The Distributive Property
Learning goals
- Multiply a sum or a difference by sending the number outside the parentheses to every number inside
- Explain why the rule works, using a rectangle whose width is cut in two
- Split an awkward number around a round one to multiply in your head
- Run the rule backward to pull out the largest number that divides both parts
- Tell a sum inside the parentheses from a product, where the rule does not apply
The statement
Write the gift-bag total the two ways you counted it:
Two words from the properties lesson make this easier to talk about. The numbers being added inside the parentheses, and , are the terms of that sum. The multiplying them is a factor, and since it stands outside the parentheses we can call it the outside factor. The rule is that the outside factor multiplies every term, and then you add the products.
Here is the same sentence in letters, so that you can put your own numbers in:
In it, means times the quantity , and is shorthand for . The outside factor is distributed across the terms and , which is where the property gets its name. In this lesson the letters stand for whole numbers, and later on the same rule will hold for fractions, decimals, and negative numbers too.
Why it is true: the area of a split rectangle
The reason the rule holds is a picture you can measure. One word first. The area of a shape is the number of squares of side needed to tile it, with no gaps and no overlaps. Tile a rectangle tall and wide that way and it holds rows with squares in each row. That is why its area is the height times the width, . Counting rows of squares is all the geometry this argument needs; a later chapter takes area up in its own right.
Now cut that rectangle’s width into and . Nothing has been added or taken away, so the area is still . It now sits in two pieces: a by piece of area , and a by piece of area . And .
Nothing in that argument depended on the numbers , , and . Put the same picture in letters. A rectangle tall and wide has area . One vertical cut splits the width into a piece of length and a piece of length . That gives an by piece of area , and an by piece of area . The whole is still the sum of its parts:
A rectangle’s area does not care where you chop its width, so multiplying the whole width at once must equal multiplying the pieces and adding.
Check your understanding
A rectangle is tall and wide. One cut splits its width into and . What are the two piece areas, and what do they add to?
A cut from top to bottom changes only the widths, so both pieces are still tall.
That total is the whole rectangle's area, , because the cut moved no space.
More than two terms is no different. Cut the width twice instead of once, and the outside factor reaches all three pieces:
Checking straight through, as well.
In the picture above the cut is drawn for you. In the rectangle below you set the width and the height, and the readout does the cutting. It splits the width down the middle and reports both piece areas beside the whole.
Cutting the width splits the area into two pieces
A rectangle 7 units wide and 4 units tall. Area 28 square units, counted as 7 times 4. Splitting the width as 3 + 4 gives 3 times 4 plus 4 times 4, which is 12 + 16 = 28.
Set the height to and the width to . Then change the width to , and after that raise the height. Each time, add the two piece areas and compare that total with the area of the whole rectangle. They match every time, because and count the same unit squares.
Distributing over subtraction
The rule works the same way when the parentheses hold a difference instead of a sum:
For now, keep the first number at least as large as the one being subtracted, so that the difference inside is not negative.
Picture a rectangle of width with a strip of width removed from the end. The full by area is , the removed by strip is , and what is left is . For example, with , , and :
Again both routes agree. The outside factor still reaches every term inside; only the sign joining the two products changes from a plus to a minus.
Mental math: distribution is the trick behind it
Distribution turns one hard multiplication into two easy ones. Split a number that is awkward to multiply into a friendly sum or difference, usually around a round number like or , then distribute.
Take . The number is just , and multiplying by or by is easy:
That is the same from the opening. This split is exactly how people multiply in their heads without realizing they are using a named property. When a number sits just below a round one, split it as a difference instead:
Every split gives the right answer, so choose the one that leaves you the easiest work. You want two products you can do at a glance, and an addition or subtraction you can finish in your head.
Worked example 1 Choose the easier split for
The round number below is , and the round number above it is . Both splits are legal, so try each one. Splitting downward:
Splitting upward:
Same answer, different amounts of work. The first leaves , which you can finish at a glance; the second leaves , which takes longer. Splitting at the nearest round number usually wins, but look at the two products before you commit.
Check your understanding
Use the distributive property to evaluate by splitting as .
Split into , distribute the to each part, then add.
Check directly: .
Factoring: running the rule backward
Read the rule from right to left and it says . Start with two products that plainly share a factor:
The shared has moved outside a single pair of parentheses. Pulling out a shared factor like that is called factoring. It is the distributive property traveled in the opposite direction, so each move undoes the other.
Usually the shared factor is hidden, because the terms are written as plain numbers. To factor , look for the largest number that divides both terms. That number is called their greatest common factor.
Finding it does not take a special technique yet. When both terms are above zero, no shared factor can be bigger than the smaller term. So start at that term and count downward, stopping at the first number that divides both. For the smaller term is , and itself does not divide , nor does , , , or . Then divides and divides , so the search stops there and is the greatest common factor. Counting down works because it reaches the largest candidate first. For numbers too big to search this way, the Factors and Multiples chapter later gives a faster method.
Both and are divisible by , and nothing larger divides both, so rewrite each term and take the out front:
You can always check a factoring by distributing back: , which matches. Pull out the greatest common factor, not just any common factor. Taking out only would give , which is true but not finished, because still share a factor of .
Worked example 2 Factor completely
Count down from the smaller term, , and stop at the first number dividing both. Nothing from down to divides both terms. For instance divides but not , while and divide but not . Then divides and divides , so is their greatest common factor. Since and ,
Check by distributing: . The leftover share no common factor above , so the factoring is complete.
Check your understanding
Factor completely.
The greatest number dividing both and is , since and .
Forms like and are correct equalities but are not fully factored, since the inside still shares a common factor.