Multiplying and Dividing Fractions
Learning goals
- Multiply numerators and denominators, with no common denominator needed
- Read a fraction of a fraction as rows against columns
- Cancel a common factor before multiplying to keep numbers small
- Flip the divisor to turn division into multiplication
- Explain why multiplying by the reciprocal is the same as dividing
What “a fraction of a fraction” means
When you see , you already read it as half of six, which is . The word of is what multiplication means here, and it does not change when the second number is also a fraction. So means one half of one third: start with one third of a whole, then take half of that piece.
Picture a single whole as a square. Slice it into thirds with two vertical cuts and shade one of the three strips. That shaded strip is of the square. Now take half of just that strip by cutting it across the middle. Half of the strip is a smaller rectangle, and the question is what fraction of the whole square that small rectangle is. Extend the horizontal cut all the way across and you can count. The square is now divided into equal small rectangles, and the doubly shaded piece is exactly one of them. So one half of one third is one sixth:
Look at where the came from. The whole square was cut into thirds across its width and into halves down its height. The two sets of cuts make the number of small rectangles the denominators multiplied together, . The doubly shaded piece is the overlap of “one of the thirds” and “one of the halves.” So the number of shaded rectangles is the numerators multiplied together, . Multiply the bottoms to count the pieces in the new whole, and multiply the tops to count how many of those pieces you keep.
The rule for multiplying fractions
The same picture works when each fraction keeps more than one part. Take , which reads as two thirds of four fifths:
The five columns and three rows cut the square into equal rectangles, which is where the comes from. The kept block is rows crossing columns, so it covers of them, and that is the . Simplify the answer whenever you can: here and share no factor above , so is already in lowest terms.
Multiplication rule. For any fractions and with and not zero,
The square diagram shows the rule for fractions between and , where you shade part of one whole. The very same rule, multiply the tops and multiply the bottoms, carries over to improper fractions and to whole numbers. A whole number is a fraction over , so . You just may end up with a result larger than one whole.
Check your understanding
What is , written in lowest terms?
Multiply the numerators together and the denominators together.
Now simplify: the greatest common factor of and is , so . Never add the denominators, and never look for a common denominator: multiplication does neither.
Cancelling before you multiply
Multiplying the tops and bottoms first and simplifying afterward always works, but the numbers can grow large and then need a big simplification. There is a shortcut that keeps the numbers small: cancel any common factor between a numerator and a denominator before multiplying.
Take . Before multiplying, notice that on top shares the factor with on the bottom. The on top also shares the factor with the on the bottom. Divide each pair by its common factor. The becomes and the becomes after dividing both by . The becomes and the becomes after dividing both by :
Multiplying the small leftovers gives directly, in lowest terms, with no large product to reduce. To see that this is the same answer the long way gives, multiply first instead: . Then simplifies by its greatest common factor to . Same result, but cancelling first kept the numbers to single digits.
That cancel paired the on top of one fraction with the on the bottom of the other. It is allowed because the product is one fraction, . In that single fraction the is a numerator and the is a denominator. Simplifying a fraction means dividing its top and its bottom by a common factor, exactly the rule from the equivalent-fractions lesson. So it makes no difference which of the two starting fractions each number came from.
Worked example 1 Compute by cancelling first
Look for common factors across the two fractions before multiplying. The numerator and the denominator share a factor of , and the numerator and the denominator share a factor of .
Divide the first pair by : the becomes and the becomes . Divide the second pair by : the becomes and the becomes . The product is now built from small numbers:
Check the long way to be sure: , and dividing top and bottom by their greatest common factor gives . The two routes agree, and cancelling first avoided the awkward .
The reciprocal of a fraction
The reciprocal of a nonzero fraction is what you get by swapping its numerator and denominator, that is by flipping it over. The reciprocal of is , and the reciprocal of is . A whole number such as is , so its reciprocal is .
The reason the reciprocal matters is a single clean fact: a nonzero fraction times its reciprocal is always .
A nonzero fraction times its reciprocal equals #
Start with , whose reciprocal is . Multiplying tops and bottoms gives . Top and bottom are the same product , and a fraction whose top equals its bottom is .
Nothing there used the digits and . Take any fraction in which neither nor is zero, so that flipping it gives a genuine fraction . Multiply the two using the multiplication rule:
The numerator and the denominator are the same product in a different order, since multiplication does not care about order. A fraction whose numerator equals its denominator is , as the first fractions lesson showed:
The numerator has to be nonzero for the reciprocal to exist. Flipping would put a in the denominator, which is undefined.
Two numbers whose product is are called reciprocals of each other. You can read the relation both ways: , so each is the reciprocal of the other. This is the multiplication version of how a number and its negative add to . There, adding the opposite undoes an addition; here, multiplying by the reciprocal undoes a multiplication.
Check your understanding
What is the reciprocal of , and what do you get when you multiply by it?
The reciprocal flips the numerator and denominator, so the reciprocal of is . Multiply to check.
A nonzero fraction times its reciprocal is always , because the top and bottom end up as the same product.
Why dividing by a fraction means multiplying by its reciprocal
Division asks a counting question: asks “how many ‘s fit into ?” Keep that meaning and apply it to fractions. The expression asks “how many eighths fit into three fourths?” Three fourths is the same amount as six eighths, because , and six eighths obviously holds six of the one-eighth pieces. So . Notice what flipping does here: , which is times the reciprocal of .
Division rule. To divide by a nonzero fraction, multiply by its reciprocal:
The rule needs to be nonzero, because the reciprocal of would be , and nothing can be divided by zero.
So to divide by a fraction, leave the first fraction alone, flip the second, and multiply, using the cancelling shortcut if it helps. For example,
where the last step divides top and bottom by their greatest common factor . A common slip is to flip the wrong fraction. Only the divisor, the fraction you are dividing by, gets turned over; the first fraction stays exactly as it is.
That picture answers the question for one size of piece. Below you can change the size. The top bar is fixed at three fourths. The bottom bar is that same three fourths, with each of its parts cut into as many pieces as you choose.
How many pieces of each size fit into three fourths
3/4 = 6/8. Each part is cut into two, so 6 of 8 parts are shaded. So 6 pieces of size 1/8 fit into the shaded part.
The numerator on the bottom bar is the answer to a division. Cut each fourth into and the bar reads , so six eighths cover the same amount. That means six one-eighth pieces fit into three fourths, and . Cut into instead and it reads , so . Check that one against the rule: , the same count.
Now run the cut all the way to its finest and watch which direction the count moves. The pieces keep shrinking and more of them fit, which is exactly why dividing by a smaller fraction gives a larger answer.
Worked example 2 Compute
Dividing by is multiplying by its reciprocal . Rewrite the division as a multiplication, keeping the first fraction as it is:
Cancel before multiplying. The numerator and the denominator share a factor of , so the becomes and the becomes :
So . Since and share no factor above , this is in lowest terms. The answer is more than , which makes sense: is larger than , so fits into it more than once.
Worked example 3 Compute
A whole number divides by a fraction the same way, once you write it over . Here , and dividing by means multiplying by its reciprocal :
Cancel the common factor between the on top and the on the bottom. That turns the into and the into :
So . This reads correctly as a counting question: how many three-quarter pieces fit into wholes? Each whole holds of them, and wholes hold .
Check your understanding
What is ?
Dividing by means multiplying by its reciprocal . Keep the first fraction and flip the second.
The last step divides top and bottom by the greatest common factor . Only the divisor is flipped, never the first fraction.