Properties of Logarithms
Learning goals
- Read every rule as an exponent law run backwards
- Apply the product, quotient and power rules with their domains
- Change base with
- Expand by splitting quotients, then products, then exponents
- Condense by sending coefficients up as exponents first
- Use to count the digits of a huge power
The mirror behind every rule
Everything here rests on the definition you already have. For a base with and , and for ,
A logarithm is an exponent. It is the exponent you must put on to reach . Two consequences follow immediately and get used constantly: for every , and for every real . Those two say that raising to a power and taking a base- logarithm are inverse operations, each undoing the other.
Now recall the exponent laws, which hold for every real exponent whenever the base is positive:
Each of the three logarithm rules is one of these laws, read backwards. That gives us a single proof strategy, and we will use it three times without variation:
- Name the logarithms. Put and .
- Translate to exponents. The definition says and .
- Apply the matching exponent law to combine them.
- Translate back by taking of both sides.
Because the exponent laws sit on one side of the mirror and the logarithm rules on the other, the correspondence is exact:
| Exponent law | Logarithm rule it becomes |
|---|---|
Multiplication on the inside becomes addition on the outside, division becomes subtraction, and an exponent becomes a multiplier. One level of difficulty is stripped away every time.
The product rule
For with , and for and :
The product rule#
Let and . Both of these logarithms exist precisely because and are positive, and by the definition of a logarithm the two statements say exactly that and .
Multiply those two equations together. The left sides give and the right sides give , so . The exponent law for a product of powers with the same base collapses the right side into a single power, , and therefore
Read that last line back through the definition of a logarithm. It says that the exponent you must put on to reach is , which is to say . (The left side is legitimate: and are positive, so is positive too.) Substituting back what and stood for,
The condition and is not decorative, and it is stronger than requiring the product to be positive. Take . Their product is , so the left side is a perfectly good number, but does not exist, so the right side is not merely wrong, it is meaningless. The rule needs each factor positive, not just their product. When both factors happen to be negative you can still get somewhere, because and both absolute values are positive: .
Here is what the product rule looks like as a picture. Mark the numbers through on a ruler, but place each number at a distance proportional to from the left end instead of at its own value. On that ruler, distances are logarithms, so adding two logarithms means laying two distances end to end.
The second bar is the distance from to , but it has been shifted so it starts at . It ends at . Multiplying by always moves you the same distance to the right on this scale, no matter where you start, and that fixed distance is . A slide rule is exactly two of these scales, and sliding one against the other adds the distances for you.
The quotient rule
For with , and for and :
The quotient rule#
The proof is the product rule with one symbol changed. Set and , which exist because and are positive, and translate them into and .
This time divide the two equations instead of multiplying them:
where the second equality is the exponent law for a quotient of powers with the same base. Note that , since , so the division is legal, and is positive, so its logarithm exists.
Reading back through the definition of a logarithm gives , and substituting back for and finishes it:
One special case is worth keeping in your head. Put and use :
Taking a reciprocal on the inside flips the sign on the outside. That single fact converts every division into a subtraction and every “one over” into a minus sign.
Check your understanding
Which single logarithm is equal to ?
A difference of two logarithms with the same base is the logarithm of the quotient, so divide the insides rather than subtracting them.
subtracts the arguments, which is not what the rule says. A quotient of two logarithms is a different animal altogether: by change of base it equals , not .
The power rule
For with , for , and for any real number :
The power rule#
Let , which exists because , and translate it: .
Raise both sides to the power . Equal numbers raised to the same power stay equal, so . The exponent law for a power of a power says , and it holds for every real exponent because the base is positive. Hence
Since is positive, is positive, so is positive and its logarithm exists. Reading the line back through the definition gives , and substituting gives the rule:
Notice what the power rule does: an exponent trapped inside a logarithm walks out to the front as a plain multiplier. That is the property that made logarithms indispensable, because it turns the brutal operation of raising to a power into ordinary multiplication.
The domain condition here is the one students lose. The rule requires . Consider the familiar-looking claim
This is true for every , and it is false for every , for a reason that is easy to miss: when is negative, is still positive. The left side is therefore a perfectly good number, but does not exist for a negative , so the right side is not a number at all. At neither side exists. So the equation holds exactly when , no more and no less.
The repair is an absolute value. For any we have with , so the power rule applies to and gives the identity that is true for every nonzero :
Check it on : the left side is , and the right side is . They agree, and neither one asks you to take the logarithm of a negative number.
Check your understanding
For which values of is the statement true?
For the power rule applies directly and both sides are equal, so every positive works.
For the left side is fine, because , but the right side contains with negative, which does not exist. At neither side exists.
So the statement is true exactly on . The identity that survives for all is .
Expanding and condensing
Two skills come out of the three rules, and they are the same skill run in opposite directions.
Expanding takes one logarithm of a complicated expression and breaks it into a sum and difference of simpler logarithms. Work from the outside in: split the top and bottom of a fraction first (quotient rule). Then split the products (product rule), and then bring exponents down to the front (power rule). Roots are exponents in disguise, so before you start.
Condensing runs the film backwards, and the order matters just as much. First send every coefficient back up as an exponent (power rule), because the product and quotient rules only combine logarithms with a coefficient of . Then add up the logarithms into a single numerator and subtract the rest into a single denominator.
Throughout, assume every variable inside a logarithm is positive. Textbooks say this so often that they stop saying it out loud, but you now know why they must.
Worked example 1 Evaluate without a calculator
Neither logarithm is a whole number on its own, so evaluating them separately is hopeless. Combine them first with the product rule.
Now the question is what exponent turns into , and the answer is , since :
The ugly numbers were never the point. The rule let them cancel before we ever had to face them.
Worked example 2 Expand for
Start with the fraction, using the quotient rule to split numerator from denominator:
The numerator is a product, so the product rule splits it again, and the denominator is a root, which is the power :
Now the power rule brings both exponents to the front, and because :
Every logarithm left in the answer is as simple as it can be, which is what “expand” asks for.
Worked example 3 Condense into one logarithm
The product and quotient rules cannot touch a logarithm that has a coefficient in front of it, so clear the coefficients first by running the power rule backwards:
The two logarithms being added combine into a product, and the one being subtracted goes into the denominator:
A single logarithm, as requested. Reversing the steps expands it back to where we started, which is a good way to check your work.
Worked example 4 How a log table multiplies, using and
Those two entries are enough to compute the logarithm of any number built from s and s. That is exactly how a four-figure table was used for three centuries.
Take . Factor the inside first: . Now the product rule splits the factors and the power rule brings the exponent down:
Take . Write it as a quotient, , and subtract:
Two table lookups and an addition replaced a multiplication; two lookups and a subtraction replaced a division.
Change of base
Every logarithm in the lesson so far has had a friendly base. Real questions are not so polite: a population that triples, an interest rate, a half-life, all produce logarithms in bases nobody has tabulated. Worse, a calculator offers you only a couple of bases, not the one you happen to need.
The fix is the change-of-base formula. For with and , and for :
Any base you can compute in will do for . The formula converts the base you want into the base you have.
The division by is always legal, because would mean , that is , and was excluded as a base from the start. The formula itself is three lines of the power rule applied to . The derivation is worked through in full in where the change-of-base formula comes from, at the bottom of this lesson.
One special case is worth knowing: swapping the base and the argument inverts the value, so sits alongside . It falls straight out of the formula. The one line of algebra is in why swapping the base and the argument inverts the value, at the bottom of this lesson.
Worked example 5 Evaluate exactly, and to three decimal places
For , notice that both and are powers of , so change to base , where both logarithms are exact:
Check it against the definition: . Correct.
For there is no such luck, so change to base , which is what a calculator’s log key gives you:
A quick sanity check keeps you honest: and , and sits between them, so the answer had to land between and .
Check your understanding
Rewrite using base-10 logarithms.
Change of base puts the argument on top and the old base underneath, never the other way round.
Sanity check the size: and , and lies between them, so the answer must lie between and . The upside-down version would give about , which is not even close.
What the rules buy you
The power rule does something no amount of arithmetic can: it measures a number too large to write down. How many digits does have? Multiplying it out is possible but tedious, and for it would be hopeless. Logarithms answer the question in one line.
The idea is that a positive integer has digits exactly when . (A three-digit number runs from to , which is .) So the digit count is read off from where falls between consecutive whole numbers.
Worked example 6 How many digits does have? Use
Take the base-10 logarithm and let the power rule pull the exponent down:
That value sits between and . Because grows as grows, this pins the number itself:
A number that is at least but below has exactly digits. So has digits, and indeed .
The same line handles , where tells you the answer has digits, without writing a single one of them.
That is the shape of every application in the next lessons. Whenever an unknown is stuck in an exponent, take a logarithm and the power rule drags it down to where ordinary algebra can reach it.