This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly. Contact us

Raising Equations to Powers

Learning goals

  • Distinguish a reversible step from one that can add solutions
  • Raise to an odd power safely, unlike an even one
  • Write x2\sqrt{x^2} as x\lvert x \rvert, not xx
  • Isolate the radical, raise, solve, then check every candidate
  • Clear two radicals by squaring twice
  • Attach ±\pm when taking an even root of both sides

Operating on both sides of an equation

Solving is a chain of reversible steps. When you add 33 to both sides you can always subtract it again. That means the new equation has exactly the same solutions as the old one: nothing is gained, nothing is lost. The two equations are equivalent. Every basic move you have used to solve linear and quadratic equations was reversible in this way, which is why you never had to look back and check.

Raising both sides to a power breaks the pattern. Half of the guarantee still holds, and it is worth stating on its own before we find the crack.

Raising both sides to a power never loses a solution#

Suppose some value of the variable makes the original equation true, so that its two sides, call them aa and bb, are equal:

a=b.a = b.

Equal quantities are the very same number written two ways. Raising that one number to the nnth power produces one definite result, so ana^n and bnb^n are that same result:

an=bn.a^n = b^n.

The value therefore still satisfies the new equation. Nothing in the argument depended on which power nn we chose, so it holds for squaring, cubing, and every power beyond. Whatever solutions the original equation had, the raised equation still has all of them.

What the argument does not promise is the reverse, that the raised equation has no others. Going from an=bna^n = b^n back to a=ba = b is a separate claim, and it is exactly where new solutions slip in.

The gap is easy to see with squaring. Knowing a=ba = b certainly gives a2=b2a^2 = b^2. But knowing a2=b2a^2 = b^2 does not give back a=ba = b, because a square forgets a sign. Both 33 and 3-3 square to 99, so a2=b2a^2 = b^2 leaves open whether a=ba = b or a=ba = -b. The raised equation quietly carries an extra possibility that the original never contained.

Squaring sends both 3 and negative 3 to 9The numbers 3 and negative 3 on the left each have an arrow, labeled square, pointing to the number 9 on the right. Two inputs map to one output, so the operation is two-to-one.3-39squaresquaretwo inputs collapse to one output
Squaring is two-to-one: the inputs 3 and negative 3 both land on 9. That collapse is why undoing a square can hand back a value the original problem never contained, so squaring both sides of an equation can add a solution you must check.

Why even powers add solutions and odd powers do not

The sign that squaring forgets is the whole story. Cubing does not forget it, and that single difference splits every power into a safe kind and a risky kind. The proof turns on two factoring patterns you already know, the difference of squares and the difference of cubes.

Why an even power can add solutions but an odd power cannot#

Start from the raised equation and ask when it forces the original. Take squaring first. Suppose

a2=b2.a^2 = b^2.

Bring everything to one side and factor with the difference of squares:

a2b2=0(ab)(a+b)=0.a^2 - b^2 = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad (a - b)(a + b) = 0.

A product is zero only when one of its factors is zero, so a=ba = b or a=ba = -b. The squared equation is satisfied by both branches. The branch a=ba = b is the one you wanted, and the branch a=ba = -b is the extra. Any value that fits the extra branch without fitting a=ba = b is a new solution the original equation never had.

Now cube instead. Suppose

a3=b3.a^3 = b^3.

Factor with the difference of cubes:

a3b3=0(ab)(a2+ab+b2)=0.a^3 - b^3 = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad (a - b)(a^2 + ab + b^2) = 0.

The first factor gives the wanted a=ba = b. The second factor cannot open a new branch over the real numbers, and completing the square shows why:

a2+ab+b2=(a+b2)2+34b2.a^2 + ab + b^2 = \left(a + \tfrac{b}{2}\right)^2 + \tfrac{3}{4}b^2.

This is a sum of two squares, and a sum of squares is zero only when each square is zero. That needs b=0b = 0 and then a=0a = 0, which is already the case a=ba = b. So over the reals a3=b3a^3 = b^3 forces a=ba = b with nothing extra. Cubing adds no solutions.

The pattern continues up the powers. An even power, like a square, keeps the sign-forgetting factor and splits into a=ba = b or a=ba = -b, so it can inflate the solution set. An odd power, like a cube, keeps an=bna^n = b^n equivalent to a=ba = b, so it is safe. The dividing line is simply whether the power hides the sign of its base.

This is the practical headline. Raising both sides to an odd power gives an equivalent equation, with the same solutions. Raising to an even power can hand you extra candidates that solve the new equation but not the one you started with. Because even roots (square roots, fourth roots) are cleared by even powers, radical equations are precisely where the extra candidates show up.

The square root of a square

The same sign-forgetting appears from the other direction, in an identity you will use constantly. The symbol x\sqrt{\phantom{x}} returns the principal root, the one that is not negative. So x2\sqrt{x^2} is not simply xx: it is the nonnegative number whose square is x2x^2. If xx is already zero or positive, that number is xx itself. If xx is negative, then xx cannot be the answer (the answer must be nonnegative), and the nonnegative number that squares to x2x^2 is x-x. Both cases are captured at once by the absolute value:

x2=x.\sqrt{x^2} = \lvert x \rvert.

Test it on a negative input. With x=4x = -4,

(4)2=16=4=4,\sqrt{(-4)^2} = \sqrt{16} = 4 = \lvert -4 \rvert,

which is x-x, not xx. Contrast this with squaring after rooting a nonnegative number: there (x)2=x\left(\sqrt{x}\right)^2 = x exactly, because x\sqrt{x} is already nonnegative and squaring it just undoes the root. The order is what matters. Root then square returns xx; square then root passes through x\lvert x \rvert and can change the sign.

Check your understanding

Simplify (6)2\sqrt{(-6)^2}.

Answer choices

Solving radical equations

A radical equation hides the variable under a root, as in 2x1=5\sqrt{2x - 1} = 5. The plan uses everything above. Raising both sides to the power that matches the index clears the root. For a square root, that matching power is even, so you finish by checking, because the even power may have added a candidate. The reliable method is four steps:

  1. Isolate the radical on one side by itself.
  2. Raise both sides to the power that matches the index (square for a square root, cube for a cube root).
  3. Solve the equation that remains.
  4. Check every candidate in the original equation, and discard any that fail.

A candidate that solves the raised equation but fails the original is called an extraneous solution. The name comes from the Latin for “foreign”: it is an outsider the squaring let in. Step 4 is not politeness. It is the step that repairs the one-way logic, because raising to an even power only promised to keep the real solutions, not to reject impostors.

Worked example 1 Solve 4+3x2=94 + \sqrt{3x - 2} = 9

Isolate the radical first. Subtract 44 from both sides so the root stands alone:

3x2=5.\sqrt{3x - 2} = 5.

Both sides are now single quantities, so square them to clear the root:

3x2=253x=27x=9.3x - 2 = 25 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad 3x = 27 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x = 9.

Check the candidate in the original equation, not the squared one:

4+3(9)2=4+25=4+5=9.4 + \sqrt{3(9) - 2} = 4 + \sqrt{25} = 4 + 5 = 9. \checkmark

The check holds, so x=9x = 9 is the solution. Isolating first was essential: squaring while the 44 was still attached would have left a radical behind.

Worked example 2 Solve x+2=x\sqrt{x + 2} = x and catch the impostor

The radical is already alone, so square both sides. The right side becomes x2x^2:

x+2=x2.x + 2 = x^2.

Rearrange into a quadratic and factor:

x2x2=0(x2)(x+1)=0,x^2 - x - 2 = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad (x - 2)(x + 1) = 0,

so the candidates are x=2x = 2 and x=1x = -1. Squaring is an even power, so test both in the original equation x+2=x\sqrt{x + 2} = x.

For x=2x = 2: the left side is 4=2\sqrt{4} = 2 and the right side is 22. They agree, so x=2x = 2 is a genuine solution.

For x=1x = -1: the left side is 1=1\sqrt{1} = 1 and the right side is 1-1. Since 111 \ne -1, the candidate x=1x = -1 fails, so it is extraneous. It is exactly the intruder the theory predicts. It solves the other branch x+2=x\sqrt{x + 2} = -x, since (1)=1=1-(-1) = 1 = \sqrt{1}. But the original equation needs the root to equal xx, and a root is never negative, so xx cannot be 1-1. The only solution is x=2x = 2.

Check your understanding

Squaring x+6=x\sqrt{x + 6} = x gives x+6=x2x + 6 = x^2, whose candidates are x=3x = 3 and x=2x = -2. Which of these are actual solutions of the original equation?

Answer choices

Odd roots behave more gently, because clearing a cube root uses cubing, an odd power that adds nothing.

Worked example 3 Solve 5x+23=2\sqrt[3]{5x + 2} = -2

Here the root is a cube root, so raise both sides to the third power to clear it. Cubing is the matching odd power:

5x+2=(2)3=8.5x + 2 = (-2)^3 = -8.

Solve the linear equation:

5x=10x=2.5x = -10 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x = -2.

A quick check confirms it: 5(2)+23=83=2\sqrt[3]{5(-2) + 2} = \sqrt[3]{-8} = -2. Notice two things. The right side was negative, which is fine, because a cube root happily returns a negative value. And because cubing is an odd power, no extraneous candidate could have appeared, so this equation cannot spring a surprise the way a squared one can. Checking is still cheap insurance, but here it was guaranteed to pass.

Equations with two radicals

When two separate roots appear, one squaring will not clear them both, because a root left next to other terms survives the square. The fix is to square twice. Isolate one radical and square to remove it, which leaves a simpler equation with a single remaining root; isolate that one and square again.

Worked example 4 Solve 3x+1x+4=1\sqrt{3x + 1} - \sqrt{x + 4} = 1

Isolate one radical by moving the other across:

3x+1=1+x+4.\sqrt{3x + 1} = 1 + \sqrt{x + 4}.

Square both sides. The right side is a binomial, so expand it in full, and a single root survives:

3x+1=1+2x+4+(x+4)=x+5+2x+4.3x + 1 = 1 + 2\sqrt{x + 4} + (x + 4) = x + 5 + 2\sqrt{x + 4}.

Isolate the surviving root, then divide the whole equation by 22:

2x4=2x+4x2=x+4.2x - 4 = 2\sqrt{x + 4} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x - 2 = \sqrt{x + 4}.

Square a second time and collect into a quadratic:

(x2)2=x+4x24x+4=x+4x25x=0.(x - 2)^2 = x + 4 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x^2 - 4x + 4 = x + 4 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x^2 - 5x = 0.

Factor out xx:

x(x5)=0x=0  or  x=5.x(x - 5) = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x = 0 \ \text{ or } \ x = 5.

Two squarings mean two chances for an impostor, so test both in the original equation.

For x=5x = 5: 169=43=1\sqrt{16} - \sqrt{9} = 4 - 3 = 1. Correct.

For x=0x = 0: 14=12=11\sqrt{1} - \sqrt{4} = 1 - 2 = -1 \ne 1. This one fails, so it is extraneous. The only solution is x=5x = 5. The intermediate line x2=x+4x - 2 = \sqrt{x + 4} already warned us, since its right side cannot be negative, so xx must be at least 22, which x=0x = 0 violates.

Even roots, the plus-or-minus sign, and rational powers

Raising to a power undoes a root; taking a root undoes a power. When you undo an even power by rooting both sides, the sign-forgetting comes back and you must write ±\pm. Starting from (xh)2=k(x - h)^2 = k with k0k \ge 0, take the square root of both sides using (xh)2=xh\sqrt{(x-h)^2} = \lvert x - h \rvert:

xh=kxh=±k.\lvert x - h \rvert = \sqrt{k} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x - h = \pm\sqrt{k}.

The absolute value is what forces the two signs, and forgetting it is the same mistake as forgetting the negative root. Both signs give genuine solutions here, because taking a root is undoing a square, not performing one, so nothing extraneous is created. The ±\pm sign simply records the two honest answers.

Check your understanding

Solve (x+2)2=9(x + 2)^2 = 9 for all real xx.

Answer choices

The same idea reaches rational exponents. To undo x2/3x^{2/3} you raise to the reciprocal power 32\tfrac{3}{2}, and because the exponent 23\tfrac{2}{3} has an even numerator, a ±\pm appears.

Worked example 5 Solve x2/3=4x^{2/3} = 4

Read x2/3x^{2/3} as (x1/3)2\left(x^{1/3}\right)^2, the cube root of xx then squared. Let u=x1/3u = x^{1/3}, which is defined for every real number and one-to-one. The equation becomes

u2=4u=±2,u^2 = 4 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad u = \pm 2,

where the ±\pm is the even-power sign-forgetting once more. Now undo the cube root by cubing, x=u3x = u^3:

u=2x=23=8,u=2x=(2)3=8.u = 2 \Rightarrow x = 2^3 = 8, \qquad u = -2 \Rightarrow x = (-2)^3 = -8.

Both check in the original: 82/3=(83)2=22=48^{2/3} = \left(\sqrt[3]{8}\right)^2 = 2^2 = 4, and (8)2/3=(83)2=(2)2=4(-8)^{2/3} = \left(\sqrt[3]{-8}\right)^2 = (-2)^2 = 4. So x=±8x = \pm 8. The even numerator is what produced two answers; an equation like x3/2=8x^{3/2} = 8, with an odd numerator, has the single solution x=4x = 4.

The same substitution rescues an equation that is quadratic in x\sqrt{x}. Setting s=xs = \sqrt{x} turns x5x+6=0x - 5\sqrt{x} + 6 = 0 into s25s+6=0s^2 - 5s + 6 = 0, since x=s2x = s^2, and that is an ordinary quadratic to factor. The one extra care is that s=xs = \sqrt{x} is a principal square root, so ss cannot be negative. Discard any negative value of ss before squaring back to x=s2x = s^2. That nonnegativity check is the same watch-the-branch habit the rest of the lesson is built on.

Changing both sides in other ways

Raising to a power is the headline case, but the same logic governs any operation that is not reversible. Two more come up often enough to name.

Multiplying both sides by an expression that can be zero adds solutions. To solve x2x2=4x2\frac{x^2}{x - 2} = \frac{4}{x - 2} you would multiply both sides by x2x - 2 to get x2=4x^2 = 4, whose roots are x=2x = 2 and x=2x = -2. But x=2x = 2 makes the original denominators zero, so the original equation is undefined there; it is extraneous, introduced by multiplying by x2x - 2, which is itself zero at x=2x = 2. Only x=2x = -2 survives. This is the very extraneous-root check you met with rational equations, and it has the same cause as squaring.

Dividing both sides by an expression that can be zero loses solutions. Given x2=5xx^2 = 5x, dividing both sides by xx gives x=5x = 5 and silently discards x=0x = 0, which is a perfectly good solution since 02=500^2 = 5 \cdot 0. The safe move is never to divide by something that might vanish. Bring everything to one side and factor instead:

x25x=0x(x5)=0x=0  or  x=5.x^2 - 5x = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x(x - 5) = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x = 0 \ \text{ or } \ x = 5.

Multiplying by a vanishing expression inflates the solution set, so you check and discard; dividing by one deflates it, so you avoid the division entirely.

Common mistakes

Practice

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)

Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.

Free Response Questions (FRQ)

Longer questions in parts, to be worked out on paper. Progressive hints, the answer on its own so you can check yourself and try again, then the full worked solution, plus a rubric to mark your own work against.

Free response Work it out on paper 5 questions Start →
More practice (optional)

Extra sets, as hard as the Challenge set. Each one opens on its own page.

More resources (optional)

Other explanations of this lesson, if you want a second take.

A bit of history (Optional)

Algebra can be too generous. Work a problem the right way and it may still hand back more answers than the question has room for.

That trouble is old. Around the year 1150, a scholar in India known as Bhaskara II wrote his problems as verse and spoke to the reader directly. A swarm of bees, a troop of monkeys, a bamboo snapped by the wind: each little puzzle became an equation. His methods are the ones you have been using. He moved terms from one side to the other, and he squared both sides to free a quantity trapped under a root.

Squaring is where it gets interesting. In several places he arrives at two values, and then tells the reader which one to keep. One value answers the puzzle. The other is a number the puzzle cannot hold, so he throws it out and says so.

Notice what that habit admits. The algebra is not the final judge of its own output. A step like squaring carries every true answer forward. It makes no promise to leave the fakes behind, so the equation you finish with can be wider than the one you started with. Bhaskara had no theory of two-to-one steps to explain the extra value. He simply tested it against the question, and dropped it.

Step 4 of this lesson is that old habit written down as a rule. Putting each candidate back into the original equation is how you learn which ones the question can hold.