Fractional Exponents and Radicals
Learning goals
- Derive from the exponent laws
- Read the denominator as the root index and the numerator as the power
- Switch between a radical and a fractional exponent in either direction
- Pull perfect-power factors out, so is
- Combine like radicals only, matching index and radicand
- Require a nonnegative radicand for an even index, unlike an odd one
What a one-half power must mean
The product rule for exponents says that to multiply two powers of the same base you add the exponents: . Nothing in that rule cares whether the exponents are whole numbers, so take it at its word with :
Read that line slowly. It says the number , multiplied by itself, gives back . A number that squares to is exactly what the square root of is. So if the product rule is to keep holding, has no room to be anything else: it must be .
Why must equal #
Suppose the product rule still applies when the exponent is a fraction, and let be a number that is zero or positive. Multiply by itself and add the exponents:
So whatever stands for, squaring it returns . That is precisely the defining property of a square root of .
There are two numbers that square to a positive , one positive and one negative. So to give the symbol a single value we make the same choice the radical sign already makes: is the non-negative one. With that agreement,
The base must be zero or positive for this to describe a real number, because no real number squares to a negative. So is defined for , and it is the principal (non-negative) square root, exactly the you already know.
The picture behind this is the one you met when square roots were introduced. A square of area has side length , because the side multiplied by itself is the area. The fractional exponent just records that same fact, since is the number you multiply by itself to reach .
The nth root
The same move works for any root. Instead of splitting the exponent into two halves, split into equal pieces of size . The rule you need now is the power-of-a-power rule, , which lets you raise to the th power by multiplying the exponents:
So is a number whose th power is . That number is called the th root of , and it gets its own symbol, an extension of the radical sign you already use for square roots.
Why is the th root of #
Assume the power-of-a-power rule holds for a fractional exponent, and raise to the th power. Multiplying the exponents,
So is a number that, used as a factor times, produces . That is the meaning of the th root of , so
When is even the argument matches the square-root case: the base must be zero or positive, and we take the non-negative root. When is odd there is exactly one real root and no sign worry, because an odd number of negative factors stays negative. For instance , since .
In the symbol , the small number is the index of the root and the number underneath is the radicand. A square root is the case , and its index is left unwritten: means . A cube root has index , written . You read as “the th root of .”
These roots stay in the real numbers as long as you mind the index. When is even, the radicand must be zero or positive, and names the non-negative (principal) root, exactly as a square root does. That restriction holds because no real number raised to an even power comes out negative. When is odd, a negative radicand is perfectly fine and gives a single negative root, so because . Every root in this lesson respects that rule, so it always denotes a real number.
Just as knowing the perfect squares makes square roots quick, knowing the small perfect cubes makes cube roots quick:
Reading the bottom row back to the top gives the cube root directly. Since sits under , you know .
Worked example 1 Evaluate and
For each one, find the number whose repeated power lands on the radicand.
For , the index is , so search for the number whose cube is . Since ,
For , the index is , so search for the number whose fourth power is . Since ,
A quick check confirms each: raise the answer to the index and you should return to the radicand, and indeed and .
Check your understanding
Evaluate .
A one-over- power is the th root, so is the cube root of : the number whose cube is .
Check by cubing: . It is not (that is the square root of ) and not (a negative exponent would give a reciprocal, but the exponent here is positive).
Raising to a fraction like two-thirds
A fractional exponent whose top is not , such as , combines a root and a power in one symbol. To see how, split the fraction into a product. Because , the power-of-a-power rule lets you read in two equivalent ways.
Why #
Start from the exponent and apply , splitting the fraction in each direction.
Taking the first, so that the root is done before the power,
Taking the first, so that the power is done before the root,
Both describe the number , so they are equal. In either reading the denominator is the index of the root and the numerator is the power. The two orders always agree, but taking the root first usually keeps the numbers small, since you root the base before it grows.
Try both orders on to see why root-first is easier. Root-first gives , working with the small number . Power-first gives , the same answer but by way of the larger . Same result, less arithmetic on the first route.
Worked example 2 Evaluate and
Take the root of index equal to the denominator first, then raise to the numerator.
For , the denominator calls for a cube root and the numerator for a square. Cube-root , then square:
For , the denominator calls for a fifth root and the numerator for a cube. Since , the fifth root of is , then cube it:
Rooting first kept both bases small, and , instead of jumping to or before rooting.
Check your understanding
Evaluate .
The denominator is the root index and the numerator is the power, so take the fourth root of first, then cube it.
Since , the fourth root is , and . It is not (that would be , treating the exponent as a multiplier) and not (that is ).
Radicals and fractional exponents are the same idea
Everything so far can be read in one sentence: a radical and a fractional exponent are two names for the same number. Collecting the results,
This is a dictionary you can read in either direction. A radical becomes a fractional exponent by putting the index in the denominator, and a fractional exponent becomes a radical by making the denominator the index. Switching to exponent form is often what makes a messy expression obey the familiar exponent laws. Switching to radical form is often what makes a value easy to evaluate.
Worked example 3 Rewrite with a fractional exponent, and evaluate
Use the dictionary in each direction.
For , the index becomes the denominator and the inside power becomes the numerator:
For , read it back as a radical to evaluate it. The denominator is a square root and the numerator is the power, so square-root first, then raise to the fifth:
Rooting first turned the base into the small number before the power made it grow. That route is far easier than computing and then taking its square root.
Simplifying radicals
Roots split across a product exactly the way powers do. The rule is , and the fractional-exponent form shows why in one line.
Why #
Write the root as a fractional exponent, then use the rule for a power of a product, . That rule holds for a fractional exponent for the same reason it holds for a whole one: raising the right-hand side to the th power returns . With ,
For even indices, take and to be zero or positive so every root is a real number. This is the same product rule you proved directly for square roots, now seen as one more consequence of the exponent laws. With that restriction, the rule holds for roots of every index.
Division splits the same way, and for the same reason. Writing the root as a fractional exponent and using the matching rule for a power of a quotient, ,
with and the same care for even indices that the radicands be zero or positive. So a quotient of roots is the root of the quotient. That is exactly what lets you divide two radicals of the same index under a single radical sign.
The product rule earns its keep when you simplify a radical, meaning you pull out any factor that is a perfect power for the index. For a square root you hunt for a perfect-square factor; for a cube root, a perfect-cube factor. Split the radicand into that factor times whatever is left, then root the part that comes out cleanly.
Worked example 4 Simplify and
In each case pull out the largest perfect-power factor that matches the index.
For , the largest perfect-square factor of is , since . Split the root and evaluate the part that comes out:
For , look for the largest perfect-cube factor. Since and is a perfect cube,
The leftover radicands are under the square root and under the cube root. Neither has a further factor that is a perfect power for its index, so each expression is fully simplified.
Adding and subtracting radicals
Two radicals are like radicals when they have the same index and the same radicand, such as and . Like radicals add and subtract the same way like terms do, because the shared radical behaves as a common factor. Pulling it out is just the distributive law from the last lesson:
Unlike radicals do not combine. There is no way to merge into a single radical, and in particular it is not , because roots split across products, never across sums. Sometimes two radicals only look unlike until you simplify them, and then they turn out to match.
Worked example 5 Simplify
The two radicands are different, so the terms are not like radicals yet. Simplify each one first by pulling out its largest perfect-square factor.
Since ,
and since ,
Now both terms carry the same radical , so they are like radicals and combine:
The hidden common radical only appeared once each root was simplified, which is why simplifying first is the habit to build.
Negative fractional exponents
A negative fractional exponent asks nothing new. It just stacks two ideas you already have: the negative sign means take the reciprocal, and the fraction means take a root and a power. So
Handle the two jobs in order. First the minus sign flips the power into its reciprocal, then the fraction is evaluated as a root and a power just as before. As always, a negative exponent moves the power to the denominator; it does not touch the sign of the result.
Worked example 6 Evaluate and
Take the reciprocal that the minus sign calls for, then evaluate the fractional power.
For , flip to a reciprocal, then read as a cube root followed by a square:
For , flip first, then take the fourth root and cube:
Both values are positive fractions. The minus sign in the exponent produced a reciprocal, not a negative number.
Check your understanding
Evaluate .
The minus sign asks for a reciprocal, and the power is a cube root. So take the reciprocal of the cube root of .
Since , the cube root is , giving . The value is a positive fraction, so it is not ; the negative exponent flips the power, it does not change the sign.