Graphing Lines: Chapter Test
20 multiple-choice questions and 10 free-response questions, drawn from across the chapter and mixed together.
Multiple choice
Answer in any order and change your mind as often as you like. When you submit, your answers lock and every question shows its worked solution.
Free response
10 questions in parts, 135 points in total. Work them out on paper. There are no hints here: reveal each question's answer, worked solution, and rubric when you are ready to mark that one.
Reset the free-response section?
This re-seals every answer you have revealed and clears your flags.
-
1. One number, read forwards and then backwards . 9 points. Question 1 of 10.
A line is known by two of its points and by nothing else: and . Every part below is settled by that pair on its own.
- Part A.
Find the slope of the line, showing the substitution into the slope formula.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part B.
Find the point of the same line whose -coordinate is .
Carry your own answer forward Use whichever slope you produced in part A, even if it was not the expected one. The credit here is for treating the slope as the ratio of the known drop to the unknown run, and for moving in the direction that ratio demands, not for landing on a particular pair of numbers.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part C.
In part A the slope came out of a change in and a change in ; in part B it turned a known change in back into a change in . Say what your single number asserts about this line, in a sentence naming what happens to when increases by , and then say what part B shows about how far must travel to bring down by .
Carry your own answer forward Interpret whichever slope and whichever point you produced above, even if they were not the expected ones. The credit is for describing the slope as a rate that works in both directions, not for reproducing one particular pair of numbers.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 3 points
The answer
Part A
.
- may be written before it is reduced; what is not the same is , which reverses the direction the line runs, or , which divides the run by the rise
Part B
.
- only; an answer of has moved to the left instead of the right, and has multiplied the drop by the slope instead of dividing by it
Part C
The slope says that wherever you stand on the line, an increase of in is matched by a decrease of in . Part B shows that bringing down by therefore takes an increase of in , because five steps of make .
Worked solution
Part A
The rise is the difference of the -values and the run is the difference of the -values, taken in the same order.
The value is negative, so the line falls as it moves to the right.
Part B
Nothing here needs the line's equation. The drop from down to a height of is , and the slope fixes the ratio of that drop to the run it takes.
The point is . Checking against the other given point, the run from to is and the rise is , again a slope of .
Part C
A slope is a rate, not a single journey. The value is what one unit of run buys in rise:
That is why it can be used in either direction. Reading it forwards turns a run into a rise. Reading it backwards turns a rise into a run, which is what part B did: a required rise of is five copies of , so it takes five copies of the matching run, an increase of in .
In one line
The slope is , and the point of the line whose -coordinate is is . The slope says that falls by for every that rises, everywhere along the line, which is exactly why a required fall of in costs a run of in .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Subtracts the -values and the -values in the same order, so the sign of the result is not manufactured by a mismatch. . Worth 2 points.
Reports the slope as one reduced number and states which way the line runs. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 3 points
Sets the known vertical change against the unknown horizontal change and solves for the run, rather than taking a single step of the slope. . Worth 2 points.
Reports the result as an ordered pair whose second coordinate is the height that was asked for. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 3 points
States the slope as the change in that accompanies an increase of one in , with the sign carried. . Worth 2 points.
Connects the part B run to that rate by counting how many times the rate has to be repeated. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
2. Two crossings a grid cannot hold . 13 points. Question 2 of 10.
The intercept method draws a line from exactly two of its solutions, the two places where it meets the axes. This question runs it on two equations and then asks what becomes of the drawing when those two places do not sit on grid corners.
- Part A.
Find both intercepts of . Report each as an ordered pair, and name the variable you zeroed to reach it.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part B.
Now find both intercepts of . Then find one further solution of whose two coordinates are both integers.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part C.
Part B produced one solution of that sits exactly on a grid corner. Find a second one, state the step across and the step up or down that carries any such solution to the next, and show why a step of that size leaves the equation satisfied. Then say what fixes each of the two crossings where it is, and why no way of drawing the line brings either of them onto a corner.
Carry your own answer forward Step off from whichever grid-corner solution you produced in part B, and speak about whichever crossings you computed there, even if they were not the expected ones. The credit is for a step that keeps the equation satisfied and for showing why it does, not for a particular pair of numbers.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points
The answer
Part A
The x-intercept is , obtained by setting ; the y-intercept is , obtained by setting .
- and ; the pair and is the same arithmetic with the coordinates in the wrong slots, and has divided by , the coefficient of the term just zeroed out
Part B
The intercepts are and . One solution with integer coordinates is .
- any pair of integers satisfying the equation is acceptable for the third point, for instance or ; what is not acceptable is a pair that has been rounded rather than solved
Part C
Stepping across and down carries to ; the step leaves the left side at , because . The crossings cannot be moved: the line meets each axis exactly once, at the values part B computed, and , and neither is an integer.
Worked solution
Part A
Each axis is the set of points whose other coordinate is zero, so zero the coordinate belonging to the axis you are crossing.
So the graph crosses the x-axis at and the y-axis at .
Part B
The two crossings come from the same two substitutions as before, and this time neither lands on an integer.
For a solution with integer coordinates, choose an that leaves a multiple of behind. Taking gives , so and :
So is on the line and sits exactly on a grid corner.
Part C
A step that carries one solution to another is one whose two changes cancel on the left. Adding to adds to , and taking off takes off .
So the left side is left exactly as it was, and any solution steps to another. From the step reaches , and confirms it; taken backwards it reaches , and as well. Repeating it in either direction supplies grid corners as far out as the drawing needs.
The crossings admit no such treatment. This line is neither horizontal nor vertical, so it meets each axis exactly once, and part B computed those two points exactly: when , and when . Those are results rather than choices, so nothing about how the line is drawn or how far it is extended puts either crossing on a corner. The line is still drawn exactly; it is just drawn through corners the equation supplies instead.
In one line
The graph of crosses the axes at , from , and at , from . The graph of crosses at and , and is a solution whose coordinates are both integers. Stepping across and down from it reaches another, , because leaves the left side untouched. The two crossings cannot be brought onto corners at all: the line meets each axis exactly once, and those single points are and .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Zeroes for the crossing of the x-axis and for the crossing of the y-axis, not the other way round. . Worth 2 points.
Reports each crossing as an ordered pair and names the variable that was zeroed to reach it. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 5 points
Produces both crossings as exact fractions rather than as decimals rounded to fit the grid. . Worth 2 points.
Finds the third point by choosing a value for one variable and solving for the other, and shows the substitution that confirms it. . Worth 2 points.
Reports all three as ordered pairs. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 5 points
Produces a second solution whose coordinates are both integers, and confirms it by substituting into the equation. . Worth 2 points.
Shows that the step leaves the left side of the equation unchanged, rather than checking one case and generalising from it. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Says what fixes each crossing where it is, and why that is not something the drawing decides. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
3. Two candles, lit together . 12 points. Question 3 of 10.
Two candles are lit at the same moment, and each burns down at its own steady rate. Candle A's height in centimetres after hours is given by . Candle B's height satisfies .
- Part A.
State candle A's slope and its -intercept, and say what each of those two numbers means for candle A.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part B.
Rewrite candle B's equation so that stands alone on one side, then state candle B's slope and its -intercept.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 3 points
- Part C.
Find the height of each candle at and at hours. Say which candle is the taller at each of those two moments, and then say what the pair of answers shows about calling one of the two candles the taller one. Name the number in each equation that decides which candle is eventually the taller.
Carry your own answer forward Use whichever equations you produced above, even if they were not the expected ones. The credit here is for evaluating both models at both times, for reading the comparison honestly, and for naming which of the two numbers in each equation controls the long run.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 5 points
The answer
Part A
The slope is and the -intercept is : candle A stands cm tall when it is lit and loses cm of height every hour.
- the intercept may be given as the number rather than the point , provided the units are said; what is not the same is a slope of , which reads the constant term as the rate
Part B
, so candle B's slope is and its -intercept is .
- is the same equation with the terms in the other order; what is not the same is a slope of , which has lost the sign that carrying across produced
Part C
At candle A is taller, cm against cm. At candle B is taller, cm against cm. So neither is the taller candle outright: the order swaps. The slopes decide the eventual order, since A loses height at twice B's rate and must fall below it.
Worked solution
Part A
The equation lists its terms out of order, so put them in the order the form expects before reading anything off.
The number multiplying is , so the slope is centimetres per hour, a loss. The constant is , so the -intercept is , the height at the moment of lighting.
Part B
Nothing on the page is the slope or the intercept until is alone, so carry the -term across.
The slope is centimetres per hour and the -intercept is . Setting in the original equation gives and confirms it.
Part C
Evaluate both equations at both times.
Candle A starts ahead and finishes behind, so "the taller candle" is not a property either one has. It is a comparison that depends on when it is made. What settles the eventual order is the pair of slopes: A loses cm an hour against B's cm an hour, so the gap of cm that A begins with is eaten away at cm an hour and cannot last. The intercepts say only where the two start.
In one line
Candle A has slope and -intercept : it is cm tall when lit and loses cm an hour. Candle B's equation is , with slope and -intercept . At candle A is taller, cm against cm, and at candle B is taller, cm against cm, so neither is the taller candle outright. The slopes settle the eventual order, because A loses height at twice B's rate.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Reads the coefficient of with its sign as the slope, rather than the number that happens to be written first. . Worth 2 points.
Says what each number is about the candle, with units on both. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 3 points
Isolates and carries the -term across with its sign changed. . Worth 2 points.
Reports the slope and the intercept from the rearranged form, not from the original one. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 5 points
Evaluates both models at both times and reports four heights with units. . Worth 2 points.
Compares the two heights at each of the two moments and says what that pair of comparisons settles about the single label. . Worth 2 points.
Names the slope, not the intercept, as what decides the eventual order, and says why. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
4. A line named by where it meets the axes . 14 points. Question 4 of 10.
A line crosses the -axis at and the -axis at . Those two crossings are the only facts about it that will be used.
- Part A.
Write this line's equation in point-slope form, then simplify it to slope-intercept form.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 5 points
- Part B.
A second line meets the -axis at the same place as the first but meets the -axis at instead. Find its slope and write its equation in slope-intercept form.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 4 points
- Part C.
Your two equations share a constant term and differ in the number multiplying . Say what their graphs therefore have in common and what they do not, name the one point they certainly share, and explain why they cannot share a second.
Carry your own answer forward Compare whichever two equations you produced above, even if they were not the expected ones, and say honestly what your own pair shares. The credit is for locating the shared point in the constant term and for arguing the uniqueness from the slopes, not for a particular fraction.
Compare the two methods Say what each one costs you, and when you would reach for it. 5 points
The answer
Part A
, which simplifies to .
- starting from the other crossing gives , which simplifies to the same line; what is not the same is a slope of , which divides the run by the rise
Part B
The slope is , and the equation is .
- is the same equation with its terms in the other order; what is not the same is for the slope, which would send the line up and away from the -axis
Part C
Both lines pass through , the shared constant, and they run in opposite directions, one rising to the right and one falling, because their slopes differ in sign. That crossing point is the only one they share: setting the two heights equal gives , so is the only place they agree.
Worked solution
Part A
Two crossings are two points, so the slope comes first.
Now put that slope and either crossing into point-slope form. Using , the subtraction becomes :
The constant agreeing with the given y-intercept is a check, not a coincidence: the y-intercept was one of the two points the line was built from.
Part B
The second line also passes through , so again there are two points.
Its crossing of the -axis is , so the constant is and no further work is needed:
At this returns , so the line does meet the -axis where it was told to.
Part C
The constant term is the height at , so both lines pass through whatever their slopes are. The slopes differ, so the two directions differ: climbs to the right and falls.
To see that no second point is shared, ask where the two heights agree:
The only solution is . That is the general picture for two lines whose slopes differ: gathering the -terms leaves a nonzero multiple of , which can vanish at one place and no more.
In one line
The first line has slope , point-slope form , and slope-intercept form . The second has slope and equation . Both pass through and run in opposite directions, and is the only point they share, because setting the two heights equal collapses to .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 5 points
Computes the slope from the two crossings before reaching for a form that needs one. . Worth 2 points.
Substitutes the chosen crossing into point-slope form with the sign its subtraction imposes. . Worth 2 points.
Simplifies to a form with alone and a coefficient of on it. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Uses both of the second line's crossings to obtain its slope, with the fall recorded as a negative rise. . Worth 2 points.
Reports the equation with the crossing of the -axis as its constant term, and checks it against the given -axis crossing. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 5 points
Identifies the shared constant as the shared point and gives it as an ordered pair. . Worth 2 points.
Argues that no second point is shared by setting the two heights equal, rather than by appealing to a picture. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
States the difference the two slopes make to the directions the lines run. . Worth 1 point.
-
-
5. Two requests made of one line and one point . 14 points. Question 5 of 10.
The line has equation , and is the point .
- Part A.
Write the equation of the line through that crosses at a right angle, in slope-intercept form.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part B.
Now write the equation of the line through that never meets , or show that there is no such line. Decide whether what you have written is a different line from , and justify that verdict from the two numbers that settle it.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points
- Part C.
Say how many points each of the two lines you considered has in common with , and explain what decides each count. Then run part B again with replaced by the point , and report what you get.
Carry your own answer forward Count against whichever two lines you produced above, even if they were not the expected ones, and say honestly what your own pair gives. The credit here is for the reason behind each count and for the effect of moving the point off the line, not for reproducing one particular equation.
Explain what it means Words, not just symbols. Say what the number is telling you about the situation. 5 points
The answer
Part A
.
- the unsimplified is the same line; what is not the same is a slope of or of , neither of which multiplies with to give
Part B
There is no such line. The only line through with 's slope is , which is itself, since its slope and its constant both match 's. A line cannot fail to meet itself, so nothing through avoids .
Part C
The right-angle line meets at exactly one point, itself. The line built with 's slope is , so it shares every point of . Had been , which is not on , that second line would have been , a genuinely different line sharing no point with .
Worked solution
Part A
The slope of is , so a line crossing it at a right angle has the negative reciprocal slope, the fraction turned over and the sign changed.
Point-slope form with then gives
At this returns , so the line does pass through .
Part B
A line that never meets must have 's slope, , since two lines whose slopes differ cross exactly once. So build the line through with that slope:
That is , letter for letter. Equal slopes alone would only have made the two lines parallel; here the constants are equal as well, and , and equal slope together with equal constant is one line written twice. The reason is visible in itself: substituting into gives , so was on all along, and every line through a point of meets at least there.
Part C
Two lines with different slopes cross exactly once, so the right-angle line meets at a single point, and since it was built through and lies on , that point is .
The second line was not a different line at all, so the count is not one but every point of .
Moving the point off changes the second case completely. With , note first that , so the point is off , and the line through it with 's slope is
Equal slopes, constants and that differ, so this really is parallel: a second line that never meets , sharing no point at all. Whether the request in part B can be met turns entirely on whether the given point lies on .
In one line
The line through crossing at a right angle is . There is no line through that never meets : the only line through with 's slope has 's constant too, so it is itself. The right-angle line shares exactly one point with , namely , while the second shares all of them. Had been , a point off , the second line would have been , parallel to and sharing no point with it.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 4 points
Takes the negative reciprocal, turning the fraction over and changing the sign, and shows the product coming out as . . Worth 2 points.
Puts that slope and the given point into point-slope form and reaches a form with alone. . Worth 2 points.
Part B 5 points
Builds the candidate line through the given point using 's own slope. . Worth 2 points.
Settles sameness on BOTH numbers, the slope and the constant, rather than on the slope alone. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Reaches a verdict on whether such a line exists, and connects that verdict to where the given point sits in relation to . . Worth 1 point.
Part C 5 points
Gives a count for each of the two lines, naming the point or points behind each count rather than leaving a bare number. . Worth 2 points.
Traces the difference between the counts to whether the two slopes differ. . Worth 1 point.
Works out the replacement case from scratch, testing the new point against and classifying the line it produces. . Worth 2 points.
-
-
6. What an equation with one letter in it pins down . 15 points. Question 6 of 10.
Three equations are given: , , and . The first two name only one of the two letters, and that difference is what this question is about.
- Part A.
The graphs of and have exactly one point in common. Name it, and say what each of those two equations contributes to fixing it. Then work out which of , and satisfy , showing each substitution, and report for every one of those three points the full list of graphs it lies on.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part B.
Find the point of the graph of whose height is , and the point of that same graph whose first coordinate is . Then run both of those searches on the graph of instead, and report honestly what each one returns.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part C.
Consider one further search alongside those in part B: a point of the graph of whose height is . Explain what it is about an equation naming only one of the two letters that decides how many answers a search of this kind has, working through the cases your part B results and this further one fall into, and say what each case looks like on the graph.
Carry your own answer forward Base the explanation on whatever your part B searches returned, even if they were not what was expected. The credit is for the account of why one letter being absent produces a determined answer in one direction and no constraint at all in the other.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 5 points
The answer
Part A
is the common point, each equation fixing one coordinate. It lies on all three graphs, on alone, and on alone.
- the verdicts may be laid out as a table; what is not acceptable is a verdict on reached by looking at whether one coordinate matches, since that equation constrains the pair and not either coordinate alone
Part B
On they are and . On no point has height , that graph holding only the height , while is its one point in that column.
- "no such point" and "exactly one point" are the two honest answers for the second pair of searches; what is not acceptable is forcing a point out of the impossible one
Part C
The equation constrains and says nothing about . So a missing is decided, a missing is unconstrained and every number works, and a point whose stated is not can be rescued by no . On the graph: one fixed height, every column at that height, and a point off the line.
Worked solution
Part A
An equation naming one letter is satisfied when that letter matches, whatever the other one is, so the two one-letter graphs make one demand each: fixes the height and fixes the column, and is the only pair meeting both. The third equation is different in kind, since it has to be satisfied by the pair together.
So satisfies as well, putting it on all three graphs. The point has the right height but the wrong column and returns , so it lies on alone. The point has the right column but the wrong height and returns , so it lies on alone.
Part B
On each search leaves one unknown coordinate and is solved by substitution.
So the two points are and . On the two searches behave quite differently. A point of height would need
to hold, since the graph holds every point of height and no other, and no first coordinate can rescue it. A point with first coordinate instead has its height unknown, and the equation names it outright, so the point is and there is no other.
Part C
Read as the pair of demands it actually makes. It demands that the height be , and it demands nothing whatever of the column, which is the same as writing it : the coefficient of is zero, so no value of can affect whether the equation holds.
Three behaviours follow directly. If the height is unknown, the equation names it, and the search returns exactly one value. If the height is given as and the column is unknown, the equation is already satisfied and every column works, so the search returns every number. If the height is given as anything else, no column can help, and the search returns nothing.
On the graph, the second case is the whole horizontal line, a single height stretching across every column, and the third case is a point sitting off that line, at the wrong height. The same account runs for with the roles of the two letters exchanged, which is why it is a vertical line.
In one line
The graphs of and meet only at , which lies on all three graphs, while lies on alone and lies on alone. On the two searches return and . On no point has height , since that height is already wrong, while is the one point in that column. An equation naming only one letter pins that letter and leaves the other entirely free, which is why one search is determined, one is impossible, and one would return every point of the line at once: the graph is a single height carrying every column.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 5 points
Substitutes into and reports what each point returns against the the equation demands. . Worth 2 points.
Settles the one-letter equations by comparing the relevant coordinate alone, leaving the other coordinate free. . Worth 2 points.
Reports, for every point, the complete list of graphs it belongs to. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 5 points
Solves both searches on by substituting the known coordinate and isolating the unknown one. . Worth 2 points.
Reports what the search by height returns on , and names the comparison that decides it. . Worth 2 points.
Reports what the search by first coordinate returns on , taking the height from the equation itself. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 5 points
Grounds both behaviours in the equation constraining one letter and leaving the other free, rather than in a rule about horizontal lines. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Says what each behaviour is on the graph, naming the line of one fixed height and a point that sits off it. . Worth 2 points.
-
-
7. A crossing the grid cannot show you . 12 points. Question 7 of 10.
The line below runs across a grid ruled in single units, passing exactly through the two marked corners. Those two corners are the only points of it whose coordinates the drawing gives exactly.
One line on a unit grid, marked at the two corners it passes through exactly. Text description of this figure
A coordinate grid ruled in single units, carrying one straight line that falls from left to right. The line passes exactly through two marked corners. The first sits two units left of the vertical axis and five units above the horizontal axis. The second sits four units right of the vertical axis and one unit above the horizontal axis. The line meets the vertical axis between the third and the fourth gridline above the origin, not at a corner.
- Part A.
Work out how far the line moves across between the two marked corners, and how far it moves up or down, counting a drop as negative. Then give the slope those two numbers produce, reduced to lowest terms.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 3 points
- Part B.
The same line is also described by the equation . Put that equation into the form , and check the slope it reports against the count you made in part A.
Carry your own answer forward Compare against whichever slope you counted in part A, even if it was not the expected one, and say honestly whether the two agree. The credit here is for solving for completely, dividing every term rather than only the first, and for making the comparison.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
The drawing shows the line meeting the -axis between two gridlines rather than at a corner, so no amount of counting could produce that height exactly. Explain how the slope from part A, together with either one of the two marked corners, fixes it exactly, and carry the argument through on one corner to show it.
Carry your own answer forward Use whichever slope and whichever form you produced above, even if they were not the expected ones. The credit is for the account of why a slope plus one point admits only one constant, and for carrying that account out on a corner, not for arriving at a particular fraction.
Explain why it works A sentence or two. Reasons, not steps. 5 points
The answer
Part A
The run is and the rise is , so the slope is .
- counting right to left instead gives a run of and a rise of , the same slope; what is not the same is , which has counted the drop as a climb, or , which has divided the run by the rise
Part B
, whose slope matches the counted slope.
- is the same equation before the division is carried through each term; what is not the same is , which has divided only part of the right side
Part C
A slope and one point leave nothing to choose: the constant is whatever makes that point satisfy . With and the corner , the equation forces , and the other corner returns the same value.
Worked solution
Part A
Count the run to the right first, then the rise, counting downward as negative.
The sign is negative because the line falls as it moves to the right, which the drawing shows and the count records.
Part B
Neither number in is the slope or the intercept until stands alone, so carry the -term across and then divide every term by .
The coefficient of is , exactly the slope counted off the grid. As a further check, the marked corner satisfies the original equation: .
Part C
Every line of slope has the form , and different values of slide the whole family up and down. Requiring the line to pass through a known point picks exactly one member, because substituting that point leaves one unknown in one linear equation.
Run it on :
Run it on instead and the same value appears:
So the drawing was never asked to supply . Two corners it could show exactly, plus arithmetic, deliver a crossing that falls between gridlines, and that crossing is exact rather than estimated.
In one line
The slope triangle gives a run of and a rise of , so the slope is . Rearranged, becomes , whose slope matches the count. The constant is not readable off the grid, but it is not guesswork either: once the slope is fixed, one known point admits exactly one constant, and substituting gives , so , which the corner confirms.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 3 points
Counts the horizontal leg and the vertical leg between the two marked corners, recording the downward leg as a negative rise. . Worth 2 points.
Reports the slope in lowest terms and says which way the line runs. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Isolates the -term and then divides every term on both sides by its coefficient, leaving with a coefficient of . . Worth 2 points.
Reads the slope off the rearranged form and states whether it agrees with the counted one. . Worth 2 points.
Part C 5 points
Explains that fixing the slope leaves one unknown constant, and that requiring a known point determines it uniquely. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Substitutes one marked corner into the slope-intercept form and solves for the constant, showing the arithmetic. . Worth 2 points.
-
-
8. Three lines built around one . 15 points. Question 8 of 10.
This question builds two further lines around a first one. Write for the line .
- Part A.
Find the value of for which the line crosses at a right angle.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part B.
Call the line from part A once is fixed. Write in slope-intercept form. Then write the equation of , the line through the origin that never meets .
Carry your own answer forward Use whichever value of you found in part A, even if it was not the expected one, and build honestly from it. The credit here is for solving for completely and for choosing 's slope from the relationship it has to be in, not for landing on particular fractions.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 5 points
- Part C.
Take the three pairs among , and in turn. Say of each pair whether the two lines are parallel, perpendicular, or neither, and set out what settles it. Then say which of the two numbers in a slope-intercept equation each of your verdicts rested on, and what work the other number did.
Carry your own answer forward Classify whichever three lines you produced above, even if they were not the expected ones, and report honestly what your own slopes give. The credit is for the comparison behind each verdict and for identifying which numbers each verdict actually used.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points
The answer
Part A
.
- only; a value of has lost the sign change that carrying the -term across produces, and a value of has matched the two slopes instead of taking a negative reciprocal
Part B
is , and is .
- may be written ; what is not the same is , which is itself and therefore meets everywhere
Part C
and are perpendicular, and so are and : each product of slopes is . and share the slope , and their constants and differ, so they are parallel. The slopes identify each relationship; the unequal constants complete the parallel verdict.
Worked solution
Part A
Neither equation shows its slope, so solve each for first.
A right-angle crossing needs the second slope to be the negative reciprocal of , which is :
Checking, .
Part B
With the second equation is , and solving for divides every term by :
A line that never meets must carry 's slope, , since two lines with different slopes cross exactly once. Through the origin, the constant is :
Its constant differs from 's , so really is a second line and not written again, and two distinct lines of equal slope never meet.
Part C
The three slopes are , and , with constants , and .
Each of the first two products is , which settles those two pairs as perpendicular on the slopes alone. The third comparison is not yet a verdict. Equal slopes leave two possibilities open, two parallel lines or one line written twice, and only the constants separate them: and are different, so and are two lines, and two distinct lines of equal slope are parallel.
So the slopes carry the work in all three pairs and finish it in the two perpendicular ones. The parallel verdict is the one that needs both numbers, the equal slopes to name the relationship and the unequal constants to establish that there are two lines to be in it.
In one line
, so is , that is , and is . Of the three pairs, with and with are perpendicular, each product of slopes being , while and share the slope and carry the different constants and , which makes them parallel. The slopes identify every relationship here, and the constants are what turn equal slopes into a parallel verdict rather than one line written twice.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 5 points
Solves both equations for before treating any coefficient as a slope. . Worth 2 points.
Sets the second slope equal to the negative reciprocal of the first, turning the fraction over and changing the sign. . Worth 2 points.
Reports a single value for and confirms the product of the two slopes. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 5 points
Divides every term by the coefficient of , so that ends with a coefficient of . . Worth 2 points.
Chooses the slope of to match 's, and uses the origin as the point that fixes its constant. . Worth 2 points.
Checks whether is a different line from by comparing the two constants. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 5 points
Gives a verdict for all three pairs, with the comparison behind each one shown. . Worth 3 points.
Says which number each verdict rested on, and what the constants settle that a comparison of slopes cannot. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
9. A form with three rules attached to it . 14 points. Question 9 of 10.
Standard form asks for more than a rearrangement. It asks for with , and integers, with zero or positive, and with the three sharing no common factor. Two lines are written that way below, and then a further request is made of one of them.
- Part A.
Write the equation of the line through with slope , first in point-slope form and then in standard form under the three conditions above.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 5 points
- Part B.
A second line passes through the same point but has slope . Write it in standard form under the same three conditions.
Write the expression An equation or an expression is enough here. Show how you built it. 4 points
- Part C.
Your part A line is now wanted with as the coefficient of . Decide whether that can be produced without breaking any of the three conditions in the stem, and justify the verdict by naming exactly which rescaling would be required and saying what it does to the equation.
Carry your own answer forward Work from whichever standard-form equation you produced in part A, even if it was not the expected one, and test the rescaling its own coefficients demand. The credit is for identifying the single multiplier that could do the job and for checking it against each condition in turn.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points
The answer
Part A
in point-slope form, and in standard form.
- is the same line but leaves the leading coefficient negative, which the conditions rule out; is also the same line but its three numbers share the factor
Part B
.
- is the same line with a negative leading coefficient, which the conditions rule out; has lost a sign in the arithmetic and is a different line
Part C
It cannot. The only rescaling that turns the coefficient into is multiplication by , which gives . That leaves the leading coefficient negative and gives all three numbers the common factor , so it breaks two of the three conditions at once.
Worked solution
Part A
Point-slope form takes the point and the slope with the signs its subtractions impose, so becomes .
Clear the fraction by multiplying both sides by , then distribute and collect.
The coefficients are integers, is positive, and , and share no factor. Substituting gives , so the point is on it.
Part B
Point-slope form again, then clear the denominator .
Collect the variables on the left and the constants on the right:
The coefficients are integers, is positive, and , and share no factor, since but is prime to both. Substituting gives .
Part C
Multiplying an equation through by a nonzero number never changes which pairs satisfy it, so the request is only about how the line is written, not about which line it is. The coefficient of in is , and the multiplier that sends to is settled:
No other multiplier will do, so there is exactly one candidate to inspect.
Now test it against the conditions. The coefficients are integers, which is fine. But is negative, and the convention asks for zero or positive. And , and are all even, so the three share the factor , which the last condition also forbids. Both failures come from the same source: a negative multiplier flips the sign of , and an even multiplier makes every coefficient even, and is both. So the request cannot be met, and the honest answer is to say which condition would have to be waived.
In one line
The first line is in point-slope form and in standard form. The second is . The first cannot be written with as the coefficient of under these conditions: the only multiplier that produces it is , giving , which leaves the leading coefficient negative and gives the three numbers the common factor .
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 5 points
Substitutes the point into point-slope form with the sign each subtraction imposes on a negative coordinate. . Worth 2 points.
Clears the fractional slope by multiplying BOTH sides, so the equation stays balanced. . Worth 2 points.
Delivers a form meeting all three conditions, and checks it against the given point. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 4 points
Multiplies both sides by the denominator of the slope before distributing. . Worth 2 points.
Gathers the terms onto the sides that leave the leading coefficient positive. . Worth 1 point.
Checks the finished equation against the given point. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 5 points
Identifies the one multiplier that would produce the requested coefficient, and says why no other could. . Worth 2 points.
Applies that multiplier to the whole equation, both sides included, and writes out the result. . Worth 1 point.
Tests the result against each of the three conditions and reaches a verdict naming the ones that fail. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
-
-
10. A shortcut for reading a slope off standard form . 17 points. Question 10 of 10.
A shortcut is sometimes used to read a slope out of an equation written as : take the coefficient of over the coefficient of , with the signs exactly as they stand on the page, and call that the slope. Below it is applied to two lines, and the two numbers it returns are multiplied together. Both equations here have a nonzero coefficient on . The two lines are and .
- Part A.
Find the true slope of each of the two lines by solving each equation for . Then work out what the shortcut returns for each.
Solve and show your work Write each step out, and end with the value and its units. 5 points
- Part B.
Decide whether the two lines cross at a right angle, and decide separately whether the shortcut's pair of numbers would have led to the same decision. Justify both.
Carry your own answer forward Test whichever four numbers you produced in part A, even if they were not the expected ones, and report the two verdicts your own numbers give, whether or not they agree. The credit here is for applying the product test twice and reporting both outcomes honestly.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 5 points
- Part C.
Set your two pairs of numbers from part A beside your two verdicts from part B, and say exactly what the shortcut does wrong. Then decide how far it can be trusted, keeping throughout to equations whose coefficient on is not zero: name the questions about a PAIR of lines that it will always answer correctly and say why, and then say for which single lines it reports the slope wrongly and for which it happens to report it correctly.
Carry your own answer forward Argue from whatever pattern your own numbers in part A showed, even if it was not the expected one, and say honestly what it does and does not license. The credit is for naming the omitted step, for showing why a comparison of two slopes survives it, and for identifying which lines the error does not touch.
Justify your claim State the claim, then give the reason it has to be true. 7 points
The answer
Part A
The true slopes are and . The shortcut returns and .
- the shortcut's values may be left unreduced as and ; what is not acceptable is reporting the shortcut's value as the true slope of either line
Part B
They do cross at a right angle, since . The shortcut would have reached the same decision, because its two numbers also multiply to : . A wrong pair of slopes has produced the right verdict.
Part C
It drops the sign change that carrying the -term across produces, so it returns the opposite of the true slope. Negating both slopes leaves both pair tests untouched, so pair verdicts survive it. A tilting line's slope comes out with the wrong sign; a horizontal line's is its own opposite and escapes.
Worked solution
Part A
Solve each equation for , dividing every term by the coefficient of and watching what happens when that coefficient is negative.
So the true slopes are and . The shortcut instead reads the coefficients straight off the page:
Each of the shortcut's numbers is the opposite of the corresponding true slope.
Part B
Apply the product test to the true slopes first.
The product is , so the two lines do meet at a right angle. Now apply the same test to what the shortcut returned.
The same verdict, from two numbers neither of which is a slope of either line. Nothing has been corrected along the way; the wrong pair simply happens to carry the same product.
Part C
What it does wrong. Solving for begins by moving the -term to the other side, and moving it changes its sign. The shortcut skips that move and reads the coefficient where it stands, so it returns the opposite of the true slope every time.
Why the pair questions survive. Both of the chapter's tests compare two slopes, and negating both leaves both comparisons alone. For the right-angle test, the two minus signs cancel in the product:
So the shortcut's product is the true product, and it returns exactly when the truth does. For the parallel test, negating both sides of an equality keeps it true and negating back restores it, so holds precisely when . Both verdicts therefore come out right, for any two equations carrying a nonzero coefficient on , however wrong the two inputs are.
Where it fails. Every question about one line on its own goes wrong: the slope itself, whether the line rises or falls as increases, the negative reciprocal built from it, and any equation written using it. Among these equations there is exactly one escape. The shortcut and the truth agree when , which forces , and is a horizontal line. So a horizontal line's slope of is reported correctly, because is its own opposite, and every line that actually tilts is reported with the wrong sign.
The case held back. All of that assumed a nonzero coefficient on , which is what makes a number at all. If the equation reads , a vertical line: the shortcut asks for and returns nothing, and the true slope is undefined as well, so there is no number here to report rightly or wrongly. A pair containing such a line falls outside the product test for the same reason, one of the two numbers it needs not existing, and is settled by the two directions instead.
In one line
The true slopes are and , while the shortcut returns and . Both pairs multiply to , so the lines do cross at a right angle and the shortcut reaches that verdict too. The shortcut omits the sign change that carrying the -term across produces, so it returns the opposite of the true slope. Negating both slopes leaves the product test and the equal-slopes test untouched, so for equations whose coefficient on is not zero its verdicts about a pair are always right; among those lines the slope of any tilting one comes out with the wrong sign, and only a horizontal line escapes, because is its own opposite. A zero coefficient on sits outside all of it: that equation is a vertical line, where the shortcut returns nothing and there is no slope to compare.
Rubric
Mark your own paper against this. Give yourself the points for each element you actually wrote down, not the ones you meant to.
Part A 5 points
Solves both equations for , dividing every term and keeping the sign right when the coefficient of is negative. . Worth 2 points.
Computes the shortcut's two values separately, without quietly correcting them to the true ones. . Worth 2 points.
Reports four numbers and says which two belong to the line and which two belong to the shortcut. . Worth 1 point.
Part B 5 points
Applies the product test to the true slopes and reaches a verdict about the two lines. . Worth 2 points.
Applies the same test to the shortcut's pair, kept separate from the true pair, and reports what it gives. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
States plainly how the two verdicts stand to one another, and whether the two pairs of numbers do the same. . Worth 1 point.
Part C 7 points
Names the omitted sign change as what goes wrong, and states the relationship between the shortcut's value and the true slope. . Worth 2 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Shows why negating both slopes leaves the product test and the equality test unchanged, rather than only reporting that they did. . Worth 3 points. needs an explanation, not just an answer
Separates the lines whose slope comes out wrong from those the shortcut happens to report correctly, and gives the reason for the exception; treating the vertical case separately is not a fault. . Worth 2 points.
-