Inequalities

Learning goals

  • Read the four symbols, and say which include the boundary
  • Describe a solution as a range rather than one value
  • Graph with an open or closed circle, shading the right way
  • Solve with the same balance moves used for equations
  • Flip the symbol when multiplying or dividing by a negative
  • Test one value inside the range and one outside

The four inequality symbols

An inequality compares two expressions that need not be equal. In place of the equals sign it uses one of four symbols:

SymbolRead asMeaning
<<”less than”strictly smaller, not equal
>>”greater than”strictly larger, not equal
≤\le”less than or equal to”, “at most”smaller, or exactly equal
≥\ge”greater than or equal to”, “at least”larger, or exactly equal

So 5<85 < 8 says five is less than eight, and 8>58 > 5 says eight is greater than five: the same fact read from each end. The symbol always opens toward the larger amount and narrows to a point at the smaller one, like a mouth that wants the bigger meal. A quick check is that the small pointed end aims at the small number: in 5<85 < 8 the point is on the 55.

The two symbols with a line underneath, ≤\le and ≥\ge, allow equality as well. The statement x≤6x \le 6 is true when xx is 66 and also true when xx is anything below 66. In words, ≤\le means “at most” (no bigger than) and ≥\ge means “at least” (no smaller than). The bar is the difference between letting the boundary number in and shutting it out. We call << and >> strict inequalities, because they exclude equality, and ≤\le and ≥\ge non-strict, because they include it.

A solution is a range, not a point

For an equation, a solution is usually one number. For an inequality, a solution is every number that makes the statement true, and that is almost always a whole range of them. Take

x>3.x > 3.

Is 44 a solution? Yes, since 4>34 > 3. Is 1010? Yes. Is 3.13.1, or 3.53.5, or a thousand? Every one of them is greater than 33, so every one is a solution. What about 33 itself? No: 3>33 > 3 is false, because 33 is not strictly greater than 33. And 22 fails too, since 22 is not greater than 33. So the solutions are exactly the numbers to the right of 33, with 33 left out. There are infinitely many of them, which is why we describe the answer as a range rather than listing it.

Compare that with x≥3x \ge 3. Now 33 itself does count, because the bar under the symbol allows equality, so the solution is 33 together with everything above it. The only difference between x>3x > 3 and x≥3x \ge 3 is that one boundary number, 33. Keeping straight whether the boundary belongs to the solution is the whole art of reading an inequality, and the number line makes it visible.

Graphing the solution on a number line

A picture of all the solutions at once is a graph on the number line. You mark the boundary number, decide whether it belongs, and shade the direction that holds the rest of the solutions. Two rules cover every case:

The variable will not always sit on the left. If you see 3<x3 < x, first read what it says about xx: 3<x3 < x means the same thing as x>3x > 3, the boundary is just written first. So it still gets an open circle on 33, shaded right.

Here is x>3x > 3. The circle on 33 is open, because 33 is not a solution, and the shading runs right toward the larger numbers.

Number-line graph of x greater than 3A number line with an open circle at 3 and shading extending right, representing all numbers greater than 3.01234567
The graph of x > 3. The open circle on 3 marks it as excluded, and the shaded arrow runs right to cover every number greater than 3.

Now compare x≥3x \ge 3. Everything is the same except the circle on 33 is filled, because this time 33 is part of the solution.

Number-line graph of x greater than or equal to 3A number line with a filled circle at 3 and shading extending right, representing 3 and all numbers greater than 3.01234567
The graph of x is greater than or equal to 3. The closed circle on 3 marks it as included, and the shading again runs right.

A “less” relation shades the other way. Here is x≤1x \le 1: the circle on 11 is filled because the bar includes it, and the arrow runs left toward the smaller numbers.

Number-line graph of x less than or equal to 1A number line with a filled circle at 1 and shading extending left, representing 1 and all numbers less than 1.-3-2-101234
The graph of x is less than or equal to 1. The closed circle on 1 includes it, and the shading runs left to cover every number below 1.

Check your understanding

Which number line shows the solution of x<2x < 2?

Answer choices

Solving inequalities with the balance moves

Here is the payoff for everything you learned about equations. An inequality is solved by isolating the variable, using the same inverse operations on both sides. Adding or subtracting the same amount from both sides keeps an inequality true. So does multiplying or dividing both sides by the same positive number. The reasoning is the balance principle again, only now the two sides need not be equal. Whatever comparison held before the move still holds after it: if one side was strictly larger, it stays larger; if the two sides were tied at an included ≤\le or ≥\ge boundary, they stay tied.

Why does adding the same amount to both sides keep the inequality? Picture the number line. Saying a<ba < b means aa sits to the left of bb. Suppose you slide both points the same distance in the same direction, by adding the same number to each. Their order does not change: aa is still on the left. So a<ba < b leads to a+c<b+ca + c < b + c for any number cc, and subtracting works the same way, since subtracting is just adding a negative. Multiplying or dividing both sides by a positive number stretches or shrinks every distance from zero by the same factor. A positive multiplier or divisor never flips anything across zero, so again the left-right order is preserved.

That gives the one-step inequalities at once. They look exactly like one-step equations, only with an inequality symbol carried straight down each line.

Worked example 1 Solve x+4<9x + 4 < 9 and graph it

The variable has 44 added to it, so subtract 44 from both sides, carrying the << symbol straight down:

x+4−4<9−4  ⇒  x<5.x + 4 - 4 < 9 - 4 \;\Rightarrow\; x < 5.

The solution is every number less than 55. To check the direction, test a number from inside the claimed range and one outside it. Try x=0x = 0: is 0+4<90 + 4 < 9? That is 4<94 < 9, true, and 00 is indeed less than 55. Try x=6x = 6, which is outside: 6+4<96 + 4 < 9 is 10<910 < 9, false, and 66 is not less than 55. The two tests agree with x<5x < 5.

Graph it with an open circle on 55, since << excludes the boundary, and shade left:

Number-line graph of x less than 5A number line with an open circle at 5 and shading extending left, representing all numbers less than 5.01234567
The graph of x < 5: an open circle on 5, shaded left.

So the solution is x<5x < 5, every number to the left of 55, with 55 itself left out.

Worked example 2 Solve 5x≥205x \ge 20

The variable is multiplied by the positive coefficient 55, so divide both sides by 55. Dividing by a positive number does not disturb the symbol, so the ≥\ge comes straight down:

5x5≥205  ⇒  x≥4.\frac{5x}{5} \ge \frac{20}{5} \;\Rightarrow\; x \ge 4.

The solution is 44 together with every number above it. Check with a value inside the range and one outside. Test x=4x = 4, the boundary: 5(4)=205(4) = 20, and 20≥2020 \ge 20 is true, so the boundary belongs, which matches the closed circle. Test x=0x = 0, outside: 5(0)=05(0) = 0, and 0≥200 \ge 20 is false, as expected.

So x≥4x \ge 4. On a number line this is a closed circle on 44 with the shading running right.

Check your understanding

Solve x−6≤1x - 6 \le 1 for xx.

Answer choices

The one new rule: a negative flips the symbol

Everything above carried the symbol down unchanged. There is exactly one situation where that fails, and it is the heart of this lesson. When you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, you must reverse the inequality symbol. A << becomes a >>, a ≤\le becomes a ≥\ge, and so on. This is the step almost everyone forgets, so it is worth seeing exactly why it is forced.

Start with a true statement that needs no variables, say

2<3.2 < 3.

Two really is less than three. Now multiply both sides by −1-1. The left side becomes −2-2 and the right side becomes −3-3. If the symbol stayed the same we would be claiming −2<−3-2 < -3, but that is false. On the number line −2-2 sits to the right of −3-3, so −2-2 is the larger number. The true statement is

−2>−3.-2 > -3.

Multiplying by −1-1 took each number to its opposite, which reflects it across zero, and a reflection across zero swaps left and right. The number that was smaller is now the larger one. So the order has to reverse, and the only way to keep the statement true is to flip the symbol from << to >>.

Multiplying an inequality by a negative reverses the orderA number line showing 2 and 3 and their reflections across zero at negative 2 and negative 3, where the left-right order is swapped.-4-3-2-1012342 < 3-2 > -3multiply by -1: reflect across 0, the order reverses
Multiplying by a negative reflects each number across zero. 2 is left of 3, but their opposites -2 and -3 land in swapped order: -2 is now to the right of -3, so the symbol reverses.

Why multiplying by a negative reverses the inequality#

Suppose a<ba < b, so aa is the smaller of the two numbers, and let kk be any positive number. We will show that multiplying both sides by −k-k forces the symbol to flip, giving −ka>−kb-ka > -kb.

Begin with what a<ba < b tells us: the difference b−ab - a is a positive number, because bb is larger than aa. Multiply that positive difference by the positive number kk. A positive times a positive is positive, so k(b−a)k(b - a) is still positive. Distributing the kk, this says kb−kakb - ka is positive, which is the same as saying kb−ka>0kb - ka > 0.

Read kb−ka>0kb - ka > 0 directly: a positive value of kb−kakb - ka means kbkb is larger than kaka, that is ka<kbka < kb. (This is just the earlier fact that multiplying both sides of a<ba < b by the positive number kk keeps the order.) Finally, rewrite that same positive difference using opposites: kb−kakb - ka is exactly (−ka)−(−kb)(-ka) - (-kb). So (−ka)−(−kb)>0(-ka) - (-kb) > 0, and by the same reading as before, a positive difference means the left side is the larger one:

−ka>−kb.-ka > -kb.

That is exactly the claim: a<ba < b multiplied through by the negative number −k-k yields −ka>−kb-ka > -kb, with the symbol reversed. The same argument runs with ≤\le in place of <<, giving ≥\ge, since the boundary case a=ba = b becomes −ka=−kb-ka = -kb either way. Division by a negative is the same move, because dividing by −k-k is multiplying by the positive reciprocal 1k\tfrac{1}{k} and then by −1-1. Only that final −1-1 flips the symbol. So every multiply-or-divide by a negative reverses the inequality, once and exactly once.

The rule is precise, so do not over-apply it. You flip the symbol only when the number you multiply or divide both sides by is negative. Adding or subtracting a negative number does not flip anything, and a negative appearing somewhere else in the problem is irrelevant. What matters is the sign of the number you multiply or divide both sides by.

Worked example 3 Solve −2x<8-2x < 8 and graph it

The variable is multiplied by the negative coefficient −2-2, so divide both sides by −2-2. Because −2-2 is negative, reverse the symbol from << to >> as you divide:

−2x−2>8−2  ⇒  x>−4.\frac{-2x}{-2} > \frac{8}{-2} \;\Rightarrow\; x > -4.

The flip is the whole point: dividing by a negative reverses the relation. Check it against the original, where the inequality is still −2x<8-2x < 8. Test x=0x = 0, which should satisfy x>−4x > -4: −2(0)=0-2(0) = 0, and 0<80 < 8 is true. Test x=−5x = -5, which should fail x>−4x > -4: −2(−5)=10-2(-5) = 10, and 10<810 < 8 is false, exactly as predicted. Both tests support x>−4x > -4, not x<−4x < -4.

Graph it with an open circle on −4-4 (the symbol is strict) and shade right:

Number-line graph of x greater than negative 4A number line with an open circle at negative 4 and shading extending right, representing all numbers greater than negative 4.-6-5-4-3-2-101
The graph of x > -4: an open circle on -4, shaded right. Dividing -2x < 8 by the negative -2 reversed the symbol.

So x>−4x > -4. Forgetting to flip would have given the wrong half of the line.

Check your understanding

Solve −x≥3-x \ge 3 for xx.

Answer choices

Two-step inequalities

When two operations sit on the variable, undo them in the reverse of the order of operations. That is exactly what you did for two-step equations: clear the added or subtracted constant first, then deal with the coefficient. The only extra vigilance is the flip rule, and it can come up at the multiply-or-divide step alone, never at the add-or-subtract step.

Worked example 4 Solve 3x+5≤173x + 5 \le 17

The constant 55 is added on, so subtract 55 from both sides. Adding or subtracting never touches the symbol:

3x+5−5≤17−5  ⇒  3x≤12.3x + 5 - 5 \le 17 - 5 \;\Rightarrow\; 3x \le 12.

Now the variable is multiplied by the positive coefficient 33, so divide both sides by 33. Since 33 is positive, the symbol stays as ≤\le:

3x3≤123  ⇒  x≤4.\frac{3x}{3} \le \frac{12}{3} \;\Rightarrow\; x \le 4.

Check a value inside the range against the original inequality. Test x=4x = 4, the boundary: 3(4)+5=173(4) + 5 = 17, and 17≤1717 \le 17 is true. Test x=5x = 5, outside: 3(5)+5=203(5) + 5 = 20, and 20≤1720 \le 17 is false. The solution is

x≤4,x \le 4,

a closed circle on 44 shaded left.

Worked example 5 Solve −2x+1>9-2x + 1 > 9

Subtract the constant 11 from both sides first. This is a subtraction, not a multiply or divide, so the symbol does not move:

−2x+1−1>9−1  ⇒  −2x>8.-2x + 1 - 1 > 9 - 1 \;\Rightarrow\; -2x > 8.

Now divide both sides by the coefficient −2-2. The divisor is negative, so reverse the symbol from >> to <<:

−2x−2<8−2  ⇒  x<−4.\frac{-2x}{-2} < \frac{8}{-2} \;\Rightarrow\; x < -4.

The flip happens at the division step and only there. Check against the original: x=−5x = -5 should work, and −2(−5)+1=10+1=11>9-2(-5) + 1 = 10 + 1 = 11 > 9 is true; x=0x = 0 should fail, and −2(0)+1=1>9-2(0) + 1 = 1 > 9 is false. So

x<−4,x < -4,

an open circle on −4-4 shaded left.

Worked example 6 Solve 8−3x≥28 - 3x \ge 2

Read the left side as 8+(−3x)8 + (-3x). Subtract the constant 88 from both sides, leaving the variable term alone; subtraction does not affect the symbol:

8−3x−8≥2−8  ⇒  −3x≥−6.8 - 3x - 8 \ge 2 - 8 \;\Rightarrow\; -3x \ge -6.

Divide both sides by the coefficient −3-3. It is negative, so flip ≥\ge to ≤\le. A negative divided by a negative is positive, the rule from the integers chapter:

−3x−3≤−6−3  ⇒  x≤2.\frac{-3x}{-3} \le \frac{-6}{-3} \;\Rightarrow\; x \le 2.

Check against the original: x=2x = 2 gives 8−3(2)=8−6=2≥28 - 3(2) = 8 - 6 = 2 \ge 2, true, so the boundary is included, matching the closed circle; x=3x = 3 gives 8−9=−1≥28 - 9 = -1 \ge 2, false. The solution is

x≤2.x \le 2.

Check your understanding

While solving −4x−1<11-4x - 1 < 11, you reach −4x<12-4x < 12. What is the correct next step?

Answer choices

Checking a solution by testing the range

The balance moves above already give the exact answer, as long as every step was valid. Testing values against the original inequality is a fast way to catch a mistake, especially a missed sign flip; it does not replace the algebra. Test a value from inside the claimed range and a value from outside it. The inside value should make the original true; the outside value should make it false. If either test disagrees, go back and check the sign at every multiply-or-divide step.

Worked example 7 Solve x2−3≥−1\dfrac{x}{2} - 3 \ge -1 and check it with two test values

Add the constant 33 to both sides; the symbol is unaffected by addition:

x2−3+3≥−1+3  ⇒  x2≥2.\frac{x}{2} - 3 + 3 \ge -1 + 3 \;\Rightarrow\; \frac{x}{2} \ge 2.

The variable is divided by the positive number 22, so undo that by multiplying both sides by 22. The symbol is unchanged, because 22 is positive:

2⋅x2≥2⋅2  ⇒  x≥4.2 \cdot \frac{x}{2} \ge 2 \cdot 2 \;\Rightarrow\; x \ge 4.

Now check it. Pick x=6x = 6 from inside the range x≥4x \ge 4 and substitute into the original:

62−3=3−3=0,0≥−1  ✓\frac{6}{2} - 3 = 3 - 3 = 0, \qquad 0 \ge -1 \;\checkmark

Then pick x=0x = 0 from outside the range:

02−3=−3,−3≥−1  false\frac{0}{2} - 3 = -3, \qquad -3 \ge -1 \;\text{false}

The inside value passes and the outside value fails, exactly as the algebra predicts, so the check supports x≥4x \ge 4.

Check your understanding

A classmate says the solution to x>3x > 3 is x>2x > 2. Testing x=4x = 4 gives true, and testing x=0x = 0 correctly gives false. Does that prove the claim x>2x > 2 is right?

Answer choices

Reading an inequality before you move

Every inequality in this lesson comes down to a short routine. First, isolate the variable with the same inverse operations you use on equations, clearing the constant before the coefficient. Second, at a multiply-or-divide step, check the sign: if you multiply or divide both sides by a negative number, reverse the symbol; otherwise leave it. Third, read off the graph: an open circle for << or >>, and a closed circle for ≤\le or ≥\ge. Shade right for a “greater” relation and left for a “less” one. Finally, test a value from inside the range and one from outside it, against the original inequality, to catch a mistake before you move on. The table collects the symbol facts at a glance.

SymbolIn wordsBoundary circleShade
x>ax > agreater than aaopenright
x≥ax \ge aat least aaclosedright
x<ax < aless than aaopenleft
x≤ax \le aat most aaclosedleft

The single fact that sets inequalities apart from equations is the flip. Multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative reverses the symbol, because taking opposites swaps the order of the numbers on the line. Hold onto that, and an inequality is no harder than the equation it resembles.

Common mistakes

Practice

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)

Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.

Core practice

Practice problems at the level of the course, to be worked out on paper. Hints one at a time, then the answer or the full worked solution, with your progress kept in this browser.

Core practice Work it out on paper 10 problems Start →
More practice (optional)

Extra sets, as hard as the Challenge set. Each one opens on its own page.

More resources (optional)

Other explanations of this lesson, if you want a second take.

A bit of history (optional)

For a long time a comparison had to be spelled out in words. A page would state that one quantity is greater than another, in full, every single time.

The two signs you used all lesson first appeared in print in 16311631. They are in an algebra book by Thomas Harriot, an English mathematician who had died ten years earlier. His colleagues gathered his papers and published them without him.

Whoever chose the shape chose extremely well. Each sign is a narrow wedge, open at one end and pointed at the other. The open end faces the larger quantity and the point faces the smaller one. So the mark is a small picture of the comparison it makes. That is why 5<85 < 8 and 8>58 > 5 report one fact from two ends.

The picture is doing real work in this lesson. Divide both sides by a negative, and the two quantities swap places on the number line. The wedge has to turn around with them.