This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly.
Contact us
Geometric Series
Learning goals
Sum a finite series with Sn=1−ra1(1−rn)
Prove it by multiplying by r and subtracting
Take S=1−ra1 when ∣r∣<1
Say why ∣r∣≥1 leaves no finite sum
Convert a repeating decimal into an exact fraction
From a sequence to its sum
An ordered list like 3,6,12,24,48 is a geometric sequence. Join its terms with plus signs and you
get a geometric series, a single number:
3+6+12+24+48=93.
As with an arithmetic series, write Sn for the sum of the first n terms of a geometric sequence.
Using the explicit term ak=a1rk−1 from the last lesson, every term is the first term times a
power of the ratio:
Sn=a1+a2+⋯+an=a1+a1r+a1r2+⋯+a1rn−1.
In the summation notation from the arithmetic-series lesson, the same sum is
Sn=k=1∑na1rk−1.
The only thing new compared with an arithmetic series is what sits between the terms: a constant
multiplier r instead of a constant added difference. That single change forces a different summing
trick, because the reverse-and-add pairing no longer produces equal columns when the terms are scaled
rather than stepped.
A formula for the finite sum
There is a clever move that collapses the whole sum. Multiply the series by the ratio r and subtract
the result from the original. Because multiplying by r shifts every term over by one position, almost
everything cancels.
Write the sum of the first n terms in full, each term the one before it times r:
Sn=a1+a1r+a1r2+⋯+a1rn−1.
Now multiply the whole line by the common ratio r. Every term picks up one more factor of r, so the
entire list shifts one place to the right:
rSn=a1r+a1r2+a1r3+⋯+a1rn.
Subtract the second line from the first and watch what lines up. The a1r in the top line cancels the
a1r in the bottom line, the a1r2 cancels the a1r2, and so on all the way down. Every middle
term appears in both sums, so every one of them cancels. Only two survivors are left. One is the a1
at the front of the top line, which has nothing beneath it. The other is the −a1rn at
the end of the bottom line, which has nothing above it:
Sn−rSn=a1−a1rn.
Factor each side. The left side has the common factor Sn, and the right side has the common factor
a1:
Sn(1−r)=a1(1−rn).
As long as r=1 the factor 1−r is not zero, so divide both sides by it to free Sn:
Sn=1−ra1(1−rn).
∎
The one ratio this formula cannot handle is r=1, because then 1−r=0 and dividing by it is
illegal. That case needs no formula at all. When r=1 every term equals a1, so the series is just
a1 added to itself n times:
Sn=n termsa1+a1+⋯+a1=na1.
When the ratio is larger than 1 it is tidier to avoid the negative quantities in the fraction.
Multiplying the top and bottom by −1 flips both differences and gives an equal form built from positive
parts:
Sn=r−1a1(rn−1).
The two versions are the same number, so reach for whichever keeps the arithmetic positive: the first
when r<1, the second when r>1.
Worked example 1Sum the first 6 terms
Find the sum of the first 6 terms of the geometric series 3+6+12+24+⋯
Read off the two numbers that define it. The first term is a1=3, and the ratio is any term divided
by the one before it, 36=2, so r=2. You want n=6 terms. Since r>1, use the
positive form:
S6=r−1a1(r6−1)=2−13(26−1).
Work out the power first, 26=64, then finish the arithmetic:
S6=13(64−1)=3×63=189.
Adding the six terms directly, 3+6+12+24+48+96, also gives 189, a good check that the
formula does the same job in a single step.
Worked example 2The chessboard grand total
Total the wheat on the chessboard from the previous lesson: one grain on the first square, two on the
second, four on the third. Each square’s count doubles the one before it, across all 64 squares.
The grain counts are the geometric sequence 1,2,4,8,…, with first term a1=1 and ratio
r=2, and the last square (the 64th) holds 263 grains. The grand total is the finite geometric
series
S64=1+2+4+⋯+263.
With a1=1, r=2, and n=64, the r>1 form keeps everything positive:
S64=r−1a1(rn−1)=2−11(264−1)=264−1.
That is 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 grains, more than eighteen quintillion, far more wheat
than has ever been harvested in all of history. Notice how the formula crushes a sum of 64 terms into a
single subtraction. The whole board comes to exactly one less than 264, the value of the square that
would have come next.
Adding infinitely many terms
A geometric sequence never runs out of terms, so you can ask what happens if you try to add all of them,
out to infinity. For most ratios the answer is dull: the running total grows past every bound and there
is no finite number to report. But when the ratio is small in size, something remarkable happens.
Infinitely many positive pieces can add up to a single finite value.
The finite formula already shows why. Look again at the sum of the first n terms:
Sn=1−ra1(1−rn).
The only part that changes as you pile on more terms is the power rn in the numerator. Suppose r
lies strictly between −1 and 1, that is ∣r∣<1. Then every multiplication by r lands you on a
number smaller in size than before, because multiplying by something less than 1 in absolute value
always shrinks it. Keep multiplying and rn marches toward zero. For r=21 the powers run
21,41,81,161,…, each half the last and all heading to nothing.
Once rn has shrunk to practically nothing, the numerator 1−rn is practically just 1, and the
running total settles right next to a fixed value:
S=1−ra1(1−0)=1−ra1.
This is the sum of the infinite geometric series. The tail you are dropping, all the terms past the
nth, is itself a tiny geometric series that keeps shrinking. So the more terms you include, the closer
the total sits to 1−ra1. When r is positive, every term is positive and the running total
climbs toward that value from below without passing it. When r is negative, the terms alternate in sign
and the running total lands just above and just below the value in turn. Those overshoots shrink to
nothing, so the running total still closes in on that value.
A quick self-check reaches the same answer by pure algebra. Call the full infinite sum S, then multiply
it by r, which shifts every term one place to the right:
S=a1+a1r+a1r2+⋯,rS=a1r+a1r2+a1r3+⋯
The second sum is exactly the first with its leading a1 removed, so rS is S−a1. Solving that
relation gives the same formula:
rS=S−a1⟹S(1−r)=a1⟹S=1−ra1.
This shortcut only makes sense when the sum S really is a finite number to begin with, which is exactly
the case ∣r∣<1.
Everything here hinges on that condition. If ∣r∣≥1 the terms do not shrink. When r=1 you are
adding a1 to itself forever and the total runs off without bound. When r>1 the terms grow, so the
total grows even faster. When r=−1 the running sum flips between a1 and 0 and never settles
anywhere. When r<−1 the terms grow in size while flipping sign, so the running total lurches further
from zero at every step and never settles either. In every one of these cases there is no finite sum, and
the formula 1−ra1 does not apply. The rule to memorize is short: an infinite geometric series has a finite sum exactly when
∣r∣<1.
Split a square in half, then halve the leftover again and again. The pieces have area 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, and so on, and they tile the whole square without ever spilling out, so 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... adds up to exactly 1.
Worked example 3Two infinite sums
Find the sum of each infinite geometric series.
(a)8+4+2+1+21+⋯
The first term is a1=8, and each term is half the one before it, so r=21. Because
∣r∣<1, the series has a finite sum:
S=1−ra1=1−218=218=16.
The pieces 8,4,2,1,… shrink fast enough that all of them together fall just short of 16 and
settle exactly there.
(b)12−6+3−23+⋯
Here a1=12, and each term is −21 times the one before it, so r=−21. The sign does
not stop it from converging, since ∣r∣=21<1; it only makes the terms alternate. Carry the
sign into the formula:
S=1−(−21)12=2312=8.
A negative ratio pulls the sum below the first term rather than above it, but the same formula still lands
the answer.
Check your understanding
Find the sum of the infinite geometric series 51+251+1251+⋯
The first term is a1=51, and each term is 51 of the one before it, so r=51. Since ∣r∣<1, the series has a finite sum S=1−ra1.
S=1−1/51/5=4/51/5=41
The shrinking terms add up to exactly 41.
Repeating decimals are geometric series
A repeating decimal such as 0.7777… hides an infinite geometric series, which is why every
repeating decimal is secretly an exact fraction. Splitting the decimal into its place values lines the
series up, and the infinite-sum formula turns it back into a fraction.
Worked example 4Repeating decimals to fractions
Write each repeating decimal as an exact fraction.
(a)0.7=0.7777…
Break the decimal into place values. The digit 7 sits in the tenths place, then the hundredths, then
the thousandths, so
0.7=107+1007+10007+⋯
This is an infinite geometric series with first term a1=107 and ratio r=101,
since each place is a tenth of the one before it. Because ∣r∣<1, apply the formula:
0.7=1−1/107/10=9/107/10=97.
(b)0.48=0.484848…
When the repeating block is two digits long, each copy is a hundredth of the last. So for a two-digit
block, the first term is the block over 100 and the ratio is 1001:
The pattern is worth keeping: a one-digit repeat divides by 9, and a two-digit repeat by 99. Each
result then reduces to lowest terms, here from 9948 down to 3316.
Worked example 5A bouncing ball
A ball is dropped from a height of 12 m. On each bounce it rebounds to half of its previous height. If
it keeps bouncing, what is the total vertical distance it travels?
The ball first falls the full 12 m. After that, every bounce carries it up to some peak and then back
down the same distance, so each bounce past the drop contributes twice its peak height. The peak heights
form a geometric sequence starting at the first rebound, 12⋅21=6 m, and halving each time:
6,3,23,…. The total up-and-down distance from all the bounces is an infinite geometric
series with a1=6 and r=21, doubled to count both directions:
2(6+3+23+⋯)=2⋅1−216=2⋅12=24 m.
Add the first drop, which happened before any bounce:
12+24=36 m.
The ball bounces infinitely many times in this idealized model, yet the rebounds shrink fast enough that
the whole journey adds up to a finite 36 m.
Common mistakes
Practice
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.
Longer questions in parts, to be worked out on paper. Progressive hints, the answer on its
own so you can check yourself and try again, then the full worked solution, plus a rubric
to mark your own work against.
Every rule of area the Greeks trusted was built for straight edges: rectangles, triangles, and shapes
you can cut into those. So what is the area of a region with a curved side?
Archimedes settled that question for one curve, the parabola, working in Syracuse, a Greek city, in the
third century BCE. His method was to fill the region with triangles. One large triangle takes most of
it. The gaps left over take smaller triangles, the gaps after those take smaller ones still, and the
process never ends.
The pattern hidden in those triangles is what rescues the calculation. Each new batch of triangles
contributes exactly a quarter of the batch before it. So the running total is one, plus a quarter, plus
a sixteenth, and on for ever. That is a geometric series with ratio 41. Archimedes proved it
comes to 34 of that first triangle. It is an exact value, not an estimate.
He would never have written the sum the way you just saw it. Greek mathematics refused to add up an
endless list. He reached 34 instead by a longer route, one that stayed finite the whole way. The
number he was chasing is nevertheless yours. Put a1=1 and r=41 into 1−ra1 and out
comes 34. He measured a region bounded by a curve, nineteen centuries before calculus existed.