Raising Equations to Powers: Free Response
5 questions in parts, 58 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.
-
1. Solving a radical equation and testing the candidate . Foundational, 12 points. Question 1 of 5.
Consider the equation .
- Part A.
Isolate the radical, then raise both sides to the matching power and solve for the candidate value of .
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part B.
Substitute the candidate from part A into the ORIGINAL equation, , not the squared one, and report whether the two sides agree.
Carry your own answer forward Use whichever candidate you found in part A; the check matters more than matching a specific value.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Explain, in general terms tied to the type of operation used to clear the radical, why the check in part B could not have been skipped, no matter how it turned out.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
This equation follows the same isolate, raise, solve, check pattern used throughout the lesson; work through each stage in order.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Get the radical by itself on one side before you square anything; only then does squaring clear it cleanly.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Plug the candidate back into the version of the equation that still has the radical in it, not the squared version.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Ask which kind of power you used to clear the radical, and recall what that kind of power can and cannot guarantee about the solution set.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
Both sides equal , so the candidate checks.
Part C
Squaring is an even power, which can add a solution that satisfies the squared equation without satisfying the original one, so only substitution into the original decides a candidate's fate.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Subtract from both sides to isolate the radical:
Both sides are now single quantities, so square them to clear the root:
Part B
Substitute the candidate into the original equation:
The left side matches the right side, so the candidate satisfies the original equation.
Part C
Isolating and squaring turned the original equation into a new one, and squaring is an even power. An even power can produce or from a single squared statement, so the squared equation can be satisfied by a value the original never was:
That this particular candidate happened to check does not mean skipping the check would have been safe in general; only substitution into the ORIGINAL equation, never the squared one, can tell a genuine candidate from an impostor.
In one line
Isolating and squaring gives the candidate , which checks in the original equation since both sides equal . The check was necessary because squaring is an even power that can introduce a solution the original equation does not have, even though this particular candidate turned out to be genuine.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 5 points
Isolates the radical by subtracting the constant from both sides before raising to a power. . Worth 2 points.
Squares both sides correctly and solves the resulting linear equation for the candidate value. . Worth 2 points.
Identifies the value found as a candidate rather than a confirmed solution of the original equation. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Substitutes the candidate into the ORIGINAL equation, not the squared equation from part A. . Worth 2 points.
Correctly evaluates the left side and compares it with the right side. . Worth 1 point.
States plainly whether the two sides agree and what that means for the candidate. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
States that squaring is an even power capable of introducing a solution the original equation does not have. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Connects that fact to why substitution into the original equation, rather than trusting the squared one, is the only way to decide. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
2. Solving an equation with two radicals . Application, 12 points. Question 2 of 5.
Consider the equation .
- Part A.
Isolate one radical and square, then isolate the radical that survives and square a second time to find both candidate values of .
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part B.
Test each candidate from part A in the ORIGINAL equation, , and report which candidate(s), if any, actually satisfy it.
Carry your own answer forward Test whichever two candidates you found in part A; the check matters more than matching specific values.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Two squarings occurred in this solution, not one. Explain in general terms why every candidate must still be checked against the ORIGINAL equation, , rather than against either the once-squared or twice-squared equation reached along the way.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
This equation has two separate radicals, so one squaring will not clear both; work through the isolate-and-square pattern twice.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Move one radical to the other side first, square to remove it, then isolate the radical that remains before squaring a second time.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Substitute each candidate directly into the two-radical equation you started with, never into either squared version along the way.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Think about what an even power like squaring can do to a solution set, and how many separate squarings happened in this solution.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
or .
Part B
Only satisfies the original equation; fails.
Part C
Each squaring is an even power and can add a candidate that solves the equation right after it without solving the one before it, so only the ORIGINAL equation, not either intermediate one, decides which candidates are genuine.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Isolate one radical by moving the other across:
Square both sides, expanding the right side as a binomial in full:
Isolate the surviving radical, then divide by :
Square a second time and collect into a quadratic:
so the candidates are and .
Part B
Substitute each candidate into the ORIGINAL equation, not either squared version reached along the way.
At the left side is , not , so this candidate fails and is extraneous. The intermediate line already warned us, since its left side must be nonnegative, requiring , which violates.
Part C
Squaring is not reversible, because it is an even power: from you can only conclude or , not alone.
The first squaring can add a candidate that solves the once-squared equation without solving the original; the second squaring can do the same again, on top of whatever the first one already added. An intermediate equation therefore proves nothing about the original equation. Only substituting directly into the equation as it was first given settles which candidates, if any, are genuine.
In one line
Squaring twice gives the candidates and ; checking both in the original equation shows only is genuine, since gives . Because squaring is an even power, every candidate from either squaring must be checked against the original equation, not against an intermediate squared version.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 5 points
Isolates one radical and squares both sides, expanding the resulting binomial in full rather than term by term. . Worth 2 points.
Isolates the surviving radical, squares a second time, and solves the resulting quadratic for both candidates. . Worth 2 points.
Recognizes both values as candidates only, not yet confirmed as solutions of the original equation. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Substitutes each candidate individually into the ORIGINAL equation, not either squared version reached along the way. . Worth 1 point.
Correctly evaluates both sides for each candidate. . Worth 2 points.
Reports which candidate(s), if any, actually satisfy the original equation. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
States that each squaring is an even power that can add a solution not present in the equation right before it. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Concludes that only the ORIGINAL equation, not an intermediate squared version, can decide which candidates are genuine. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
3. Two equations, opposite directions through a square . Foundational, 15 points. Question 3 of 5.
Two equations are given: and .
- Part A.
Solve for all real , keeping both signs that arise from taking the square root of both sides.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part B.
Solve , testing every candidate in the ORIGINAL equation and reporting only the one(s) that survive.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part C.
Compare your work in part A with your work in part B. Using both results together, state in its guarded form what actually decides whether a candidate is a genuine solution, and explain why the reasoning in part A did not require that same check.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Both equations involve an even power somewhere, but the two operations run in opposite directions; notice which one is squaring and which one is undoing a square.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Remember that the square root of a squared quantity is its absolute value, not the quantity itself, so keep both signs when you remove the square root.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Isolate the radical if needed, square once, and test both resulting candidates directly in the original equation.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Ask which of the two equations involved squaring an equation, and which one involved undoing a square that was already there.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
or .
Part B
is the only solution; fails.
Part C
Only substitution into the ORIGINAL equation decides a candidate's fate, which is why part B needed a check: squaring can add an impostor. Part A needed no such check, since taking a root undoes a square rather than performing one, so it cannot add a candidate the original did not already have.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Take the square root of both sides, using :
So gives , and gives . Both signs are genuine solutions.
Part B
Square both sides, expanding the right side as a binomial in full:
Collect into a quadratic and factor:
so the candidates are and . Test each in the original equation.
For : , and . They agree.
For : , but . Since , fails: a principal root can never equal a negative number.
Part C
Only substitution into the ORIGINAL equation can tell a genuine candidate from an impostor, because squaring is an even power:
That is exactly why part B needed a check: the squared equation there admits both branches, and only testing each candidate against the ORIGINAL reveals that actually satisfies the OTHER branch, , instead. Part A involved no squaring of the equation at all; it started from an already-squared statement, , and undid that square by taking a root. Rooting recovers exactly the values that were squared to produce in the first place, so it cannot manufacture a value beyond those, and no check against a different equation is needed.
In one line
has both solutions and , since taking a root of both sides undoes a square rather than performing one and adds nothing to check. Solving by squaring gives candidates and , but only survives, since would force the principal root to equal . Only substitution into the ORIGINAL equation decides a candidate's fate when squaring is involved.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 5 points
Takes the square root of both sides using , rather than dropping the absolute value. . Worth 2 points.
Writes both signs after taking the square root of , then solves each resulting branch for . . Worth 2 points.
Presents both resulting values as the complete answer to the equation. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 5 points
Squares both sides, expanding the right side as a binomial in full, and solves the resulting quadratic for both candidates. . Worth 2 points.
Tests each candidate individually in the ORIGINAL equation. . Worth 1 point.
Correctly determines, for each candidate individually, whether it satisfies the original equation, tying any failure to the root being unable to equal a negative number. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 5 points
States that only substitution into the ORIGINAL equation of part B decides a candidate's fate, tying this to squaring being an even power that can add an impostor. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Explains that part A needed no such check because taking a root of both sides undoes a square rather than performing one, so no new candidate can appear. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
States, in guarded form, that raising to an even power can require a check while undoing one by rooting does not. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
4. A chain of four steps, one broken link . Reasoning, 10 points. Question 4 of 5.
Here is a solution to , presented as a chain of four lines, each claimed to follow from the line directly above it.
Line 1: Take the square root of both sides.
Line 2: Simplify each side.
Line 3: Solve for .
Line 4: State the solution.
So is the solution.
- Part A.
Identify the first of the four lines that does not validly follow from the line directly above it, and state exactly what went wrong.
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 3 points
- Part B.
Using the corrected line you found in part A, find every candidate value of .
Carry your own answer forward Continue from whichever corrected line you found in part A; the method matters more than matching the exact wording above.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Contrast the kind of mistake made by the flawed line in part A with the kind of mistake made by failing to check a candidate after squaring a radical equation. Does each one add an impostor to the solution set, or drop a genuine solution from it? Explain your reasoning for both.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Check each line only against the line directly above it, not against the final answer; exactly one line fails that test.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Recall exactly what the square root of a squared quantity equals for a real number, and compare that with what one of the lines claims.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Rewrite the corrected line so it keeps both signs, then solve each resulting linear equation separately.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Think about which direction each kind of mistake pushes the solution set: toward one candidate too many, or one candidate too few.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
Line 2. equals , not ; dropping the absolute value drops the negative branch, so the line should read .
Part B
or .
Part C
Neither candidate from part B needs to be discarded: both arose from taking a root of both sides, which undoes a square rather than performing one, so it cannot add a value the original equation does not already have. The flawed line instead dropped a genuine solution.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Test each line against the one directly above it.
Line 1 takes the square root of both sides of the given equation: sound, as far as it goes.
Line 2 claims and , giving . The right side is fine, but the left side drops the absolute value: is , not , for every real . The correct line keeps both signs:
This is the first line that does not validly follow. Lines 3 and 4 carry out valid algebra, but only on the incomplete equation Line 2 handed them, so the negative branch is lost from that point on.
Part B
Starting from the corrected line, , solve each branch separately:
Both values are candidates for .
Part C
A step that drops a genuine solution, like discarding a sign, makes the final list too short: a value that truly solves the equation is never recovered. A step that fails to check a candidate after an even power, like squaring, makes the final list too long: a value that does not truly solve the equation is kept. In symbols, squaring turns into
which can add the branch ; dropping a sign when undoing that same square instead throws one of the two genuine branches away. The two errors move the solution set in opposite directions, so neither candidate found in part B needs to be checked for being extraneous.
In one line
Line 2 is the first invalid line: the square root of is , not , so the correct line keeps both signs, . That gives the candidates and , and since both arose from taking a root rather than raising to a power, neither needs to be checked for being extraneous. Line 2's mistake dropped a genuine solution before it was ever found, the opposite risk from failing to check a candidate after squaring a radical equation, which can let an impostor stay in.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Names one specific line as the first that does not validly follow from the line before it, and clears every earlier line as sound. . Worth 1 point.
States specifically what is wrong with that line, tying the diagnosis to what the line directly before it actually shows, and reports the corrected version of that line. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 4 points
Rebuilds the corrected line found in part A. . Worth 2 points.
Solves each branch of the corrected line correctly and reports both resulting values. . Worth 1 point.
Reports both resulting values from the corrected line as the candidates for this equation. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
States which kind of error, adding an extra candidate or dropping a genuine one, the flawed line makes, and justifies the classification. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Contrasts that with the kind of error a missed check after squaring a radical equation makes, and explains why the two run in opposite directions. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
5. Proving an identity from the definition of the principal root . Reasoning, 9 points. Question 5 of 5.
The principal square root symbol always returns a value that is . Using that definition, prove the general identity for every real number .
- Part A.
Let be a real number with . Show that in this case, appealing directly to the definition of the principal square root as the nonnegative number that squares to the given value.
Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 3 points
- Part B.
Now let be a real number with . Show that in this case, using the same definition, and explain why itself cannot be the answer here.
Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 3 points
- Part C.
Combine parts A and B into the single statement for every real , and explain why proving only the case from part A would not have been enough to justify using in general.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Recall exactly what the principal square root symbol is defined to return: a value that is never negative, and whose square matches what is under the root.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
When is already , check directly whether itself satisfies both parts of that definition.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
When , fails the nonnegative requirement immediately, so try instead and check both parts of the definition on it.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
A statement about every real number needs a case covering every real number; ask what part A alone leaves unproven.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
When , itself is nonnegative and squares back to , so is the principal square root of : .
Part B
When , cannot be the principal root since a root is never negative; but is positive and , so is the nonnegative number that squares to : .
Part C
Since for and for , parts A and B together match in every case, so for every real . Part A alone only covers ; without part B, a negative is unproven.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
is defined as the nonnegative number whose square is . Since is already nonnegative, and
the number itself satisfies both requirements of that definition. Because the principal square root is unique, must be that root: when .
Part B
If then is negative, and the definition demands a nonnegative output, so itself is disqualified immediately. Consider instead: since , , so is nonnegative, and
so squares back to . Both requirements of the definition are satisfied by , and by uniqueness, when .
Part C
Since when and when , parts A and B match it case for case:
Together these cover every real , giving always. Part A alone only established the nonnegative case; without part B, nothing rules out the identity failing for a negative , where the naive guess is in fact false.
In one line
For , itself is nonnegative and squares to , so . For , is disqualified by the definition's nonnegativity requirement, but is positive and squares to , so . Together the two cases cover every real number and match the two cases of the absolute value, giving the general identity ; the first case alone would leave every negative unproven.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
States the two requirements the definition of the principal square root imposes: nonnegative, and squares to the given value. . Worth 1 point.
Shows that itself satisfies both requirements when , and concludes by the uniqueness of the principal root. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 3 points
States that itself cannot be the principal root when , since the root can never be negative. . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Shows that is nonnegative and squares to , so satisfies the definition and equals the principal root. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 3 points
States that the two cases together cover every real , and that each case's result matches the corresponding case of the absolute value. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Explains that part A by itself leaves negative unproven, so both cases are required for the general identity. . Worth 1 point.
-