Inequality Basics
Learning goals
- Compare two quantities with , , or
- Describe a solution set as a range of values
- Show a solution in words, on a line, and as an interval
- Bracket an included endpoint and parenthesize an excluded one
- Reverse the direction when scaling by a negative number
- Read a compound as a band between bounds
The four inequality symbols
An inequality compares two quantities that need not be equal. In place of the equals sign it uses one of four symbols.
| Symbol | Read as | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| ”less than” | strictly smaller, not equal | |
| ”greater than” | strictly larger, not equal | |
| ”less than or equal to”, “at most” | smaller, or exactly equal | |
| ”greater than or equal to”, “at least” | larger, or exactly equal |
So says five is less than eight, and says eight is greater than five. Those are the same fact read from opposite ends. The symbol always opens toward the larger amount and narrows to a point at the smaller one. So the pointed end aims at the smaller number: in the point sits on the .
That two-ended reading is worth stating as a rule, because it lets you turn any inequality around. The statements and say exactly the same thing: ” is at most ” is the same claim as ” is at least .” To flip an inequality end for end, swap the two sides and reverse the symbol, and the meaning is untouched. You will use this often to move a variable to the left, rewriting as .
The two symbols with a bar underneath, and , allow equality as well as the strict comparison. The statement is true when is and also true when is anything below . We call and strict inequalities, because they exclude the boundary, and and inclusive (or non-strict), because they let it in. That one bar is the whole difference between admitting the boundary number and shutting it out.
Because an inequality allows many values, its solution is a whole collection of numbers, called a solution set. Ask which numbers satisfy : the value works, and so do , , , and a million. Every number to the right of qualifies, so there are infinitely many solutions. That is why we describe the answer as a range and draw it, rather than listing it.
Worked example 1 Turn each phrase into an inequality
Let be the number in question. Match the wording to the symbol, watching for whether the boundary is allowed.
“A rider must be at least inches tall” allows exactly and anything taller, so it includes the boundary:
“You may spend at most dollars” allows exactly and anything less, again including the boundary:
“There are more than players” excludes itself, since “more than” is strict:
Finally, rewrite with the variable on the left. Swap the sides and reverse the symbol:
Both forms say ” is at most .”
Picturing the solution on a number line
A number line turns a solution set into a picture you can take in at a glance. You mark the boundary number, decide whether the boundary itself belongs, and shade the direction that holds the rest of the solutions. Two choices capture every case.
The circle at the boundary records whether the boundary is a solution. Draw an open (hollow) circle for a strict inequality, or , because the boundary is excluded. Draw a filled (closed) circle for an inclusive inequality, or , because the boundary is included. The shaded ray then runs in the direction of the solutions: to the right for a “greater” relation ( or ), toward the larger numbers. The ray runs to the left for a “less” relation ( or ). The arrowhead means the solutions run on forever that way.
Here is the graph of . The circle on is open, because is not a solution, and the shading runs right across every number larger than .
The only thing that changes for is the circle: it becomes filled, because now belongs to the solution. Switching between a strict and an inclusive relation never moves the shading, it only opens or closes the boundary circle.
That last sentence is the one to test rather than take on trust, and the figure below is built for it. Its three controls are exactly the three decisions described above: where the boundary sits, which side is shaded, and whether the boundary itself is in or out.
Put the boundary on and shade right, and you have the graph of from the picture above. Now press the third control back and forth and watch the whole figure. The ray does not move a pixel, the sign in the readout changes from to , and the circle fills in. One decision, one thing on the screen, and it is the decision students most often lose. Then send the boundary left past zero and shade left instead, and you have the graph the next worked example asks for before you read it.
The three decisions behind a solution graph
x > 2. Every number to the right of 2 is a solution. 2 itself is not, so its circle is hollow: the sign is strict.
Worked example 2 Graph and describe its parts
The symbol is , which is inclusive, so the boundary is a solution and gets a filled circle. It is a “less” relation, so the solutions are the numbers below , which lie to the left. Shade left from the filled circle.
So the picture is a filled dot on with a ray heading left. In words it reads ” is at most ,” and the boundary is part of the answer.
Check your understanding
Which number line shows the solution of ?
The symbol is strict (), so itself is not a solution: use an open circle. The relation is 'less than', so the solutions are the numbers below , which lie to the left.
A filled circle would wrongly include , and shading right would graph instead.
Interval notation
Drawing a picture every time is slow, so there is a compact written shorthand for the same solution set, called interval notation. An interval is written as its two endpoints inside a pair of fences, with the kind of fence recording whether each endpoint is included.
A square bracket includes the endpoint, matching a filled circle and an inclusive symbol. A parenthesis excludes the endpoint, matching an open circle and a strict symbol. So becomes , while becomes . The two can be mixed: is the half-open interval , closed on the left and open on the right.
When the solution runs on forever in one direction, we mark that end with the infinity symbol, for the right and for the left. Here is the one firm rule: infinity always takes a parenthesis, never a bracket. Infinity is not a number, so there is no endpoint to reach or to include; the parenthesis records that the interval is open and unbounded. That is why is written and is written , with a bracket on the real endpoint and a parenthesis at infinity. The table lines up all three ways of saying the same thing.
| Inequality | In words | Number line | Interval |
|---|---|---|---|
| greater than | open circle at , shade right | ||
| at least | filled circle at , shade right | ||
| less than | open circle at , shade left | ||
| at most | filled circle at , shade left | ||
| above and at most | open at , filled at , shade between |
One caution about reading. Written on its own, a symbol pair like could be an interval on a line or a point in the plane from the last chapter. The surrounding words tell you which is meant: an interval names a set of numbers on one axis, while a coordinate point names one location in the plane.
Worked example 3 Move between symbols, number line, and interval
Take the inequality . It is inclusive, so the boundary belongs, and it is a “greater” relation, so the solutions run right. On a number line that is a filled circle on with a ray to the right. In interval notation the real endpoint is included, so it takes a bracket, and the right end runs to infinity, which always takes a parenthesis:
Now run the translation the other way, starting from the interval . The left end is , so the set is unbounded below, and the right endpoint carries a parenthesis, so is excluded. That is exactly the strict “less” relation
an open circle on with the shading running left. Reading the fences carefully is the whole skill: a bracket is a filled circle, a parenthesis is an open circle, and an infinity end is always open.
Check your understanding
Which interval represents ?
The relation is 'less than or equal to', so the solutions run left from toward smaller numbers. The boundary is included because the symbol is inclusive.
The left end is unbounded, so it takes with a parenthesis, and the included endpoint takes a bracket. A parenthesis on would wrongly exclude it, and the intervals starting at describe or instead.
The rules for changing an inequality
To rearrange an inequality without breaking it, you need to know which moves keep the statement true. Three of the rules match your equation habits exactly, and one carries a twist. In each case the reason is visible on the number line, where simply means sits to the left of .
Adding or subtracting the same quantity from both sides keeps the direction. Sliding both numbers the same distance in the same direction does not change which one is on the left. Starting from the true statement and adding to each side gives , still true, and subtracting from each side of gives , also true. The order survives every shift.
Multiplying or dividing both sides by a positive number keeps the direction. Scaling by a positive factor stretches or shrinks every distance from zero but never carries a number across zero, so the left-right order holds. From , multiplying both sides by gives , and dividing by returns . Both stay true.
Multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number reverses the direction. This is the twist, and it is the single most error-prone fact about inequalities, so it deserves a careful look. Take the true statement and multiply both sides by . The left becomes and the right becomes . If the symbol stayed put we would be claiming , but that is false. On the number line lies to the left of , so is the larger number. The true statement is , with the symbol flipped.
Why multiplying by a negative reverses the inequality#
Suppose , so is the smaller of the two numbers, and let be any positive number. We will show that multiplying both sides by the negative number forces the symbol to flip, giving .
Begin with what tells us: the difference is positive, because is larger than . Multiply that positive difference by the positive number . A positive times a positive is positive, so is positive, and distributing the turns this into
Read that line directly: if is positive, then is larger than . That is the fact that multiplying by the positive number keeps the order. Now take the opposite of each side. Taking opposites sends to and to , and the positive difference is the same number as . So is positive as well, and the relation becomes
That is exactly the claim: multiplying through by the negative number yields , with the symbol reversed. The same argument runs with in place of , giving , since the boundary case turns into either way. Division by a negative is the same move. That is because dividing by is multiplying by the positive number and then by , and only that final flips the direction. So every multiply-or-divide by a negative reverses the inequality, once and exactly once.
Transitivity chains comparisons together. If and , then . On the line, is left of and is left of , so must be left of . A quick check: since and , transitivity gives , which is plainly true. This is what lets us write a chain like in a single line and read off any comparison inside it.
These rules are enough to take a short step on an inequality, the same way you take one step on an equation. For , subtract from both sides, and since subtraction never disturbs the symbol, . For , divide both sides by , and because is negative you reverse the symbol, giving . Carrying such a problem through several steps in a reliable order is the job of the next lesson. Here the point is only that each individual move is governed by the rules above.
Worked example 4 Apply one rule to an inequality
Start with . The variable is multiplied by the negative number , so to isolate you multiply both sides by . Multiplying by a negative reverses the direction, so turns into :
The flip is the entire lesson of this step. To confirm the direction, test one value against the original inequality. Try , which should satisfy : the original gives , and is true. Try , which should fail : the original gives , and is false, exactly as predicted. The solution set is .
Check your understanding
You multiply both sides of the true statement by . Which statement is correct?
Multiply each side by : the left becomes and the right becomes . Because the multiplier is negative, the direction must reverse, so becomes .
The statement is true, which confirms the flip. Keeping the symbol as would give the false claim .
Compound inequalities
Sometimes a value is squeezed from both sides at once, larger than one number and smaller than another. A compound inequality writes both bounds in a single line. The notation means and at the same time, so lies strictly between and . Read it as two claims joined by “and”: is above , and is below .
For this to make sense, the two ends must point the same way, with the smaller bound on the left. We write , which reads left to right as ” is less than , and is at most .” Writing the ends in conflicting directions, such as , would demand that be both above and below , which nothing satisfies. So that is never how a compound inequality is written.
Each end keeps its own circle: an open circle where the bound is strict and a filled circle where it is inclusive. On the number line the solution is the band between the two boundaries rather than a ray running off to one side. In interval notation the same band is just the pair of bounds in one set of fences, each fence chosen by its own symbol. So , open on the left and closed on the right, is the half-open interval .
Worked example 5 A compound inequality in three forms
Read the statement ” is at least and less than .” “At least ” is inclusive, so the left bound is included; “less than ” is strict, so the right bound is excluded. Written as one line with the smaller bound on the left, that is
On the number line this is a filled circle on , an open circle on , and a shaded band between them. In interval notation the left endpoint is included, so it takes a bracket, and the right endpoint is excluded, so it takes a parenthesis:
Test a value to make sure both parts hold. Is a solution? The left part is true and the right part is true, so is in, matching the filled circle. Is a solution? The right part is false, so is out, matching the open circle. The value sits comfortably inside, since and both hold.