This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly. Contact us
Free response · work it on paper ← Back to lesson

Raising Equations to Powers: Free Response

5 questions in parts, 58 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.

Free response · work it on paper Question 1 of 5
  1. 1. Solving a radical equation and testing the candidate . Foundational, 12 points. Question 1 of 5.

    Consider the equation 3+4x+9=103 + \sqrt{4x + 9} = 10.

    1. Part A.

      Isolate the radical, then raise both sides to the matching power and solve for the candidate value of xx.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points

    2. Part B.

      Substitute the candidate from part A into the ORIGINAL equation, 3+4x+9=103 + \sqrt{4x+9} = 10, not the squared one, and report whether the two sides agree.

      Carry your own answer forward Use whichever candidate you found in part A; the check matters more than matching a specific value.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points

    3. Part C.

      Explain, in general terms tied to the type of operation used to clear the radical, why the check in part B could not have been skipped, no matter how it turned out.

      Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points

    Hints

    One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.

    Answer and solution

    Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.

    Rubric

    Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.

    Part A 5 points

    Isolates the radical by subtracting the constant from both sides before raising to a power. . Worth 2 points.

    Squares both sides correctly and solves the resulting linear equation for the candidate value. . Worth 2 points.

    Identifies the value found as a candidate rather than a confirmed solution of the original equation. . Worth 1 point.

    Part B 4 points

    Substitutes the candidate into the ORIGINAL equation, not the squared equation from part A. . Worth 2 points.

    Correctly evaluates the left side and compares it with the right side. . Worth 1 point.

    States plainly whether the two sides agree and what that means for the candidate. . Worth 1 point.

    Part C 3 points

    States that squaring is an even power capable of introducing a solution the original equation does not have. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Connects that fact to why substitution into the original equation, rather than trusting the squared one, is the only way to decide. . Worth 1 point.

  2. 2. Solving an equation with two radicals . Application, 12 points. Question 2 of 5.

    Consider the equation 3x+4x+2=2\sqrt{3x + 4} - \sqrt{x + 2} = 2.

    1. Part A.

      Isolate one radical and square, then isolate the radical that survives and square a second time to find both candidate values of xx.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points

    2. Part B.

      Test each candidate from part A in the ORIGINAL equation, 3x+4x+2=2\sqrt{3x+4} - \sqrt{x+2} = 2, and report which candidate(s), if any, actually satisfy it.

      Carry your own answer forward Test whichever two candidates you found in part A; the check matters more than matching specific values.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points

    3. Part C.

      Two squarings occurred in this solution, not one. Explain in general terms why every candidate must still be checked against the ORIGINAL equation, 3x+4x+2=2\sqrt{3x+4}-\sqrt{x+2}=2, rather than against either the once-squared or twice-squared equation reached along the way.

      Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points

    Hints

    One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.

    Answer and solution

    Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.

    Rubric

    Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.

    Part A 5 points

    Isolates one radical and squares both sides, expanding the resulting binomial in full rather than term by term. . Worth 2 points.

    Isolates the surviving radical, squares a second time, and solves the resulting quadratic for both candidates. . Worth 2 points.

    Recognizes both values as candidates only, not yet confirmed as solutions of the original equation. . Worth 1 point.

    Part B 4 points

    Substitutes each candidate individually into the ORIGINAL equation, not either squared version reached along the way. . Worth 1 point.

    Correctly evaluates both sides for each candidate. . Worth 2 points.

    Reports which candidate(s), if any, actually satisfy the original equation. . Worth 1 point.

    Part C 3 points

    States that each squaring is an even power that can add a solution not present in the equation right before it. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Concludes that only the ORIGINAL equation, not an intermediate squared version, can decide which candidates are genuine. . Worth 1 point.

  3. 3. Two equations, opposite directions through a square . Foundational, 15 points. Question 3 of 5.

    Two equations are given: (x5)2=49(x - 5)^2 = 49 and 3x+4=8x\sqrt{3x + 4} = 8 - x.

    1. Part A.

      Solve (x5)2=49(x-5)^2 = 49 for all real xx, keeping both signs that arise from taking the square root of both sides.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points

    2. Part B.

      Solve 3x+4=8x\sqrt{3x+4} = 8 - x, testing every candidate in the ORIGINAL equation and reporting only the one(s) that survive.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points

    3. Part C.

      Compare your work in part A with your work in part B. Using both results together, state in its guarded form what actually decides whether a candidate is a genuine solution, and explain why the reasoning in part A did not require that same check.

      Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points

    Hints

    One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.

    Answer and solution

    Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.

    Rubric

    Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.

    Part A 5 points

    Takes the square root of both sides using (x5)2=x5\sqrt{(x-5)^2} = \lvert x - 5 \rvert, rather than dropping the absolute value. . Worth 2 points.

    Writes both signs after taking the square root of 4949, then solves each resulting branch for xx. . Worth 2 points.

    Presents both resulting values as the complete answer to the equation. . Worth 1 point.

    Part B 5 points

    Squares both sides, expanding the right side as a binomial in full, and solves the resulting quadratic for both candidates. . Worth 2 points.

    Tests each candidate individually in the ORIGINAL equation. . Worth 1 point.

    Correctly determines, for each candidate individually, whether it satisfies the original equation, tying any failure to the root being unable to equal a negative number. . Worth 2 points.

    Part C 5 points

    States that only substitution into the ORIGINAL equation of part B decides a candidate's fate, tying this to squaring being an even power that can add an impostor. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Explains that part A needed no such check because taking a root of both sides undoes a square rather than performing one, so no new candidate can appear. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    States, in guarded form, that raising to an even power can require a check while undoing one by rooting does not. . Worth 1 point.

  4. 4. A chain of four steps, one broken link . Reasoning, 10 points. Question 4 of 5.

    Here is a solution to (x4)2=36(x - 4)^2 = 36, presented as a chain of four lines, each claimed to follow from the line directly above it.

    Line 1: Take the square root of both sides.

    (x4)2=36\sqrt{(x-4)^2} = \sqrt{36}

    Line 2: Simplify each side.

    x4=6x - 4 = 6

    Line 3: Solve for xx.

    x=10x = 10

    Line 4: State the solution.

    So x=10x = 10 is the solution.

    1. Part A.

      Identify the first of the four lines that does not validly follow from the line directly above it, and state exactly what went wrong.

      Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 3 points

    2. Part B.

      Using the corrected line you found in part A, find every candidate value of xx.

      Carry your own answer forward Continue from whichever corrected line you found in part A; the method matters more than matching the exact wording above.

      Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points

    3. Part C.

      Contrast the kind of mistake made by the flawed line in part A with the kind of mistake made by failing to check a candidate after squaring a radical equation. Does each one add an impostor to the solution set, or drop a genuine solution from it? Explain your reasoning for both.

      Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points

    Hints

    One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.

    Answer and solution

    Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.

    Rubric

    Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.

    Part A 3 points

    Names one specific line as the first that does not validly follow from the line before it, and clears every earlier line as sound. . Worth 1 point.

    States specifically what is wrong with that line, tying the diagnosis to what the line directly before it actually shows, and reports the corrected version of that line. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Part B 4 points

    Rebuilds the corrected line found in part A. . Worth 2 points.

    Solves each branch of the corrected line correctly and reports both resulting values. . Worth 1 point.

    Reports both resulting values from the corrected line as the candidates for this equation. . Worth 1 point.

    Part C 3 points

    States which kind of error, adding an extra candidate or dropping a genuine one, the flawed line makes, and justifies the classification. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Contrasts that with the kind of error a missed check after squaring a radical equation makes, and explains why the two run in opposite directions. . Worth 1 point.

  5. 5. Proving an identity from the definition of the principal root . Reasoning, 9 points. Question 5 of 5.

    The principal square root symbol x\sqrt{\phantom{x}} always returns a value that is 0\ge 0. Using that definition, prove the general identity x2=x\sqrt{x^2} = \lvert x \rvert for every real number xx.

    1. Part A.

      Let xx be a real number with x0x \ge 0. Show that x2=x\sqrt{x^2} = x in this case, appealing directly to the definition of the principal square root as the nonnegative number that squares to the given value.

      Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 3 points

    2. Part B.

      Now let xx be a real number with x<0x < 0. Show that x2=x\sqrt{x^2} = -x in this case, using the same definition, and explain why xx itself cannot be the answer here.

      Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 3 points

    3. Part C.

      Combine parts A and B into the single statement x2=x\sqrt{x^2}=\lvert x\rvert for every real xx, and explain why proving only the case x0x \ge 0 from part A would not have been enough to justify using x\lvert x\rvert in general.

      Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 3 points

    Hints

    One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.

    Answer and solution

    Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.

    Rubric

    Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.

    Part A 3 points

    States the two requirements the definition of the principal square root imposes: nonnegative, and squares to the given value. . Worth 1 point.

    Shows that xx itself satisfies both requirements when x0x \ge 0, and concludes x2=x\sqrt{x^2}=x by the uniqueness of the principal root. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Part B 3 points

    States that xx itself cannot be the principal root when x<0x<0, since the root can never be negative. . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Shows that x-x is nonnegative and squares to x2x^2, so x-x satisfies the definition and equals the principal root. . Worth 2 points.

    Part C 3 points

    States that the two cases together cover every real xx, and that each case's result matches the corresponding case of the absolute value. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer

    Explains that part A by itself leaves negative xx unproven, so both cases are required for the general identity. . Worth 1 point.