Understanding Fractions
Learning goals
- Read the denominator as the size of a part and the numerator as a count
- Treat the bar as division, so is
- Place a fraction on the number line by counting equal steps
- Tell a proper fraction from an improper one by comparing top and bottom
- Say why is one and a zero denominator is undefined
- Compare fractions sharing a numerator or a denominator, and say which wins
Equal parts of a whole
Start with one whole thing and cut it into parts that are all the same size. Cut a chocolate bar into four equal pieces, and each piece is one fourth of the bar. Take three of those pieces, and you have three fourths of the bar. We write these as
A fraction is written as two numbers separated by a bar. The number below the bar, the denominator, tells you how many equal parts the whole was cut into. The number above the bar, the numerator, tells you how many of those parts you are counting. So means “the whole was cut into equal parts, and we are taking of them.”
The whole does not have to be a bar. Cut a round pizza into equal slices and take of them. You are holding the same fraction you just shaded on the bar. Only two things matter: how many equal parts the whole was cut into, and how many of them you took. The shape of the whole is not one of them.
The two numbers do very different jobs, and keeping them straight is most of the battle. The denominator names the size of each part: fourths are bigger than fifths, which are bigger than sixths. The reason is that the more parts you cut a fixed whole into, the smaller each part has to be. The numerator just counts how many of those parts you have. Think of “fourths” as a unit, the way “feet” or “dollars” is a unit. So is three of the unit called a fourth, exactly as feet is three of the unit called a foot. One handy memory hook: the denominator is down, and it names the kind of piece you are counting.
A quick word on names. The denominator gives halves, gives thirds, and gives fourths (or quarters). From onward we use the ordinary ordinal word: fifths, sixths, sevenths, and so on. The numerator is always read as a plain count: is “two fifths,” and is “four sevenths.”
Unit fractions: the size of one part
The simplest fractions have a numerator of : a single equal part, such as or . A fraction with numerator is called a unit fraction, and it is the building block of every other fraction. Three fourths is just three copies of one fourth stacked together:
The denominator by itself fixes the size of one part. And here is the idea that trips up the most students: a bigger denominator makes each part smaller. Cut one whole into equal pieces instead of . Then each piece has to be smaller, because the same whole is now shared among more of them.
So is less than , even though is bigger than . Reading the denominator backwards, thinking that more pieces must mean more, is the single most common fraction mistake.
The bar means divide
The bar in a fraction is a division sign. The fraction is another way of writing :
The denominator must not be zero here, because dividing by zero is not allowed.
Why the fraction equals #
Start with identical cakes shared equally among children. By the meaning of division, each child receives of a cake. Now find that same share a second way, by cutting every cake into equal pieces. Each piece is one fifth of a cake, and the three cakes together give pieces. Dealing pieces out to children gives each child pieces. Three pieces of one fifth each is of a cake, so the two ways of sharing agree: .
Nothing in that argument used the particular numbers and , so run it again with letters.
Share identical wholes equally among people. By the very meaning of division, each person receives . Now work out that same share a second way, by cutting.
Slice every one of the wholes into equal pieces. Each piece is one of equal parts of a whole, so each piece is . Cutting all wholes this way produces small pieces in total. Deal those pieces out equally to the people. Since there are pieces and people, each person gets
Every piece is , so one person’s share is copies of , which is . The two methods describe the very same share, one written as a division and one written as a fraction. So they must name the same number: .
Division of whole numbers does not always give a whole number. As long as you are not dividing by zero, such a division always gives a fraction. The problem has no answer among the whole numbers, yet it has the perfectly good answer . And when the division does come out even, the fraction simply is that whole number:
So a fraction is a single number, the result of one division, not two numbers sitting near each other.
Check your understanding
A ribbon is cut into equal pieces and you take of them. Which fraction of the whole ribbon do you have, and what division does it stand for?
The whole was cut into equal parts, so is the denominator, and you took of them, so is the numerator.
The bar always reads as numerator divided by denominator, so means , not .
Fractions live on the number line
Because a fraction is a single number, it has a home on the number line, sitting between the whole numbers you already know. Finding that home uses the two parts of the fraction in turn. To place , look at the segment from to . The denominator tells you to split that segment into equal steps, which creates the marks , , , and finally . The numerator tells you to count steps from , which stops you at the mark labelled .
This is the same story as the shaded bar, stood on its side: the segment from to is the whole. The denominator says how many equal steps to cut that segment into, and the numerator says how far to count. A fraction whose numerator is smaller than its denominator lands before the mark. That happens because you have taken fewer steps than it takes to reach a whole. The closer the numerator gets to the denominator, the closer the fraction sits to . And when the numerator equals the denominator, you have taken every step and arrived exactly at .
Proper and improper fractions
Nothing forces the numerator to be smaller than the denominator. You can count out more parts than it takes to make one whole, simply by using more than one whole. If you have two chocolate bars and cut each into thirds, you have thirds available, and you could take of them. That is the fraction : five parts, each one a third of a bar. It is more than one whole bar but less than two.
Fractions split into two kinds by this comparison:
- A proper fraction has a numerator smaller than its denominator, so its value is less than . Examples: , , .
- An improper fraction has a numerator greater than or equal to its denominator, so its value is at least . Examples: , , .
The word “improper” is unfortunate, because there is nothing wrong with such a fraction. It is simply a fraction whose value has reached or passed a whole. On the number line sits past . Counting in thirds, three thirds bring you to , and two more thirds carry you to , which lands between and .
Why a fraction over itself is one
Any fraction whose numerator equals its denominator is equal to .
A fraction with equal numerator and denominator equals #
Start with , and read it as parts of a whole. The denominator says the whole was cut into equal parts, and the numerator says to take of them. Taking all seven of those parts is taking the entire whole back, so is one whole. The division reading agrees: , since one seven fits into seven exactly once. Nothing there depended on the number , so the argument runs the same way with a letter.
Take any whole number that is not zero, and consider the fraction . Read it as parts of a whole. The denominator says the whole was cut into equal parts, and the numerator says we are taking of those parts. But taking all of the parts is taking the entire whole back, with nothing left out and nothing extra. So is one whole.
The fraction means , and any nonzero number divided by itself is , since one copy of fits into exactly once. Either way,
So , , and . The requirement that is not zero matters, because cutting a whole into zero parts has no meaning, a point the next section makes precise.
A close cousin is the fraction with denominator . Take and read it as parts of a whole. The whole was cut into just part, so that one part is the whole itself. Taking of those parts gives wholes. The division reading agrees, since . Nothing in that depended on the number : for any whole number , . So every whole number is secretly a fraction:
Check your understanding
Which of these fractions is not equal to a whole number?
A fraction equals a whole number when the numerator is a multiple of the denominator. Check each one.
But means , which is not whole: goes into once with left over. So is the one that is not a whole number.
Why the denominator can never be zero
The denominator counts the parts the whole is cut into, and you cannot cut something into zero parts and still have parts to take. The division reading shows the problem even more sharply. Take , which would mean , and ask what number times gives . Nothing times gives , because anything times is . There is no answer, so names no number at all. The same happens for whenever is not zero: division asks what times gives back , and nothing does. The fraction fails the other way: every number times gives , so no single answer can be chosen. We say a fraction with denominator is undefined, and you must never write one. The numerator, by contrast, is allowed to be . The fraction means you took none of the four parts, which is a perfectly good amount, namely .
Comparing fractions
Often you only need to know which of two fractions is larger, without finding their exact values. Two situations let you compare at a glance, and both follow directly from the meaning of the numerator and the denominator.
Same denominator: compare the numerators. Comparing and , both count eighths, so the one with more eighths wins:
because eighths is more than eighths. The comparison works the same way as apples against apples, once you know the apples are the same size. When two fractions are cut into the same size of part, the one with more parts is larger.
Same numerator: compare the denominators, but backwards. Compare and . Both take parts, but thirds are larger than fifths, so thirds outweighs fifths:
Suppose two fractions take the same nonzero number of parts, but the parts are different sizes. Then the one with the smaller denominator is larger, because a smaller denominator means each part is bigger. When the fractions share neither the numerator nor the denominator, neither shortcut applies directly. The next lesson, on equivalent fractions, gives the general method of rewriting both fractions so that they do share a denominator.
Worked example 1 Identify the parts of and place it on the number line
The fraction has denominator and numerator . The denominator tells you the whole is cut into equal parts, called tenths, and the numerator tells you to count of them.
To place it, split the segment from to into equal steps. Each step is one tenth. Count steps from :
You stop at the seventh mark, which sits between and . The mark sits closer to than to , because is more than half of . Since the numerator is smaller than the denominator , this is a proper fraction. So it must land short of , which matches the picture.
Worked example 2 Find of apples
Taking a fraction of a quantity uses the two numbers in turn, exactly as the definition says. The denominator means split the apples into equal groups:
The numerator means take of those groups:
So of is . The method is always the same: divide by the denominator to find the size of one part. Then multiply by the numerator to count how many of those parts you want.
Worked example 3 Name the improper fraction shown by 11 shaded sixths
You have two identical bars, each cut into equal parts, and of those parts are shaded in total. Every part is one sixth, so parts is sixths:
Because the numerator is larger than the denominator , this is an improper fraction, so its value is more than one whole. To see how much more, note that of the sixths fill one entire bar:
which leaves more sixths shaded on the second bar. So is one whole and sixths more, placing it between and on the number line. (Writing it as “one and five sixths” is the subject of the later lesson on mixed numbers. For now, is a complete and correct answer.)
Check your understanding
Which symbol makes a true statement: ?
Both fractions have the same numerator , so compare the denominators backwards: the larger denominator gives the smaller fraction, because the parts are smaller. Sevenths are smaller parts than fourths.
Three sevenths is less than three fourths because each seventh is a smaller piece than each fourth.