This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly.
Contact us
Conversion Factors
Learning goals
Build a factor from two equal amounts, so it equals one
Orient the factor so the unwanted unit cancels
Chain several factors when one hop is not enough
Convert a rate with two factors, one per unit
Raise the factor to a power for area and volume
A conversion factor is the number one in disguise
Every unit conversion rests on an equality between two amounts. A foot is twelve inches. A kilometer is
a thousand meters. An hour is sixty minutes. Each such fact, read as an equation, lets you build a
fraction that equals exactly 1, and that fraction is a conversion factor.
Take 1 ft=12 in. Because the two sides are equal, you may write the ratio of one to
the other, and a ratio of equal quantities is 1:
1 ft12 in=1and12 in1 ft=1.
Both fractions equal 1; they are the same fact written two ways. Which one you reach for depends on
the unit you want to cancel, and that choice is the only real decision in the whole method. First,
though, here is why multiplying by such a factor is always allowed.
Why multiplying by a conversion factor keeps the amount the same#
Start from a fact about equal quantities. The statement 12 in=1 ft says that twelve
inches and one foot are two names for the very same length. Divide both sides of that equation by
1 ft, and the right side becomes 1:
1 ft12 in=1 ft1 ft=1.
So the conversion factor 1 ft12 in is not close to 1; it is exactly 1,
because its top and bottom measure the same length. Dividing instead by 12 in gives the other
orientation, 12 in1 ft=1. Every conversion factor is a fraction whose
numerator and denominator name equal amounts, so every conversion factor equals 1.
Now recall the multiplicative identity: multiplying any quantity by 1 leaves it unchanged. When you
multiply a length by a conversion factor, you are multiplying it by 1, so the amount of length cannot
change. What changes is only the label. That is the whole justification: a conversion factor is the
number 1 in disguise, dressed up to trade one unit for another.
The last piece is why the units cancel. A unit behaves inside a fraction exactly as a number does. Just
as 55=1 and a shared factor of 5 cancels from a numerator and denominator, a shared
factor of ft cancels the same way. In 3 ft×1 ft12 in
the ft on top of the first quantity meets the ft on the bottom of the factor. Those
two form ftft=1 and disappear, leaving 3×12=36 carrying the unit
in. You did not delete the foot by decree; it cancelled because a quantity over itself is 1,
the same rule that cancels numbers. This is why lining up the factor so the unwanted unit sits opposite
itself is the entire technique.
∎
Writing a factor both ways and choosing the orientation
A conversion factor comes in two orientations, and only one of them cancels the unit you are trying to
remove. The rule is short: put the unwanted unit on the opposite side of the fraction from where it
sits now. A plain measurement like 7 ft carries its unit on top, so the factor needs that
unit on the bottom; then the two line up as ftft and cancel. Pick the wrong
orientation and nothing cancels, which is your signal to flip the factor over.
Worked example 1Convert 7 feet to inches
Start with the quantity 7 ft and the fact 1 ft=12 in. You want feet to
disappear and inches to appear, so choose the orientation with feet in the denominator,
1 ft12 in. Multiply, and cancel the ft that shows up on top and
bottom:
7 ft×1 ft12 in=7×12 in=84 in.
The foot cancels because ftft=1, leaving inches, so 7 feet is
84 inches. Had you picked 12 in1 ft instead, nothing would cancel and you
would be left with the meaningless ft2/in, the built-in warning that the factor is
upside down.
Check your understanding
You want to convert 48 inches into feet using 1 ft=12 in. Which conversion factor should you multiply by?
The inches must cancel, so inches has to sit in the denominator of the factor, opposite the inches you start with. Only 12 in1 ft places inches on the bottom while using the true equality 1 ft=12 in.
48 in×12 in1 ft=1248 ft=4 ft
Multiplying by 1 ft12 in instead would leave in2/ft, a nonsense unit, which is the sign that the factor is flipped.
Chaining several factors
When no single factor connects your starting unit to your target unit, string several together. Each
factor still equals 1, so multiplying by all of them at once is still multiplying by 1, and the
amount is preserved through the whole chain. You arrange the factors so that every intermediate unit
appears once on top and once on the bottom. That arrangement lets each intermediate unit cancel and
hands you the next unit in line.
Worked example 2How many seconds are in one day?
No single conversion factor turns days straight into seconds, but a chain of familiar ones does the
job. Use 1 day=24 h, then 1 h=60 min, then
1 min=60 s, and line the factors up so each unwanted unit cancels the one before it:
1 day×1 day24 h×1 h60 min×1 min60 s.
Read the units down the line: day cancels the starting day, and h cancels between
the first and second factors. Then min cancels between the second and third, leaving only
s. Now multiply the numbers:
24×60×60=86,400 s.
So a day holds 86,400 seconds. The chain never needed a day-to-second constant; each factor was one
you already knew, and the intermediate units bookkept themselves by cancelling.
Check your understanding
How many minutes are in 3 days? Use 1 day=24 h and 1 h=60 min.
Chain two factors so that days cancels first, then hours cancels, leaving minutes.
3 days×1 day24 h×1 h60 min=3×24×60=4320 min
Stopping after one factor gives 72 hours, and 1440 is the number of minutes in a single day, not three.
Converting rates
A rate such as miles per hour is a fraction with a unit above and a unit below, so it has two units to
convert, not one. Handle each with its own factor: one factor cancels the top unit and installs the new
one, and a second factor does the same for the bottom unit. Because a bottom unit sits in the
denominator, its factor goes in the orientation that cancels a denominator, which usually means
flipping it relative to the top factor.
Worked example 3Convert 30 miles per hour to feet per second
A rate carries two units, one on top and one on the bottom. Converting a rate therefore takes two
factors: one to fix the distance unit and one to fix the time unit. Write the speed as a fraction and
attach both factors, using 1 mi=5280 ft and 1 h=3600 s:
1 h30 mi×1 mi5280 ft×3600 s1 h.
The mi on top cancels the mi in the second factor’s denominator, and the h
in the first denominator cancels the h in the third numerator. What remains is ft
over s, exactly the unit you want. Multiply the numbers, remembering the 3600 divides:
360030×5280=3600158,400=44 ft/s.
So 30 miles per hour is 44 feet per second. Notice the time factor is flipped compared with the
distance factor: hours needed to leave the denominator, so hours went on top of its factor. Miles, in
contrast, needed to leave the numerator, so miles went on the bottom of its factor.
Converting 30 miles per hour to feet per second uses two factors. Line them up so mi meets mi and h meets h on opposite sides of the bar; each cancels as a quantity over itself, leaving feet on top and seconds on the bottom. Then 30 times 5280 divided by 3600 is 44.
Squared and cubed units
Area and volume carry powers of a unit, like square feet or cubic centimeters, and a power changes how
many times you must convert. A squared unit hides two lengths and a cubed unit hides three. The
conversion factor therefore has to be applied once for each hidden length, and that repetition raises
the factor to that power.
Worked example 4Convert 3 square feet to square inches
It is tempting to multiply by 1 ft12 in just once, but that leaves a stray
unit and the wrong number. Square feet means feet multiplied by feet,
1 ft2=1 ft×1 ft, so there are two lengths to convert and the factor
must appear twice:
3 ft2×1 ft12 in×1 ft12 in=3 ft2×(1 ft12 in)2.
Squaring the factor squares both the number and the unit, giving 1 ft2144 in2,
and the ft2 now cancels the ft2 you started with:
3 ft2×1 ft2144 in2=3×144=432 in2.
So 3 square feet is 432 square inches. The factor is still equal to 1, since 12=1, so
squaring it changes nothing about the amount, only how many times the unit gets converted.
Worked example 5Convert 2 cubic yards to cubic feet
Volume raises the same idea one step higher. A cubic yard is three lengths multiplied together,
1 yd3=1 yd×1 yd×1 yd, so the yard-to-foot factor
must appear three times, which cubes it. With 1 yd=3 ft,
2 yd3×(1 yd3 ft)3=2 yd3×1 yd327 ft3.
Cubing the factor turns 3 into 33=27 and turns the unit into ft3, which cancels the
yd3 you began with:
2×27=54 ft3.
So 2 cubic yards is 54 cubic feet. The rule generalizes cleanly: a squared unit needs the factor
squared, and a cubed unit needs it cubed. In the same way, an nth power needs the factor to the
nth, because that is how many separate lengths are hidden inside the unit.
Check your understanding
A tile covers 2 square feet. How many square inches is that? Use 1 ft=12 in.
Because 1 ft2=1 ft×1 ft, apply the length factor twice, which squares it.
2 ft2×(1 ft12 in)2=2×144=288 in2
Using the factor only once gives 2×12=24, the classic mistake of forgetting that area carries two lengths.
Common mistakes
Practice
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.
Longer questions in parts, to be worked out on paper. Progressive hints, the answer on its
own so you can check yourself and try again, then the full worked solution, plus a rubric
to mark your own work against.
A foot was once an actual foot, and towns disagreed about whose. A bolt of cloth measured in one
market came out a different length in the next. A pound of one good was not a pound of another.
Traders carried thick books of local conversions, the way travelers once carried phrasebooks. Being
cheated was a matter of arithmetic, not honesty.
France threw the whole tangle out in the 1790s. A commission of scientists fixed one base unit of
length, the meter. Every other unit was then built a power of ten away from it. A thousand meters
became a kilometer. A hundredth of a meter became a centimeter. Nothing needed looking up any more,
because the name of a unit now announced its size.
That decision is why the metric conversions in this lesson feel so light. Turning kilometers into
meters costs a factor of a thousand and no thought at all. Miles still drag the 5280 they inherited
from older units.
The lightness is convenience, though, and nothing more. Both factors are exactly one, because the top
and the bottom of each name the same length. A decimal system does not make a conversion true; it
only spares you the lookup.