Factoring by Grouping: Free Response
5 questions in parts, 55 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.
-
1. Two pairs, one shared binomial . Foundational, 10 points. Question 1 of 5.
A four-term polynomial can often be factored by splitting it into two pairs, each with its own greatest common factor, and watching for a binomial the two pairs share. Work through that process on .
- Part A.
Split into its first two terms and its last two terms, and factor the greatest common factor out of each pair separately.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Using the binomial that both pairs in part A left behind, write the complete factorization of , and check it by expanding your answer back out.
Carry your own answer forward Factor out whichever binomial your two pairs in part A actually shared, even if it is not the expected one, and let the expansion check tell you whether it is right.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
State, in general terms, the one condition the two pairs' leftover binomials must satisfy for grouping to produce any factorization at all, and say what a student should try next if the first pairing does not meet it.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Grouping works because a binomial can be a common factor exactly the way a number can. Before you factor anything, think about what you are hoping the two pairs will end up having in common.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
For each pair, ask what power of divides both terms, and separately what number divides both terms; those give you the two greatest common factors.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Once the two pairs show the same binomial, that binomial comes out front, and whatever is left beside it inside becomes the other factor.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Think about what would happen if the two leftover pieces from part A had not matched each other. The fix for that situation is not to give up on the polynomial after one try.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
The first pair factors as and the second pair factors as .
Part B
.
Part C
The two pairs must leave behind the exact same binomial. If they do not, reordering or re-pairing the four terms is the next move, since one failed pairing does not by itself mean the polynomial never groups.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Group the first two terms and the last two terms.
The first pair shares : . The second pair shares : .
Part B
Both pairs from part A carry the same binomial, so it factors out in front.
Expanding checks the answer: , the original polynomial.
Part C
Factoring each pair only sets up the method; grouping finishes only when the two leftover pieces are the identical binomial, since that is exactly what the distributive property needs:
If the first pairing leaves two different binomials, that particular pairing has failed, but the polynomial has not necessarily failed: reordering the four terms, most often into descending order by degree, or trying a different pairing, can still produce a match. Only after checking the reasonable pairings is it fair to conclude the polynomial does not group at all.
In one line
, reached by grouping the pairs into and and factoring out the shared binomial; grouping works whenever some pairing of the four terms leaves an identical binomial behind, and reordering or re-pairing is the fix when the first attempt does not.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Identifies the correct greatest common factor of each pair separately, rather than a partial or incorrect factor. . Worth 2 points.
Writes both factored pairs correctly, ready to compare their leftover binomials. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Factors the shared binomial out of the two pieces from part A, rather than stopping at the grouped-but-unfactored line. . Worth 2 points.
Expands the resulting product back out and confirms it reproduces the original four-term polynomial term by term. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
Names the general condition correctly: the two pairs must leave behind the identical binomial, tied to why the distributive property needs that match. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
States the correct next step when the condition fails on the first attempt (reorder or re-pair), rather than concluding immediately that the polynomial cannot be factored. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
2. Splitting first, solving second . Application, 11 points. Question 2 of 5.
Apply the AC method to : split the middle term, group, and factor. Then use that factorization to solve the equation it came from.
- Part A.
Factor by the AC method: find the two numbers the split needs, rewrite the middle term with them, then group and factor.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Use your factorization from part A to solve by the zero-product property. Report every solution.
Carry your own answer forward Solve using whichever two factors your own part A produced, even if they are not the expected pair.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Redo the split from part A with the same two numbers written in the opposite order, group again, and compare the result to part A. Does the order in which the split pieces are written change the final factorization, and why or why not?
Carry your own answer forward Use the same two numbers your part A search found, just written in the reverse order; the comparison holds regardless of which specific pair you found.
Compare the two methods Say what each one costs you, and when you would reach for it. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
This trinomial has a leading coefficient other than , so a single number search is not enough. Two conditions have to hold on the same pair of numbers at once.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
List the ways to write as a product of two positive integers, and check each pair's sum against before you split anything.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Setting a product of two factors equal to zero gives two separate equations, one from each factor. Solve both all the way through, and do not let the second one round off to a whole number by mistake.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Try the split with the two pieces swapped and carry the grouping all the way through, rather than assuming the answer from how addition usually behaves.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
or .
Part C
No: writing the split in the opposite order still groups to the identical factorization, because addition does not care about the order of the two pieces being added, so the four-term polynomial being grouped is the same expression either way.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Here , , , so the split needs two numbers with product and sum . Those numbers are and , since and . Split the middle term:
Group and factor each pair:
Part B
Set each factor from part A equal to .
Both values solve the original equation; neither factor is dropped.
Part C
Reversing the order gives
Grouping this the same way: , the same two factors as part A, just written in the other order. The middle term is the sum , and addition gives the same total no matter which piece is written first, so the four-term line itself is unchanged in value, only in the order its two middle terms are listed. Grouping a rearranged sum of the same four terms cannot change what it factors to.
In one line
, giving the solutions and ; splitting the middle term in the opposite order regroups to the identical factorization, since addition does not care which of the two pieces is written first.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Finds a pair of numbers satisfying BOTH conditions the AC method requires: their product equals and their sum equals . . Worth 2 points.
Splits the middle term with that pair, groups the resulting four terms, and factors each pair to reach the complete factorization. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 4 points
Sets each factor from part A equal to separately, rather than solving only one of them. . Worth 1 point.
Solves each resulting linear equation correctly, including the one that produces a fraction. . Worth 2 points.
Reports BOTH solutions as the complete solution set, not only the integer one. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Confirms, by actually redoing the split and grouping, that the two orders lead to the identical factorization rather than only asserting that they do. . Worth 2 points.
Explains that the reason is addition not depending on order, connecting it to why the four-term line itself is unchanged by swapping which split piece is written first. . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
3. Grouping, tested twice . Foundational, 11 points. Question 3 of 5.
Two four-term polynomials appear below. Treat each one on its own merits, since they do not necessarily behave alike.
- Part A.
Factor by grouping. Watch the sign on the second pair.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Determine whether factors by grouping. Test more than one pairing before you decide, and state your conclusion precisely.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points
- Part C.
Using what you found in parts A and B, explain, in terms of what you actually check at each attempted pairing, what separates a four-term polynomial that groups from one that does not.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
These two polynomials look alike on the surface, but grouping does not promise to work on every four-term expression. Do the same first move on both: pair the first two terms and the last two, and see what each pair's greatest common factor actually is.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Look hard at the sign the second pair starts with. Factoring out a positive number here leaves a binomial that will not match the first pair; try a negative factor instead.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
One failed pairing does not settle anything by itself. There are only three genuinely different ways to split four terms into two pairs; try more than the first one before you conclude anything.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Think about what actually happens to the two leftover pieces once each pair's greatest common factor is removed, in the case that worked and in the case that did not.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
It does not factor by grouping: every pairing of the four terms leaves two different binomials, so no arrangement produces a shared factor to pull out.
Part C
A pairing succeeds exactly when the two leftover pieces, after each pair's own greatest common factor is pulled out, are the identical binomial; that match, or mismatch, is the actual test, not any property of the individual coefficients on their own.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Group the first two and last two terms.
The first pair gives . The second pair, , leads with a negative term: factoring out would give , which does not match , so factor out instead.
Both pairs now carry :
Expanding checks it: .
Part B
Try the terms in their given order first.
The leftover binomials, and , do not match. Try pairing the first and third terms with the second and fourth:
The second group has no common factor beyond , and it is not of the matching form either, so this pairing fails too. The remaining pairing, the first and fourth terms with the second and third, fares no better: shares no common factor with that could line up as a matching binomial. With all three ways of splitting four terms into two pairs tried, none leaves a shared binomial, so this polynomial does not factor by grouping.
Part C
Every pairing produces two leftover pieces once each pair's greatest common factor is removed. The test that decides success has nothing to do with the size of the coefficients or how many terms cancel; it is simply whether those two leftover pieces are the same binomial.
When the pieces match, the identical binomial factors out by the distributive property. When they do not match, as in every pairing tried, there is nothing to pull out, and no amount of further arithmetic manufactures a shared factor. Checking every reasonable pairing this way is the only honest route to concluding that a polynomial fails to group, rather than assuming it after one attempt.
In one line
, reached by factoring a negative out of the second pair so its binomial matched the first; does not factor by grouping, since none of the three ways to pair its four terms leaves a shared binomial; what decides success either way is whether the two pairs' leftover pieces, after each pair's own greatest common factor is removed, turn out to be the identical binomial.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Recognizes that the second pair leads with a negative term and factors out a negative, rather than a positive, greatest common factor. . Worth 2 points.
Completes the factorization with matching binomials and confirms it by expanding. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 4 points
Tests at least two distinct pairings of the four terms, not just the first one written down, before drawing a conclusion. . Worth 2 points.
States the verdict as a fact about grouping specifically, not as a claim that the expression can never be factored by any method. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part C 3 points
Names the actual test applied at each pairing, whether the two leftover pieces form the identical binomial, not merely that some pairings succeed and others fail. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Connects the explanation to both parts A and B without needing to redo either computation. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
4. Every step correct, until one is not . Reasoning, 12 points. Question 4 of 5.
Here is an attempt to factor by the AC method, written one step at a time.
Step 1 restates the trinomial: .
Step 2 computes and picks and , since .
Step 3 splits the middle term with that pair: .
Step 4 groups and factors each pair: .
Step 5 concludes: .
That final claim does not check out, but the step where the reasoning first goes wrong is not the same as the step where the wrong answer first appears.
- Part A.
Identify the step above that is the first one not fully justified (not necessarily the step where a false equation first appears), and say exactly what check it skipped. Then name a pair of numbers that actually satisfies both of the AC method's requirements.
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 4 points
- Part B.
Using the pair you named in part A, redo the split, the grouping, and the factorization correctly, and check your result by expanding it back out.
Carry your own answer forward Use whichever pair of numbers you named in part A, even if it is not the expected one, and carry it through the split and the grouping.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 5 points
- Part C.
In general, when the AC method's split turns up two numbers that add to but the grouping step leaves mismatched binomials, what does that mismatch actually reveal about the numbers chosen, and what should be done next?
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Every individual computation shown is carried out correctly on its own terms. The trouble is a claim made early on that only checked half of what it needed to.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
The AC method's search has two separate requirements on the same pair of numbers, not one. Check both of them, separately, for the pair used in the second step.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Once you have a pair that truly satisfies both conditions, the split, the grouping, and the sign-minding all follow the same pattern as any other AC-method problem.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Ask what it actually means, about the pair that was chosen, when the two leftover pieces after grouping do not match each other.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
Step 2. It checked only that matches the sum , but never checked whether and multiply to ; in fact . A pair that satisfies both conditions is and .
Part B
.
Part C
A mismatch reveals that the chosen pair failed the other required condition, their product is not , even though it satisfied the sum; the correct response is to return to the search for a pair meeting both conditions, not to force a factorization out of pieces that do not match.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Test each step for what it actually establishes.
Step 1 is the trinomial itself: nothing to check. Step 2 claims and are the numbers the AC method needs, backed only by . The AC method needs a pair satisfying two conditions at once, sum and product , and Step 2 never checks the second one.
So Step 2 is the first step that is not fully justified, well before Step 5's false conclusion. Steps 3 and 4 carry out correct algebra on the wrong pair from Step 2, which is why they do not themselves contain an error, only an unhelpful result: the mismatched binomials and are the visible symptom of Step 2's mistake, not a new mistake of their own. A pair that actually satisfies both conditions is and , since and .
Part B
Split the middle term with the pair from part A.
Group and factor each pair, minding the sign on the second one:
Expanding checks it: , the original trinomial.
Part C
Grouping only completes when the two leftover pieces are the identical binomial. A pair must satisfy both conditions at once:
If the pieces after grouping are not the identical binomial, that is not a sign to keep pushing forward with what is at hand; it is evidence that the split itself was wrong, specifically, that the numbers used, while adding to , must not actually multiply to , since a pair meeting both conditions is exactly what guarantees the four terms will group. The correct response is to go back to the search for numbers with product and sum , check both conditions this time, and split again with the corrected pair, rather than combining mismatched pieces into an invalid product.
In one line
Step 2 is the first unjustified step: it checked only that and never checked that the pair also multiplies to (it does not). The pair and satisfies both conditions, and splitting with it gives . A mismatch after grouping means the chosen pair failed the product condition, and the fix is to search again for a pair meeting both requirements.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Names ONE specific step as the first that is not fully justified, and confirms every step before it is sound, rather than pointing at the step where a false equation first appears. . Worth 2 points.
States precisely which of the AC method's two required conditions the flagged step left unchecked, and supplies a pair of numbers that satisfies both conditions. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 5 points
Splits the middle term using the pair named in part A. . Worth 1 point.
Groups the four terms and factors out a negative from the second pair so its binomial matches the first, reaching the complete factorization. . Worth 3 points.
Confirms the result by expanding it back out and matching it to the original trinomial. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Explains that a mismatch specifically implicates the product condition, the pair failed to multiply to , not just calls it a generic error. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
States the correct next step: return to the search for a pair meeting both conditions, rather than forcing a factorization from mismatched pieces. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
5. A common factor, then the AC method, all the way to the roots . Application, 11 points. Question 5 of 5.
The expression has three terms, but a common factor and the AC method still take it apart completely. This question carries that factorization through to its roots.
- Part A.
Factor the greatest common factor out of , and then find the two numbers the AC method needs to split the middle term of what remains.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Using the greatest common factor and the pair of numbers from part A, group and factor the remaining trinomial completely, minding the sign in the second pair, and give the complete factorization of the original expression, including the factor pulled out in part A.
Carry your own answer forward Split the middle term with whichever pair your part A search produced, and carry the common factor from part A through to your final answer.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
Use the complete factorization to solve , reporting every solution, and state how many solutions there are in total.
Carry your own answer forward Use your own complete factorization from part B, including all of its factors, to set up the equations.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
This expression is not four terms to begin with, but the same two tools from this lesson still apply in sequence: pull out what every term shares, then treat what is left as its own factoring problem.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Look at all three original terms together to find their shared factor before you touch the middle-term split. Then treat the trinomial left behind exactly like any other AC-method problem.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
The second pair inside the parentheses starts with a negative term. The same sign rule from earlier in this lesson still applies here.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
A product is zero when any of its factors is zero, and this product has three factors, not two. Do not stop after checking only the binomials.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
, and the split needs two numbers with product and sum : and .
Part B
.
Part C
, , and : three solutions in total, one from each of the three factors.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Every term shares a factor of .
Inside the parentheses, , , , so . Two numbers with product and sum are and , since and .
Part B
Split the middle term with the pair from part A.
Group, factoring a negative out of the second pair so its binomial matches the first:
Carrying the from part A back through gives the complete factorization:
Part C
Set every factor of equal to in turn, including the leading , not only the two binomials.
Three different factors give three different solutions.
In one line
, reached by pulling out the common factor and then applying the AC method (with the sign trap) to what remained; setting each of the three factors to zero gives , , and .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Pulls the correct greatest common factor out of all three terms before doing anything else. . Worth 1 point.
Computes for the remaining trinomial correctly and finds a pair satisfying both the product and the sum conditions. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 4 points
Factors out a negative from the second pair so its binomial matches the first, rather than a positive one. . Worth 2 points.
Completes the factorization and carries the common factor from part A into the final answer, rather than dropping it. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 4 points
Sets ALL THREE factors equal to zero, including the leading factor pulled out in part A, not just the two binomial factors. . Worth 2 points.
Reports all three solutions correctly and states the correct total count. . Worth 2 points.
-