The Binomial Theorem: Free Response
5 questions in parts, 61 points in total. Work each one out on paper, taking a hint if you get stuck. When you have an answer, reveal the answer to check it, and the full solution only if you still want it. The rubric is there so you can mark your own work.
-
1. Building row nine, and reading one entry as a count . Foundational, 13 points. Question 1 of 5.
Row of Pascal's triangle is . This question builds the row after it and asks what one of its entries is actually counting.
- Part A.
Using only the boundary values and Pascal's rule , build row of Pascal's triangle in full. Show the addition that produces each interior entry.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part B.
One entry of the row you built in part A is . State exactly what that entry counts, in terms of the nine factors of , and use that meaning to give the coefficient of in the expansion of .
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 4 points
- Part C.
Without recomputing any entries, explain why must hold, arguing from the definition of as a count of choices rather than from the numbers themselves. Then point to where that equality shows up in the row you built in part A.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Every entry of Pascal's triangle is either one of the two easy boundary values or the sum of the two entries diagonally above it in the row before it.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Add C(8,0) and C(8,1) for the first interior entry of row 9, then slide one position to the right along row 8 for each entry after that.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Match the four y's in x to the fifth power times y to the fourth against the number of the nine factors chosen to donate a y, then count what is left over.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Ask whether choosing which four factors donate a y is really a different act from choosing which five factors donate an x, or just the same choice looked at from the other side.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
Row is .
Part B
It counts the ways of choosing which of the factors donate their (equivalently, which donate their ); that count is exactly the coefficient of , which is .
Part C
Choosing which factors donate a is the same act as choosing which remaining donate an , so the two counts must agree. Row shows this as the two matching entries sitting on either side of the middle.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Row 9 has two easy entries at its ends and eight interior entries built one addition at a time from row 8.
Start adjacent to a boundary value and add across row 8:
Continue the same way across the rest of the row:
Putting the boundary values back at the two ends gives the complete row.
Ten entries in all, one for each value of from to , matching the entries every row of the triangle has.
Part B
The definition of does not depend on which row it sits in: it is the number of ways to choose which of the factors of donate a instead of an . Setting , counts the ways to choose which of the factors donate a ; the remaining factors then donate an automatically.
That is exactly the situation the term describes: factors gave up an and gave up a . So the coefficient of that term is nothing but this count.
Part C
A choice of which of the factors donate a automatically decides which donate an : fix one and the other is forced, since every factor donates exactly one letter. So the two descriptions, choosing factors to donate and choosing factors to donate , name the very same set of choices, described from two directions.
Two counts of the same set of choices have to be equal, whatever that set turns out to be.
Row confirms it directly: the fifth and sixth entries, sitting on either side of the row's middle, both read .
In one line
Row 9 is 1, 9, 36, 84, 126, 126, 84, 36, 9, 1, built by adding adjacent entries of row 8; the entry counts the ways to choose which 4 of the 9 factors of donate a y, which is the coefficient of ; and because choosing 4 factors to donate y is the same act as choosing the other 5 to donate x, confirmed by the two matching 126's in the row.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 5 points
States the two boundary values of row 9 as 1 and identifies, for each interior entry, the two adjacent entries of row 8 that must be added. . Worth 1 point.
Computes all eight interior additions correctly, arriving at the complete row 9. . Worth 3 points.
Reports row 9 as a sequence of ten entries, matching the n + 1 entries expected for n = 9. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
States that the entry counts the ways of choosing which 4 of the 9 factors donate their y (equivalently, which 5 donate their x). . Worth 2 points.
Connects that count directly to the coefficient of x^5y^4 in the expansion, without recomputing it a different way. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 4 points
Argues that choosing which 4 factors donate y and choosing which 5 factors donate x are the same act described two ways, so the two counts must be equal. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Points to the specific pair of matching entries in the row built in part A that this equality produces. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
2. A sum and a difference from the same row . Foundational, 13 points. Question 2 of 5.
and draw their coefficients from the same row of Pascal's triangle, row : . Expanded, the two polynomials do not look alike.
- Part A.
Expand completely, using the coefficients of row .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Expand completely. Reuse the coefficients and the magnitudes from part A rather than starting over from the distributive law.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
Compare your two expansions term by term. Name every term whose sign stayed the same between the two expansions and every term whose sign flipped, and explain the pattern using the parity of .
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Both expansions come from exactly the same binomial coefficients, row 5; the only thing that changes between the plus version and the minus version is where a negative sign enters.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Write out C(5,k) times x to the (5-k) times 3 to the k for k running from 0 through 5, then combine each pair of factors before adding the six terms.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Reuse the six magnitudes from part A term by term, and attach negative one to the k power to each one instead of recomputing any power of 3.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Sort the six terms into two groups by whether k is even or odd before deciding which group's sign actually changed between the two expansions.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
.
Part C
The terms at even (, , ) keep the same sign in both expansions; the terms at odd (, , ) flip sign, since is negative exactly when is odd.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Expand using the theorem with , , and , taking the coefficients from row : .
Evaluate each power of and combine it with its coefficient:
So the expansion is
Part B
Write as and let the same row-5 coefficients apply to , .
Every magnitude here is exactly the one already computed in part A, since has the same size as ; only the sign of each power of is new.
The odd powers come out negative and the even powers come out positive, giving
Part C
Line the two expansions up term by term.
The terms at , namely , , and , are identical in both expansions. The terms at , namely , , and , have opposite signs in the two expansions.
The reason traces straight back to . Whenever is even, and the term is unaffected by the change from to . Whenever is odd, and the term's sign reverses. Nothing about the size of any term changes; only the terms at odd have anything to flip.
In one line
and ; the two share identical terms at even and opposite-signed terms at odd , because is negative exactly when is odd.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Writes the general term C(5,k) x^{5-k} 3^k for each k from 0 to 5 before combining anything. . Worth 1 point.
Evaluates every power of 3 and every binomial coefficient correctly, arriving at all six terms of (x+3)^5. . Worth 3 points.
Part B 4 points
Reuses the coefficients and magnitudes already found in part A rather than re-expanding from scratch. . Worth 2 points.
Attaches the correct alternating sign to each of the six terms, arriving at the complete expansion of (x-3)^5. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 5 points
Correctly sorts all six terms into the group whose sign stayed the same and the group whose sign flipped between the two expansions. . Worth 2 points.
Explains the split using the parity of k, tying it to (-1)^k rather than to a memorized pattern. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
3. One term out of thirteen, with no expansion . Application, 12 points. Question 3 of 5.
expands to thirteen terms once fully written out. This question extracts one of them directly from the general term, without producing the other twelve.
- Part A.
Write the general term of the expansion of , simplified so the power of is separated from the powers of and .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Find the coefficient of the term containing .
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
A classmate reads the exponent on directly as the term number, claiming that the term containing must be the third term of the expansion because is raised to the third power. Determine the term's actual position in the expansion, and explain in general why the term number is always one more than , not equal to .
Find and correct the error Say which line first goes wrong, why it is wrong, and then do it correctly. 5 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
The general term formula lets you name one term of an expansion by its k-value alone, without writing out any of the other twelve terms.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Match A to x and B to 3y in the general term formula before you write down the exponents n minus k and k.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Set the exponent on x, which is 12 minus k, equal to 9 first; that single equation fixes k for both variables in the term at once.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Count how many terms come before T sub k in the list T sub 0, T sub 1, and onward, to see what the term number actually is.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
.
Part B
The coefficient is .
Part C
The term is the fourth term, not the third: the list of terms begins at , so is preceded by earlier terms and is therefore the st. Here , so it is the fourth term, not the third the classmate named.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Apply the general term formula with , , and .
The factor raises the whole term to the power , so split it into and before the term is in its simplest form.
Part B
The term containing needs the exponent on to equal .
That same automatically gives , matching the target, so this is the right term to evaluate. Substitute into the general term from part A.
So the coefficient is .
Part C
The list of terms runs , starting the count at rather than at . So has exactly terms sitting in front of it in that list, at through , which makes it the st term overall.
Part B found for the term containing , so its term number is : the fourth term, not the third. The classmate's mistake was reading the exponent on as if the list of terms started counting at instead of ; that off-by-one gap between and the term number is fixed, and it applies to every expansion, not only this one.
In one line
; the term containing has and coefficient ; and since the list of terms starts at , that term is the fourth term of the expansion, not the third, because is always the st term.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Identifies A = x, B = 3y, and n = 12 before writing the general term. . Worth 1 point.
Simplifies the general term to a single expression, separating the power of 3 from the powers of x and y. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 4 points
Sets the exponent of x, 12 - k, equal to 9 and solves for the corresponding whole number k. . Worth 1 point.
Evaluates the binomial coefficient and the power of 3 at the k found above, and multiplies them together. . Worth 2 points.
Reports the coefficient as a single number, distinct from stating the whole term (the coefficient together with its powers of x and y). . Worth 1 point.
Part C 5 points
Identifies the term's correct position in the list of terms, distinguishing it from the position the classmate named. . Worth 2 points.
Explains in general that T_k is the (k+1)st term of the expansion because the list begins at k = 0, so k earlier terms come before it. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
4. When no whole-number k fits . Application, 12 points. Question 4 of 5.
has a general term whose exponent on can be set equal to any target you like, but not every target has a whole-number solution.
- Part A.
Rewrite as a power of with a negative exponent, then write the general term of the expansion, combined into a single power of .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Find the coefficient of the term containing .
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Determine whether this expansion has a constant term. Justify your answer using the equation for , rather than by searching the expansion term by term.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
Convert every part of the binomial to a power of x first; once you do, the whole general term is a single power of x whose exponent you can set equal to any target you like.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
2 over x is the same as 2 times x to the power negative one; keep that negative one attached when you multiply exponents by k.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Set 21 minus 4k equal to 9 and solve for the whole number k before you touch the numerical coefficient at all.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Set 21 minus 4k equal to 0 and see what value of k that forces, then ask whether that particular value is even allowed.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
, and .
Part B
The coefficient is .
Part C
No. Setting gives , which is not a whole number, and must be a whole number from to for a term to exist, so this expansion has no constant term.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
A quotient with in the denominator becomes a negative exponent:
Apply the general term formula with , , and .
Multiply the two powers of by adding their exponents, .
Part B
Set the exponent from part A equal to the target power.
Substitute into the general term.
So the coefficient is .
Part C
A constant term is the term whose exponent on is , so set the exponent from part A equal to and solve.
That is not a whole number. But can only ever be a whole number from to , since it counts how many of the factors donated the piece, and there is no such thing as a fraction of a factor. Because no whole number satisfies the equation, no value of in the allowed range produces a constant term, so none of the eight terms of this expansion is constant.
In one line
; the term containing has and coefficient ; and this expansion has no constant term, since forces , not a whole number.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Rewrites 2/x as 2x^{-1} before writing the general term. . Worth 1 point.
Derives and simplifies the general term to a single power of x, combining the coefficient and the exponent correctly. . Worth 3 points.
Part B 4 points
Sets the exponent expression from part A equal to 9 and solves for the corresponding whole number k. . Worth 1 point.
Evaluates the binomial coefficient and the power of 2 at the k found above, and multiplies them together. . Worth 2 points.
Reports the coefficient as a single number, not the whole term together with its power of x. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 4 points
Sets the exponent expression from part A equal to 0 rather than scanning the expansion term by term. . Worth 1 point.
Explains that k must be a whole number within the valid range for a term to exist, and correctly reports whether the value of k that a constant term would require satisfies that condition. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
5. Finding n when the row number is the unknown . Reasoning, 11 points. Question 5 of 5.
Every formula in this lesson can be run backward: given a fact about the coefficients in row , find itself. This question solves for directly, then asks which of this lesson's two methods for finding a coefficient actually makes that solve possible.
- Part A.
Using , write and each as a simplified expression in .
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part B.
Solve for the whole number , and check your value by evaluating both sides directly.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Explain why building rows of Pascal's triangle one at a time, using Pascal's rule, would not be a practical way to solve part B, since nothing tells you in advance which row to stop at. Then explain what it is about the closed-form formula that makes solving for the unknown possible at all.
Compare the two methods Say what each one costs you, and when you would reach for it. 4 points
Hints
One at a time, each one a step further than the last. Take only as many as you need.
-
Hint 1 of 4
This whole question treats the row number n itself as the unknown, which is something Pascal's triangle was never built to search for.
-
Hint 2 of 4 · Part A
Cancel the factorial of n minus 2 out of the top and bottom of the closed-form expression for C(n,2) before simplifying anything else.
-
Hint 3 of 4 · Part B
Clear the fraction in n(n-1)/2 = 5n by multiplying both sides by 2, or divide both sides by n directly since n is at least 2 and so cannot be zero.
-
Hint 4 of 4 · Part C
Ask whether Pascal's rule can ever jump ahead to a row you have not already reached, and whether the closed-form formula ever needs you to reach one first.
That is every hint for this question.
Answer and solution
Check your answer first. If it is wrong, go back to your paper: the worked solution will still be here.
The answer
Part A
and .
Part B
; both sides check out, since and .
Part C
Pascal's rule only extends a row already reached; it never signals which row to stop at. The closed-form formula writes as an explicit expression in , turning the count into algebra that can be solved for directly.
Not what you got? Look for the slip on your own paper before you open the solution. Finding it yourself is worth more than reading it.
Worked solution
Part A
Write out using the closed form and cancel against the tail of .
Do the same for , canceling against the tail of .
Part B
Substitute the two expressions from part A into the given equation.
Multiply both sides by to clear the fraction, then move everything to one side and factor.
A product is zero only when one of its factors is, so or . The problem requires , so is discarded, leaving
Check by evaluating both sides of the original equation directly: , and . The two agree.
Part C
Pascal's rule builds one row from the row before it, always moving forward and never backward: to reach row you would have to build every row from up to it in order, and the only way to know you have reached the right row is to already suspect the answer is . Nothing in the rule itself points to which row satisfies ; you would be searching, not solving.
The closed-form formula sidesteps that entirely, because appears as a genuine algebraic variable in both expressions from part A.
That is what allowed part B to set up and solve an equation in directly, the same way any other algebraic equation is solved, rather than checking row after row by hand.
In one line
and ; solving gives , so (checked: ); and only the closed-form formula, which treats as an algebraic variable, makes solving for an unknown row number possible, since Pascal's rule can only extend a row already reached.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Cancels the factorials in the closed-form expression for C(n,1) to reach a fully reduced expression in n. . Worth 1 point.
Simplifies C(n,2) to a fully reduced expression in n, showing the cancellation of (n-2)! against the tail of n!. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 4 points
Sets up the equation described by the problem, matching C(n,2) to 5 times C(n,1) using the two expressions found in part A. . Worth 1 point.
Solves the equation by a valid method (clearing the fraction and factoring, or dividing both sides by n since n >= 2 makes n nonzero) and rejects n = 0 as outside the stated domain n >= 2 to arrive at the required whole number. . Worth 2 points.
Checks the answer by evaluating both sides of the original equation at the value found and confirming they agree. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 4 points
Explains that Pascal's rule only extends a row already reached and never indicates in advance which row to stop building. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Explains that the closed-form formula writes C(n,k) as an explicit algebraic expression in n, which is what lets n be solved for directly instead of searched for. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-