This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly.
Contact us
Arithmetic of Complex Numbers
Learning goals
Derive every operation from i2=−1 plus ordinary algebra
Add and subtract part by part
Expand a product, then exchange i2 for −1
Use zz=a2+b2, real and never negative
Show conjugation passing through sums and products
Divide by rationalizing with the denominator's conjugate
One new symbol, no new laws
When the previous lesson called a+bi a number, that word carried a promise: the new numbers obey
the same laws of algebra as the old ones. Addition is still commutative and associative, multiplication
still distributes over addition, and subtraction and division still mean what they always meant, namely
adding an opposite and multiplying by a reciprocal. The complex numbers add exactly one fact to that
rulebook:
i2=−1.
Everything in this lesson is forced by that single stipulation. The working strategy throughout is to
treat a+bi as a two-term expression in the symbol i and run the ordinary algebra you have used
for years. Then exchange i2 for −1 the moment it appears. The question worth asking in advance is
whether the answers stay inside the system. If you add, subtract, multiply, or divide two complex
numbers, is the result again of the form (real)+(real)i? Watch for the answer as
each operation is built, because it will be yes all four times. That is what makes the complex
numbers a self-contained place to do mathematics rather than a notational accident.
Before computing anything, pin down what it means for two complex answers to agree. Your work will
produce expressions like 23+2i, and you need to know that no other pair of real numbers can name
that same value.
Suppose a+bi=c+di, where all four of a, b, c, d are real. Write r=a−c and
s=b−d, both real. Subtracting the right side from the left turns the supposed equality into
r+si=0, that is, r=−si.
Square both sides. The left side becomes r2, and the right side becomes (−si)2=s2i2=−s2,
so
r2=−s2,that is,r2+s2=0.
Now r and s are real numbers, so r2≥0 and s2≥0. If either of them were nonzero, its
square would be strictly positive and the sum r2+s2 would be strictly positive, not zero. So both
squares are zero, which forces r=0 and s=0, meaning a=c and b=d.
The converse direction is immediate: if a=c and b=d, the two expressions are the same expression.
So two complex numbers are equal exactly when their real parts match and their imaginary parts match.
∎
This little theorem is what makes complex answers readable. When a computation ends at 23+2i, the
real part 23 and the imaginary part 2 are not one description among many; they are the only
description. It also hands you a technique: an equation between complex numbers is really two equations
between real numbers, one for the real parts and one for the imaginary parts. Several problems in the
practice sets are solved by exactly that splitting.
Addition and subtraction combine like terms
Add two complex numbers by regrouping, which the commutative and associative laws permit, and then
factoring i out of the two imaginary terms, which the distributive law permits:
(a+bi)+(c+di)=(a+c)+(bi+di)=(a+c)+(b+d)i.
Real parts add to real parts, and imaginary parts add to imaginary parts, precisely the way x-terms
and constant terms keep to themselves when you simplify (3+5x)+(2+4x). Subtraction is the same
computation after distributing the minus sign through both terms of the second number:
(a+bi)−(c+di)=(a−c)+(b−d)i.
Notice what the right sides look like. Since a+c and b+d are real numbers, each result is again
(real)+(real)i: adding and subtracting complex numbers can never produce anything
but a complex number. Two operations down, two to go.
Worked example 1Adding and subtracting
Compute (3−5i)+(7+2i), then (4+3i)−(6−8i).
For the sum, collect the real parts and the imaginary parts separately:
(3−5i)+(7+2i)=(3+7)+(−5+2)i=10−3i.
For the difference, first distribute the minus sign through the second number, turning −(6−8i) into
−6+8i, and only then collect:
(4+3i)−(6−8i)=4+3i−6+8i=(4−6)+(3+8)i=−2+11i.
The single most common slip in this entire lesson happens in that second computation: subtracting only
the 6 and forgetting that the minus sign also flips the −8i. Distribute first, then combine.
Check your understanding
Compute (5−3i)−(2+4i).
Distribute the minus sign through both terms of 2+4i, then combine like terms.
(5−3i)−(2+4i)=5−3i−2−4i=(5−2)+(−3−4)i
The real part is 3 and the imaginary part is −7, so the difference is 3−7i.
Multiplication is expansion plus one substitution
Multiply two complex numbers the way you multiply any two binomials: distribute every term of the first
factor across every term of the second. Nothing about that step is new. The new step comes after, when
an i2 is sitting in the result and must be exchanged for −1:
(a+bi)(c+di)=ac+adi+bci+bdi2=(ac−bd)+(ad+bc)i.
Read the middle expression carefully. The four products are exactly the four you would write for
(a+bx)(c+dx). The only difference is the last one, where bdi2=−bd abandons the imaginary
column and joins the real part with its sign flipped. That is the whole novelty of complex
multiplication. Do not memorize the boxed-looking formula (ac−bd)+(ad+bc)i; it is faster and
safer to expand and substitute each time, letting the formula rebuild itself. And once more the result
is (real)+(real)i, so multiplication also stays inside the system.
An area model for the product of 2 + 3i and 4 - 5i. Each cell holds one of the four products from the expansion. Three cells are routine, but the bottom-right cell contains i squared, and the rule i squared = -1 folds it back into the real column. That returned +15 is why the real part of the answer is 23 rather than 8.
Worked example 2Two products in full
Compute (2+3i)(4−5i), then (3−2i)2.
Expand the first product term by term, exactly as the area model above lays it out:
(2+3i)(4−5i)=8−10i+12i−15i2.
Now spend the rule. Since i2=−1, the last term is −15i2=+15, a real number:
8−10i+12i+15=(8+15)+(−10+12)i=23+2i.
For the square, use the binomial pattern (x−y)2=x2−2xy+y2 with x=3 and y=2i, or
simply expand:
(3−2i)2=9−12i+4i2=9−12i−4=5−12i.
In both computations the expansion was ordinary algebra; the only complex-number moment was trading
each i2 for −1 before collecting.
Check your understanding
Compute (3+i)(2−5i).
Expand all four products first, keeping signs attached.
(3+i)(2−5i)=6−15i+2i−5i2
Then exchange i2 for −1, so −5i2=+5 joins the real part.
6+5+(−15+2)i=11−13i
The conjugate makes products real
One special product deserves its own name, because it powers everything in the rest of the lesson. The
conjugate of z=a+bi is the number
z=a−bi,
the same number with the sign of its imaginary part flipped. So 4+7i=4−7i, the
conjugate of −3−5i is −3+5i, and 6i=−6i. Flipping the sign twice restores the
original, so z=z: conjugation is its own undo. A real number is its own
conjugate, since r=r+0i and flipping the sign of 0 changes nothing, and the matching-parts
theorem gives the converse too: z=z demands −b=b, so b=0. A complex number equals
its own conjugate exactly when it is real.
Pair a number with its conjugate and both basic operations produce real answers. The sum is
(a+bi)+(a−bi)=2a, twice the real part, with the imaginary parts cancelling. The product is the
important one.
The product of conjugates is real and never negative#
Expand the product of z=a+bi and z=a−bi like any other product:
(a+bi)(a−bi)=a2−abi+abi−b2i2=a2+b2.
The two middle terms are opposites and cancel, and the last term flips sign because i2=−1. Compare
this with the difference-of-squares pattern (x+y)(x−y)=x2−y2 that you know from factoring:
the pattern fires here too, giving a2−(bi)2=a2−b2i2. That last i2 turns the familiar
difference of squares into a sum of squares. So
zz=a2+b2,
a real number built from two squares of real numbers. Each square is at least 0, so
zz≥0 always. Better still, the sum-of-squares argument from the equality proof
applies word for word: a2+b2=0 forces a=0 and b=0, and conversely z=0 gives
02+02=0. So zz is strictly positive for every complex number except z=0
itself.
∎
Keep the shape of that result in mind: multiplying any complex number by its conjugate erases i
entirely and leaves the positive real number a2+b2. The next lesson will draw a+bi as a point
in a plane and read a2+b2 off the picture geometrically. For this lesson, what matters is that
a2+b2 is real and, for z=0, positive.
Conjugation has one more property worth proving now, because a famous fact about quadratics will fall
out of it at the end of the lesson. Conjugation does not care whether you conjugate before or after
doing arithmetic.
Let z=a+bi and w=c+di be any two complex numbers, with a,b,c,d real.
For sums, compute both orders. Conjugating after adding gives
z+w=(a+c)+(b+d)i=(a+c)−(b+d)i. Adding the conjugates gives
z+w=(a−bi)+(c−di)=(a+c)−(b+d)i. The two agree, so
z+w=z+w.
For products, the multiplication formula from earlier gives zw=(ac−bd)+(ad+bc)i, so
conjugating after multiplying yields
zw=(ac−bd)−(ad+bc)i.
Multiplying the conjugates first instead,
zw=(a−bi)(c−di)=ac−adi−bci+bdi2=(ac−bd)−(ad+bc)i,
the same number. So zw=zw as well. In words: conjugate first or
compute first, the answer is identical, for addition and for multiplication. The answer is therefore
identical for anything built out of those two operations, such as subtraction, squaring, and higher
powers.
∎
Worked example 3Conjugate products at work
Compute (3+4i)(3−4i) and (1+2i)(1−2i) without a full expansion.
Each is a number times its own conjugate, so the theorem answers immediately with a2+b2:
(3+4i)(3−4i)=32+42=25,(1+2i)(1−2i)=12+22=5.
If you distrust the shortcut, expand the first one: 9−12i+12i−16i2=9+16=25. The cross
terms cancel and the i2 flips the last sign, exactly as the proof said they must. Notice both answers
are positive real numbers; an i can never survive this pairing.
Division is rationalizing in disguise
You have solved this problem before, in a different costume. When a denominator held a radical, you
multiplied by a well-chosen form of 1 to clear it:
3+21=3+21⋅3−23−2=9−23−2=73−2.
The conjugate 3−2 was chosen because the difference-of-squares pattern makes the new
denominator 32−(2)2=7, a rational number. Division of complex numbers is the same trick
with the same name. To divide by c+di, multiply numerator and denominator by its conjugate
c−di, and the proof above guarantees the new denominator is the real number c2+d2:
c+dia+bi=c+dia+bi⋅c−dic−di=c2+d2(a+bi)(c−di).
Multiplying by c−dic−di is multiplying by 1, so the value never changes; only its
costume does. After this move, the numerator is one ordinary complex multiplication, and dividing a
complex number by the positive real c2+d2 just divides each part, since
mp+qi=mp+mqi.
Pause on when this is allowed. The move needs c2+d2=0, and the conjugate proof showed
c2+d2=0 happens only for c+di=0. So the only forbidden division is division by zero, the
same single exception the real numbers always had. Every nonzero complex number can divide, and in
particular every nonzero z=c+di has a reciprocal,
c+di1=c2+d2c−di,
again of the form (real)+(real)i. That settles the closure question asked at the
start: all four operations take complex numbers to complex numbers. The system that began as one symbol
and one rule supports the full arithmetic that the rational and real numbers enjoy, with nothing missing
and nothing extra needed.
Worked example 4A quotient, start to finish
Compute 1−4i3+2i.
The denominator is 1−4i, so multiply numerator and denominator by its conjugate 1+4i:
1−4i3+2i⋅1+4i1+4i=(1−4i)(1+4i)(3+2i)(1+4i).
The denominator is a conjugate product, so it is 12+42=17 with no work. Expand the numerator
and spend i2=−1:
(3+2i)(1+4i)=3+12i+2i+8i2=3+14i−8=−5+14i.
Now divide each part by 17:
1−4i3+2i=17−5+14i=−175+1714i.
The answer is not pretty, but it is exact, and it has the required shape of a real part plus a real
multiple of i.
Worked example 5Division undoes multiplication
Find the complex number z satisfying (2−i)z=4+3i.
Division exists precisely to undo multiplication, so divide both sides by 2−i, which is legal
because 2−i=0:
Check it, because a check costs one multiplication:
(2−i)(1+2i)=2+4i−i−2i2=2+3i+2=4+3i.✓
Linear equations over the complex numbers solve exactly the way they did over the reals, because the
algebraic laws are the same and the reciprocal always exists.
Check your understanding
Compute 3−i2+i.
Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, 3+i. The denominator becomes 32+12=10.
10(2+i)(3+i)=106+2i+3i+i2=105+5i
Dividing each part by 10 gives 21+21i.
The quadratics that had no solutions
Here is the payoff the chapter has been building toward. In the last chapter, the discriminant sorted
every quadratic, and the verdict for Δ<0 was blunt: no real solutions. Take
z2−4z+5=0, whose discriminant is Δ=(−4)2−4(1)(5)=−4. The quadratic formula asks
for a number whose square is −4, and the reals have none; but the complex numbers do, because
(2i)2=4i2=−4. Feeding 2i into the formula in place of the missing square root suggests the
candidates
z=24±2i=2±i.
The formula was derived for real arithmetic, so treat this as a suggestion rather than a conclusion.
Then let the arithmetic of this lesson give the honest verdict by direct substitution.
Worked example 6Checking a complex root
Verify that z=2+i satisfies z2−4z+5=0.
Compute the square first, expanding and spending i2=−1:
z2=(2+i)2=4+4i+i2=3+4i.
Then assemble the whole left side, distributing −4 across 2+i:
z2−4z+5=(3+4i)−(8+4i)+5=(3−8+5)+(4−4)i=0.
Both the real part and the imaginary part collapse to 0, so 2+i really is a solution, certified by
nothing but addition and multiplication.
What about the other candidate, 2−i? It is the conjugate of the root just checked, and you do not
need to repeat the computation to trust it. Conjugate both sides of the true statement
z2−4z+5=0. The right side is the real number 0, its own conjugate. The left side is built
from z by multiplication and addition with the real numbers −4 and 5. The proof above showed
conjugation respects both operations while leaving real numbers fixed, so the conjugate of that left
side is z2−4z+5. The conjugated statement therefore reads
z2−4z+5=0: whenever a complex number solves this equation, its conjugate
automatically solves it too. Notice also that the pair fits the sum and product of roots from the last
chapter perfectly: (2+i)+(2−i)=4 and (2+i)(2−i)=22+12=5, matching
z2−4z+5 term for term. The final lesson of this chapter turns these observations into the full
story of quadratics with negative discriminants.
Common mistakes
Practice
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.
Longer questions in parts, to be worked out on paper. Progressive hints, the answer on its
own so you can check yourself and try again, then the full worked solution, plus a rubric
to mark your own work against.
By the middle of the 1500s, square roots of negatives kept turning up inside perfectly normal
problems. Nobody could ban them, since the algebra produced them without being asked. Nobody could use
them with any confidence either. One writer had multiplied a pair of them in a single worked case. He
set the answer aside as useless. What one such root times another meant in general, nobody had settled.
Rafael Bombelli was an engineer who drained marshes in northern Italy for a living. He wrote his
algebra book while one of those projects was held up, and it appeared in 1572. What he offered was not
so much a discovery as a decision. He treated the impossible root as an object like any other, and
built it the first systematic table of signs.
He had no symbol for it, so he used words. A positive multiple of the root he called “plus of minus”,
and a negative one “minus of minus”. Then came the rule that opened everything after it: plus of
minus, times plus of minus, makes minus. Take the words away and that line is i⋅i=−1, two
centuries before the letter arrived.
The rest followed from ordinary algebra, and Bombelli used it on cubics that had defeated everyone.
His key point was a humble one. Once you can multiply, you can expand, and this lesson is that point
carried through. You spread the product out as you would any binomial, then trade every
i2 for −1.