Isosceles and Equilateral Triangles

Watch the video explainer

Learning goals

  • Identify the base and opposite angles from a triangle's marked equal sides
  • Prove the base-angle theorem and its converse using triangle congruence
  • Calculate missing lengths and angles in isosceles and equilateral triangles
  • Explain why the vertex bisector, median, and altitude coincide in an isosceles triangle

Find the base from the equal sides

An isosceles triangle has at least two congruent sides. Choose a pair of equal sides: their common endpoint is the vertex for this choice, their included angle is the vertex angle, and the opposite side is the base. The two angles at the base’s endpoints are the base angles. These roles follow the marked equal sides, even when the triangle is tilted.

For example, suppose the side lengths in centimeters are

PQ=11.PR=11.QR=14.\begin{aligned} PQ&=11. \\ PR&=11. \\ QR&=14. \end{aligned}

The chosen equal sides meet at PP. The base is QRQR, and the base angles are at QQ and RR. Each base angle is opposite one of the equal sides.

Throughout this lesson, triangles have three noncollinear vertices. An equilateral triangle qualifies as isosceles too; any pair of its sides can be the chosen equal pair.

Find the base from the equal sidesP is above the horizontal base QR. PQ and PR have matching single ticks and are each labeled 11 centimeters. The base QR is labeled inside the triangle near its bottom edge.PQR11 cm11 cmbase QR
The tick marks select the equal sides. The base is opposite their common vertex.

Check your understanding

Triangle KLM has the following equal sides:

KL=LM.\begin{aligned} KL&=LM. \end{aligned}

Which is its base, and which pair of angles will this lesson connect?

Answer choices

Why the base angles match

Equal sides force equal angles opposite them. Take a second flag with equal edges of 99 centimeters and a vertex angle of 74∘74^\circ; its base length is not specified. Draw the internal angle bisector from its vertex to the base. Each part at the vertex is 37∘37^\circ.

The two smaller triangles have a side of length 99, the same included 37∘37^\circ angle, and the shared bisector segment. Side-angle-side (SAS) therefore makes those triangles congruent. Their base angles match. Since together those angles use what remains of 180∘180^\circ, each is

180∘−74∘2=53∘.\frac{180^\circ-74^\circ}{2}=53^\circ.
Match the two sides around the bisected angleThe equal sides meet at the top vertex. A segment from that vertex to the base is shared by the two smaller triangles. The two angles beside the segment at the top are each marked 37 degrees. No base angle is labeled.9 cm9 cm37°37°shared segment
The vertex bisector gives the 37-degree parts. Blue and dashed red distinguish the halves, each with a side of length 9 and the shared dividing segment.

The length 99 and angle 74∘74^\circ did not make the congruence work: what mattered was equal sides and a bisected included angle. Here is the argument for any isosceles triangle.

The isosceles base-angle theorem#

In △ABC\triangle ABC, let

AB=AC.\begin{aligned} AB&=AC. \end{aligned}

Draw the internal bisector of ∠BAC\angle BAC, meeting BCBC at DD.

Compare the two halves by SASTriangle ABC has equal-side ticks on AB and AC. D lies inside BC. AD divides angle BAC into two equally marked parts. No base-angle, midpoint, or right-angle marks are shown.ABCD
The given equal sides and bisected vertex angle surround the shared side AD. Blue and dashed red distinguish the two halves.

Compare △ABD\triangle ABD with △ACD\triangle ACD. The given, shared side, and bisector’s definition supply these facts respectively:

AB=AC.AD=AD.∠BAD≅∠DAC.\begin{aligned} AB&=AC. \\ AD&=AD. \\ \angle BAD&\cong\angle DAC. \end{aligned}

The equal angle lies between the two named sides in each triangle, so SAS gives

△ABD≅△ACD.\begin{aligned} \triangle ABD&\cong\triangle ACD. \end{aligned}

The corresponding angles ∠ABD\angle ABD and ∠ACD\angle ACD are congruent. Because DD is inside BCBC, these are the original base angles ∠ABC\angle ABC and ∠ACB\angle ACB.

The base-angle theorem says that if two sides of a triangle are congruent, the angles opposite those sides are congruent. Triangle congruence is justified by the rigid-motion results from the preceding lessons; the angle equality is a conclusion of that congruence, not a fact inferred from the picture.

Check your understanding

In triangle ABC, AD is the internal bisector of angle BAC, with D on BC. The given equal sides are

AB=AC.\begin{aligned} AB&=AC. \end{aligned}

Which evidence proves triangles ABD and ACD congruent before any base-angle equality is used?

Answer choices

Worked example 1 Locate the repeated angle before calculating

Problem. In △FGH\triangle FGH, the givens are

FG=GH.m∠F=68∘.\begin{aligned} FG&=GH. \\ m\angle F&=68^\circ. \end{aligned}

Find m∠Hm\angle H and m∠Gm\angle G.

Locate the base angles in FGHTriangle FGH has matching ticks on FG and GH, meeting at G. The only labeled angle is the given 68 degrees at F. Angles at H and G are not labeled.GFH68°
Schematic, not for measurement: the ticks and the 68-degree label are the givens.

Solution. The equal sides meet at GG. Their opposite angles, at HH and FF, are the matching base angles, so

m∠H=68∘.\begin{aligned} m\angle H&=68^\circ. \end{aligned}

Subtract both base angles from the triangle total:

m∠G=180∘−68∘−68∘=44∘.\begin{aligned} m\angle G&=180^\circ-68^\circ-68^\circ \\ &=44^\circ. \end{aligned}

Check your understanding

A triangle has equal sides UV and UW, and its vertex angle at U measures 38 degrees. What is the measure of each base angle?

Answer choices

Reverse the reasoning

Equal angles also force equal opposite sides. For example, suppose in △JKL\triangle JKL that

m∠J=47∘.m∠K=47∘.\begin{aligned} m\angle J&=47^\circ. \\ m\angle K&=47^\circ. \end{aligned}

The opposite sides KLKL and JLJL must match. This is the converse of the base-angle theorem. The theorem alone does not prove it; a reversed claim needs its own argument.

Imagine two copies of this triangle with JJ and KK exchanging roles. The base JKJK has the same length in either direction. Its two end angles are 47∘47^\circ and 47∘47^\circ in both copies. Angle-side-angle (ASA) fixes the triangle, so the sides leading to LL must match under that exchange.

Use equal angles as the givensL is above base JK. Equal angle arcs mark the angles at J and K. No equal-side ticks are drawn.JKL47°47°
For the converse, the given markings belong on the angles. Equal sides are the conclusion.

The converse of the base-angle theorem#

In △ABC\triangle ABC, suppose

∠ABC≅∠ACB.\begin{aligned} \angle ABC&\cong\angle ACB. \end{aligned}
Reverse the angle correspondenceTriangle ABC has congruent angles at B and C, shown by matching arcs. Side BC joins those angles. No equal-side ticks are shown.ABC
The given arcs mark the base angles. The side BC lies between them; no side equality is assumed.

Compare the triangle named BCABCA with the same triangle named CBACBA.

The angle at BB in the first name matches the equal angle at CC in the second. The angle at CC matches the equal angle at BB. Between those angles, the shared side gives

BC=CB.\begin{aligned} BC&=CB. \end{aligned}

By ASA,

△BCA≅△CBA.\begin{aligned} \triangle BCA&\cong\triangle CBA. \end{aligned}

The correspondence exchanges BB and CC and keeps AA fixed. The corresponding sides BABA and CACA therefore have equal lengths.

The proof uses one triangle twice with a different correspondence, not a new assumption about its appearance. We can now say both directions: in a triangle, two sides are equal exactly when their opposite angles are equal.

Worked example 2 Use the converse to form an equation

Problem. In △RST\triangle RST, the givens are

∠R≅∠T.RS=4x+1 centimeters.ST=6x−9 centimeters.\begin{aligned} \angle R&\cong\angle T. \\ RS&=4x+1\text{ centimeters}. \\ ST&=6x-9\text{ centimeters}. \end{aligned}

Find xx and both lengths.

Connect equal angles to opposite lengthsTriangle RST has matching angle arcs at R and T. The opposite sides ST and RS are labeled 6x minus 9 centimeters and 4x plus 1 centimeters. No equal-side ticks or solved lengths are shown.SRT4x + 16x − 9
The matching angle arcs are givens. The expressions label their opposite sides.

Solution. The side opposite RR is STST, and the side opposite TT is RSRS. The converse gives

ST=RS.\begin{aligned} ST&=RS. \end{aligned}

Therefore,

4x+1=6x−9.4x+1=6x-9.

Subtract 4x4x and add 99:

10=2x.x=5.\begin{aligned} 10&=2x. \\ x&=5. \end{aligned}

Substitute into each length expression:

RS=4(5)+1=21 centimeters.ST=6(5)−9=21 centimeters.\begin{aligned} RS&=4(5)+1 \\ &=21\text{ centimeters}. \\ ST&=6(5)-9 \\ &=21\text{ centimeters}. \end{aligned}

Both lengths are positive.

Check your understanding

To prove the converse, compare triangle BCA with CBA when angles B and C are congruent. The conclusion to be proved is

AB=AC.\begin{aligned} AB&=AC. \end{aligned}

Which fact supplies the included side for ASA without assuming that conclusion?

Answer choices

When all three parts match

An equilateral triangle has three congruent sides. An equiangular triangle has three congruent interior angles. In an equilateral triangle with sides of length 88, applying the base-angle theorem to two different pairs of equal sides makes all three angles equal. The triangle sum then gives

180∘÷3=60∘.180^\circ\div3=60^\circ.

The length 88 has no special role. Every equilateral triangle is equiangular, with three 60∘60^\circ angles.

Conversely, three equal angles give equal opposite sides by the converse theorem. Thus every equiangular triangle is equilateral. These angle measures do not specify the side length: equilateral triangles of side lengths 88 and 1212 are not congruent.

Equilateral is a special isosceles caseThe top vertex is above a horizontal base. Matching single ticks mark every side, and a 60-degree label appears inside each corner.60°60°60°
All three side pairs are equal, so the base-angle reasoning connects every pair of angles. This triangle is both equilateral and isosceles.

Worked example 3 Two different kinds of equality

Problem. Case A. An equilateral triangle has perimeter 5757 centimeters. Find each side length and each angle measure.

Case B. A triangle has two angles of 60∘60^\circ. Must its sides equal those in Case A?

Solution. Case A. Its three equal side lengths total 5757 centimeters, so each side is

57÷3=19 centimeters.\begin{aligned} 57\div3&=19\text{ centimeters}. \end{aligned}

Its three equal angles total 180∘180^\circ, so each angle is 60∘60^\circ.

Case B. No. The third angle is also 60∘60^\circ, so the converse makes this triangle equilateral. Its side length is not specified; it need not be 1919 centimeters.

One segment does three jobs

A median joins a vertex to the midpoint of its opposite side. An altitude is a perpendicular segment from a vertex to the line containing the opposite side. An internal angle bisector halves the angle at its own vertex. They describe three different jobs; in an isosceles triangle, the segment from the vertex between the equal sides can do all three.

Return to the 11,11,1411,11,14 flag and its vertex bisector PMPM. The base-angle argument applies here, giving congruent halves by SAS. Their corresponding base pieces match, so their lengths in centimeters are

QM=7.MR=7.\begin{aligned} QM&=7. \\ MR&=7. \end{aligned}

Their angles at MM match too. Those angles form a straight angle and therefore are each 90∘90^\circ. Thus the bisector is also a median and an altitude.

Three roles for the vertex segmentP lies above midpoint M of QR. PQ and PR have equal-side ticks. QM and MR have double ticks. PM is perpendicular to QR, marked by a square at M. The two angles at P have equal arcs.PQRM7 cm7 cm
These extra markings are conclusions after the two halves have been proved congruent.

The vertex bisector is a median and an altitude#

Suppose

AB=AC.\begin{aligned} AB&=AC. \end{aligned}

Let ADAD be the internal vertex bisector as in the first proof. That proof gives, by SAS,

△ABD≅△ACD.\begin{aligned} \triangle ABD&\cong\triangle ACD. \end{aligned}

Corresponding sides give

BD=DC.\begin{aligned} BD&=DC. \end{aligned}

Thus DD is the midpoint of BCBC and ADAD is a median.

Corresponding angles give

∠ADB≅∠ADC.\begin{aligned} \angle ADB&\cong\angle ADC. \end{aligned}

These two adjacent angles total 180∘180^\circ because B,D,CB,D,C lie on one line. Equal halves of that total are 90∘90^\circ, so

AD⊥BC.\begin{aligned} AD&\perp BC. \end{aligned}

The segment ADAD is an altitude.

Read the derived roles after congruenceTriangle ABC has equal AB and AC and internal bisector AD. Matching double ticks on BD and DC and a right-angle square at D show the conclusions established in the proof.ABCD
After SAS establishes congruence, the matching base pieces and the right angle show the median and altitude roles.

You can start with the median instead. The equal sides, equal half-base lengths, and shared median give SSS congruence. It follows that the median bisects the vertex angle and is perpendicular to the base. Starting with the altitude gives the same line, because there is only one perpendicular to the base through that vertex, as proved in Proving Lines Parallel or Perpendicular. These conclusions concern the vertex between the equal sides; an arbitrary median elsewhere need not do all three jobs.

The line through this segment is a line of symmetry: reflecting across it keeps the vertex and the midpoint fixed and exchanges the two base endpoints, which lie equal distances on opposite sides of the midpoint along a perpendicular line. The whole triangle then matches itself. An equilateral triangle has such a symmetry line through each vertex, giving three reflection axes.

Worked example 4 Use the segment's stated role

Problem. In △EFG\triangle EFG, the equal sides satisfy

EF=EG.\begin{aligned} EF&=EG. \end{aligned}

Point NN lies on FGFG, and ENEN bisects ∠FEG\angle FEG. The other givens are

FN=3t+2.NG=5t−8.m∠FEN=26∘.\begin{aligned} FN&=3t+2. \\ NG&=5t-8. \\ m\angle FEN&=26^\circ. \end{aligned}

Find tt, FGFG, m∠NEGm\angle NEG, and m∠ENFm\angle ENF.

Use the given bisector in EFGTriangle EFG has matching side ticks on EF and EG. Segment EN meets the interior of FG and bisects the vertex angle, shown by equal arcs. Angle FEN is labeled 26 degrees. FN is labeled 3t plus 2 and NG 5t minus 8. No midpoint ticks, right-angle square, or solved values appear.EFGN3t + 25t − 826°
Only the stated equal sides, vertex bisector, angle, and base-length expressions are marked. The drawing is schematic.

Solution. The vertex bisector in this isosceles triangle is also a median. Set its two base pieces equal:

3t+2=5t−8.3t+2=5t-8.

This gives

t=5.\begin{aligned} t&=5. \end{aligned}

Each base piece is 1717, so

FG=34.\begin{aligned} FG&=34. \end{aligned}

The bisector gives

m∠NEG=26∘.\begin{aligned} m\angle NEG&=26^\circ. \end{aligned}

It is also an altitude, so

m∠ENF=90∘.\begin{aligned} m\angle ENF&=90^\circ. \end{aligned}

Check your understanding

Triangle ABC has the equal sides

AB=AC.\begin{aligned} AB&=AC. \end{aligned}

D is the midpoint of BC. Which argument proves that AD bisects angle BAC without first assuming it is a bisector?

Answer choices

Common mistakes

Practice

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)

Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.

Core practice

Practice problems at the level of the course, to be worked out on paper. Hints one at a time, then the answer or the full worked solution, with your progress kept in this browser.

Core practice Work it out on paper 10 problems Start →
More resources (optional)

Other explanations of this lesson, if you want a second take.

A bit of history (optional)

Euclid’s proof of the base-angle theorem has an unexpectedly busy drawing. He extends both equal sides of the triangle, chooses equal longer segments, and joins their endpoints across the figure. Two comparisons of triangles eventually establish the equal base angles. His proposition also proves an equality between angles outside the triangle.

The proposition became known as the pons asinorum, Latin for the bridge of asses. The origin of the nickname is uncertain: accounts connect it either with the difficulty readers faced or with the bridge-like drawing. It is a nickname attached to the proposition, not a name Euclid gave his students.

Pappus of Alexandria, who worked centuries later, is credited with a much shorter argument. He compares the original triangle with itself, exchanging the two base vertices. No extra lines appear, but the reader has to accept that two different orderings of one triangle can make a useful comparison. The shorter drawing asks for a less obvious way of looking.

David Joyce’s edition and commentary on Proposition I.5 presents Euclid’s construction, the uncertain nickname, and the proof attributed to Pappus.

Your progress

See all your progress →