Rationalizing Denominators: Free Response
5 questions in parts, 59 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.
-
1. Choosing when to simplify first . Application, 11 points. Question 1 of 5.
A denominator that is a single square root always clears the same way: multiply by that root over itself. What changes from problem to problem is whether it pays to simplify the radical BEFORE you rationalize, or to rationalize first and reduce afterward.
- Part A.
Rationalize , then simplify your result completely.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Rationalize , then simplify your result completely.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
State the general test that tells you, before you do any arithmetic, whether it is worth simplifying the radical in a denominator like before you rationalize it. Explain why that test works.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Every one of these fractions clears by multiplying top and bottom by the denominator's own square root eventually. The only real choice is the ORDER: simplify the radical first, or clear it first and reduce afterward.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Check for a perfect-square factor before you multiply anything. If you don't find one, go straight to multiplying top and bottom by .
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
is not like : it hides a factor of inside it. Pull that out of the radical before you touch the fraction at all.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Look back at what made part B's numbers smaller than part A's. The difference was sitting inside the radical before either problem was ever rationalized.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
.
Part C
It is worth simplifying first exactly when has a perfect-square factor greater than , since pulling that factor out shrinks the numbers before you ever multiply. When has no such factor, rationalize directly and reduce afterward instead.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Multiply the numerator and denominator by , since has no perfect-square factor to pull out first.
The and the share a factor of , so reduce the fraction:
Part B
Here does have a perfect-square factor, so pull it out first: .
Now rationalize the smaller fraction that is left:
Part C
Compare what happened in the two parts. In part A, has no perfect-square factor greater than , so there was nothing to simplify before rationalizing; the work was rationalize, then reduce.
In part B, carries the perfect-square factor . Pulling it out first shrank the radical itself:
which turned the fraction into before any rationalizing began, keeping every later number small.
So the test is on the radicand alone, before any multiplying: does it have a perfect-square factor greater than ? If yes, pull it out first. If no, there is nothing to gain by looking for one, so rationalize directly and reduce whatever fraction is left at the end.
In one line
and ; simplifying the radical first pays off exactly when the radicand has a perfect-square factor greater than , which has and does not.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Multiplies the numerator and denominator by , the same root that appears in the denominator. . Worth 2 points.
Reduces the resulting fraction by its common factor, leaving no further common factor between the numerator and denominator. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 4 points
Simplifies into a smaller radical before doing any rationalizing. . Worth 2 points.
Rationalizes the simplified fraction correctly, reaching a denominator with no radical left in it. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
States the test correctly: check the radicand itself for a perfect-square factor greater than , independent of the numerator. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Explains why the test works, connecting it to how it shrank the numbers in one case but had nothing to act on in the other. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
2. The conjugate, built and tested . Foundational, 10 points. Question 2 of 5.
Every rationalizing move on a two-term denominator starts the same way: write down the conjugate, then multiply by it. This question drills that move on its own, before any fraction is involved.
- Part A.
Write the conjugate of , and the conjugate of .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Multiply by the conjugate you wrote for it, and multiply by the conjugate you wrote for it. Simplify both products completely.
Carry your own answer forward Multiply by the conjugates you wrote in part A, whatever they turned out to be.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Suppose that instead of using the conjugate, you multiplied by again. Explain why the denominator would still contain a radical, and name the property of the conjugate's product that a repeated same-sign product does not have.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
A conjugate is defined by one move only: keep both terms, flip the sign between them. Everything else in this question is either applying that move or testing what happens when you skip it.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Look only at the sign sitting between the two terms; the terms themselves, radicals included, never change.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Each product is a difference of two squares. Square each term on its own, then subtract, being careful that the squared radical loses its root sign.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Multiply the two binomials out fully, term by term, and watch what happens to the two middle terms when both factors carry the same sign instead of opposite ones.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
, and .
Part B
, and .
Part C
Squaring gives : the two middle terms are both , so they add instead of cancelling, and the radical survives. Only the conjugate's opposite-signed middle terms cancel, leaving .
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
The conjugate keeps both terms the same and flips only the sign between them.
The second pair works exactly like the first: it makes no difference that both terms happen to carry a radical.
Part B
Each product is a difference of two squares, where the middle terms cancel.
Both products come out as whole numbers with no radical remaining, which is exactly what a conjugate is for.
Part C
Expand the repeated product the same way you would any binomial squared.
Both middle terms carry the SAME sign, so they add together instead of cancelling, and the radical is still there in the result.
Compare the conjugate product:
Here the middle terms carry OPPOSITE signs, and , so they cancel to zero and only the two squared terms remain. That cancellation is the one property a repeated same-sign product never has, no matter what number replaces .
In one line
The conjugates are and ; multiplying each original expression by its conjugate gives and ; and multiplying by itself again gives , still irrational, because the middle terms then add instead of cancelling, the one thing only opposite-signed factors do.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Flips the sign between the two terms in each expression, leaving the terms themselves unchanged. . Worth 2 points.
Applies the same rule to the second expression even though both of its terms carry a radical. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Squares each term correctly with the right sign, so the product is of the form , never . . Worth 2 points.
Squares each radical term correctly, so becomes and not . . Worth 1 point.
States that both results are rational, with no radical remaining, confirming the conjugate did its job. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
Expands the repeated product in full and shows that the two middle terms add rather than cancel. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Names the property the conjugate alone has, that its middle terms are forced to be opposite in sign. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
3. The same expression twice is not the conjugate . Reasoning, 13 points. Question 3 of 5.
A student is asked to rationalize . Instead of building the conjugate, they multiply the numerator and denominator by again, since that is what is already sitting in the denominator. The fraction that comes out is messier than the one they started with, and the denominator still has a root in it, so they conclude that this particular fraction 'will not rationalize.'
- Part A.
Explain what the student did wrong, and say what expression they should have multiplied by instead.
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 4 points
- Part B.
Rationalize correctly.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
The student's approach did not produce a wrong final answer, it produced no rational denominator at all. Explain why multiplying a two-term denominator by an identical copy of itself can never clear a root, no matter which binomial is chosen, while the conjugate always does.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Every number the student wrote down is correct. Read their FIRST move, not their arithmetic, and ask whether it matches the rule for clearing a two-term radical denominator.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
There are two ways to pair with another copy of itself: an identical copy, or a sign-flipped one. Only one of those is called the conjugate.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Use the conjugate this time, not another copy of the denominator. The result should be a difference of two squares, so square each term and subtract.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Expand and side by side, term by term, and compare what happens to the two middle terms in each.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
They multiplied by the denominator itself again instead of by its conjugate, which squares the expression rather than pairing it with a sign-flipped twin, so the middle terms add instead of cancelling. They should have multiplied by the conjugate.
Part B
.
Part C
Squaring any binomial or always produces a middle term that does not cancel, so a root inside survives. Only the conjugate pairs opposite signs, forcing the two middle terms to be exact opposites that cancel, which a repeated same-sign product structurally cannot do.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
The move that clears a two-term radical denominator is multiplying by the CONJUGATE, the same two terms with the sign between them flipped. The student instead multiplied by an identical copy of itself, which squares the expression rather than pairing it with its sign-flipped twin.
Both middle terms are , so they add together instead of cancelling, and is still there. The correct multiplier is the conjugate of the original denominator, whose opposite-signed middle terms would cancel instead.
Part B
Multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate .
The denominator is , and the numerator distributes to :
No common factor divides , , and together, so this is fully simplified.
Part C
Expand the two possibilities in letters, with standing for a radical term. Squaring the same expression gives
which always keeps a middle term . If carries a radical, that middle term still does, so the denominator is never rational. Multiplying by the conjugate instead gives
where the two middle terms are exact opposites, and , forced to cancel by the fact that one factor has the opposite sign from the other. A repeated same-sign product can never reproduce that cancellation, since both of its middle terms are forced to carry the SAME sign as each other, whatever binomial it started from.
In one line
The student multiplied by the same expression again instead of by the conjugate, which squares and leaves a middle term that does not cancel; multiplying correctly gives ; and in general, squaring any binomial keeps a term, while only the conjugate's opposite signs force that term to cancel.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Identifies that the correct move is the CONJUGATE, the sign-flipped twin of the denominator, not a second identical copy of it. . Worth 2 points.
Explains mechanically why repeating the same expression fails, that the two middle terms carry the same sign and add rather than cancel. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 4 points
Multiplies the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the original denominator, not by the same expression again. . Worth 2 points.
Distributes the numerator correctly and computes the denominator as a difference of two squares, reaching a fraction with no common factor left. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 5 points
Argues in letters, not in one example, showing that squaring any binomial always leaves a middle term standing. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Contrasts this with the conjugate product, where the opposite signs force the middle terms to cancel. . Worth 2 points.
-
-
4. Two roots that only sometimes need the conjugate . Application, 12 points. Question 4 of 5.
A denominator built from two square roots looks like it always needs the conjugate. Sometimes it does; sometimes simplifying a radical first removes the second root before the conjugate is ever needed.
- Part A.
Rationalize , and simplify your result completely.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Rationalize , and simplify your result completely.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 5 points
- Part C.
Compare the two denominators, from part A and from part B. State the test that tells you, just by looking at a two-root denominator, whether it will collapse to a single root before you ever need the conjugate.
Compare the two methods Say what each one costs you, and when you would reach for it. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
A two-root denominator is not always what it looks like. Before reaching for the conjugate, simplify every radical in the denominator first, the same habit you would use anywhere else.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Neither nor hides a perfect-square factor, so this denominator is a genuine two-term expression. Multiply by its conjugate.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Look hard at before you do anything else with this fraction. It is not written in simplest form.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Ask what happened to that never happened to or , and think about when two radical terms can be combined by ordinary subtraction, the way like terms can.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
.
Part C
It collapses when the two radicals simplify to multiples of the SAME root, as shares its root with . It does not collapse when both radicals are already in simplest form and share no common root, as and .
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of .
The denominator is , and the numerator distributes to :
Every term shares a factor of , so the fraction reduces all the way down.
Part B
Before reaching for the conjugate, check the two radicals: , so the denominator simplifies to
a SINGLE root instead of two. The problem is now , which clears the ordinary way:
The conjugate would have reached the same value, but simplifying the radicals first made the whole conjugate step unnecessary.
Part C
Simplify each radical in both denominators on its own, before comparing anything.
In , neither nor has a perfect-square factor, so neither radical simplifies, and the two roots share no common radicand. There is nothing to combine, so a true two-term conjugate is needed.
In , the radicand does have a perfect-square factor, so pull it out:
Once that is done, both terms are multiples of the SAME radical , so they combine into one term by ordinary subtraction, the way does for any matching variable.
The test: simplify each radical first. If the two simplified radicals share the same number under the root, they combine into a single root and no conjugate is needed. If they do not, the denominator is a genuine two-term expression, and the conjugate is the only way to clear it.
In one line
, using the conjugate; , because collapses the denominator to the single root before any conjugate is needed; and the test is whether the two simplified radicals share the same number under the root.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Multiplies the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of . . Worth 2 points.
Reduces both terms of the numerator by the common factor left with the denominator, leaving no further common factor. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 5 points
Simplifies and combines it with the other radical term into a single root before doing any rationalizing. . Worth 2 points.
Clears the resulting single root correctly and reduces the fraction completely. . Worth 3 points.
Part C 3 points
States the test correctly: simplify each radical first, then check whether the two share the same number under the root. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Connects the test to both given denominators, explaining why one collapses and the other does not. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
5. When the difference of squares comes out negative . Reasoning, 13 points. Question 5 of 5.
The conjugate always turns a two-root denominator into a rational number, . That number is not always positive, and this question works out what to do when it is not, first on one fraction and then for every fraction of its kind.
- Part A.
Rationalize .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Let and be positive real numbers with . Rationalize in general, then rewrite your result so that the denominator is a positive number.
Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 5 points
- Part C.
Check your general result from part B against your own numbers from part A, and explain why a negative denominator, on its own, does not mean a mistake was made.
Carry your own answer forward Substitute your own numbers from part A into your own general formula from part B, whatever each of them turned out to be.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
The conjugate always clears the root. What it hands you is not always a POSITIVE rational number, and this question is about handling that honestly rather than avoiding it.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Multiply by the conjugate exactly as usual, and then look closely at the sign of before you write your final answer.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Do the same multiplication you did in part A, but with letters instead of numbers, and keep the assumption in view the whole time; it is what pins down the sign of for every case at once.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Plug the specific numbers from part A into the letters of your part B formula, and ask what the word rationalized actually promised: that the denominator has no radical, not that it is positive.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
, valid for every positive .
Part C
Substituting the values from part A into the general formula reproduces part A's result exactly. A negative denominator simply means the first radicand was smaller than the second, since the difference of squares is built that way; it is a correct rational number, not a sign of an error.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of .
The denominator is , a NEGATIVE rational number:
The radical never went away improperly; the difference of squares is simply negative here because .
Part B
Multiply by the conjugate , exactly as for any two-root denominator.
Since , the difference is negative, so this result has a negative denominator for EVERY such and , not just for one chosen pair. To write it with a positive denominator, multiply the top and bottom by , itself a form of :
Because was assumed and never dropped, is positive for every valid choice, so this form always has a positive denominator.
Part C
Substitute and into the general formula from part B.
which matches part A exactly, confirming the general result on a case already worked by hand.
A negative denominator is not a warning sign here. The conjugate's product is DEFINED to be , and whenever the first radicand is smaller than the second, that difference is negative by ordinary arithmetic, exactly as is negative. The fraction is still fully rationalized: no radical remains in the denominator, which is the only thing the word rationalized ever promised.
In one line
; in general, for positive , ; and a negative denominator is not an error, since is negative by ordinary arithmetic whenever , and the fraction is still fully rationalized.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Multiplies the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of . . Worth 2 points.
Computes the difference of squares as a NEGATIVE rational number and carries that sign through to the final answer, rather than dropping it. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 5 points
Multiplies by the conjugate in letters and reaches a denominator of . . Worth 2 points.
Argues that is negative for EVERY valid , not just an example, and rewrites the fraction with a positive denominator using as a form of . . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part C 4 points
Substitutes the specific numbers from part A into the general formula from part B and confirms the two match. . Worth 2 points.
Explains why a negative denominator is not an error, tying it to the assumption that the first radicand is smaller. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-