This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly.
Contact us
Rationalizing Denominators
Learning goals
Multiply by a disguised form of one to clear a root
Turn ba into bab
Use the conjugate on a two-term denominator
Recognize the difference of squares the conjugate creates
Simplify the result, reducing factors and any leftover radical
Multiplying by a disguised form of 1
Every rationalizing step is one idea in disguise, which is to multiply the fraction by 1. Any nonzero
quantity divided by itself equals 1, so 22=1 and
2−32−3=1. Multiplying a number by 1 leaves its value untouched, which is
exactly why the move is allowed. What changes is the form of the fraction, not the number it stands for.
The reason a well-chosen form of 1 can clear a root comes down to one fact about square roots. For any
b≥0, a square root times itself gives back the number under it, so b⋅b=b.
Recall the product rule for square roots: for nonnegative numbers, a⋅b=ab,
because the square root of a product is the product of the square roots. Take a=b in that rule so the
two factors are the same:
b⋅b=b⋅b=b2=b.
The last step holds because b is nonnegative, so b2 is b itself. Squaring a square root and
multiplying a square root by itself are the same operation, and both undo the root. This is why a lone
b in a denominator disappears the moment you multiply by another b: the product is the
plain number b, with no radical left.
∎
So the whole method is to pick the form of 1 that turns the denominator into something with no radical.
For a single root the choice is easy, and for a two-term denominator it is the conjugate.
Clearing a single square root
When the denominator is a single square root, the form of 1 to use is that same root over itself. To
rationalize ba, multiply the numerator and the denominator by b:
ba=ba⋅bb=bab.
The denominator b⋅b became b, a whole number, and the root moved up to the numerator
where the convention allows it. Notice that you must multiply the top by b as well; multiplying
only the bottom would change the value.
Worked example 1Rationalize 21 and 53
For 21, multiply top and bottom by 2. The bottom becomes
2⋅2=2:
21=21⋅22=22.
As a check, 21≈0.707 and 22≈0.707, the same number in a
tidier form.
For 53, multiply top and bottom by 5. The bottom becomes 5:
53=53⋅55=535.
The 3 stays out front and the new root 5 rides along in the numerator.
Worked example 2Rationalize and then simplify
Often the fraction reduces after you rationalize, or the radical simplifies first. Take
28. Multiply by 22:
28=282=42.
The 8 and the 2 share a factor of 2, so the fraction reduces to 42.
Now take 126. Here it pays to simplify the radical first, since 12=4⋅3=23:
126=236=33=333=3.
After cancelling the 6 and the 2, the fraction 33 rationalizes to 333,
which reduces to 3. Simplifying 12 up front kept the numbers small.
Check your understanding
Rationalize 35.
Multiply the top and bottom by 3. The bottom becomes 3⋅3=3.
35=35⋅33=353
The root moves to the numerator; it does not vanish, so 35 is a different value.
Clearing a binomial denominator with its conjugate
A denominator with two terms, like 1+2, cannot be fixed by multiplying by a single root:
multiplying 1+2 by 2 gives 2+2, which still has a root. The move that works
uses the difference-of-squares pattern you proved earlier in this chapter.
The conjugate of a two-term expression is the same expression with the sign between its terms
flipped. The conjugate of a+b is a−b, and the conjugate of a−b is
a+b. Multiplying an expression by its conjugate produces a difference of squares, and the
square of a square root is rational, so every radical disappears.
Multiply the expression by its conjugate exactly as you multiply any difference of squares, treating
b as the second term:
(a+b)(a−b)=a2−ab+ab−(b)2.
The two middle products, −ab and +ab, are exact opposites and cancel, which is the same
mechanism that made the difference of squares work. The remaining (b)2 is just b, because a
square root squared returns the number under it:
(a+b)(a−b)=a2−b.
The result a2−b is a plain rational expression with no radical in sight. That is why the conjugate is
the right form of 1 to use: it converts a two-term radical denominator into a rational one in a single
stroke.
∎
To rationalize a+b1, multiply the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate
a−b:
a+b1=a+b1⋅a−ba−b=a2−ba−b.
The denominator is now rational. As always, the conjugate over itself is just 1, so the value is
unchanged. The same conjugate device comes back in a later chapter for a different kind of number. In
this lesson, though, every root is an ordinary square root of a positive number, so a2−b is a plain
real number.
Worked example 3Rationalize 1+21
The denominator is 1+2, so its conjugate is 1−2. Multiply top and bottom by it:
1+21=1+21⋅1−21−2=12−(2)21−2.
The denominator is 12−(2)2=1−2=−1:
1−21−2=−11−2=2−1.
Dividing by −1 flips both signs, so 1−2 becomes 2−1. A quick check:
1+21≈0.414 and 2−1≈0.414.
Check your understanding
What is the conjugate of 3−5?
The conjugate flips the sign between the two terms, leaving each term otherwise unchanged. For 3−5 that turns the minus into a plus.
3−5⟶3+5
Multiplying the two gives 32−(5)2=9−5=4, a rational number.
Worked example 4Two more conjugate denominators
Rationalize 2−31. The conjugate is 2+3, and
(2−3)(2+3)=22−(3)2=4−3=1:
2−31=4−32+3=12+3=2+3.
When the difference of squares comes out to 1, the denominator disappears entirely.
Now rationalize 5+14, where the numerator is not 1. Multiply top and bottom by the
conjugate 5−1. The denominator is (5)2−12=5−1=4, and the numerator is
4(5−1):
5+14=5−14(5−1)=44(5−1)=5−1.
The 4 out front cancels the 4 in the denominator, leaving 5−1. Always look for a common
factor to cancel at the end.
When both terms are square roots
The conjugate trick works just as well when both terms are square roots. The product
(a+b)(a−b) is again a difference of squares:
(a+b)(a−b)=(a)2−(b)2=a−b.
Both squares collapse to whole numbers, so the denominator becomes the plain difference a−b, with no
radical remaining.
Worked example 5Rationalize 5−31 and 7−56
For 5−31, the conjugate is 5+3, and
(5−3)(5+3)=5−3=2:
5−31=5−35+3=25+3.
The denominator 5−3=2 has no radical, and the numerator keeps both roots.
For 7−56, multiply by the conjugate 7+5. The denominator is
7−5=2, and the numerator is 6(7+5):
7−56=7−56(7+5)=26(7+5)=3(7+5).
The 6 over 2 reduces to 3, giving 37+35.
Check your understanding
Rationalize 6−51.
Multiply top and bottom by the conjugate 6+5. The denominator is a difference of squares, (6)2−(5)2=6−5=1.
6−51=6−56+5=6+5
Since the denominator equals 1, the answer is just 6+5. Adding the numbers to get 11 is the difference-of-squares sign slip.
Common mistakes
Practice
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.
Longer questions in parts, to be worked out on paper. Progressive hints, the answer on its
own so you can check yourself and try again, then the full worked solution, plus a rubric
to mark your own work against.
A rule nobody can defend usually had a solid reason once. Keeping square roots out from under a fraction
bar is one of those.
Divide 1 by the square root of two with pencil and paper. You will feel the problem at once. You are
dividing by 1.41421…, and the digits keep arriving. Move the root upstairs and the identical value
asks you to divide 1.41421… by 2 instead. That is a halving anyone can finish in a line.
Generations of students rationalized denominators for that reason alone. Their textbooks printed tables
of square roots in the back. That put the new numerator within easy reach.
Then the reason evaporated. In 1972 a shirt-pocket machine called the HP-35 arrived with a square root
key on its face. Within a few years the slide rule was a museum piece. Both versions of the fraction now
cost one button.
The convention outlived its motive because it quietly does a second job. It gives every answer one
standard shape. Two students can then compare results instead of arguing about them. That is the real
payoff of the conjugate here. Turning 1+2 into the plain number −1 makes the fraction no
faster to evaluate. It does make the answer recognizable.