2 points.
Explains why a single direction cannot certify an inverse pair in general, tying the explanation to the actual failure found in part B. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
4. Recovering the Celsius reading a forecast came from . Application, 10 points. Question 4 of 5.
A weather sensor reports temperatures in Fahrenheit, computed from an internal Celsius reading using . A forecaster only has the Fahrenheit numbers and wants a formula that recovers the Celsius reading each one came from.
- Part A.
Find by writing , swapping the two letters, and solving for the new output variable. State the resulting formula, using for a Fahrenheit reading.
Model the situation Name your unknown first, then write every other quantity in terms of that one letter. 3 points
- Part B.
A forecast reads degrees Fahrenheit. Use to recover the Celsius reading it came from, and check your answer by substituting it back into .
Carry your own answer forward Use whatever formula for you found in part A, even if it is not the one above.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
State the property of , beyond simply being a function, that guarantees the formula from part A is a genuine inverse rather than a rule that only happens to undo some of the time. Confirm in one line that has it.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Two different variables are in play here: the Celsius reading the sensor started with, and the Fahrenheit number it reports. Keep straight which direction each part of the question runs.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Write the rule in form first, with the fraction left as rather than a decimal, then swap and solve exactly as with any other rule.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Plug the Fahrenheit number into your part A formula first, then run the result back through the ORIGINAL rule as a check, not through the inverse a second time.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Ask what could go wrong with an inverse if two different Celsius readings ever produced the exact same Fahrenheit number. Then test algebraically whether that can happen here.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
degrees Celsius, and confirms it.
Part C
The property is one-to-one: no two different Celsius readings give the same Fahrenheit reading. Since forces and so , has it, which is what guarantees a genuine inverse function exists.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Write the rule as an equation in :
Swap and :
Solve for by subtracting and dividing by :
Renaming the input , the formula that recovers Celsius from a Fahrenheit reading is .
Part B
Substitute into the formula from part A:
Check it going forward, back into the original rule:
which matches the forecast, so degrees Celsius is confirmed as the reading it came from.
Part C
Being a function only guarantees ONE output per input; it says nothing about whether two different inputs could share an output, and it is exactly that possibility that would break an inverse. The property that rules it out is one-to-one.
Confirm has it algebraically. Suppose :
So equal outputs force equal inputs: is one-to-one, and that is what makes the formula from part A a real inverse rather than a rule that only works on part of the domain.
In one line
; a degree forecast recovers degrees Celsius, confirmed by ; and the formula is a genuine inverse because is one-to-one, which follows since forces .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Swaps the two letters before solving, rather than rearranging the original equation for . . Worth 2 points.
Solves correctly for the new output variable and states the formula in terms of a Fahrenheit input . . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Correctly evaluates using the formula from part A. . Worth 2 points.
Checks the result by substituting it back into the original rule and confirming it returns . . Worth 1 point.
Reports the Celsius value with its units. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Names the specific extra property must have, beyond simply being a function, and distinguishes it from merely being a function. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Gives a short algebraic argument confirming has that property. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
5. Restricting a parabola until it has an inverse . Reasoning, 13 points. Question 5 of 5.
Let . On its own this rule is defined for every real number .
- Part A.
Give two different inputs to , defined on all real numbers, that produce the same output. Explain what this shows about whether has an inverse function on that domain.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points
- Part B.
Restrict the domain to , where is one-to-one. Find by writing , swapping the letters, and solving for , watching both the sign and which variable the restriction attaches to.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 5 points
- Part C.
State the domain and the range of the you found in part B. Then find the range of restricted to , and confirm that it matches the domain of , and that the restricted domain of matches the range of .
Carry your own answer forward Use whichever formula and domain you found for in part B, even if it is not the one above.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
A parabola opened up on all reals always collides with itself somewhere: the same output shows up on both sides of its vertex. Restricting to one side is what an inverse needs.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Pick two inputs equally spaced on either side of , since cannot tell them apart.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
The condition described the INPUT of the original rule. After swapping, ask which letter now stands for that same input, and attach the restriction there instead.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Find the smallest value the restricted piece of the parabola reaches, at its own vertex, and that single number tells you the whole range of on this domain.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
. Two different inputs share an output, so on all reals is not one-to-one, and therefore it has no inverse function there: an inverse would need to send that shared output back to a single input, which is impossible.
Part B
, defined wherever the expression under the root is nonnegative.
Part C
The domain of is and its range is . The restricted has minimum value and increases from there, so its range is . Lined up against each other, the domain of matches the range of the restricted , and the range of matches the restricted domain of .
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Pick two inputs the same distance on either side of , since treats them alike. Try and :
Both give . Since two different inputs, and , share the output , is not one-to-one on all reals. An inverse would have to send back to a single input, but there are two honest candidates, so no function can do that job, and has no inverse function on this domain.
Part B
Write the restricted rule as an equation in :
Swap and . The restriction was on the INPUT of , which becomes the OUTPUT of , so it now attaches to :
Solve for :
Two numbers square to give , namely , but means , so only the nonnegative root is allowed:
So , defined wherever , that is, .
Part C
From part B, has domain (where the root is defined), and since , its range is .
Now find the range of on . This restricted piece of the parabola opens upward starting at its vertex, so its smallest value is at :
and only increases for , so the range of the restricted is .
Line the two pairs up. The range of the restricted , , matches the domain of , ; and the restricted domain of , , matches the range of , . Both trade places exactly as the general rule predicts.
In one line
shows is not one-to-one on all reals, so it has no inverse there; restricted to it is one-to-one, with on ; and the domain and range of exactly match the range and domain of the restricted .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Produces two distinct inputs to that give an equal output, with correct arithmetic. . Worth 2 points.
Explains why sharing an output blocks an inverse function from existing, rather than simply asserting it. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 5 points
Swaps the letters and correctly carries the restriction onto rather than leaving it on . . Worth 2 points.
Sets up the swapped equation and solves it for , choosing the sign consistent with the restriction now attached to . . Worth 2 points.
States the resulting domain of explicitly, rather than leaving it implicit. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 4 points
Correctly states both the domain and the range of from part B's formula. . Worth 1 point.
Correctly finds the range of restricted to by locating its minimum at the vertex. . Worth 1 point.
Confirms explicitly that BOTH pairs, domain-to-range and range-to-domain, match between and . . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-