The Binomial Theorem Advanced. This lesson goes beyond core Algebra II. You can skip it.
Learning goals
- State the Binomial Theorem, where counts the ways factors donate
- Expand using row of Pascal's triangle, and alternate signs for a difference
- Build Pascal's triangle from the addition rule
- Pick out one term of an expansion by solving for from its exponent
Multiplying out is really choosing
A power like is not a new kind of object. It is shorthand for a product of seven identical factors:
So expanding it is just multiplying out a product of sums, and the distributive law has told you how to do that since the beginning. Take one term from each factor, multiply your picks together, and add up the result over every possible way of picking. Nothing else appears in the product, and nothing is left out.
Here every factor is the same, and each one offers exactly two things: an or a . Watch what that means for the two smallest cases before asking about or anything bigger.
The four picks for are , , , and , so
That is not decoration. It counts the two picks that took a single , one from the first factor and one from the second. Now do , where there are picks:
Collecting the eight products by pile gives
and the in front of is not a mystery number. It is the count of ways to pick which one of the three factors donated its , and there are three factors to pick from.
The doubling never stops. Build the list of picks one factor at a time. Each way of picking from the first factors turns into exactly two ways once an -th factor arrives, one taking its and one taking its . No other way is possible, so every new factor doubles the list: picks for , for , and in general picks for . Beginning from the single empty pick, doublings give ways in all. The expansion of is therefore a sum of products before a single like term is collected.
What does one of those products look like in general? Suppose your picks took the from exactly of the factors. Then they took the from the other , and since multiplication does not care about order, the product is . That is the whole shape of the answer. Every one of the products is for some whole number between and . The exponents always add up to , and no other kind of term can possibly appear. What is left to find is how many products land on each pile.
That observation deserves a name, because it is the entire lesson.
Definition. For whole numbers and with , write , read ” choose ”, for the number of ways to choose which of the factors donate their .
Notice what this definition is and is not. It is not a formula you have to trust. It is a description of something you can count, and you have already counted four of them by hand:
A single pick is completely described by the set of factors that gave a . So counting the picks with exactly of the ‘s and counting the sets of factors are the same job. That is why one number answers both questions.
The Binomial Theorem
The expansion has one term for each possible number of -picks, from to :
which is terms, one for each value of from to .
That same list can be written compactly using sigma notation:
The means “add one term for every whole-number value of from through .” It is nothing more than shorthand for the sum you already wrote out above.
You have already done the work that proves this. Every product in the expansion has the form for some from to , and counts exactly how many of the products land in that pile. Summing the piles for every therefore accounts for the whole expansion, which is the Binomial Theorem.
Before building a shortcut for the coefficients, use the theorem to fill in only the exponents of . There are terms, one for each from to :
Notice the pattern even before a single coefficient is known: the exponent of falls by each term while the exponent of climbs by , and every pair still adds to . The two ends are already filled in, since . The three missing boxes are , , and , exactly the numbers Pascal’s triangle is about to hand you without any more counting by hand.
Pascal’s triangle, built from addition alone
The theorem is only as useful as your ability to compute , and so far the only method on offer is to list every selection by hand. For that means writing out strings, which is not a method, it is a punishment. One short argument replaces the listing with addition.
Start with the two easy counts. There is exactly one way for no factor to donate a (every factor donates its ), and exactly one way for all of them to donate a . So for every ,
One more fact comes free before you even build the rest of the triangle. Choosing which factors donate a is the same act as choosing which factors donate an : fix one selection and the other is decided. Two descriptions of the same act must have the same count, so
Every row of the triangle you are about to build will read the same forwards and backwards because of this.
Everything in between the edges follows from a single rule.
Pascal's rule: #
Start with a concrete case: choosing of labeled factors to donate a . Look at factor alone. A selection either includes factor or it does not, and never both.
If it includes factor , factor already supplies one of the two ‘s, and the other comes from the remaining factors: ways. If it does not include factor , both ‘s must come from the remaining factors: ways. Listing them out confirms the split:
Every selection falls into exactly one of these two groups, so
Nothing about that split depended on the specific numbers and . Take any and any interior index with , and look at the last of the factors, factor . A selection of factors to donate a either uses factor or it does not.
If it uses factor , the other ‘s come from the first factors, giving ways. If it does not, all ‘s come from the first factors, giving ways. The two groups are disjoint and together they are every selection counted by , so the total is the sum of the two counts:
Both symbols on the right stay legal: makes , and keeps inside its own range .
Stack the counts as row of a triangle, with the ‘s from the edge values anchoring both ends. Pascal’s rule says each interior entry is the sum of the two entries directly above it.
Row of the triangle is the complete list of coefficients for , and row is , exactly what the hand count produced. Two more rows reach everything you will need below:
Before reading any more rows off the page, build one entry yourself with the addition rule.
Check your understanding
Row of Pascal's triangle is . Using Pascal's rule, what is the entry at in row ?
Pascal's rule builds each interior entry from the two entries directly above it: .
Row reads , so those two entries are and .
The entry is , which matches row : . Reaching for means adding the wrong pair from row .
Two habits keep you on the right row. Row always has entries, and its second entry is always , since counts the single factors that could have donated the lone .
Check your understanding
Use Pascal's triangle. What is the coefficient of in the expansion of ?
The term takes a from of the factors, so and the coefficient is .
Row of the triangle reads , and its entries are through . Counting from , the entry at is the second .
The symmetry gives the same answer from the other side.
Expanding a power
To expand , write down row of the triangle and march from to , giving the exponent and the exponent . The one thing to guard is that and are whole terms, coefficients included: if , then is , not .
Once you have expanded, there is a quick way to catch an arithmetic slip. Setting every variable to turns the expansion into the sum of its coefficients, while the unexpanded side stays easy to evaluate by hand. If the two sides disagree, an error is guaranteed. If they agree, that is reassuring, but it does not certify every coefficient: two mistakes can still cancel each other out and leave the sums equal.
Worked example 1 Expand
Here , , and , so the coefficients come from row , which is . Write the five terms with losing a power and gaining one:
Now evaluate each piece, keeping the whole of inside its power:
So the expansion is
Check it by setting . The left side is , and the right side is . The check passes: if the two sides had disagreed, that would prove an error, but agreement here is reassuring rather than a guarantee that every coefficient is correct.
Powers of a difference
Nothing new is needed for , because a difference is a sum in disguise. Write as and let the theorem do the work:
The only thing to simplify is , which drags one minus sign along for each factor that donated a . So
and since is a count it is never zero or negative. The sign of the coefficient of is therefore the sign of alone: the coefficient is negative exactly when is odd, and positive exactly when is even. The signs alternate , starting from on the pure term.
Worked example 2 Expand
Take and , so that the theorem applies to the sum . Row is , and the powers of climb from to :
Evaluate the powers of , which alternate in sign: , , , and . That gives
The signs alternate because the odd powers of are negative and the even ones are positive, which is the from the derivation showing up in the arithmetic.
Check with . The left side is , and the right side is . The check passes, which is reassuring, though it does not by itself guarantee every sign is correct: verify the alternating pattern directly from the powers of , negative at the odd exponents and positive at the even ones.
Check your understanding
What is the coefficient of in the expansion of ?
Write as . The term holding has raised to , so .
That term is , and row of the triangle gives . Since is even, and the sign stays positive.
The coefficient is . Reaching for means attaching a minus sign just because the binomial has one. The sign is , and it is negative only when is odd, which is not.
A closed form for the coefficients
Pascal’s triangle gives every coefficient you could want, but it makes you build all the rows below the one you need. If a problem asks for a coefficient in , you do not want to write twenty rows. There is a closed-form formula that always produces the same number as counting the selections by hand.
First, notation. For a positive whole number , the factorial is the product of every whole number from down to :
The empty case is defined to be . That is a convention, chosen so the formula below gives , matching the counts you already found by hand.
In practice you never expand the factorials in full. Cancel against the tail of first, which leaves factors on top and factors on the bottom.
Worked example 3 Find the coefficient of in
Take and . Since for every , the term holding is simply , and the coefficient is .
Twenty rows of Pascal’s triangle would settle it, and so would the formula, in one line. Write out the factorials and cancel against the tail of :
Cancel before multiplying: , so the product is .
The coefficient of is . Notice the shape of the shortcut: three factors on top counting down from , and underneath. That pattern is what the cancellation always produces.
The same formula also explains the symmetry you spotted earlier, since swapping and swaps the two factorials in the denominator and leaves the value alone.
Picking out a single term
Expanding a whole power is rarely the point. The question that actually gets asked is “what is the coefficient of ”, and expanding twenty terms to read off one of them is wasted work. The theorem lets you go straight to it, because it hands you the general term:
The method is always the same three steps. Write the general term for your and . Collect all the powers of the variable into a single exponent. Set that exponent equal to the one you want, solve for , and only then evaluate.
Worked example 4 Find the coefficient of in
Here and , with . The general term is
You want , so . That also fixes the power of at , which matches the asked for, so such a term does exist. Now evaluate the three pieces. Row gives , the power of is , and because is odd:
The coefficient is . Two traps sat in that problem: the inside had to be cubed along with the , and the odd made the sign negative.
Worked example 5 Find the coefficient of in
Here , , and . The general term is
You want , so set the exponent equal to and solve for :
Now evaluate. Row gives , and the power of is :
The coefficient is . Solving for is the whole method here: no negative exponents and no fractions, just one equation in .
Check your understanding
What is the coefficient of in the expansion of ?
Take and , so the general term is .
The power of is , so needs . Row gives , and the inside is cubed along with the :
Answering means forgetting to cube the .