Equivalent Fractions and Simplifying: Core practice
10 practice problems for this lesson. Work on paper, use hints when you need them, and check the answer or the full solution when you are ready.
Difficulty: Core (core-course level)
0 of 10 completed · 0 skipped
Progress saved in this browser.
Progress can't be saved in this browser, so your choices last for this visit only.
-
Problem 1 A fraction built from products
Write in lowest terms.
- Hint 1
The greatest common factor of the top and bottom is built from the primes they share.
- Hint 2
Break each of , , and into prime factors.
- Hint 3
Divide out every prime the top and bottom share, then see what is left of each.
Answer
.
Full solution
Break each number into primes: , and
So the numerator is and the denominator is .
The top has one and the bottom has three, and each has one and one , so taking each shared prime at the smaller of its two counts gives the greatest common factor
Dividing both by leaves on top, because every prime in the numerator is shared, and on the bottom:
The numbers and share no factor above , so the fraction is in lowest terms.
As a check, the numerator is and the denominator is , which is .
Answer
.
Key idea
To put a fraction built from products in lowest terms, divide its top and bottom by their greatest common factor, the product of the primes they share, each taken at the smaller of its two counts, read from the factors of each product.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 2 Equal fractions in a range
Which fractions equal to have whole-number terms and a denominator between and ?
- Hint 1
Each fraction must name the same amount using a different part size.
- Hint 2
Since and share no factor above , any fraction equal to is built up by one whole-number multiplier.
- Hint 3
Find the multiples of between and , then multiply by the number that turns into each one.
Answer
, and .
Full solution
The numbers and share no factor above , so is in lowest terms.
Any fraction equal to it has the same lowest-terms form.
So dividing the numerator and denominator of such a fraction by their greatest common factor gives , which means the fraction is with its numerator and denominator multiplied by that same whole number.
Its denominator is therefore a multiple of .
The multiples of between and are , and , which are times , and .
Multiply the numerator by the same number each time:
The next multiple of is , which is past , so these three are all of them.
Answer
, and .
Key idea
Listing the multiples of a fraction's lowest-terms denominator that fall in a range finds every equal fraction with whole-number terms whose denominator lies in that range.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 3 A fraction built from sums
Write in lowest terms.
- Hint 1
The whole expression above the bar is the numerator, and the whole expression below is the denominator.
- Hint 2
After finding both numbers, look for their greatest common factor.
Answer
.
Full solution
Evaluate the grouped parts of the fraction:
The greatest common factor of and is .
Dividing both by gives
The remaining numbers and have no common factor above , so the fraction is in lowest terms.
Answer
.
Key idea
When the top or bottom of a fraction is a sum, evaluate the sum before simplifying the resulting fraction.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 4 A dial setting
A dial stores a setting as . Its screen must show the same value with denominator , while its printed report must use lowest terms. What should the screen and the report show?
- Hint 1
The screen and the report need different names for one value.
- Hint 2
The screen denominator is twice the stored denominator.
- Hint 3
For the report, find the greatest common factor of and .
Answer
Screen: ; report: .
Full solution
The denominator doubles from to , so double the numerator as well:
This is what the screen shows.
The greatest common factor of and is .
Divide both by :
Since and share no factor above , this is what the report shows.
Both describe the same dial setting.
Answer
Screen: ; report: .
Key idea
A required denominator and lowest terms are different forms that can describe the same value.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 5 An editor’s division
An editor divides the numerator and denominator of a fraction by and gets . What was the original fraction, and was the greatest common factor of its numerator and denominator?
- Hint 1
Undoing the editor’s division recovers the original top and bottom, and the greatest common factor is the largest number that divides both.
- Hint 2
Write both original numbers as products of primes, then multiply together the primes they share.
Answer
; yes, is the greatest common factor of and .
Full solution
Before division by , the numerator was and the denominator was
Thus the original fraction was
In primes, and
The primes they share are one and one , so their greatest common factor is
As a check, and , and the leftovers and share no prime, so is in lowest terms.
Had not been the greatest common factor, and would still share a factor, so was the greatest.
Answer
; yes, is the greatest common factor of and .
Key idea
Reversing a common-factor division restores the original numerator and denominator together, and the divisor was their greatest common factor exactly when the result is in lowest terms.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 6 Two sensor records
Two sensor records show and . Lower exactly one of the two numerators by , leaving every other number unchanged, so that the records agree. Which record should change, and what should it become? Justify your decision.
- Hint 1
There are two possible edited pairs, and their values determine which change works.
- Hint 2
Compare the cross products for each possible pair.
Answer
Change to ; leave unchanged.
Full solution
If the first numerator decreases, the records are and .
Their cross products are
These differ, so that change does not make the records agree.
If the second numerator decreases, the records are and .
Their cross products are
These match, so the second record should become .
As a check, both final records reduce to .
Both allowed changes have been tested, so this is the one that works.
Answer
Change to ; leave unchanged.
Key idea
Cross products can test each allowed change when two fraction records must agree.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 7 Allowed divisions
A machine stores the fraction . It may divide both numbers by any common factor, but its new denominator must be less than . List every new fraction it can produce in one such division.
- Hint 1
Every allowed division uses a number that divides both the numerator and the denominator.
- Hint 2
List those common factors, then test which ones bring the denominator below .
Answer
and .
Full solution
The factors of are , , , , , , and .
Of these, the ones that also divide are , , and , so those are the common factors.
Dividing by them gives denominators , , and , respectively.
Only division by or gives a denominator less than :
These are all the allowed results because every common factor has been checked.
Answer
and .
Key idea
A restriction on a new denominator can be checked against the complete list of common factors.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 8 Milo’s claim
Milo says two fractions can be equal only if multiplying the numerator and denominator of one by the same whole number gives the other. Is he correct? Support your answer with an example.
- Hint 1
Equal fractions share one lowest-terms form.
- Hint 2
Test Milo’s claim on two different fractions that simplify to the same lowest-terms form.
- Hint 3
Check that no whole number turns one of your denominators into the other.
Answer
No; for example (any pair of equal fractions in which neither denominator is a whole-number multiple of the other is accepted).
Full solution
One pair of equal fractions in which neither is the other with its numerator and denominator multiplied by one whole number is enough to show that Milo is wrong.
Start from a fraction in lowest terms, such as .
Since , multiply the numerator and denominator of by :
Since , multiply them by instead:
Both results equal , so they equal each other.
As a check, their cross products agree:
No whole number times gives , and no whole number times gives .
So neither fraction is the other with its numerator and denominator multiplied by one whole number, and Milo is not correct.
Both are built from the same lowest-terms form, , by different multipliers.
Answer
No; for example (any pair of equal fractions in which neither denominator is a whole-number multiple of the other is accepted).
Key idea
Two fractions can be equal even when neither is the other with its numerator and denominator multiplied by one whole number.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 9 A finer pattern
A pattern is divided into nine equal parts, and four of them are colored. Every part is divided into five equal pieces, and then each new piece is divided into two equal pieces. Mara says the colored fraction is now and the colored area has not changed. Is she correct? Explain.
- Hint 1
Count what the two stages of cutting do to each original part.
- Hint 2
The same two stages apply to every colored part and every part in the whole.
Answer
Yes; .
Full solution
Each original ninth becomes equal pieces.
The nine parts of the whole therefore become pieces, and the four colored parts become colored pieces.
The new description is
No area was added or removed by drawing the extra dividing lines, so the amount colored is unchanged.
Dividing and by returns .
Answer
Yes; .
Key idea
Repeated equal subdivision changes the counts of all parts together without changing the amount represented.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 10 Kai’s replacement
Kai replaces with by deleting the last digit of each number. Does the replacement preserve the value? Give the original fraction in lowest terms and justify your decision.
- Hint 1
Two fractions are equal exactly when their lowest-terms forms match.
- Hint 2
Simplify the original fraction, then compare it with the replacement.
Answer
No; , and .
Full solution
The greatest common factor of and is , so
The proposed replacement is .
The cross products for and are
Since they do not match, the replacement changes the value.
Here, deleting the last digits turned into and into , which is not dividing both numbers by one common factor.
Answer
No; , and .
Key idea
Simplifying removes a common factor from the numbers, not matching positions from their written digits.
- Hint 1