Adding and Subtracting Polynomials: Free Response
5 questions in parts, 52 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.
-
1. Reading a polynomial written out of order . Foundational, 9 points. Question 1 of 5.
A polynomial can be written with its terms in any order without changing its value, but the order chosen changes how easily its features can be read off. Consider .
- Part A.
Rewrite in standard form.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
From the standard form, state the degree of , its leading term, its leading coefficient, and its constant term.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points
- Part C.
Explain why the leading coefficient is not , even though is the coefficient of the very first term written in the ORIGINAL (non-standard) form of .
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
The value of a polynomial does not change when its terms are reordered, but which term counts as its degree, leading term, or leading coefficient all depend on finding the highest-degree term first.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part A
List the exponent that belongs to each of the four terms, then sort the terms from the largest exponent down to the smallest, keeping each term's own sign attached to it.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
Look at which term of , once it is sorted by degree, carries the highest power of . That term, not the one written first in the unsorted original, is the one whose coefficient counts as leading.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
Degree ; leading term ; leading coefficient ; constant term .
Part C
The leading coefficient belongs to the term of HIGHEST degree, not to whichever term happens to be written first. Once is in standard form, the highest-degree term is , so the leading coefficient is ; is only the coefficient of the degree- term .
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
The four terms have degrees , , , and (reading as and as ). Sorting from the highest degree down to the lowest, with each term keeping its own sign:
Only the ORDER of the terms changed; the value of at any is the same as it was before.
Part B
Standard form puts the highest-degree term first, so each feature can be read straight off it:
The degree of is the largest of these four, . The leading term is that degree- term, , so the leading coefficient is . The constant term, the term, is .
Part C
The leading coefficient is defined by DEGREE, not by writing order. In the original expression, the first term written down happens to be , whose coefficient is , but only has degree ; it is nowhere near the highest power present.
Once is sorted into standard form,
the term of highest degree is visibly , so the leading coefficient is its coefficient, . Reading '' off as the leading coefficient mistakes the first-written term for the highest-degree term, exactly the trap that writing a polynomial in standard form before naming anything is meant to avoid.
In one line
In standard form, , which has degree , leading term , leading coefficient , and constant term ; the leading coefficient is rather than because is only the coefficient of the degree- term, not the highest-degree term.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Lists all four terms in descending order of degree. . Worth 2 points.
Carries each term's own sign and coefficient through unchanged while reordering. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 3 points
Names the degree as the largest exponent actually present in the polynomial. . Worth 1 point.
Identifies the leading term together with its coefficient, distinguishing the coefficient from the exponent. . Worth 1 point.
Names the constant term correctly. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Explains that the leading coefficient belongs to the highest-degree term, not to whichever term is written first. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Identifies which term of the ORIGINAL expression is easiest to mistake for the leading term, and correctly names that term's own degree rather than assuming it is the highest one. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
2. What survives an addition, and why . Foundational, 10 points. Question 2 of 5.
Add .
- Part A.
Write the sum in standard form, showing which terms you combined.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Identify which power of appears in only the FIRST polynomial, which power appears in only the SECOND, and which two powers appear in both and therefore combine.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points
- Part C.
However the coefficients had come out, the sum of these two polynomials was guaranteed to be a polynomial itself. Explain why, referring to what addition does to each term's exponent and to each term's coefficient.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
Work through the two polynomials degree by degree: for each power of that appears, ask whether it shows up in the first polynomial, the second, or both.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part A
A plus sign in front of a parenthesis leaves everything inside it unchanged; erase the parentheses and gather the powers that match each other.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
A polynomial's definition asks only two things of every term: a whole-number exponent that is not negative, and a real coefficient. Check whether adding two polynomials can ever break either one.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
The degree- term appears only in the first polynomial and the degree- term only in the second; the degree- terms and the two constant terms each appear in both and merge.
Part C
Adding two terms never changes an exponent, it only merges terms that already share one, and adding two real numbers always gives another real number. Since a polynomial's definition demands only nonnegative whole-number exponents and real coefficients, and addition disturbs neither, the sum must again be a polynomial.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
A leading plus sign changes nothing inside the parentheses, so drop them and group by power:
Only the -terms and the constants have a partner to combine:
The term and the term each came from only one of the two polynomials, so they carry straight down unchanged.
Part B
Compare the two polynomials term by term. The first, , has degrees , , . The second, , has degrees , , .
Degree shows up only in the first polynomial, and degree shows up only in the second, so each of those two terms carries straight down into the sum with no partner:
Degree and degree each show up in BOTH polynomials, which is exactly why the -terms and the constants were the ones that combined in part A.
Part C
A polynomial's definition places two requirements on every term: its exponent must be a nonnegative whole number, and its coefficient must be a real number. Check what addition does to each.
Exponents: combining like terms never changes the shared power, it only merges terms that already have it,
a term with no partner, like or above, simply carries down with its own exponent untouched. Every exponent in the sum is therefore one that was already present, still a nonnegative whole number.
Coefficients: adding two real numbers, whether they are matching coefficients such as and , or any other pair, always produces another real number.
Since neither requirement is ever broken, the sum of and , or of any two polynomials at all, satisfies the definition of a polynomial. That is what it means to say the polynomials are closed under addition.
In one line
; the degree- term came only from the first polynomial and the degree- term only from the second, while the degree- terms and the constants each combined; and the sum is guaranteed to be a polynomial because addition never changes an exponent and never turns two real coefficients into anything but another real number.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Drops the parentheses without changing any sign, since the connecting sign is a plus. . Worth 1 point.
Combines only the pair of terms that share a power, leaving any term with no matching power unchanged. . Worth 2 points.
Adds the two constant terms correctly and writes the whole result in standard form. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 3 points
Correctly sorts each power of present into 'appears in only one of the two polynomials' or 'appears in both', with no power miscategorized. . Worth 2 points.
States, in general terms, why a power that appears in both polynomials is exactly the kind that ends up combined into a single term in the sum. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Explains that combining like terms never changes the shared exponent, and that an unmatched term carries its own exponent down unchanged. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Explains that adding two real coefficients always yields another real coefficient, so both requirements of the definition survive. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
3. Four lines about the degree of a difference . Reasoning, 11 points. Question 3 of 5.
Here is a chain of four lines computing the degree of , each claimed to follow from the line directly above it.
Line 1:
Line 2:
Line 3: Since a difference of two polynomials always keeps the higher of the two degrees, and both polynomials above have degree , this difference has degree .
Line 4: So the leading coefficient of the difference is , the coefficient of the term.
- Part A.
Identify the first of the four lines that is not fully justified. Say exactly what is wrong with it, and give the correct degree of the difference.
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 4 points
- Part B.
Finish the computation correctly: give the fully simplified difference in standard form, and confirm its leading coefficient.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
State the rule for the degree of a difference in a form that is actually always true, not simply 'the larger of the two,' and check that this particular pair of polynomials satisfies the condition for the exception.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
Read the four lines in order and test each one against the line directly above it, not against the final answer. Exactly one line fails to follow from what came before it, and everything before that line is sound.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part A
Compare what Line 3 claims about the degree with what Line 2 already shows about which power of actually survived the subtraction.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
This lesson states the rule for the degree of a difference with a built-in exception. Write that exception out in words, then check whether this particular pair of leading terms triggers it.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
Line 3. Line 2 already shows the terms have cancelled, so the difference has degree , not : the rule that a difference keeps the larger degree holds only when the leading terms do not cancel, and here they do.
Part B
; leading coefficient .
Part C
The degree of a difference is at most the larger of the two degrees, and equals it unless the two share that same degree and their leading terms cancel. Here both polynomials have degree with leading term on each side; subtracting cancels them, so the degree drops to .
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Test each line against the one before it.
Line 1 distributes the minus sign to every term of the second polynomial, correctly: sound.
Line 2 combines like terms from Line 1. The two terms cancel (), the terms give , and the constants give :
That matches Line 2 exactly: sound.
Line 3 is where the chain breaks. It asserts the difference has degree by appealing to 'a difference always keeps the higher of the two degrees,' but Line 2's own expression, , has no term at all: its degree is . Line 3 contradicts the work directly above it. The rule it quotes is not universal; it is guarded, and this pair of polynomials is exactly the exception, since both have degree with the same leading term , which cancels in the subtraction.
Part B
Line 2 already gives the fully simplified difference; nothing further needs combining. It is in standard form,
with degree . Its leading term is , so its leading coefficient is , not the that Line 4 reports.
Part C
The rule that survives every case is guarded, not absolute: the degree of a difference is at most the larger of the two degrees, and drops below it only when the two polynomials share that same degree AND their leading terms cancel.
Check the condition here. Both and have degree , and the leading term of each is . Subtracting lines them up with opposite signs,
so the leading terms cancel exactly. Both halves of the guarded condition hold, which is why the degree drops to instead of staying at .
In one line
Line 3 is the first unjustified line: Line 2 already shows the terms cancelling, so the difference has degree , not , with fully simplified form and leading coefficient . The rule for a difference's degree is guarded: at most the larger of the two degrees, and less than that only when the two share that degree and their leading terms cancel, which is exactly what happens with this pair of degree- polynomials.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Names one specific line as the first that is not fully justified, and clears every line before it as sound, rather than pointing at a step that is in fact correct. . Worth 2 points.
Attaches a reason to the diagnosis by pointing out what the flagged line contradicts in the line directly before it, and reports the corrected degree. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 4 points
Correctly determines the fully simplified difference in standard form, built from whichever earlier lines were already confirmed sound rather than recomputed from scratch. . Worth 2 points.
Names the leading coefficient as the coefficient of the highest-degree term actually present in the simplified expression, not the value the chain's Line 4 asserts. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
States the rule with its exception attached, rather than the unqualified 'larger of the two' version. . Worth 2 points.
Confirms that this pair's leading terms are equal and therefore cancel under subtraction, which is exactly the condition the guarded rule requires. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
4. Profit as a difference of two models . Application, 10 points. Question 4 of 5.
A small business's monthly revenue from selling units of a product is modeled by dollars, and its monthly cost of producing those units is modeled by dollars. Profit is what is left of revenue after cost, .
- Part A.
Write as a single polynomial in standard form.
Model the situation Name your unknown first, then write every other quantity in terms of that one letter. 4 points
- Part B.
Evaluate , and state what the sign of the result means for the business at that sales level.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part C.
Without recomputing , explain why its degree could not have exceeded , using the degrees of and and the guarded rule for the degree of a difference.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Profit is the difference of two modeled quantities, so treat and exactly the way you would treat any two polynomials being subtracted.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Distribute the minus sign across every term of before combining anything, not only its first term.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Substitute into the single simplified polynomial from part A, not into and one at a time.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Compare the leading terms of and directly: do they cancel when one is subtracted from the other, or not?
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
dollars, a profit (a positive value).
Part C
By the guarded rule, 's degree is at most the larger of 's and 's degrees, both , so can have degree at most ; since the leading terms and do not cancel when subtracted, keeps degree exactly, matching part A.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Substitute the two given polynomials and distribute the minus sign to EVERY term of , not only its first:
Combine like terms:
The , the , and the all keep their own sign; only the , , and of had their signs flipped by the subtraction.
Part B
Substitute into the standard-form polynomial from part A, not into and separately:
The result is positive, so at units sold the business has a profit that month.
Part C
and each have degree : their highest powers are and . The guarded rule for a difference says the result has degree at most the larger of the two, here , and drops below that only if the two degree- leading terms are equal and cancel. Check whether they do:
Since the leading terms do not cancel, nothing forces the degree down, and keeps degree exactly, which matches the term found in part A without needing to redo the whole subtraction.
In one line
; dollars, a profit; and is guaranteed to have degree at most because that is the larger of 's and 's degrees, and it keeps that degree exactly because the leading terms and do not cancel when subtracted.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Sets up with the two given polynomials substituted in before doing any arithmetic. . Worth 1 point.
Distributes the minus sign to every one of 's three terms, not only the first. . Worth 2 points.
Combines the like terms correctly and writes the result in standard form. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 3 points
Substitutes into the single polynomial found in part A, rather than into and separately. . Worth 1 point.
Carries out the arithmetic correctly, in particular squaring before multiplying by the coefficient. . Worth 1 point.
States what the sign of the result means for the business, and reports the dollar unit. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
States the guarded rule for the degree of a difference, with its exception attached, rather than the unqualified version. . Worth 2 points.
Checks explicitly whether 's and 's leading terms cancel under subtraction, rather than assuming an answer either way. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
5. Combining three polynomials in two steps . Application, 12 points. Question 5 of 5.
Let , , and . Define .
- Part A.
Compute and write it in standard form.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Using your sum from part A, compute by distributing the minus sign to every term of , and write in standard form.
Carry your own answer forward Continue from whatever trinomial you found for in part A, even if it is not the one above: the credit here is for distributing the minus sign correctly and combining like terms, not for matching one particular expression.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
Compare the degree of with the degrees of , , and individually, and explain, in the guarded terms for the degree of a sum or difference, why 's degree is not simply the largest of the three.
Carry your own answer forward Compare against the degrees your own expressions from parts A and B actually have, even if they differ from the ones above: the point is tracking degree through each step, not matching a specific number.
Compare the two methods Say what each one costs you, and when you would reach for it. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
Work through the two operations in the order they are written, add first and then subtract, and track the degree after each one rather than guessing from the three starting degrees.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part A
Look at the terms of and specifically before you touch anything else: what do their coefficients do when added?
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
The degree of the WHOLE expression is not decided by the three original degrees at once; it is decided one operation at a time, and the first operation already changed what degree is available for the second.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
.
Part C
and each have degree and has degree , yet has degree : the first step cancels 's and 's degree- leading terms before is ever subtracted, so degree never reaches , and the surviving term comes from alone.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Drop the parentheses, since the connecting sign is a plus, and group by power:
The terms cancel completely, since :
Part B
Subtract from the sum found in part A, flipping the sign of every one of its three terms:
Combine like terms, in standard form:
Part C
Read off each polynomial's degree from its own leading term: and both have degree (leading terms and ), and has degree (leading term ). A first guess might say inherits the largest of these, degree .
But the guarded rule for a sum applies at the FIRST step: has the same degree, , in both polynomials, and their leading terms and are opposite, so
and the sum drops to degree , as part A found. That degree- pair is gone before is ever involved, so the second step is really a degree- polynomial minus a degree- one: the guarded rule this time gives degree , the larger of and , with no further cancellation, matching part B's term. The degree of the whole expression is decided step by step, not by looking at the three original degrees , , and taking the largest.
In one line
, and ; even though , , and have degrees , , and , has degree because the first step cancels 's and 's degree- leading terms, leaving a degree- polynomial to combine with in the second step.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Drops the parentheses correctly, since the connecting sign between and is a plus. . Worth 1 point.
Correctly combines every pair of terms that shares a power, whatever the result turns out to be for each power, rather than assuming in advance which powers survive. . Worth 2 points.
Writes the resulting trinomial in standard form with the correct signs. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Distributes the minus sign to every term of , not only its first. . Worth 2 points.
Combines like terms correctly using the sum from part A, and writes in standard form. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 4 points
Correctly reads the degrees of , , and from their own leading terms, and identifies which pair of those three leading terms is the one to check for cancellation. . Worth 2 points.
Explains, using the guarded degree rule at EACH step in turn, why ends at a lower degree than a one-step guess from the three original degrees would give. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-