Rate and Work Problems
Learning goals
- Turn a completion time into the rate
- Add or subtract work rates to find a team's time or a missing worker's time
- Subtract a drain's rate from a filling rate, and tell whether the tank can fill at all
- Apply , solving for whichever is unknown
- Compute average speed from totals, not from a mean
Part 1: Work rate problems
From time to rate
Suppose that a job is done at a steady pace, and that it takes units of time from start to finish. Then in one unit of time exactly the fraction of that job gets done. That fraction per unit time is the work rate. A pump that empties a pool in hours removes one fifth of the pool each hour, so its rate is pool per hour. In general,
Rate and time are reciprocals, the same inverse-variation relationship from the last lesson, now applied to work instead of speed. The amount of work is fixed at one whole job, so , a constant product, which means the rate is inversely proportional to the time. Double the time and the rate halves; a faster rate goes with a shorter time. This reciprocal is the hinge of every work problem, so it is worth turning both ways:
You almost always work in rates while solving, then flip the final rate back into a time at the very end.
Why work rates add
Rates combine cleanly in a way that times refuse to, and it is worth seeing exactly why before trusting it.
Worked example 1 Two painters, one room
One painter can paint a room alone in hours; a second painter can paint the same room alone in hours. Working together, how long do they take?
Turn each time into a rate. The first paints of the room per hour, the second paints per hour. Add the rates over the common denominator to get the combined rate:
Together they paint of the room each hour. The time for the whole room is the reciprocal of that rate:
So they finish in hours, which is hours and minutes (since ). Notice the answer is smaller than either painter’s solo time of or hours, exactly as it must be: two people working together beat either one alone.
Nothing about that reasoning depended on the specific numbers and . The same addition works for any two workers with steady rates on the same job, as long as they neither duplicate each other’s work nor slow each other down, which is worth stating in general.
Why work rates add#
Say one worker would finish the job alone in units of time and the other alone in units. Ask what happens in a single unit of time while both work at once. The first worker, going at the steady rate , completes of the job in that unit. The second, going at rate , completes of the job in the same unit. Assume the two do not get in each other’s way, and neither redoes work the other already finished. Then whatever the first finishes is simply work the second no longer has to do, so the fractions they complete add together. In that one unit of time the team finishes
of the job. But the fraction of a job that a team finishes in one unit of time is, by the definition above, exactly the team’s combined rate. So the combined rate is the sum of the individual rates,
where is the time the team takes together. Rates add; times do not. This is why you can never average the two times, nor add them: it is the rates, the work done per unit of time, that combine. Only once you have added the rates do you take the reciprocal of that combined rate to get the time, provided that rate is positive. The argument extends without any change to three or more helpers, and even to helpers who work against each other. A drain that empties a tank is just a negative rate, and it enters the same sum with a minus sign.
Working together
As long as each worker holds a steady rate on the same job, and they neither slow each other down nor redo each other’s work, you find how long a team takes by adding the individual rates to get the combined rate, then taking the reciprocal of that sum, exactly as with the two painters above.
Check your understanding
One hose fills a pool in hours; another fills the same pool in hours. Running together, how long do they take to fill it?
Add the rates, not the times. The first hose fills per hour and the second per hour.
The combined rate is pool per hour, so the time is the reciprocal, hours. Averaging the times to or adding them to both ignore that it is the rates that combine.
Finding an unknown time
The same equation runs in reverse. If you know the team’s time and every individual time but one, the missing rate is whatever remains after you subtract the known rates from the combined rate. Solve for that one rate, then flip it to get the time. Solving for the rate first sidesteps having to solve an equation with the unknown time buried inside a fraction.
Worked example 2 How long would the second worker take?
Two people raking leaves finish a yard together in hours. Working alone, the first would take hours. How long would the second take working alone?
Let the second worker’s solo time be hours, so the second rate is . The combined rate is per hour and the first rate is per hour, and the rates add:
Solve for the unknown rate by subtracting the known one, using the common denominator :
The second worker’s rate is of the yard per hour, so the solo time is the reciprocal:
Check it: , the combined rate, so the pair really does finish in hours.
Check your understanding
Two people can mow a lawn together in hours. Working alone, one of them would take hours. How long would the other take alone?
Subtract the known rate from the team rate. The team's rate is per hour and the known worker's rate is per hour:
The other worker's rate is of the lawn per hour, so the solo time is the reciprocal, hours. Subtracting or averaging the times themselves, hour or hours, ignores that only rates combine additively.
Filling against a drain
A rate can be negative. A pipe that fills a tank adds a positive rate; a drain that empties it contributes a negative one, because it undoes work rather than doing it. The net rate is still just the signed sum of the separate rates. The time to fill the tank is the reciprocal of that net rate, provided the net rate is positive. If the drain were the faster of the two, the net rate would be negative and the tank would never fill at all. A -hour pipe against a -hour drain, for instance, nets tank per hour: the negative sign means the tank loses ground every hour, so no matter how long you wait it never fills.
Worked example 3 A pipe and an open drain
A pipe fills an empty tank in hours. A drain at the bottom, left open, would empty a full tank in hours. If the pipe runs while the drain stays open, how long does the tank take to fill?
The pipe works at tank per hour. The drain removes water, so it works at tank per hour. Add the signed rates over the common denominator to get the net rate:
The net rate is positive, so the tank does fill, gaining of a tank each hour. The time is the reciprocal of the net rate:
So the tank fills in hours. The open drain stretches a -hour fill out to hours, which fits the picture: some of every hour’s inflow is lost back out the bottom.
Check your understanding
A faucet fills a basin in hours. With the plug out, a drain would empty the full basin in hours. With the faucet on and the drain open, how long does the basin take to fill?
The faucet adds per hour and the drain subtracts per hour, so combine them with a minus sign.
The net rate is basin per hour, so the fill time is the reciprocal, hours. Adding the rates instead of subtracting would wrongly give hours.
Sometimes the drain wins. Check the net rate’s sign before you take a reciprocal of anything.
Check your understanding
A hose fills a tank in hours. A leak at the bottom would empty a full tank in hours. With the hose running and the leak open, what happens?
The hose contributes per hour and the leak subtracts per hour:
The net rate is negative: the leak drains faster than the hose fills, so the tank loses ground every hour and never fills, no matter how long the hose runs. A negative rate has no reciprocal time to take, since there is no completion to time.
Part 2: Distance and speed problems
The distance formula
This second family of rate problems trades “jobs per hour” for “miles per hour.” The formula has the same shape, distance equals rate times time, just as work equaled rate times time. The combining rule is different, though. Simultaneous workers who hold steady rates on the same job, without duplicating work or slowing each other down, combine by adding their rates; a multi-leg trip instead adds up the separate distances and the separate times, leg by leg, never the speeds themselves. Distance covered is rate multiplied by time:
Here is the speed, the distance covered per unit of time, and it plays the same role the work rate did. One relationship gives you all three questions, because you can solve it for whichever letter is unknown:
Worked example 4 A steady drive, two ways
A delivery van covers miles in hours at a steady speed. First find that speed, then find how far the van travels in hours at the same speed.
The speed is distance divided by time:
Now hold that speed and run the relationship the other way, with :
So the van travels at mph and covers miles in hours. The single relationship answered both questions; you only changed which letter you solved for.
Check your understanding
A cyclist covers miles in hours at a steady speed. At that same speed, how long would it take to cover miles?
First find the speed: mph. Then use for the new distance: hours. Multiplying instead of dividing gives , dividing the wrong way around gives , and dividing the new distance by the original time while skipping the speed gives .
Average speed done right
When a trip covers the same distance at each of two different speeds, its average speed is not the plain average of the two speeds: it always sits below that average. Average speed has one definition, and you must always go back to it, whatever the split:
Add up all the distance, add up all the time, and divide. Why the plain mean misses in this equal-distance case is worth pinning down, because the trap is so easy to fall into.
Why average speed is total distance over total time#
Average speed answers one question. If the whole trip had been run at a single steady speed, what speed would cover the same distance in the same total time? That is the speed you could replace the trip with and change nothing overall. So that speed must be the total distance divided by the total time, by the very definition applied to the trip as a whole.
Now see why, for equal distances at two different speeds, that plain average is too high. Because time is distance divided by speed, the slow leg takes more time than the fast leg: the slower you go, the longer you spend going. So when you form total distance over total time, the total time is weighted toward the slow leg, where you lingered. That weighting drags the average down toward the slower speed. The plain mean of the two speeds pretends you spent equal time at each, but you did not. You spent equal distance, and more time at the slower speed. That extra time at the low speed is exactly what pulls the true average below the halfway mark. The two averages coincide only when the two speeds are themselves equal, since equal distances at genuinely different speeds always eat unequal amounts of time.
Worked example 5 There and back at different speeds
You drive to a town miles away at mph, then return home along the same road at mph. What is your average speed for the whole round trip?
Resist averaging and to get . Go back to the definition, and build the total distance and the total time from the two legs.
The total distance is the round trip:
Now the time for each leg, using . The trip out at mph takes hours; the trip back at mph takes hour. So the total time is
Divide total distance by total time:
The average is mph, below the naive mph. That is because you spent of the hours crawling at the slower mph and only hour at mph. More time at the low speed pulls the average down.
Check your understanding
A cyclist rides miles out at mph and returns the same miles at mph. What is the average speed for the whole ride?
Do not average and to get . Use total distance over total time. The distance is miles. The times are hour out and hours back, so the total time is hours.
The answer sits well below the mean of because the cyclist spent of the hours at the slow mph.