This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly. Contact us

Understanding Fractions

Learning goals

  • Read the denominator as the size of a part and the numerator as a count
  • Treat the bar as division, so ab\frac{a}{b} is a÷ba \div b
  • Place a fraction on the number line by counting equal steps
  • Tell a proper fraction from an improper one by comparing top and bottom
  • Say why nn\frac{n}{n} is one and a zero denominator is undefined
  • Compare fractions sharing a numerator or a denominator, and say which wins

Equal parts of a whole

Start with one whole thing and cut it into parts that are all the same size. Cut a chocolate bar into four equal pieces, and each piece is one fourth of the bar. Take three of those pieces, and you have three fourths of the bar. We write these as

14and34.\frac{1}{4} \qquad\text{and}\qquad \frac{3}{4}.

A fraction is written as two numbers separated by a bar. The number below the bar, the denominator, tells you how many equal parts the whole was cut into. The number above the bar, the numerator, tells you how many of those parts you are counting. So 34\frac{3}{4} means “the whole was cut into 44 equal parts, and we are taking 33 of them.”

One whole cut into 4 equal parts, with 3 of them shaded. The denominator 4 counts the parts in the whole; the numerator 3 counts the shaded parts. Rectangular bars divided into equal parts, with some parts shaded to show a fraction. 3 4
One whole cut into 4 equal parts, with 3 of them shaded. The denominator 4 counts the parts in the whole; the numerator 3 counts the shaded parts.

The whole does not have to be a bar. Cut a round pizza into 44 equal slices and take 33 of them. You are holding the same fraction you just shaded on the bar. Only two things matter: how many equal parts the whole was cut into, and how many of them you took. The shape of the whole is not one of them.

The same fraction, cut from a different shapeA pizza drawn as a circle cut into four equal quarters. Three quarters are shaded and one is left plain, showing three fourths.3 of 4 equal slices
The same 3/4, cut from a circle instead of a bar. The pizza is divided into 4 equal slices and 3 are shaded, so the picture changes shape while the fraction does not.

The two numbers do very different jobs, and keeping them straight is most of the battle. The denominator names the size of each part: fourths are bigger than fifths, which are bigger than sixths. The reason is that the more parts you cut a fixed whole into, the smaller each part has to be. The numerator just counts how many of those parts you have. Think of “fourths” as a unit, the way “feet” or “dollars” is a unit. So 34\frac{3}{4} is three of the unit called a fourth, exactly as 33 feet is three of the unit called a foot. One handy memory hook: the denominator is down, and it names the kind of piece you are counting.

A quick word on names. The denominator 22 gives halves, 33 gives thirds, and 44 gives fourths (or quarters). From 55 onward we use the ordinary ordinal word: fifths, sixths, sevenths, and so on. The numerator is always read as a plain count: 25\frac{2}{5} is “two fifths,” and 47\frac{4}{7} is “four sevenths.”

Unit fractions: the size of one part

The simplest fractions have a numerator of 11: a single equal part, such as 14\frac{1}{4} or 18\frac{1}{8}. A fraction with numerator 11 is called a unit fraction, and it is the building block of every other fraction. Three fourths is just three copies of one fourth stacked together:

34=14+14+14.\frac{3}{4} = \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4}.

The denominator by itself fixes the size of one part. And here is the idea that trips up the most students: a bigger denominator makes each part smaller. Cut one whole into 88 equal pieces instead of 44. Then each piece has to be smaller, because the same whole is now shared among more of them.

Same whole, more pieces: one eighth is smaller than one fourth, so 1/8 is less than 1/4 even though 8 is bigger than 4. Rectangular bars divided into equal parts, with some parts shaded to show a fraction. 1 4 1 8
Same whole, more pieces: one eighth is smaller than one fourth, so 1/8 is less than 1/4 even though 8 is bigger than 4.

So 18\frac{1}{8} is less than 14\frac{1}{4}, even though 88 is bigger than 44. Reading the denominator backwards, thinking that more pieces must mean more, is the single most common fraction mistake.

The bar means divide

The bar in a fraction is a division sign. The fraction 34\frac{3}{4} is another way of writing 3÷43 \div 4:

ab=a÷b.\frac{a}{b} = a \div b.

The denominator bb must not be zero here, because dividing by zero is not allowed.

Why the fraction ab\frac{a}{b} equals a÷ba \div b#

Start with 33 identical cakes shared equally among 55 children. By the meaning of division, each child receives 3÷53 \div 5 of a cake. Now find that same share a second way, by cutting every cake into 55 equal pieces. Each piece is one fifth of a cake, and the three cakes together give 3×5=153 \times 5 = 15 pieces. Dealing 1515 pieces out to 55 children gives each child 15÷5=315 \div 5 = 3 pieces. Three pieces of one fifth each is 35\frac{3}{5} of a cake, so the two ways of sharing agree: 3÷5=353 \div 5 = \frac{3}{5}.

Nothing in that argument used the particular numbers 33 and 55, so run it again with letters.

Share aa identical wholes equally among bb people. By the very meaning of division, each person receives a÷ba \div b. Now work out that same share a second way, by cutting.

Slice every one of the aa wholes into bb equal pieces. Each piece is one of bb equal parts of a whole, so each piece is 1b\frac{1}{b}. Cutting all aa wholes this way produces a×ba \times b small pieces in total. Deal those pieces out equally to the bb people. Since there are a×ba \times b pieces and bb people, each person gets

(a×b)÷b=a pieces.(a \times b) \div b = a \text{ pieces.}

Every piece is 1b\frac{1}{b}, so one person’s share is aa copies of 1b\frac{1}{b}, which is ab\frac{a}{b}. The two methods describe the very same share, one written as a division and one written as a fraction. So they must name the same number: a÷b=aba \div b = \frac{a}{b}.

Division of whole numbers does not always give a whole number. As long as you are not dividing by zero, such a division always gives a fraction. The problem 3÷43 \div 4 has no answer among the whole numbers, yet it has the perfectly good answer 34\frac{3}{4}. And when the division does come out even, the fraction simply is that whole number:

63=6÷3=2,05=0÷5=0.\frac{6}{3} = 6 \div 3 = 2, \qquad \frac{0}{5} = 0 \div 5 = 0.

So a fraction is a single number, the result of one division, not two numbers sitting near each other.

Check your understanding

A ribbon is cut into 88 equal pieces and you take 55 of them. Which fraction of the whole ribbon do you have, and what division does it stand for?

Answer choices

Fractions live on the number line

Because a fraction is a single number, it has a home on the number line, sitting between the whole numbers you already know. Finding that home uses the two parts of the fraction in turn. To place 34\frac{3}{4}, look at the segment from 00 to 11. The denominator 44 tells you to split that segment into 44 equal steps, which creates the marks 14\frac{1}{4}, 24\frac{2}{4}, 34\frac{3}{4}, and finally 44=1\frac{4}{4} = 1. The numerator 33 tells you to count 33 steps from 00, which stops you at the mark labelled 34\frac{3}{4}.

Why counting three of four equal steps lands on three fourthsA number line from 0 to 1 split into four equal steps at one fourth, two fourths, three fourths, and four fourths, which is 1. The third mark, three fourths, is highlighted.01/42/43/41
The segment from 0 to 1 split into 4 equal steps. Counting 3 steps from 0 lands on 3/4. The fourth step lands exactly on 1, because 4 fourths make one whole.

This is the same story as the shaded bar, stood on its side: the segment from 00 to 11 is the whole. The denominator says how many equal steps to cut that segment into, and the numerator says how far to count. A fraction whose numerator is smaller than its denominator lands before the 11 mark. That happens because you have taken fewer steps than it takes to reach a whole. The closer the numerator gets to the denominator, the closer the fraction sits to 11. And when the numerator equals the denominator, you have taken every step and arrived exactly at 11.

Proper and improper fractions

Nothing forces the numerator to be smaller than the denominator. You can count out more parts than it takes to make one whole, simply by using more than one whole. If you have two chocolate bars and cut each into thirds, you have 66 thirds available, and you could take 55 of them. That is the fraction 53\frac{5}{3}: five parts, each one a third of a bar. It is more than one whole bar but less than two.

Fractions split into two kinds by this comparison:

The word “improper” is unfortunate, because there is nothing wrong with such a fraction. It is simply a fraction whose value has reached or passed a whole. On the number line 53\frac{5}{3} sits past 11. Counting in thirds, three thirds bring you to 11, and two more thirds carry you to 53\frac{5}{3}, which lands between 11 and 22.

The improper fraction 5/3 drawn as 5 thirds: a full bar of 3 thirds (one whole) plus 2 more thirds of a second bar. It is more than 1 but less than 2. Rectangular bars divided into equal parts, with some parts shaded to show a fraction. 3 3 2 3
The improper fraction 5/3 drawn as 5 thirds: a full bar of 3 thirds (one whole) plus 2 more thirds of a second bar. It is more than 1 but less than 2.

Why a fraction over itself is one

Any fraction whose numerator equals its denominator is equal to 11.

A fraction with equal numerator and denominator equals 11#

Start with 77\frac{7}{7}, and read it as parts of a whole. The denominator says the whole was cut into 77 equal parts, and the numerator says to take 77 of them. Taking all seven of those parts is taking the entire whole back, so 77\frac{7}{7} is one whole. The division reading agrees: 7÷7=17 \div 7 = 1, since one seven fits into seven exactly once. Nothing there depended on the number 77, so the argument runs the same way with a letter.

Take any whole number nn that is not zero, and consider the fraction nn\frac{n}{n}. Read it as parts of a whole. The denominator says the whole was cut into nn equal parts, and the numerator says we are taking nn of those parts. But taking all nn of the nn parts is taking the entire whole back, with nothing left out and nothing extra. So nn\frac{n}{n} is one whole.

The fraction nn\frac{n}{n} means n÷nn \div n, and any nonzero number divided by itself is 11, since one copy of nn fits into nn exactly once. Either way,

nn=1.\frac{n}{n} = 1.

So 44=1\frac{4}{4} = 1, 99=1\frac{9}{9} = 1, and 100100=1\frac{100}{100} = 1. The requirement that nn is not zero matters, because cutting a whole into zero parts has no meaning, a point the next section makes precise.

A close cousin is the fraction with denominator 11. Take 51\frac{5}{1} and read it as parts of a whole. The whole was cut into just 11 part, so that one part is the whole itself. Taking 55 of those parts gives 55 wholes. The division reading agrees, since 5÷1=55 \div 1 = 5. Nothing in that depended on the number 55: for any whole number nn, n1=n÷1=n\frac{n}{1} = n \div 1 = n. So every whole number is secretly a fraction:

51=5,121=12,11=1.\frac{5}{1} = 5, \qquad \frac{12}{1} = 12, \qquad \frac{1}{1} = 1.

Check your understanding

Which of these fractions is not equal to a whole number?

Answer choices

Why the denominator can never be zero

The denominator counts the parts the whole is cut into, and you cannot cut something into zero parts and still have parts to take. The division reading shows the problem even more sharply. Take 60\frac{6}{0}, which would mean 6÷06 \div 0, and ask what number times 00 gives 66. Nothing times 00 gives 66, because anything times 00 is 00. There is no answer, so 60\frac{6}{0} names no number at all. The same happens for a0\frac{a}{0} whenever aa is not zero: division asks what times 00 gives back aa, and nothing does. The fraction 00\frac{0}{0} fails the other way: every number times 00 gives 00, so no single answer can be chosen. We say a fraction with denominator 00 is undefined, and you must never write one. The numerator, by contrast, is allowed to be 00. The fraction 04\frac{0}{4} means you took none of the four parts, which is a perfectly good amount, namely 00.

Comparing fractions

Often you only need to know which of two fractions is larger, without finding their exact values. Two situations let you compare at a glance, and both follow directly from the meaning of the numerator and the denominator.

Same denominator: compare the numerators. Comparing 38\frac{3}{8} and 58\frac{5}{8}, both count eighths, so the one with more eighths wins:

58>38,\frac{5}{8} > \frac{3}{8},

because 55 eighths is more than 33 eighths. The comparison works the same way as 55 apples against 33 apples, once you know the apples are the same size. When two fractions are cut into the same size of part, the one with more parts is larger.

Same numerator: compare the denominators, but backwards. Compare 23\frac{2}{3} and 25\frac{2}{5}. Both take 22 parts, but thirds are larger than fifths, so 22 thirds outweighs 22 fifths:

23>25.\frac{2}{3} > \frac{2}{5}.
Two thirds against two fifths. Both bars are the same whole and both shade 2 parts, but thirds are larger parts than fifths, so 2/3 covers more of the bar. Rectangular bars divided into equal parts, with some parts shaded to show a fraction. 2 3 2 5
Two thirds against two fifths. Both bars are the same whole and both shade 2 parts, but thirds are larger parts than fifths, so 2/3 covers more of the bar.

Suppose two fractions take the same nonzero number of parts, but the parts are different sizes. Then the one with the smaller denominator is larger, because a smaller denominator means each part is bigger. When the fractions share neither the numerator nor the denominator, neither shortcut applies directly. The next lesson, on equivalent fractions, gives the general method of rewriting both fractions so that they do share a denominator.

Worked example 1 Identify the parts of 710\frac{7}{10} and place it on the number line

The fraction 710\frac{7}{10} has denominator 1010 and numerator 77. The denominator tells you the whole is cut into 1010 equal parts, called tenths, and the numerator tells you to count 77 of them.

To place it, split the segment from 00 to 11 into 1010 equal steps. Each step is one tenth. Count 77 steps from 00:

110,  210,  310,  ,  710.\frac{1}{10}, \; \frac{2}{10}, \; \frac{3}{10}, \; \ldots, \; \frac{7}{10}.

You stop at the seventh mark, which sits between 00 and 11. The mark sits closer to 11 than to 00, because 77 is more than half of 1010. Since the numerator 77 is smaller than the denominator 1010, this is a proper fraction. So it must land short of 11, which matches the picture.

Worked example 2 Find 23\frac{2}{3} of 1212 apples

Taking a fraction of a quantity uses the two numbers in turn, exactly as the definition says. The denominator 33 means split the 1212 apples into 33 equal groups:

12÷3=4 apples in each group.12 \div 3 = 4 \text{ apples in each group.}

The numerator 22 means take 22 of those groups:

2×4=8 apples.2 \times 4 = 8 \text{ apples.}

So 23\frac{2}{3} of 1212 is 88. The method is always the same: divide by the denominator to find the size of one part. Then multiply by the numerator to count how many of those parts you want.

Worked example 3 Name the improper fraction shown by 11 shaded sixths

You have two identical bars, each cut into 66 equal parts, and 1111 of those parts are shaded in total. Every part is one sixth, so 1111 parts is 1111 sixths:

116.\frac{11}{6}.

Because the numerator 1111 is larger than the denominator 66, this is an improper fraction, so its value is more than one whole. To see how much more, note that 66 of the sixths fill one entire bar:

66=1,\frac{6}{6} = 1,

which leaves 116=511 - 6 = 5 more sixths shaded on the second bar. So 116\frac{11}{6} is one whole and 55 sixths more, placing it between 11 and 22 on the number line. (Writing it as “one and five sixths” is the subject of the later lesson on mixed numbers. For now, 116\frac{11}{6} is a complete and correct answer.)

Check your understanding

Which symbol makes a true statement: 37    34\frac{3}{7} \;\square\; \frac{3}{4}?

Answer choices

Common mistakes

Practice

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)

Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.

Free Response Questions (FRQ)

Longer questions in parts, to be worked out on paper. Progressive hints, the answer on its own so you can check yourself and try again, then the full worked solution, plus a rubric to mark your own work against.

Free response Work it out on paper 5 questions Start →
More practice (optional)

Extra sets, as hard as the Challenge set. Each one opens on its own page.

More resources (optional)

Other explanations of this lesson, if you want a second take.

A bit of history (Optional)

A scribe in ancient Egypt could not write most of the fractions you just met. Nearly every fraction in his system had a one on top.

He had halves, thirds, fourths, eighths, and hundreds of other single pieces. Five eighths was not among them. So he wrote five eighths as one half plus one eighth, two named pieces that add up to the amount he wanted.

The Rhind Papyrus, an Egyptian scroll copied around 1650 BCE, is crowded with sums like that one. It even carries a table of them, because scribes needed the answers to divide bread and land among workers.

The system sounds clumsy, and it was. But it rests on the idea this lesson opened with. A denominator names the size of one piece, and everything after that is counting. You count three copies of one fourth; the scribe counted a half and an eighth. Neither of you can name an amount before the size of the piece is settled.