This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly. Contact us

The Distributive Property

Learning goals

  • Multiply a sum or a difference by sending the number outside the parentheses to every number inside
  • Explain why the rule works, using a rectangle whose width is cut in two
  • Split an awkward number around a round one to multiply in your head
  • Run the rule backward to pull out the largest number that divides both parts
  • Tell a sum inside the parentheses from a product, where the rule does not apply

The statement

Write the gift-bag total the two ways you counted it:

6(10+3)=6×10+6×3.6(10 + 3) = 6 \times 10 + 6 \times 3.

Two words from the properties lesson make this easier to talk about. The numbers being added inside the parentheses, 1010 and 33, are the terms of that sum. The 66 multiplying them is a factor, and since it stands outside the parentheses we can call it the outside factor. The rule is that the outside factor multiplies every term, and then you add the products.

Here is the same sentence in letters, so that you can put your own numbers in:

a(b+c)=ab+ac.a(b + c) = ab + ac.

In it, a(b+c)a(b + c) means aa times the quantity (b+c)(b + c), and abab is shorthand for a×ba \times b. The outside factor aa is distributed across the terms bb and cc, which is where the property gets its name. In this lesson the letters stand for whole numbers, and later on the same rule will hold for fractions, decimals, and negative numbers too.

Why it is true: the area of a split rectangle

The reason the rule holds is a picture you can measure. One word first. The area of a shape is the number of squares of side 11 needed to tile it, with no gaps and no overlaps. Tile a rectangle 33 tall and 99 wide that way and it holds 33 rows with 99 squares in each row. That is why its area is the height times the width, 3×9=273 \times 9 = 27. Counting rows of squares is all the geometry this argument needs; a later chapter takes area up in its own right.

Now cut that rectangle’s width into 44 and 55. Nothing has been added or taken away, so the area is still 2727. It now sits in two pieces: a 33 by 44 piece of area 1212, and a 33 by 55 piece of area 1515. And 12+15=2712 + 15 = 27.

A 3 by 9 rectangle cut once across its width, into a 3 by 4 piece of area 12 and a 3 by 5 piece of area 15. The cut moved no space, so 12 plus 15 is the original 27. A rectangle of height 3 divided into vertical regions of widths 4, 5. 4 12 5 15 3
A 3 by 9 rectangle cut once across its width, into a 3 by 4 piece of area 12 and a 3 by 5 piece of area 15. The cut moved no space, so 12 plus 15 is the original 27.

Nothing in that argument depended on the numbers 33, 44, and 55. Put the same picture in letters. A rectangle aa tall and b+cb + c wide has area a(b+c)a(b + c). One vertical cut splits the width into a piece of length bb and a piece of length cc. That gives an aa by bb piece of area abab, and an aa by cc piece of area acac. The whole is still the sum of its parts:

a(b+c)=ab+ac.a(b + c) = ab + ac.

A rectangle’s area does not care where you chop its width, so multiplying the whole width at once must equal multiplying the pieces and adding.

Check your understanding

A rectangle is 55 tall and 88 wide. One cut splits its width into 33 and 55. What are the two piece areas, and what do they add to?

Answer choices

More than two terms is no different. Cut the width twice instead of once, and the outside factor reaches all three pieces:

3(10+4+2)=3×10+3×4+3×2=30+12+6=48.3(10 + 4 + 2) = 3 \times 10 + 3 \times 4 + 3 \times 2 = 30 + 12 + 6 = 48.

Checking straight through, 3×16=483 \times 16 = 48 as well.

In the picture above the cut is drawn for you. In the rectangle below you set the width and the height, and the readout does the cutting. It splits the width down the middle and reports both piece areas beside the whole.

Cutting the width splits the area into two pieces

A rectangle 7 units wide and 4 units tall. Area 28 square units, counted as 7 times 4. Splitting the width as 3 + 4 gives 3 times 4 plus 4 times 4, which is 12 + 16 = 28. A rectangle drawn on a grid of unit squares, inside a dashed boundary showing how large it can grow. Use the controls below the figure to change either dimension and watch the width split into two pieces whose areas add back to the whole. 7 4
Width Height

A rectangle 7 units wide and 4 units tall. Area 28 square units, counted as 7 times 4. Splitting the width as 3 + 4 gives 3 times 4 plus 4 times 4, which is 12 + 16 = 28.

A rectangle drawn on unit squares. Choose its width and its height, and the readout splits that width in two and shows the areas of the pieces adding back to the whole.

Set the height to 44 and the width to 77. Then change the width to 99, and after that raise the height. Each time, add the two piece areas and compare that total with the area of the whole rectangle. They match every time, because a(b+c)a(b + c) and ab+acab + ac count the same unit squares.

Distributing over subtraction

The rule works the same way when the parentheses hold a difference instead of a sum:

a(bc)=abac.a(b - c) = ab - ac.

For now, keep the first number at least as large as the one being subtracted, so that the difference inside is not negative.

Picture a rectangle of width bb with a strip of width cc removed from the end. The full aa by bb area is abab, the removed aa by cc strip is acac, and what is left is abacab - ac. For example, with a=4a = 4, b=8b = 8, and c=3c = 3:

4(83)=4×5=20,4×84×3=3212=20.4(8 - 3) = 4 \times 5 = 20, \qquad 4 \times 8 - 4 \times 3 = 32 - 12 = 20.
Taking a strip off the width takes the same strip off the areaA rectangle of height 4 and width 8 has a strip of width 3 removed from its right-hand end. The removed strip, drawn dashed, has area 4 times 3 or 12. The solid region that remains has width 5 and area 4 times 5 or 20, which is the original 32 less the 12 taken away.844 × 5 = 204 × 3 = 12taken away53
A rectangle 4 tall and 8 wide, with a strip 3 wide taken off its end. The strip carries away 4 times 3, which is 12, and the part left standing is 4 times 5, which is 20.

Again both routes agree. The outside factor still reaches every term inside; only the sign joining the two products changes from a plus to a minus.

Mental math: distribution is the trick behind it

Distribution turns one hard multiplication into two easy ones. Split a number that is awkward to multiply into a friendly sum or difference, usually around a round number like 1010 or 100100, then distribute.

Take 6×136 \times 13. The number 1313 is just 10+310 + 3, and multiplying by 1010 or by 33 is easy:

6×13=6(10+3)=6×10+6×3=60+18=78.6 \times 13 = 6(10 + 3) = 6 \times 10 + 6 \times 3 = 60 + 18 = 78.

That is the same 7878 from the opening. This split is exactly how people multiply in their heads without realizing they are using a named property. When a number sits just below a round one, split it as a difference instead:

7×98=7(1002)=70014=686.7 \times 98 = 7(100 - 2) = 700 - 14 = 686.

Every split gives the right answer, so choose the one that leaves you the easiest work. You want two products you can do at a glance, and an addition or subtraction you can finish in your head.

Worked example 1 Choose the easier split for 8×638 \times 63

The round number below 6363 is 6060, and the round number above it is 7070. Both splits are legal, so try each one. Splitting downward:

8×63=8(60+3)=480+24=504.8 \times 63 = 8(60 + 3) = 480 + 24 = 504.

Splitting upward:

8×63=8(707)=56056=504.8 \times 63 = 8(70 - 7) = 560 - 56 = 504.

Same answer, different amounts of work. The first leaves 480+24480 + 24, which you can finish at a glance; the second leaves 56056560 - 56, which takes longer. Splitting at the nearest round number usually wins, but look at the two products before you commit.

Check your understanding

Use the distributive property to evaluate 4×124 \times 12 by splitting 1212 as 10+210 + 2.

Answer choices

Factoring: running the rule backward

Read the rule from right to left and it says ab+ac=a(b+c)ab + ac = a(b + c). Start with two products that plainly share a factor:

4×7+4×3=4(7+3)=4×10=40.4 \times 7 + 4 \times 3 = 4(7 + 3) = 4 \times 10 = 40.

The shared 44 has moved outside a single pair of parentheses. Pulling out a shared factor like that is called factoring. It is the distributive property traveled in the opposite direction, so each move undoes the other.

Usually the shared factor is hidden, because the terms are written as plain numbers. To factor 12+1812 + 18, look for the largest number that divides both terms. That number is called their greatest common factor.

Finding it does not take a special technique yet. When both terms are above zero, no shared factor can be bigger than the smaller term. So start at that term and count downward, stopping at the first number that divides both. For 12+1812 + 18 the smaller term is 1212, and 1212 itself does not divide 1818, nor does 1111, 1010, 99, 88 or 77. Then 66 divides 1212 and divides 1818, so the search stops there and 66 is the greatest common factor. Counting down works because it reaches the largest candidate first. For numbers too big to search this way, the Factors and Multiples chapter later gives a faster method.

Both 1212 and 1818 are divisible by 66, and nothing larger divides both, so rewrite each term and take the 66 out front:

12+18=6×2+6×3=6(2+3).12 + 18 = 6 \times 2 + 6 \times 3 = 6(2 + 3).
The same picture read backward. A piece of area 12 and a piece of area 18 share a height of 6, so pushed together they form one rectangle 6 tall and 2 plus 3 wide. Factoring is distributing in reverse. A rectangle of height 6 divided into vertical regions of widths 2, 3. 2 12 3 18 6
The same picture read backward. A piece of area 12 and a piece of area 18 share a height of 6, so pushed together they form one rectangle 6 tall and 2 plus 3 wide. Factoring is distributing in reverse.

You can always check a factoring by distributing back: 6(2+3)=12+186(2 + 3) = 12 + 18, which matches. Pull out the greatest common factor, not just any common factor. Taking out only 33 would give 3(4+6)3(4 + 6), which is true but not finished, because 4+64 + 6 still share a factor of 22.

Worked example 2 Factor 18+2418 + 24 completely

Count down from the smaller term, 1818, and stop at the first number dividing both. Nothing from 1818 down to 77 divides both terms. For instance 99 divides 1818 but not 2424, while 88 and 1212 divide 2424 but not 1818. Then 66 divides 1818 and divides 2424, so 66 is their greatest common factor. Since 18=6×318 = 6 \times 3 and 24=6×424 = 6 \times 4,

18+24=6×3+6×4=6(3+4).18 + 24 = 6 \times 3 + 6 \times 4 = 6(3 + 4).

Check by distributing: 6(3+4)=18+246(3 + 4) = 18 + 24. The leftover 3+43 + 4 share no common factor above 11, so the factoring is complete.

Check your understanding

Factor 20+3020 + 30 completely.

Answer choices

Common mistakes

Practice

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)

Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.

Free Response Questions (FRQ)

Longer questions in parts, to be worked out on paper. Progressive hints, the answer on its own so you can check yourself and try again, then the full worked solution, plus a rubric to mark your own work against.

Free response Work it out on paper 5 questions Start →
More practice (optional)

Extra sets, as hard as the Challenge set. Each one opens on its own page.

More resources (optional)

Other explanations of this lesson, if you want a second take.

Go deeper (optional)

You can skip this and keep going. Read it if you want to know more.

The counting reason for the distributive property

The rectangle explains the rule with area. Here is the same rule from the meaning of multiplication, for a whole number of copies.

Why a(b+c)=ab+aca(b + c) = ab + ac#

Try it on 4(5+2)4(5 + 2). Multiplying by 44 means taking four copies and adding them:

4(5+2)=(5+2)+(5+2)+(5+2)+(5+2).4(5 + 2) = (5 + 2) + (5 + 2) + (5 + 2) + (5 + 2).

A sum can be reordered and regrouped freely, so gather the four 55s together and the four 22s together:

=(5+5+5+5)+(2+2+2+2)=20+8=28.= (5 + 5 + 5 + 5) + (2 + 2 + 2 + 2) = 20 + 8 = 28.

That is 4×54 \times 5 plus 4×24 \times 2. Reading 4(5+2)4(5 + 2) straight through gives 4×7=284 \times 7 = 28 as well.

Now let aa be any whole number. By the meaning of multiplication, a(b+c)a(b + c) is aa copies of (b+c)(b + c) added together:

a(b+c)=(b+c)+(b+c)++(b+c)a copies.a(b + c) = \underbrace{(b + c) + (b + c) + \cdots + (b + c)}_{a \text{ copies}}.

Regroup as before, all the bb terms into one group and all the cc terms into another:

=(b+b++b)a copies+(c+c++c)a copies=ab+ac.= \underbrace{(b + b + \cdots + b)}_{a \text{ copies}} + \underbrace{(c + c + \cdots + c)}_{a \text{ copies}} = ab + ac.

The only moves were reordering and regrouping the addends, and no step used the numbers 44, 55, and 22. It matches the rectangle exactly: the aa rows are the aa copies, and sorting the bb part of every row from the cc part is the single vertical cut.

What happens if you split both factors

In 6×13=6(10+3)6 \times 13 = 6(10 + 3), only the 1313 is broken up. The outside 66 stays whole so that it reaches both pieces. What if you split it as well, writing 6×136 \times 13 as (3+3)(10+3)(3 + 3)(10 + 3)?

Then every piece of the first factor has to meet every piece of the second, which is four products rather than two:

(3+3)(10+3)=3×10+3×3+3×10+3×3=30+9+30+9=78.\begin{aligned} (3 + 3)(10 + 3) &= 3 \times 10 + 3 \times 3 + 3 \times 10 + 3 \times 3\\ &= 30 + 9 + 30 + 9 = 78. \end{aligned}

The total is still 7878, but the bookkeeping is worse, and it is easy to stop after 3×10+3×3=393 \times 10 + 3 \times 3 = 39, which is exactly half the answer. Multiplying two sums together is a later topic. For now, split one factor and leave the other whole.

A bit of history (Optional)

Mathematicians had been listing the rules of arithmetic for a very long time. Over the early twentieth century, what those lists were used for gradually shifted.

Rather than starting with numbers and noting the rules they follow, you can start with a short list of rules. Then you ask what else follows from that list. Anything obeying it inherits every consequence of it, whether or not it is made of numbers. Emmy Noether and Emil Artin both helped shape that way of working. Their lectures were written up by Bartel van der Waerden in a textbook called Moderne Algebra in 1930. That book helped the approach spread, and something close to it is still how algebra is taught to university students.

One of those short lists defines a structure called a ring, and the rule you learned today is on it. Most rules in arithmetic are about adding on its own, or about multiplying on its own. This one says how the two fit together. You read it off a rectangle cut in two, and it now does a great deal more work than a rectangle.