Arithmetic with Expressions
Learning goals
- Name a term's coefficient and variable part
- Combine like terms by adding coefficients, the distributive law reversed
- Add expressions by dropping parentheses and collecting
- Subtract by adding the opposite, flipping every sign inside
- Scale an expression by distributing across every term
- Check a simplification by substituting a value into both forms
The parts of an expression
An expression is any meaningful combination of numbers, variables, and operations that names a value, such as . Its building blocks have names worth fixing now, because the rest of the lesson is about moving these blocks around without breaking anything.
A term is a piece of the expression that is added to the others. The expression has three terms: , , and . Because subtraction is adding the opposite, the sign in front of a term belongs to it, so the middle term is , not . Keeping the sign attached to its term is what makes the arithmetic below reliable.
The coefficient of a term is its numerical factor, and the variable part is what is left. In the coefficient is and the variable part is ; in the coefficient is and the variable part is . A term like or that shows no number has an invisible coefficient of , since . A constant term is a term with no variable at all, just a number, like the above.
Finally, like terms are terms with the same variable part, meaning the same variables raised to the same powers. So and are like terms, and so are and , because makes their variable parts identical. But and are unlike, because and are different variable parts, and and are unlike because they use different letters. Telling like from unlike is the whole game, so read the variable part carefully every time.
Combining like terms
To simplify an expression is to rewrite it as an equivalent expression with as few terms as possible, and the main tool is combining like terms. The rule is short: like terms combine into one term by adding their coefficients, and unlike terms cannot combine at all. Both halves of that rule come straight from the distributive law you proved in the first lesson.
Why like terms combine, and unlike terms do not#
The distributive law says . Read it from right to left and it becomes a rule for pulling out a shared factor: . That reverse reading is the entire engine behind combining like terms.
Two like terms share the same variable part. Write that shared part as , so the two terms are and for some numbers and . For and the shared part is with and ; for and it is . Because multiplication is commutative, and , so
The two terms collapse into a single term whose coefficient is the sum and whose variable part is unchanged. This is why , and why , since a bare carries the invisible coefficient .
Unlike terms have different variable parts, so there is no single to factor out and the step above never starts. In one term has variable part and the other is a constant; in the parts are and . In the variable parts are and . None of these pairs shares a variable part, so each sum is already as simple as it gets and must be left as two separate terms.
It helps to picture terms as tiles. Let a long tile stand for one and a small square for a . Then combining like terms is nothing more than sorting the tiles into piles of the same shape and counting each pile.
Worked example 1 Name the parts, then combine
First read off the terms with their signs: , , , , and . The constant term is . The like terms fall into two families, the terms and , and the terms and .
Combine each family by adding coefficients. For the terms,
and for the terms, remembering that has coefficient ,
The constant has nothing to pair with, so the simplified expression is
Its three terms are pairwise unlike, so no further combining is possible.
Check your understanding
Combine like terms: .
Combine the terms and the constants separately.
The terms and are like terms, while and are constants; nothing else combines.
Adding and subtracting whole expressions
Often you need to add or subtract entire expressions, each wrapped in parentheses, such as . Adding is the easy case. The associative and commutative laws of addition, which hold for every number, let you erase the parentheses and reorder the terms however you like. So when you are adding, you simply drop the parentheses and combine like terms:
Subtraction takes one extra moment of care, because subtracting an expression is not the same as subtracting only its first term. Subtracting a whole expression means adding its opposite, and the opposite of a sum flips the sign of every term inside.
Why a minus sign in front reverses every term#
To subtract an expression is to add its opposite, and the opposite of any quantity is . So a minus sign written in front of a parenthesis is really the factor waiting to be distributed.
Take . Rewrite the subtraction inside as an addition, , then distribute the across both terms:
Every term inside came out with its sign reversed: became , and became . Nothing here depends on the particular numbers, so the same reasoning gives the general rule . Distributing a leading minus sign changes the sign of each term it reaches. Forgetting to flip the second term is the single most common error in this whole lesson.
Worked example 2 Subtract from
Subtraction adds the opposite of the second expression, so distribute the minus sign across both of its terms:
The inside became ; missing that flip is the classic slip. Now reorder and combine like terms:
To check, substitute a value into both the original and the result and confirm they agree. At the original is , and the simplified form is . They match, which is the reassurance that the two expressions are equivalent.
Check your understanding
Simplify .
Subtracting the second group flips the sign of each of its terms.
The becomes , which is the step most often missed; the answer is , not .
Scaling an expression by a number or a term
You already know the distributive law, . It is what lets you scale an entire expression by a single factor: multiply each term inside the parentheses by the factor outside. Scaling by gives
and the factor can carry a sign, so scaling by would give . The factor outside can even be a single term rather than a bare number; distributing across gives . Multiplying two multi-term expressions together is a bigger job, saved for the next lesson. Most simplifications here combine scaling with the earlier skills. Distribute every product first, then collect like terms, and when grouping symbols are nested inside one another, clear those symbols from the inside out.
Worked example 3 Distribute, then combine
Use the distributive law on each product first, keeping every sign:
Now the expression is a plain sum, so gather like terms:
The two steps never blur together: distribute every product before you start collecting like terms.
Worked example 4 Simplify the nested expression
Nested grouping symbols are cleared from the inside out. Start with the innermost parentheses, where a minus sign flips both terms:
Multiply by the outside the brackets:
Finally subtract that whole quantity from , flipping its signs:
Reaching outward before an inner layer is finished is what produces sign mistakes, so resolve one bracket completely before moving out to the next.
Check your understanding
Simplify .
Distribute the , then subtract every term of .
The turns into , giving the constant .
Checking a simplification by substitution
Simplifying is supposed to produce an equivalent expression, one that gives the same value for every input. So a quick substitution is the natural way to catch an error. Pick a convenient value, evaluate both the original and your simplified form, and compare. Agreement does not prove the two are equivalent (recall from the first lesson that no finite list of checks can). But a disagreement instantly reveals a slip, almost always a dropped sign. Values like or tend to expose mistakes that or quietly hide.
Worked example 5 Simplify and check
Distribute the , then subtract every term of the second group:
Combine the terms and the terms:
Now verify with a substitution, which a correct simplification will survive. At the original is , and gives . The agreement is the sign that every step preserved the value, which is exactly what simplifying is meant to do.