Fractional Exponents and Radicals
Learning goals
- Explain how the exponent laws make a square root, and why the principal-root convention then selects
- Read the denominator as the root index and the numerator as the power
- Switch between a radical and a fractional exponent in either direction
- Pull perfect-power factors out, so is
- Combine like radicals only, matching index and radicand
- Require a nonnegative radicand for an even index, unlike an odd one
What a one-half power must mean
The product rule for exponents says that to multiply two powers of the same base you add the exponents: . That rule was proved for whole-number exponents, but insisting it keeps holding for a fractional one is exactly the choice this lesson makes. Try it on a number first, with and :
Whatever means, it has to square to give . Nothing about that argument used the number in particular, so the same reasoning holds for any base :
Read that general line the same way. It says the number , multiplied by itself, gives back . A number that squares to is exactly what a square root of is. So if the product rule is to keep holding, must be a square root of , and the next block pins that down to a single value.
Why must equal #
The paragraph above narrows down to being some square root of . It does not yet say which one.
There are two numbers that square to a positive , one positive and one negative. So to give the symbol a single value we make the same choice the radical sign already makes: is the non-negative one. With that agreement,
The base must be zero or positive for this to describe a real number, because no real number squares to a negative. So is defined only for , and it is the principal (non-negative) square root, exactly the you already know.
The picture behind this is the one you met when square roots were introduced. A square of area has side length , because the side multiplied by itself is the area. The fractional exponent just records that same fact, since is the number you multiply by itself to reach .
The nth root
The same move works for any root. Instead of splitting the exponent into two halves, split into equal pieces of size . The rule you need now is the power-of-a-power rule, , which lets you raise to the th power by multiplying the exponents:
So is a number whose th power is . That number is called the th root of , and it gets its own symbol, an extension of the radical sign you already use for square roots.
Why is the th root of #
The line above already shows that raising to the th power returns , so is some th root of . Whether that root is unique, and what it equals, depends on whether is even or odd.
When is even, a positive has two real th roots, one positive and one negative, so exactly as with the square root we take the non-negative one; has the single root . Either way we require :
When is odd there is exactly one real th root and no sign worry, because an odd number of negative factors stays negative, so for every real . For instance , since . Contrast that with an even index on the same kind of number: has no real value at all, since no real number raised to the fourth power is negative.
In the symbol , the small number is the index of the root and the number underneath is the radicand. A square root is the case , and its index is left unwritten: means . A cube root has index , written . You read as “the th root of .”
Keep the even-odd rule from above in mind for every root in this lesson: an even index needs a radicand that is zero or positive, and an odd index accepts any real radicand.
Just as knowing the perfect squares makes square roots quick, knowing the small perfect cubes makes cube roots quick:
Reading the bottom row back to the top gives the cube root directly. Since sits under , you know .
Worked example 1 Evaluate and
For each one, find the number whose repeated power lands on the radicand.
For , the index is , so search for the number whose cube is . Since ,
For , the index is , so search for the number whose fourth power is . Since ,
A quick check confirms each: raise the answer to the index and you should return to the radicand, and indeed and .
Check your understanding
Evaluate .
A one-over- power is the th root, so is the cube root of : the number whose cube is .
Check by cubing: . It is not (that is the square root of ) and not (a negative exponent would give a reciprocal, but the exponent here is positive).
Raising to a fraction like two-thirds
A fractional exponent whose top is not , such as , combines a root and a power in one symbol. Try it first on a number before asking what the rule is in general.
Try both orders on to see why root-first is easier. Root-first gives , working with the small number . Power-first gives , the same answer but by way of the larger . Same result, less arithmetic on the first route.
That pattern holds for every fractional exponent, not just . Because , the power-of-a-power rule lets you read in two equivalent ways, one for each order you just tried.
Why #
Take , as in the last two proofs, so every root below names a real number, and let and be positive whole numbers. Start from the exponent and apply , splitting the fraction in each direction.
Taking the first, so that the root is done before the power,
Taking the first, so that the power is done before the root,
Both describe the number , so they are equal. In either reading the denominator is the index of the root and the numerator is the power. For the two orders always agree, but taking the root first usually keeps the numbers small, since you root the base before it grows.
Worked example 2 Evaluate and
Take the root of index equal to the denominator first, then raise to the numerator.
For , the denominator calls for a cube root and the numerator for a square. Cube-root , then square:
For , the denominator calls for a fifth root and the numerator for a cube. Since , the fifth root of is , then cube it:
Rooting first kept both bases small, and , instead of jumping to or before rooting.
Check your understanding
Evaluate .
The denominator is the root index and the numerator is the power, so take the fourth root of first, then cube it.
Since , the fourth root is , and . It is not (that would be , treating the exponent as a multiplier) and not (that is ).
Radicals and fractional exponents are the same idea
Everything so far can be read in one sentence: a radical and a fractional exponent are two names for the same number. Collecting the results, for and positive whole numbers and ,
This is a dictionary you can read in either direction. A radical becomes a fractional exponent by putting the index in the denominator, and a fractional exponent becomes a radical by making the denominator the index. Switching to exponent form is often what makes a messy expression obey the familiar exponent laws. Switching to radical form is often what makes a value easy to evaluate.
Worked example 3 Rewrite with a fractional exponent, and evaluate
Use the dictionary in each direction.
For , the index becomes the denominator and the inside power becomes the numerator:
For , read it back as a radical to evaluate it. The denominator is a square root and the numerator is the power, so square-root first, then raise to the fifth:
Rooting first turned the base into the small number before the power made it grow. That route is far easier than computing and then taking its square root.
Simplifying radicals
Roots split across a product exactly the way powers do. The rule is , and the fractional-exponent form shows why in one line.
Why #
Write the root as a fractional exponent, then use the rule for a power of a product, . That rule holds for a fractional exponent for the same reason it holds for a whole one: raising the right-hand side to the th power returns . With ,
For even indices, take and to be zero or positive so every root is a real number. This is the same product rule you proved directly for square roots, now seen as one more consequence of the exponent laws. With that restriction, the rule holds for roots of every index.
Division splits the same way, and for the same reason: writing the root as a fractional exponent and using the matching rule for a power of a quotient, ,
with and, for an even index, both and zero or positive. For instance, : one root instead of two.
The product rule earns its keep when you simplify a radical, meaning you pull out any factor that is a perfect power for the index. For a square root you hunt for a perfect-square factor; for a cube root, a perfect-cube factor. Split the radicand into that factor times whatever is left, then root the part that comes out cleanly.
Worked example 4 Simplify and
In each case pull out the largest perfect-power factor that matches the index.
For , the largest perfect-square factor of is , since . Split the root and evaluate the part that comes out:
For , look for the largest perfect-cube factor. Since and is a perfect cube,
The leftover radicands are under the square root and under the cube root. Neither has a further factor that is a perfect power for its index, so each expression is fully simplified.
Adding and subtracting radicals
Two radicals are like radicals when they have the same index and the same radicand, such as and . Like radicals add and subtract the same way like terms do, because the shared radical behaves as a common factor. Pulling it out is just the distributive law from the last lesson:
Unlike radicals do not combine. There is no rule that adds the radicands: is not , because roots split across products, never across sums. Once each term is in simplest form and the radicands still differ, the sum stays as two terms. Sometimes two radicals only look unlike until you simplify them, and then they turn out to match.
Worked example 5 Simplify
The two radicands are different, so the terms are not like radicals yet. Simplify each one first by pulling out its largest perfect-square factor.
Since ,
and since ,
Now both terms carry the same radical , so they are like radicals and combine:
The hidden common radical only appeared once each root was simplified, which is why simplifying first is the habit to build.
Negative fractional exponents
A negative fractional exponent asks nothing new. It just stacks two ideas you already have: the negative sign means take the reciprocal, and the fraction means take a root and a power. One bookkeeping rule keeps the domain from getting ambiguous: always write in lowest terms, with no factor shared by and , so that an exponent has one settled index to check, not several equivalent fractions that could disagree. (Unreduced, would look like it needs a sixth root, which rejects a negative base; reduced to , the same exponent plainly allows one.) With in lowest terms, the domain is the same domain from before, with one extra condition: since becomes a denominator, it also cannot be zero. So itself must be defined and nonzero: for even that means (an even root needs , and cannot be a denominator), while for odd any nonzero , positive or negative, still works. Then
Handle the two jobs in order. First the minus sign flips the power into its reciprocal, then the fraction is evaluated as a root and a power just as before. A negative exponent moves the power to the denominator; taking a reciprocal never changes the sign of a nonzero number, so is positive whenever is positive, and negative whenever is negative (which needs an odd and a negative , as in ).
Worked example 6 Evaluate and
Take the reciprocal that the minus sign calls for, then evaluate the fractional power.
For , flip to a reciprocal, then read as a cube root followed by a square:
For , flip first, then take the fourth root and cube:
Both values are positive fractions. With a positive base, the minus sign in the exponent produces a reciprocal, not a negative number.
Check your understanding
Evaluate .
The minus sign asks for a reciprocal, and the power is a cube root. So take the reciprocal of the cube root of .
Since , the cube root is , giving . The value is a positive fraction, so it is not ; the negative exponent flips the power, it does not change the sign.