Special Factorizations: Chapter Test
20 multiple-choice questions and 10 free-response questions, drawn from across the chapter and mixed together.
Multiple choice
Answer in any order and change your mind as often as you like. When you submit, your answers lock and every question shows its worked solution.
Free response
10 questions in parts, 95 points in total. Work them out on paper. There are no hints here: reveal each question's answer, worked solution, and rubric when you are ready to mark that one.
Reset the free-response section?
This re-seals every answer you have revealed and clears your flags.
-
1. Comparing two squared binomials . 8 points. Question 1 of 10.
A squared sum and a squared difference are built from the same two pieces and differ only in one sign. Expand both, then track exactly which parts of the result depend on that sign and which do not.
- Part A.
Expand .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Expand .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 2 points
- Part C.
Name the two terms that came out identical in both expansions, and explain why only the middle term's sign changes, tracing it to the sign of the cross-products.
Carry your own answer forward Compare your own two expansions from parts A and B, whatever they came out to; the relationship between them is the point, not the specific numbers.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
.
Part C
The first term and the last term are identical in both. Only the middle term changes sign, because the two cross-products carry the sign of the second term: both positive in the sum, both negative in the difference.
Worked solution
Part A
Square the whole first term, double the product of the two terms, and square the last term.
Part B
Apply the squared-difference pattern to the same two terms; only the middle term's sign changes.
Part C
Line the results up:
The first term and the last term never involve the sign of the second piece, since and are both . The middle term is the sum of the two cross-products , both positive in and both negative in , so only it flips.
In one line
and ; both share the first term and last term , and only the middle term's sign changes, because the cross-products carry the sign of the second term.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Squares the whole first term to and uses the doubled middle term , rather than squaring only the variable or halving the middle. . Worth 2 points.
Computes all three terms correctly, keeping the last term positive. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 2 points
Uses the squared-difference pattern on the whole terms and . . Worth 1 point.
Computes all three terms correctly, keeping the last term positive and only the middle term negative. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Names the first term and the last term as the two shared by both expansions. . Worth 1 point.
Explains the sign change by tracing it to the sign of the two cross-products, not merely stating that the signs differ. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
2. One root, then two . 10 points. Question 2 of 10.
A radical in a denominator is cleared by multiplying by a carefully chosen form of . Which form to use depends on whether the denominator is a single root or a two-term expression.
- Part A.
Rationalize the denominator and simplify: .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Rationalize the denominator and simplify: .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
In part B you cleared the root by multiplying by the conjugate. Explain why the conjugate works where multiplying by another copy of the denominator would not.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
.
Part C
The conjugate has the opposite middle sign, so the two cross-products cancel and leave , a rational number. A copy of squares it, giving , whose middle terms add instead of cancelling, so a root survives.
Worked solution
Part A
Multiply the numerator and denominator by , so the denominator becomes , then reduce.
Part B
Multiply by the conjugate . The denominator becomes a difference of squares, , and the fraction reduces by .
Part C
The conjugate product is a difference of squares:
because the cross-products and are opposites and cancel. Multiplying by a copy instead squares the expression:
where both cross-products are and add, so the radical stays. Only opposite signs force the cancellation.
In one line
and ; the conjugate works because its opposite middle sign makes the cross-products cancel into , while a repeated copy squares the denominator and leaves a radical.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Multiplies numerator and denominator by , the same root in the denominator. . Worth 1 point.
Uses and reduces so no common factor is left. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 4 points
Multiplies numerator and denominator by the conjugate , not by a copy of the denominator. . Worth 2 points.
Evaluates the denominator as and reduces the fraction completely. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
Explains that the conjugate's opposite-signed cross-products cancel to leave a rational , arguing the mechanism rather than asserting it. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Contrasts this with squaring a copy, whose equal-signed cross-products add and keep the root. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
3. Split it, solve it, then swap the split . 10 points. Question 3 of 10.
The AC method rewrites the middle term of a non-monic trinomial as two pieces so the four terms can be grouped. Once it is factored, the equation it came from falls to the zero-product property.
- Part A.
Factor by the AC method: find the two numbers, split the middle term, then group.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Use your factorization to solve . Report every solution.
Carry your own answer forward Solve using whichever two factors your part A produced, even if they are not the expected pair.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part C.
Redo the split from part A with the same two numbers written in the opposite order, group again, and say whether the order the split is written in changes the final factorization, and why.
Carry your own answer forward Use the same two numbers your part A search found, written in the reverse order; the comparison holds whichever pair you found.
Compare the two methods Say what each one costs you, and when you would reach for it. 3 points
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
or .
Part C
No. Splitting as groups to , the same two factors. The order does not matter, because addition does not depend on order, so the four-term polynomial being grouped is the same expression either way.
Worked solution
Part A
With , , , the method needs two numbers with product and sum : those are and . Split and group.
Part B
Set each factor equal to zero.
Part C
Writing the split in the other order gives
the same factorization as part A. The middle term is the sum , and addition gives the same total no matter which piece is written first, so the four-term line has the same value either way and must group to the same result.
In one line
, giving and ; splitting the middle term in the opposite order regroups to the identical factorization, because addition does not depend on which piece is written first.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Finds a pair with product and sum , satisfying both conditions at once. . Worth 2 points.
Splits the middle term with that pair, groups, and factors each pair to the complete factorization. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 3 points
Sets each factor from part A equal to zero separately. . Worth 1 point.
Reports both solutions, including the fractional one, as the complete solution set. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
Actually redoes the split and grouping in the reversed order and reaches the identical factorization, rather than only asserting it. . Worth 2 points.
Explains that the reason is addition not depending on order, so the four-term line is unchanged in value. . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
4. Which ones factor, and which only look like they should . 9 points. Question 4 of 10.
Two-term expressions can be a difference of squares, a sum or difference of cubes, or none of these. Telling them apart, and being precise about what 'does not factor' means, is the whole job here.
- Part A.
Classify and factor and , naming which special form each one is.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Does factor? Answer precisely, and justify your answer from what a product of two real binomials can produce.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
- Part C.
The difference of cubes factors as . Show that its trinomial factor does not factor further over the integers.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
The answer
Part A
, a difference of squares; , a difference of cubes.
Part B
does not factor over the real numbers. It is a sum of squares, and the only candidate, , expands to , a difference, which can never equal for any real .
Part C
An integer factorization would need and . The integer pairs multiplying to are and (sum ) and and (sum ); negatives give a negative sum. None sums to , so it does not factor over the integers.
Worked solution
Part A
The first is a difference of squares, , with opposite-sign factors. The second is a difference of cubes, , factored by SOAP with a single- trinomial.
Part B
A sum of squares has no real linear factorization. The natural candidate is a product of two real binomials , but that expands to a difference:
whose constant term is and can never equal the in . So the claim must be stated with its domain: does not factor over the real numbers.
Part C
To factor as with integers you would need and . List the integer pairs with product and check their sums:
None of them sums to , so no integer pair works and does not factor over the integers.
In one line
and ; does not factor over the real numbers, since can never build a positive constant; and does not factor over the integers, since no integer pair multiplies to and sums to .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Names each form correctly (difference of squares, difference of cubes) rather than only factoring. . Worth 1 point.
Factors both correctly, with opposite signs for the squares and the SOAP signs and single for the cubes. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 3 points
Argues from what can produce that no real factorization gives , rather than asserting it. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
States the verdict with its domain named: does not factor over the real numbers. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Sets the correct test: an integer pair with product and sum at once. . Worth 1 point.
Checks the integer pairs, rules out negatives, and concludes it does not factor over the integers. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
5. Four pieces of one square . 9 points. Question 5 of 10.
A square plot of side length is paved with four rectangular pieces arranged in a two-by-two block: one by piece, two by strips, and one by piece. The area can be found two ways, and they must agree.
- Part A.
Write the plot's total area as a single trinomial by squaring its side length.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 2 points
- Part B.
Add the areas of the four separate pieces and confirm the total matches your trinomial from part A, term by term.
Carry your own answer forward Check the sum against your own trinomial from part A, whatever it came out to; what matters is whether the two routes agree term by term.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 4 points
- Part C.
Suppose only ONE by strip had been used instead of two. Name the area that would be missing, and explain in general why the middle term of a squared binomial always needs two equal strips, not one.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
The answer
Part A
square units.
Part B
The four areas are , , , and , and their sum matches part A. The single piece gives the first square, the corner piece gives the last square, and the two strips together give the middle term.
Part C
The missing area is one strip, . In general the middle term of is because a square of side splits into two equal by rectangles, one along the top and one along the side; leaving out either loses a full .
Worked solution
Part A
The whole plot is a square of side , so its area is . Expand with the squared-sum pattern.
Part B
Each piece contributes one area: , then twice, then .
That is exactly part A, matched term by term: the two strips are what combine into the middle term .
Part C
With one strip, the three pieces total , short of the correct by one strip.
This is general:
The middle term exists because a square of side genuinely splits into TWO equal by rectangles, not one. Counting only one leaves the area short by exactly one , whatever and are.
In one line
The plot's area is , matching the four piece areas term by term; using only one strip would leave the total short by , because a squared binomial's middle term comes from two equal cross-rectangles, not one.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 2 points
Sets the area up as , the square of the side length, before expanding. . Worth 1 point.
Expands to a trinomial with the correct first, middle, and last terms. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Computes the correct area for all four pieces and adds them. . Worth 2 points.
Matches the sum to part A term by term, noting the middle term comes from the two strips together. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
Identifies the missing area as one strip's worth. . Worth 1 point.
Explains in general, not just for this plot, why the middle term needs two equal regions rather than one. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
6. Clearing two roots, and the reason it works . 10 points. Question 6 of 10.
Clearing a two-term radical denominator uses the conjugate, and the reason it works is a pattern from earlier in this chapter. This question uses it twice, then asks you to name it.
- Part A.
Rationalize the denominator and simplify: .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Rationalize the denominator and simplify: .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
Explain why multiplying a denominator by its conjugate always produces the rational number , and name the identity from earlier in this chapter that this is.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
.
Part C
: this is the difference-of-squares identity with and . The cross-terms and cancel, and each squared root becomes a whole number, so no radical remains.
Worked solution
Part A
Multiply by the conjugate . The denominator becomes , which cancels the numerator's .
Part B
Multiply by the conjugate . The denominator becomes .
Part C
The conjugate product is exactly the difference-of-squares pattern with the two roots as and :
The two cross-terms and are opposites and cancel, and squaring a square root removes the radical, so the result is rational for any nonnegative and .
In one line
and ; the conjugate clears the root because is the difference-of-squares identity, whose cross-terms cancel and whose squared roots are rational.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Multiplies numerator and denominator by the conjugate . . Worth 2 points.
Evaluates the denominator as and cancels to leave no fraction. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Multiplies numerator and denominator by the conjugate . . Worth 2 points.
Evaluates the denominator as and reduces both numerator terms by it. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
Argues the mechanism: the cross-terms cancel and each squared root becomes rational, giving , rather than asserting it. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Names this as the difference-of-squares identity applied to the two roots. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
7. Taking a cubic apart . 11 points. Question 7 of 10.
A three-term expression with a leading coefficient is still a factoring problem in two moves: remove what every term shares, then treat what is left with the AC method. The factored form then solves the equation.
- Part A.
Factor completely: .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Use your complete factorization to solve . Report every solution.
Carry your own answer forward Solve using your own complete factorization from part A, including every one of its factors.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part C.
How many distinct solutions does the equation have, and why does the monomial factor pulled out in part A contribute a solution while the bare constant inside it contributes none? Argue from the zero-product property.
Carry your own answer forward Count from your own factorization and solutions in parts A and B, whatever they were.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 4 points
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
, , or .
Part C
Three distinct solutions: , , and . The zero-product property sets each factor containing to zero, and forces ; but the constant is never zero, so it can contribute no solution.
Worked solution
Part A
Every term shares , so pull it out first, then apply the AC method to what remains.
For , and the split pair with sum is and :
Keeping the common factor, the complete factorization is .
Part B
Set each variable factor of equal to zero.
Part C
The complete factorization has three factors that contain : , , and . The zero-product property makes the product zero exactly when one of these is zero, giving three distinct values.
The factor contributes because it contains ; the bare constant inside it is never zero, so it adds no equation and no solution.
In one line
, reached by pulling out and then applying the AC method; the equation has three distinct solutions , , and , one from each factor that contains , while the constant contributes none.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Pulls out the common factor before applying the AC method, rather than trying to factor the trinomial with the common factor still in it. . Worth 2 points.
Applies the AC method correctly to the remaining trinomial and keeps the common factor in the final answer. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 3 points
Applies the zero-product property to every factor, including the leading , not only the two binomials. . Worth 1 point.
Reports all three solutions, including the fractional ones. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 4 points
States three distinct solutions, tied to the three factors that contain . . Worth 2 points.
Explains from the zero-product property why contributes a solution but the constant does not. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
8. Cubing a sum is not adding two cubes . 8 points. Question 8 of 10.
A claim states that , so that a sum of cubes could be factored just by cubing the sum. This question tests that claim and then applies the real identity.
- Part A.
Disprove the claim : choose one specific pair of numbers, evaluate both sides, and show they differ.
Construct a counterexample Give one specific case, and show it breaks the claim. 3 points
- Part B.
Factor using the correct sum-of-cubes identity.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 2 points
- Part C.
Expand in full, and state exactly which terms it carries beyond , so that the difference found in part A is accounted for.
Carry your own answer forward Account for the specific gap you found in part A, whatever pair you used, using the two extra terms.
Compare the two methods Say what each one costs you, and when you would reach for it. 3 points
The answer
Part A
With and : , but . Since , the claim is false.
Part B
.
Part C
, so beyond it carries two extra terms, and . With , those extra terms are , exactly the gap between and .
Worked solution
Part A
A claim about all numbers falls to a single pair on which it fails, so evaluate both sides on a small pair.
Since , the pair , refutes the claim.
Part B
This is a sum of cubes with and . By SOAP the binomial keeps the plus sign, the trinomial's middle term takes the opposite sign, and the last term is .
Part C
Expand the cubed sum fully:
Comparing with , the cubed sum carries two extra middle terms, and , that the sum of cubes never has. On the pair from part A they total , which is precisely .
In one line
The pair , gives but , so the claim is false; the correct factorization is ; and carries the two extra terms and that account for the gap.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Chooses a specific numerical pair rather than arguing in general terms. . Worth 1 point.
Evaluates both sides correctly on that pair and reaches two different values. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 2 points
Identifies the cube roots and and keeps the binomial's plus sign. . Worth 1 point.
Forms the trinomial with a single middle term of the opposite sign and the correct last term. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Expands correctly into its four terms. . Worth 2 points.
Names the two extra terms and and ties them to the numerical gap from part A. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
9. Correct is not the same as complete . 11 points. Question 9 of 10.
A factorization can multiply back to the original expression and still not be finished, because one of its factors hides another pattern. Telling correct from complete is the point of this question.
- Part A.
A proposed factorization of is . Decide whether it is complete, and if not, finish it.
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 4 points
- Part B.
Factor completely.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
State the general two-step habit for factoring completely, and use to explain how a factorization can rebuild the original expression and still not be complete.
Carry your own answer forward Argue from the expression and the proposed factorization in part A, whatever you concluded about it.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
The answer
Part A
Not complete. does multiply back to , but is itself a difference of squares. The complete factorization is ; is a sum of squares and stops over the real numbers.
Part B
.
Part C
Pull out any common factor first, then re-check every resulting factor for another pattern. multiplies back to , so it is a correct product, but not complete, because is still a difference of squares that factors again.
Worked solution
Part A
Check each factor for another pattern. The product is genuinely correct, since , but is a difference of squares and factors again:
The factor is a sum of squares and does not factor over the real numbers, so the work stops there. The complete factorization is .
Part B
Pull out the common factor first, which uncovers a difference of squares, then factor that too.
Part C
The habit has a fixed order: remove any common factor first, then re-check every factor that remains for another special pattern, and only stop when no factor matches one.
Expanding proves a product correct, but it cannot prove it complete:
The product expands to , yet completeness is a separate question, answered only by testing each factor again. Here still factors, so the correct product was not the finished one.
In one line
is correct but incomplete, since factors again; complete is . Also . The habit is common factor first, then re-check every factor, because expanding proves a product correct but never proves it complete.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Recognizes the proposed product is correct yet incomplete because factors further. . Worth 2 points.
Finishes the factorization and correctly stops at the sum of squares, naming that it does not factor over the real numbers. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 4 points
Pulls out the common factor before checking for a pattern. . Worth 2 points.
Factors the remaining difference of squares and keeps the common factor in the answer. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
States the two-step habit in the correct order: common factor first, then re-check every resulting factor. . Worth 1 point.
Explains that expanding proves a product correct but not complete, using still factoring as the evidence. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
10. The step where the reasoning first breaks . 9 points. Question 10 of 10.
Below is an attempt to factor as a perfect square, written one step at a time.
Step 1 restates the trinomial: .
Step 2 notes the outer terms are perfect squares: and .
Step 3 concludes it is a perfect square: .
Step 4 expands to check: .
Step 5 concludes: .
The final claim is false, but the step where the reasoning first breaks is not the step where the false equation first appears.
- Part A.
Identify the first step that is not fully justified (not the step where the false equation first appears), and say exactly what check it skipped.
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 3 points
- Part B.
Factor correctly.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part C.
Explain in general why matching the two outer terms is not enough to conclude a perfect-square trinomial, and state the third check that actually decides it.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
The answer
Part A
Step 3. It concluded a perfect square from the two outer squares alone, never checking that the middle term equals . The actual middle term is , so the trinomial is not a perfect square.
Part B
.
Part C
Two outer perfect squares only fix the candidate roots and ; they say nothing about the middle. The middle term must independently equal . Without that third check, every trinomial with square outer terms would pass, which is exactly the slip in Step 3.
Worked solution
Part A
Test each step for what it establishes. Steps 1 and 2 are sound: the outer terms really are perfect squares. Step 3 is the first unjustified step: it names the trinomial a perfect square on the strength of the outer terms alone, skipping the middle-term test.
Step 4 is correct arithmetic on the wrong claim (the false equation only surfaces at Step 5), which is why the reasoning breaks at Step 3, before the false line appears.
Part B
It is not a perfect square, so use the AC method: , and the split pair with sum is and .
Part C
Perfect-square outer terms and determine only the candidate roots and . They place no constraint on the middle term, so infinitely many trinomials share the same outer squares while having different middle terms. The pattern holds only when the middle term is exactly , so that equality is the decisive third check.
In one line
Step 3 is the first unjustified step: it called the trinomial a perfect square from the outer squares alone, skipping the check that the middle term equals , when it is . The correct factorization is , and the decisive test for any perfect square is that the middle term equal .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Names Step 3 as the first unjustified step, not Step 5 where the false equation surfaces. . Worth 2 points.
States exactly the skipped check: the middle term must equal , but it is . . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 3 points
Recognizes it is not a perfect square and applies a valid factoring method. . Worth 1 point.
Produces the correct factorization, verifiable by expansion. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
Explains that the outer squares fix only the candidate roots and leave the middle term free. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
States the decisive third check: the middle term must equal . . Worth 1 point.
-