Adding and Subtracting Fractions
Learning goals
- Add or subtract numerators once the denominators match
- Explain why parts must be the same size before counting them
- Rewrite unlike fractions over a common denominator first
- Choose the least common denominator to keep the numbers small
- Treat a whole number as a fraction over one, then combine
- Simplify the answer to lowest terms at the end
Why the parts must be the same size
Think about why never needs explaining. You are counting copies of a single unit, the apple, so you total the copies. A fraction is exactly the same kind of object: means two copies of the unit “one fifth.” In the same way, means one more copy of that same unit. Counting the copies gives three fifths:
The denominator stayed because the size of the piece never changed; only the count went up. Fractions add by counting parts, and counting only works when the parts are identical. A fifth and a fifth can be tallied together. A half and a third cannot, in the same way that two apples and three oranges are not five of any single thing. They only become five of something once you describe both as, say, five pieces of fruit. So the rule splits into two cases: when the denominators already match, you add at once. When they do not match, your first job is to make them match.
Adding and subtracting with the same denominator
When two fractions share a denominator, they are built from identical pieces, so you combine them by working only with the numerators. For example,
Three eighths is three of those pieces, and one eighth is one more, so together you are holding four of them. Only the count changed, so the denominator is still . The last step divides the top and bottom by their greatest common factor , exactly the simplifying skill from the previous lesson.
Like-denominator rule. For any whole numbers , , and with not zero, Here and are the two numerators, and is the denominator they share.
Why same-denominator fractions add by adding the numerators#
Run the argument on first. Cutting a whole into equal parts makes each part . So is copies of , and is more copies of that same piece. Lining them up gives copies of , and copies of is the fraction . Running it backwards, taking those copies away again leaves copies, which is .
Nothing in that depended on the numbers , and . Recall from the first fractions lesson that a fraction is built from unit fractions: is copies of the unit . The reason is that cutting a whole into equal parts makes each part , and takes of them.
So is copies of , and is more copies of the very same unit . Lining them all up, you are holding copies of in total. By that same meaning, copies of is the fraction . Therefore
Subtraction is the same argument run the other way. Taking copies of away from copies leaves copies, which is . The denominator never moves, because the size of the unit piece, , is exactly what stays fixed. Only the number of those pieces changes.
So the procedure with like denominators is short: add (or subtract) the numerators and keep the common denominator. Then simplify the result to lowest terms. A common slip is to add the denominators too, writing . That is wrong, because the denominator names the size of the piece. The pieces also did not get smaller when you put two groups of them together, so stays .
Check your understanding
What is ?
The denominators already match, so add the numerators and keep the denominator .
Since and share no factor above , is already in lowest terms. Do not add the denominators: each piece stays a ninth.
Unlike denominators: make the pieces match first
When the denominators differ, the pieces are different sizes and cannot be counted together yet. The fix is the building rule from the last lesson: rewrite each fraction as an equivalent one over a denominator they share. Then the like-denominator rule finishes the job.
Take . Halves and thirds are different sizes, so picture cutting both into a size they have in common. Sixths work: a half is three sixths, and a third is two sixths. Once both are written in sixths, they are made of identical pieces and you can count:
To rewrite in sixths, the denominator goes from to by multiplying by , so the numerator does too: . To rewrite in sixths, the denominator goes from to by multiplying by : . Now both are sixths, so add the numerators:
Notice what the common denominator is: it is a multiple of both and . Being a multiple of both is what lets each fraction be rebuilt over . Any common multiple of the two denominators would serve. We could rewrite both over instead and still get the right answer, just with larger numbers to simplify at the end. The cleanest choice is the smallest common multiple, and you already know how to find it.
You can do that rebuilding yourself.
Which finer cuts of thirds can also be counted in fourths
2/3 = 4/6. Each part is cut into two, so 4 of 6 parts are shaded. 6 is not a multiple of 4, so 4ths cannot be counted in 6ths.
Say the problem were . Fourths cannot be counted alongside thirds, so hunt for a cut that lands on a denominator fourths can reach as well. Cutting each third into gives , and a fourth can be rewritten in twelfths, so that cut does the job. Cutting into gives , which also works, with numbers twice as large for the same sum. Try the other cuts: , , , , and all produce denominators that no whole number of fourths can reach.
Whichever cut you pick, keep an eye on the shaded length. It never moves, because the bar is still two thirds and only its name has changed. That is what makes rewriting a fraction safe in the middle of an addition.
The least common denominator
A common denominator of two fractions is any common multiple of their denominators. The least common denominator (LCD) is the smallest one. For and the denominators are and , whose common multiples run and on. The smallest is , which is why was the natural choice above.
So the LCD is exactly the least common multiple of the two denominators, from the factors chapter:
Using the LCD keeps the numbers as small as possible, so there is less arithmetic and usually less simplifying at the end. The full method for unlike denominators is four steps:
- Find the LCD, the least common multiple of the two denominators.
- Rewrite each fraction as an equivalent fraction over the LCD, using the building rule.
- Add or subtract the numerators, keeping the common denominator.
- Simplify the result to lowest terms.
Each rewrite in step 2 is an equality, so nothing about the two amounts changes on the way to the common denominator. All that changes is the size of the pieces they are counted in. Once both are counted in the same pieces, step 3 is the like-denominator rule again.
Worked example 1 Compute
The denominators and are different, so find the least common denominator first. The least common multiple of and is , so the LCD is .
Rewrite each fraction over with the building rule. For , the denominator goes from to by multiplying by , so the numerator does too:
For , the denominator goes from to by multiplying by :
Now both are twelfths, so add the numerators and keep the denominator:
Finally, check lowest terms: and share no factor above , so is the final answer.
Worked example 2 Compute
Subtraction follows the very same plan. The denominators and differ, so find the LCD. The least common multiple of and is , so the LCD is .
Rewrite each fraction over . For , the denominator goes from to by multiplying by :
For , the denominator goes from to by multiplying by :
Both are twenty-fourths now, so subtract the numerators:
Check lowest terms: and share no factor above , so is the final answer.
Check your understanding
To compute , what is the least common denominator you should use?
The least common denominator is the least common multiple of the denominators and . List multiples: and , and the smallest shared one is .
So the LCD is . The product is a common denominator too, but not the least, so it would leave larger numbers to simplify.
When one denominator is already a multiple of the other
Sometimes the larger denominator is itself a multiple of the smaller one. Take . Since is a multiple of (because ), the least common multiple of and is , so the LCD is . The fraction is already over and stays as it is; only needs rebuilding:
The last step simplifies by dividing the top and bottom by their greatest common factor . Whenever the larger denominator is a multiple of the smaller one, the LCD is that larger denominator. Only the fraction with the smaller denominator has to be rewritten, so spotting a pair like this saves half the work.
Adding a whole number to a fraction
A whole number can join a fraction the same way, once you remember that every whole number is a fraction with denominator . To add , write as , then give it the denominator so the pieces match. The LCD of and is , and , which just says two wholes is ten fifths. Then add:
The improper fraction is a complete and correct answer. (Rewriting it as a whole-number part plus a fraction is the subject of the later lesson on mixed numbers.) The same idea handles a subtraction like : write , so that .
Worked example 3 Compute and simplify
The denominators and differ, so find the LCD. The least common multiple of and is , so the LCD is . To see why, list the multiples of : they are , and is the first that also divides.
Rewrite each fraction over . For , multiply top and bottom by :
For , multiply top and bottom by :
Subtract the numerators over the common denominator:
Check lowest terms: and share no factor above , so is the final answer.
Check your understanding
What is ?
Write the whole number as a fraction over so the pieces match: . Then subtract the numerators.
Since and share no factor above , is in lowest terms.