Parabolas: Free Response
5 questions in parts, 57 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.
-
1. From two distances to one equation . Foundational, 11 points. Question 1 of 5.
Every fact this lesson proves about a parabola starts from the same single sentence: a point belongs to the curve exactly when its distance to the focus equals its distance to the directrix. This question puts that sentence to work on a parabola whose focus and directrix are not centered at the origin, then asks why the algebra that turns the sentence into an equation can be trusted.
- Part A.
A parabola has focus and directrix . Starting from the distance condition for a point , derive the equation of this parabola and write it in the form .
Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 4 points
- Part B.
From the equation you found in part A, read off the vertex, the value of , and which way the parabola opens. Then check that these give back the focus and directrix stated in the problem.
Carry your own answer forward Read these values off whatever equation you reached in part A, in the form ; credit is for reading , , and off your own coefficients correctly, not for matching one particular equation.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 4 points
- Part C.
The derivation in part A squared both sides of . Explain why that squaring step could not introduce an extraneous solution, that is, why every point satisfying the squared equation also satisfies the original distance condition.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 3 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Write the two distances in part A as expressions in and before touching a single algebra step; the rest of the derivation is bookkeeping once that one equation exists.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Expand and separately and watch which terms cancel; the placement of the directrix relative to the vertex is exactly what makes the terms disappear.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
The number multiplying is , not on its own; divide it by and keep the sign before you use it anywhere else.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Ask what sign a square root and an absolute value can ever produce, then ask what that guarantees about when two nonnegative numbers being equal is the same fact as their squares being equal.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
- Any equivalent unsimplified line, such as , reached before it is written in the standard form
Part B
Vertex , , opens downward. Focus and directrix match the given data.
Part C
A square root and an absolute value are both never negative, so both sides of the original equation are nonnegative. For nonnegative quantities, holds exactly when , so squaring changes nothing about the solution set.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Write both distances as expressions in and , then set them equal. The distance to the focus is , and the distance to the horizontal directrix is , so
Both sides are nonnegative, so squaring is reversible:
Expand the two squares in : and . Substituting,
The terms cancel, and moving everything but to the right side gives
So the equation is , already in the required form.
Part B
Match against the template . The vertex is , and the coefficient on the right is , so
Since , the focus sits below the vertex and the curve opens downward.
Recover the focus and directrix from , , and and check them against the problem: the focus is , and the directrix is . Both agree exactly with the focus and directrix given at the start, confirming the derivation.
Part C
Squaring an equation can normally introduce extraneous solutions, because does not in general have the same solutions as : for instance and give the same square but are different equations. What rescues this particular squaring step is the nature of the two quantities being squared.
A square root, by its definition, is never negative, and an absolute value is never negative either. So both and are nonnegative numbers for every and . For two nonnegative real numbers and , it is a genuine biconditional that
because the function is one-to-one on the nonnegative numbers (it never sends two different nonnegative values to the same square). So no solution of the original equation is lost, and no new solution is gained: the squared equation has exactly the same solution set.
In one line
, with vertex , , opening downward, and focus and directrix exactly as given. The squaring step loses nothing because both sides of the original equation are nonnegative distances, and for nonnegative quantities equality survives squaring in both directions.
Another way: Find the vertex first, then write the equation directly
Since the vertex is always the midpoint of the segment from the focus to the point of the directrix directly across from it, average the focus with the point directly above it on the directrix: the vertex is . The signed distance from the vertex to the focus is . Both numbers can now be dropped straight into without repeating the distance-squaring argument, giving .
When it is worth it Once the general derivation has been proved once, finding a specific parabola's equation from its focus and directrix is faster from the vertex and alone than from re-deriving the distance condition every time.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Writes the distance to the focus and the distance to the directrix as expressions in and , and sets them equal before squaring anything. . Worth 2 points.
Squares both sides, expands the two binomials correctly, and simplifies to isolate on one side, showing the cancellation of the terms. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Part B 4 points
Reads the vertex and the value correctly from the coefficient , not from directly. . Worth 2 points.
States that the parabola opens downward, tying that conclusion to the sign of . . Worth 1 point.
Recovers the focus and directrix from , , and , and confirms they match the values given in the stem. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
States that both sides of the original equation are nonnegative distances (a square root and an absolute value), rather than treating this as a general fact about all equations. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Concludes that is equivalent to specifically for nonnegative quantities, and that this is why no solution is gained or lost. . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
Derive the equation of the parabola with focus and directrix , then state its vertex and the direction it opens.
The answer
; vertex ; opens upward since .
Set the two distances equal: . Squaring, both sides nonnegative,
Expanding and and cancelling the terms,
The vertex is , and gives , so the parabola opens upward.
-
-
2. The number in front is not the distance to the focus . Application, 10 points. Question 2 of 5.
The coefficient in carries two pieces of information folded together, and the parabola is a clean place to pull them apart: one number gives the width of the chord through the focus, and a separate shortcut turns the distance from any point on the curve to the focus into a one-line computation.
- Part A.
For the parabola , find , the focus, the directrix, and the focal width.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Using only the focus and the value of from part A, with no new substitution into , find the two endpoints of the chord through the focus parallel to the directrix. Then confirm that one of them satisfies the original equation.
Carry your own answer forward Use whichever focus and you found in part A; credit is for using them consistently, not for matching one particular pair of values.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part C.
Show that lies on , then find its distance to the focus two ways: directly with the distance formula, and with the shortcut . Explain why those two computations are guaranteed to agree for every point of this parabola.
Carry your own answer forward Use the focus you found in part A for both computations.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
Match the given equation against before doing anything else; every later part of this question reuses the value of and the focus you read off here.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part B
The chord's two endpoints sit at the same height as the focus itself, and the focal width tells you how far each one sits from the axis of symmetry.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
The shortcut is not an extra fact to memorize on top of the definition; it is what the distance-to-the-directrix side of the definition already simplifies to for a point with .
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
; focus ; directrix ; focal width .
Part B
and .
Part C
satisfies . Both methods give . They must agree because the shortcut is exactly the distance to the directrix, which the definition sets equal to for every point of the curve.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Match against the template . The coefficient in front of is , not itself, so
With the vertex at the origin, the focus is and the directrix is . The focal width is the absolute value of the same coefficient that was matched first, .
Part B
The chord through the focus parallel to the directrix sits at the same height as the focus, , and reaches on either side of the axis of symmetry, so its endpoints are
No substitution into was needed to locate them. Checking one endpoint against the original equation,
confirms it genuinely lies on the curve.
Part C
Substituting confirms the point is on the curve: .
By the distance formula, using the focus ,
By the shortcut,
Both give , and that is not a coincidence of this one point. The shortcut is not a separate fact bolted onto the definition; for it is simply the distance from to the horizontal directrix , namely for a point with . The defining condition of the parabola sets that distance equal to for every point of the curve, so the two computations are two routes to the same number, not two independent checks.
In one line
has , focus , directrix , and focal width , with focal chord endpoints . The point lies on the curve, and its focal distance is whether computed by the distance formula or by the shortcut , because that shortcut is exactly the directrix side of the defining condition.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Matches the equation against and identifies before doing any division. . Worth 1 point.
Computes , the focus, the directrix, and the focal width correctly, with the correct sign on each. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 3 points
Locates the two endpoints as using the focus and alone, without substituting a new value into to find them. . Worth 2 points.
Verifies that at least one endpoint satisfies . . Worth 1 point.
Part C 4 points
Verifies that satisfies by direct substitution. . Worth 1 point.
Computes correctly by both the distance formula and the shortcut . . Worth 2 points.
Explains that the shortcut is exactly the distance-to-directrix side of the defining condition, so it must equal rather than merely happening to. . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
For , find the focus, directrix, and focal width, then compute the focal distance of the point two ways.
The answer
, focus , directrix , focal width ; the point has focal distance by both the distance formula and the shortcut .
Matching against gives
so the focus is , the directrix is , and the focal width is . Checking the point, .
By the distance formula,
By the shortcut,
-
-
3. The coefficient is not p, and neither is the sign a coincidence . Reasoning, 12 points. Question 3 of 5.
A single misread number produces a focus that is off by a lot, not a little, and the fix is the same confusion the lesson warns about. This question corrects that error, then asks for an algebraic reason, not a picture, for why the sign of the coefficient controls which way a sideways parabola opens.
- Part A.
A student is asked for the focus of and writes: 'Matching against , the vertex is and , so the focus is .' Identify the specific error, and give the correct focus and directrix.
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 4 points
- Part B.
Using only the equation , and without appealing to a picture, show that every point of this parabola satisfies , and say what that proves about which side of the vertex the curve lies on.
Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 4 points
- Part C.
Suppose instead the coefficient were negative, so the equation has the general form with . Repeat the argument of part B in general: what inequality does it force on , and which way does the curve open? Be careful with the direction of the inequality when you divide by a negative number.
Carry your own answer forward Use the same style of argument as part B (a real square can never be negative); you do not need any of the specific numbers from part A.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
A wrong number and a wrong reason are different things to catch. Before fixing anything, name exactly which single quantity the student misread.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Compare the given equation term by term against the general standard form; the coefficient sitting there carries only one piece of information, and it is not .
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
A real number's square can never be negative. Apply that one fact to the left side of the given equation, and the rest of the argument is a single division.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Redo the one-line argument from part B, but the number you are dividing by is negative this time, and dividing an inequality by a negative number is not free.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
The student treated the coefficient as itself, when is , so , not . The correct focus is and directrix is .
Part B
Since always, and it equals , dividing by the positive gives , i.e. : the whole curve lies on or to the right of the vertical line through the vertex.
Part C
Since and it equals with , dividing by the negative flips the inequality: , i.e. . The curve lies on or to the left of the vertex, so it opens left.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
The vertex reading is correct: matching and against and gives , exactly as the student found. The error is in the very next step.
The number sitting in the equation is , the focal width, not itself. Dividing correctly,
The focus is units from the vertex along the axis, so
and the directrix is the same distance on the other side, . The student's answer of came from adding the whole coefficient instead of its quarter.
Part B
A real number's square is never negative, so the left side of the equation satisfies
for every real . The equation says this quantity equals , so
Dividing by the positive number preserves the direction of the inequality:
So every satisfying the equation has , meaning the entire curve lies on or to the right of the vertical line , which passes through the vertex. No point of the parabola can ever sit to the left of its own vertex.
Part C
The starting fact is the same as in part B: for every real , and the equation says this equals , so
This time the coefficient is negative, and dividing an inequality by a negative number reverses its direction:
So every point of this parabola satisfies , meaning the whole curve lies on or to the left of the vertical line through the vertex, which is exactly what "opens left" means. The sign of was the only thing that changed between the two arguments, and it alone flipped both the inequality's direction and the curve's direction.
In one line
The student's error is mistaking for itself; the correct focus is and directrix . Algebraically, forces and hence , so the whole curve lies to the right of the vertex, which is why it opens right. The same argument with a negative flips the inequality to , showing why a negative opens a horizontal-axis parabola to the left.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Names the specific error as mistaking the coefficient for itself, not merely stating that the final answer is wrong. . Worth 2 points.
Computes the correct value from . . Worth 1 point.
States the correct focus and correct directrix . . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Uses the fact that a real number's square is never negative to conclude directly from the given equation. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Divides by the positive correctly to reach . . Worth 1 point.
States the geometric meaning of the inequality: the entire curve lies on one side of the vertical line through the vertex. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 4 points
Divides the inequality by the negative and correctly reverses its direction. . Worth 2 points.
States the resulting containment and connects it to the curve opening left. . Worth 1 point.
Explicitly identifies dividing by a negative number as the step that reverses the inequality, rather than leaving the sign flip unexplained. . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
A student claims the focus of is . Find the actual focus and directrix, then show algebraically that every point of this parabola satisfies .
The answer
Correct focus , directrix ; since forces , dividing by the negative flips the inequality to , so .
Matching gives vertex and
The focus is and the directrix is ; the student added the whole coefficient instead of dividing it by .
Since , the equation forces . Dividing by the negative reverses the inequality:
-
-
4. What completing the square hides about p . Application, 12 points. Question 4 of 5.
A quadratic with a fractional leading coefficient still hides a focus and a directrix, and completing the square reveals them. This question also asks for the exact relationship between that leading coefficient and : the two are related, but not interchangeable.
- Part A.
Complete the square on to reach vertex form, then isolate the squared term to reach the form .
Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 4 points
- Part B.
State the focus and directrix of this parabola, and say which way it opens.
Carry your own answer forward Read these values off whatever equation you reached in part A; credit is for reading the focus and directrix off your own coefficients correctly, not for matching one particular equation.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 4 points
- Part C.
The original equation is , in the form with . Explain why is NOT simply , and use your work in part A to state the correct relationship between and .
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Completing the square with a fractional leading coefficient uses exactly the same steps as with a whole-number one; only the arithmetic is fussier.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Factor the out of both -terms first, complete the square inside the parentheses, and then multiply the whole equation by the reciprocal of that fraction to isolate the squared term.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
The number multiplying once the square is isolated is , not ; divide it by and read the sign before deciding a direction.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Go back to the general relationship between vertex form's leading coefficient and the standard conic form: it involves , not alone.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
Focus ; directrix ; opens upward since .
Part C
because equals , not ; here while . The correct relation is , which gives .
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Factor out of the two -terms before completing the square:
The vertex form gives vertex . To isolate the squared term, add to both sides and multiply by the reciprocal of :
Part B
From , the coefficient gives , so . Since , the parabola opens upward. The focus sits above the vertex, and the directrix the same distance below:
Part C
Rearranging vertex form to isolate the square gives . Matching that against the standard conic form shows that the coefficient plays the role of , not on its own:
Solving for gives the correct relationship,
With , that is , exactly the value found in part A. Treating as directly would have given , four times too large, because it skips the division by that turning vertex form into the conic form requires.
In one line
, vertex , focus , directrix , opening upward. With , the relation is , not .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Factors out of the -terms and completes the square correctly, including the constant correction this produces. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Isolates the squared term correctly to reach . . Worth 1 point.
States the vertex . . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Reads from the equation and computes . . Worth 1 point.
Computes the correct focus and directrix . . Worth 2 points.
States that the parabola opens upward, tying that to the sign of . . Worth 1 point.
Part C 4 points
States that equals , not , by rearranging vertex form into the conic standard form. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Computes correctly from . . Worth 1 point.
Contrasts the correct value with the wrong shortcut value explicitly, rather than only stating the correct formula. . Worth 1 point.
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
Complete the square on to find the vertex, focus, and directrix, and state in terms of .
The answer
; vertex ; focus ; directrix ; , not .
Factoring and completing the square,
The vertex is . Isolating the square gives
so and . The focus is and the directrix is . Checking against the general relationship,
not .
-
-
5. A curve that is a function of y but not of x . Reasoning, 12 points. Question 5 of 5.
Completing the square on the squared variable is the same procedure whichever letter carries the square, and swapping which variable is squared swaps which axis the parabola runs along. This question completes the square on , then asks what that sideways opening does to the vertical line test.
- Part A.
Complete the square on the -terms of to reach the form .
Complete the derivation Each line should follow from the one above it. Say what lets you take each step. 4 points
- Part B.
State the focus, directrix, and direction of opening for this parabola.
Carry your own answer forward Read these values off whatever equation you reached in part A; credit is for reading the focus, directrix, and direction off your own coefficients correctly, not for matching one particular equation.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points
- Part C.
Show that the vertical line meets this parabola twice, and use that to explain why the curve cannot be the graph of a function of . Then solve the equation for in terms of to show it IS the graph of a function of .
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 3
Completing the square on the -terms works exactly like completing it on the -terms, with the roles of the two variables swapped.
-
Hint 2 of 3 · Part A
Move every term except the -terms to the other side of the equation before completing the square, and add the same completing number to both sides.
-
Hint 3 of 3 · Part C
Pick a single value of inside the curve's domain and solve the resulting equation for directly; a quadratic in typically hands back two roots, not one.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
Focus ; directrix ; opens right, since .
Part C
At : , so or , two points on one vertical line, so the curve fails the vertical line test. Solving gives , one for every , so it is a function of .
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Move everything except the -terms to the other side:
Half of is , and , so add to both sides to complete the square:
Factoring the right side gives the required form, , with vertex .
Part B
From , the coefficient gives , so , and since the axis is horizontal and the curve opens to the right. The focus sits to the right of the vertex and the directrix the same distance to the left:
Part C
Substitute into :
Both and satisfy the equation, so the single vertical line meets the curve at two points. A graph is the graph of a function of exactly when every vertical line meets it at most once, and this line meets it twice, so the curve is not the graph of a function of .
Solving the same equation for instead, dividing by and moving the constant,
The right side is a single number for every real , so this equation assigns exactly one -value to each -value: the curve is the graph of a function , even though it failed to be one of .
In one line
, vertex , focus , directrix , opening right. The vertical line meets the curve at and , so it fails the vertical line test and is not a function of , but solving for shows it is a function of .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Isolates the -terms and completes the square correctly, adding the same completing constant to both sides of the equation. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Factors the right side correctly into . . Worth 1 point.
States the vertex . . Worth 1 point.
Part B 3 points
Reads from the equation and computes . . Worth 1 point.
Computes the correct focus and directrix . . Worth 1 point.
States that the parabola opens to the right, tying that to the sign of . . Worth 1 point.
Part C 5 points
Solves at to find both -values. . Worth 2 points.
States that two points sharing one vertical line means the curve fails the vertical line test and is not a function of . . Worth 1 point. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Solves the equation for in terms of and identifies the result as a function of . . Worth 2 points.
Try a similar problem (Optional)
Same idea, different numbers. Work it on paper, then check yourself the same way.
Complete the square on to find its vertex, focus, and directrix, then show the vertical line meets the curve twice.
The answer
; vertex ; focus ; directrix ; at , or , two points on one vertical line.
Isolating the -terms, . Half of is , and , so
The vertex is , and gives , so the focus is and the directrix is .
At ,
two points on the single vertical line .
-