Telescoping Sums: Core practice
10 practice problems for this lesson. Work on paper, use hints when you need them, and check the answer or the full solution when you are ready.
Difficulty: Advanced (beyond the core course) Advanced. This problem set goes beyond core Algebra I. You can skip it.
0 of 10 completed · 0 skipped
Progress saved in this browser.
Progress can't be saved in this browser, so your choices last for this visit only.
-
Problem 1 The closed record
Three real readings satisfy and . Find .
- Hint 1
Adding the recorded differences cancels the middle reading.
- Hint 2
Reverse the direction of the resulting difference.
Answer
.
Full solution
Adding the two equations cancels , giving
Thus .
Reversing the difference changes its sign, so
The three directed changes total , as a closed record should.
Answer
.
Key idea
Differences around a closed chain add to zero because every reading appears with both signs.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 2 The quadratic denominators
Evaluate
exactly, as a fraction in lowest terms.
- Hint 1
Factor the denominator before hunting for a split.
- Hint 2
Each fraction becomes , so line the brackets up.
- Hint 3
Only the first positive fraction and the last negative fraction lack a partner.
Answer
.
Full solution
Factoring gives , and every denominator is nonzero because .
Combining over the common denominator rebuilds that term, so the split
is exact.
Each interior fraction is subtracted in one bracket and added back in the next, so it cancels.
The survivors are the leading and the final , giving
As a check, the first two terms are , matching the survivors of those two brackets.
Answer
.
Key idea
Factoring a quadratic denominator can reveal the difference of reciprocals that makes a sum telescope.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 3 The boundary reading
A record satisfies . It also gives , , and . Find .
- Hint 1
List the positive and negative subscripts in the sum.
- Hint 2
The interior readings cancel two positions apart.
- Hint 3
Use the four boundary readings to form one equation.
Answer
.
Full solution
The positive readings run from through , while the negative readings run from through .
Canceling the interior readings gives
Substitution gives
Thus .
The surviving total checks as
Answer
.
Key idea
A gap of two leaves two boundary readings at each end, even when the interior readings are unknown.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 4 The omitted radical
A report should add the terms for the integers through , but it omits the term with . Find the reported total in simplified exact form.
- Hint 1
Find the complete total by cancellation.
- Hint 2
Write out the single omitted term.
- Hint 3
Subtract that entire term, keeping its signs.
Answer
.
Full solution
The complete total cancels to .
The omitted term is .
Therefore the reported total is
Simplifying gives
As a check, the two retained blocks cancel separately to and , giving the same result.
Answer
.
Key idea
A missing term breaks a cancellation chain, so subtract it explicitly or total the retained blocks separately.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 5 The painted strips
A square sheet has side length centimeters. Its side is increased by centimeter at a time until it reaches centimeters, and each increase paints the strip of material it adds. Write the painted total as a sum of differences of consecutive squares, then find that total in square centimeters and state how many strips are painted.
- Hint 1
Each increase adds the new square area minus the old square area.
- Hint 2
Chain the strips and look for each square area appearing with both signs.
- Hint 3
Count the stages carefully: the first strip carries the side from to .
Answer
square centimeters, painted in strips.
Full solution
Raising the side from to adds a strip of area , because the larger square contains the smaller one.
The painted total is therefore
Each meets the of the next strip, so every interior square area cancels.
Only the largest square area and the smallest survive, leaving
square centimeters.
The stages run from to , so strips are painted.
As a check, the strip areas are the odd numbers , whose average is , and
Answer
square centimeters, painted in strips.
Key idea
Differences of consecutive square areas telescope, so a long chain of added strips collapses to the final area minus the starting area.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 6 The target total
Let for positive integers . Find the least for which , and explain why no smaller index works.
- Hint 1
Split into half of .
- Hint 2
Keep two positive boundary fractions and two negative ones.
- Hint 3
The totals increase, so compare the indices on either side of the crossing.
Answer
.
Full solution
Combining fractions verifies
The gap of two cancels each negative fraction two terms later.
The positive survivors total .
The outer factor halves those survivors and the leftover tail alike, so the halved survivors give .
Define the remaining tail by
Then , so the target requires .
At , , which exceeds
At , , which is less than
Every added term is positive, so all earlier totals are smaller.
Hence is the least index.
Answer
.
Key idea
For positive telescoping terms, a strict target can be located by comparing the surviving tails at neighboring indices.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 7 The nine differences
For a positive integer , nine differences satisfy
Find and check it in the uncanceled boundary expression.
- Hint 1
The nine differences leave one square root at each end.
- Hint 2
Isolate one square root before squaring.
- Hint 3
Check the result in the boundary equation because squaring may introduce unwanted values.
Answer
; .
Full solution
Cancellation leaves
Isolating the first root gives
Both sides are positive.
Squaring gives
Therefore , so .
In the original boundary expression, , and the indices through contain exactly nine terms.
Answer
; .
Key idea
Telescoping can turn an unknown starting position into an equation involving just the two boundary values.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 8 The raised reading
For , let . One reading , with , is increased by wherever it appears. A student says is unchanged. Is this correct? Explain.
- Hint 1
Locate both appearances of the changed reading.
- Hint 2
It appears negatively in one difference and positively in the next.
- Hint 3
Compare the changes to those two terms.
Answer
Yes; is unchanged.
Full solution
The reading appears in and in .
Increasing it by lowers the first difference by and raises the second by .
The net change is
Equivalently, the sum is , and neither boundary reading changed.
Answer
Yes; is unchanged.
Key idea
Changing an interior reading consistently in both neighboring differences leaves a telescoping total unchanged.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 9 The logarithm chain
Decide whether has a finite total, justifying your verdict from its partial sums.
- Hint 1
The logarithm of a quotient is a difference of two logarithms.
- Hint 2
After that rewrite, the interior logarithms cancel in pairs.
- Hint 3
Compare the totals at , at and at before deciding.
Answer
No finite total; the partial sums are .
Full solution
Write for the total of the first terms.
The quotient rule writes each term as the difference
a mirror telescope with
Every interior logarithm is added once and subtracted once, so only the two boundary values survive, giving
Since , the partial sums are
Now test whether that surviving expression settles as climbs.
For any positive integer , taking gives , so the partial sums pass every whole number instead of approaching one fixed value.
The infinite sum therefore has no finite total, even though each term shrinks toward zero as moves toward .
Answer
No finite total; the partial sums are .
Key idea
Terms shrinking toward zero do not by themselves give a finite infinite total; what must settle is the surviving boundary expression.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 10 The student's shortcut
Let for positive integers . A student says because the interior cancels. Decide whether the claim is correct and give the exact sum.
- Hint 1
Write the finite partial sum first.
- Hint 2
Determine what the final boundary reading approaches.
- Hint 3
Subtract that limiting boundary value from the initial reading.
Answer
The claim is false; the sum is .
Full solution
The finite sum is .
Here and , so
The fraction tends to zero, and the partial sums approach .
The final reading itself approaches , not zero, so discarding the entire final reading would incorrectly give .
Answer
The claim is false; the sum is .
Key idea
When the final boundary reading settles, a telescoping infinite total subtracts that limiting value, which need not be zero.
- Hint 1