Properties of Logarithms
Learning goals
- Read every rule as an exponent law run backwards
- Apply the product, quotient and power rules with their domains
- Change base with
- Expand and condense logarithmic expressions using all three rules
- Use to count the digits of a huge power
The mirror behind every rule
Everything here rests on the definition you already have. For a base with and , and for ,
A logarithm is an exponent. It is the exponent you must put on to reach . Two consequences follow immediately and get used constantly: for every , and for every real . Those two say that raising to a power and taking a base- logarithm are inverse operations, each undoing the other.
Here is what that gives you with actual numbers. Since and , their product is . Multiplying the numbers matched adding their exponents, and . But and are also the base-two logarithms of and , so that same addition is . Multiplying two numbers matched adding their logarithms. That one example is the whole idea of this lesson. The three rules below just say it for any base and any numbers, not only , , and .
To see why it always works, recall the exponent laws, which hold for every real exponent whenever the base is positive:
Each of the three logarithm rules is one of these laws, read backwards. That gives us a single proof strategy, and we will use it three times without variation:
- Name the logarithms. Put and .
- Translate to exponents. The definition says and .
- Apply the matching exponent law to combine them.
- Translate back by taking of both sides.
The exponent laws and the logarithm rules line up exactly, one for one:
| Exponent law | Logarithm rule it becomes |
|---|---|
Multiplication on the inside becomes addition on the outside, division becomes subtraction, and an exponent becomes a multiplier. One level of difficulty is stripped away every time.
The product rule
For with , and for and :
The product rule#
Let and . Both of these logarithms exist precisely because and are positive, and by the definition of a logarithm the two statements say exactly that and .
Multiply those two equations together. The left sides give and the right sides give , so . The exponent law for a product of powers with the same base collapses the right side into a single power, , and therefore
Read that last line back through the definition of a logarithm. It says that the exponent you must put on to reach is , which is to say . (The left side is legitimate: and are positive, so is positive too.) Substituting back what and stood for,
The condition and is not decorative, and it is stronger than requiring the product to be positive. Take . Their product is , so the left side is a perfectly good number, but does not exist, so the right side is not merely wrong, it is meaningless. The rule needs each factor positive, not just their product.
Here is what the product rule looks like as a picture. Mark the numbers through on a ruler, but place each number at a distance proportional to from the left end instead of at its own value. On that ruler, distances are logarithms, so adding two logarithms means laying two distances end to end.
The second bar is the distance from to , but it has been shifted so it starts at . It ends at . Multiplying by always moves you the same distance to the right on this scale, no matter where you start, and that fixed distance is . A slide rule is exactly two of these scales, and sliding one against the other adds the distances for you.
The quotient rule
For with , and for and :
The quotient rule#
This is the product-rule proof with one symbol changed. Let and , so and . Divide the two equations instead of multiplying them:
using the exponent law for a quotient of powers with the same base. ( since , so the division is legal, and , so its logarithm exists.) Reading back through the definition gives , which is
One special case is worth keeping in your head. Put and use :
Taking a reciprocal on the inside flips the sign on the outside. That single fact converts every division into a subtraction and every “one over” into a minus sign.
Check your understanding
Which single logarithm is equal to ?
A difference of two logarithms with the same base is the logarithm of the quotient, so divide the insides rather than subtracting them.
subtracts the arguments, which is not what the rule says. And divides two logarithm values, a different operation from the quotient rule; it is not equal to .
The power rule
For with , for , and for any real number :
The power rule#
Same pattern once more. Let , which exists because , so . Raise both sides to the power :
using the exponent law for a power of a power, which holds for every real exponent because . Since is positive, is positive and its logarithm exists. Reading the line back through the definition gives , and substituting gives the rule:
Notice what the power rule does: an exponent trapped inside a logarithm walks out to the front as a plain multiplier. That is the property that made logarithms indispensable, because it turns the brutal operation of raising to a power into ordinary multiplication.
The domain condition here is the one students lose. The rule requires . Consider the familiar-looking claim
This is true for every , and it is false for every , for a reason that is easy to miss: when is negative, is still positive. The left side is therefore a perfectly good number, but does not exist for a negative , so the right side is not a number at all. At neither side exists. So the equation holds exactly when , no more and no less.
The repair is an absolute value. For any we have with , so the power rule applies to and gives the identity that is true for every nonzero :
Check it on : the left side is , and the right side is . They agree, and neither one asks you to take the logarithm of a negative number.
Check your understanding
For which values of is the statement true?
For the power rule applies directly and both sides are equal, so every positive works.
For the left side is fine, because , but the right side contains with negative, which does not exist. At neither side exists.
So the statement is true exactly on . The identity that survives for all is .
Expanding and condensing
Two skills come out of the three rules, and they are the same skill run in opposite directions.
Expanding takes one logarithm of a complicated expression and breaks it into a sum and difference of simpler logarithms. Work from the outside in: split the top and bottom of a fraction first (quotient rule). Then split the products (product rule), and then bring exponents down to the front (power rule). Roots are exponents in disguise, so before you start.
Condensing runs the film backwards, aiming for one logarithm with no coefficient left outside it. The product and quotient rules combine two bare logarithms, ; they say nothing about a coefficient in front. So the first step is always the power rule: send every coefficient back up as an exponent, turning each term into a bare logarithm. Only then can the product and quotient rules add everything into a single numerator and subtract the rest into a single denominator.
Throughout, assume every variable inside a logarithm is positive. Textbooks say this so often that they stop saying it out loud, but you now know why they must.
Worked example 1 Evaluate without a calculator
Neither logarithm is a whole number on its own, so evaluating them separately is hopeless. Combine them first with the product rule.
Now the question is what exponent turns into , and the answer is , since :
The ugly numbers were never the point. The rule let them cancel before we ever had to face them.
Worked example 2 Expand for
Start with the fraction, using the quotient rule to split numerator from denominator:
The numerator is a product, so the product rule splits it again, and the denominator is a root, which is the power :
Now the power rule brings both exponents to the front, and because :
Every logarithm left in the answer is as simple as it can be, which is what “expand” asks for.
Worked example 3 Condense into one logarithm
We want a single logarithm with no coefficient in front, and the product and quotient rules only combine bare logarithms. So clear the coefficients first by running the power rule backwards:
The two logarithms being added combine into a product, and the one being subtracted goes into the denominator:
A single logarithm, as requested. Reversing the steps expands it back to where we started, which is a good way to check your work.
Check your understanding
Condense into a single logarithm.
Clear the coefficient first. The power rule turns into , and now both logarithms have coefficient , so the quotient rule combines them.
turns a difference of logarithms into a logarithm of a difference, which the quotient rule never does. combined the terms with the quotient rule but forgot to send the up as an exponent first, so it is not fully condensed. still has a coefficient sitting outside a single logarithm, which is not one logarithm on its own.
Worked example 4 How a log table multiplies, using and
Those two entries are enough to compute the logarithm of any number built from s and s. That is exactly how a four-figure table was used for three centuries.
Take . Factor the inside first: . Now the product rule splits the factors and the power rule brings the exponent down:
Take . Write it as a quotient, , and subtract:
Now put the two together to see the actual trick. Since , multiplying is the same as adding their logarithms:
A table lets you look that sum back up to find the number it belongs to. Because , the closest entry is , which you can check directly: . The small gap between and is just the rounding in our four-decimal entries; a real table, carrying more decimal places, would land on even more precisely. Two table lookups and an addition replaced a multiplication; two lookups and a subtraction replaced a division.
Change of base
Every logarithm in the lesson so far has had a friendly base. Real questions are not so polite: a population that triples, an interest rate, a half-life, all produce logarithms in bases nobody has tabulated. Worse, a calculator offers you only a couple of bases, not the one you happen to need.
The fix is the change-of-base formula. For with and , and for :
Any base you can compute in will do for . The formula converts the base you want into the base you have.
Here is why it works, in three lines. Let , so . Take a base- logarithm of both sides and use the power rule on the left:
Solve for by dividing by , and since , that gives the formula. The division is always legal, because would mean , that is , and was excluded as a base from the start. The full derivation, with every legality check spelled out, is in where the change-of-base formula comes from, at the bottom of this lesson.
One special case is worth knowing: swapping the base and the argument inverts the value, so sits alongside . It falls straight out of the formula. The one line of algebra is in why swapping the base and the argument inverts the value, at the bottom of this lesson.
Worked example 5 Evaluate exactly, and to three decimal places
For , notice that both and are powers of , so change to base , where both logarithms are exact:
Check it against the definition: . Correct.
For there is no such luck, so change to base , which is what a calculator’s log key gives you:
A quick sanity check keeps you honest: and , and sits between them, so the answer had to land between and .
Check your understanding
Rewrite using base-10 logarithms.
Change of base puts the argument on top and the old base underneath, never the other way round.
Sanity check the size: and , and lies between them, so the answer must lie between and . The upside-down version would give about , which is not even close.
What the rules buy you
The power rule does something no amount of arithmetic can: it measures a number too large to write down. How many digits does have? Multiplying it out is possible but tedious, and for it would be hopeless. Logarithms answer the question in one line.
The idea is that a positive integer has digits exactly when . (A three-digit number runs from to , which is .) So the digit count is read off from where falls between consecutive whole numbers.
Worked example 6 How many digits does have? Use
Take the base-10 logarithm and let the power rule pull the exponent down:
That value sits between and . Because grows as grows, this pins the number itself:
A number that is at least but below has exactly digits. So has digits, and indeed .
The same line handles , where tells you the answer has digits, without writing a single one of them.
That is the shape of every application in the next lessons. Whenever an unknown is stuck in an exponent, take a logarithm and the power rule drags it down to where ordinary algebra can reach it.