This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly.
Contact us
Laws of Exponents
Learning goals
Add exponents to multiply powers of the same base
Subtract exponents to divide powers of the same base
Multiply exponents when raising a power to a power
Spread an exponent across a product or a quotient
Derive each law by counting copies of the base
Refuse to apply a law to am+an, which has none
The one definition everything rests on
Every rule below is read straight off the definition of a power from the previous lesson. Start with a
case you can check by hand: 34 is 3×3×3×3, which multiplies out to 81.
Counting copies of the base works the same way for any base a and whole-number exponent n≥1,
an=n copies of aa×a×⋯×a.
Each law below counts these copies in the same way, when powers are multiplied, divided, or raised to
another power.
Throughout this lesson the exponents are whole numbers (1 or more), and the bases are ordinary
numbers you have already met.
The product rule: multiply by adding exponents
Suppose you multiply two powers that share the same base, say 23×24. Replace each power by
its factors and count what you get:
Three 2‘s sitting next to four 2‘s is just seven 2‘s in a row, so the answer is 27. Notice
that 3+4=7: the exponent of the answer is the sum of the two exponents.
Take 62×63, two powers that share the base 6. The first power is two copies of 6 and
the second is three copies of 6. Setting them side by side gives one run of five 6‘s:
62×63=2(6×6)×3(6×6×6)=56×6×6×6×6=65.
The run holds 2+3=5 factors of 6, which is exactly why the two exponents add.
Nothing in that count depended on the particular numbers 6, 2 and 3, so run it again with
letters. Take any base a and two whole-number exponents m and n. By the definition of a power,
am is m factors of a multiplied together, and an is n factors of a multiplied together.
When you multiply am by an, you set those two groups of factors side by side in one long
product. Multiplication lets you drop the inner grouping, so nothing separates them:
am×an=m(a×⋯×a)×n(a×⋯×a)=m+na×⋯×a.
The combined product is one run of a‘s, and its length is m copies followed by n copies, which
is m+n copies in all. A product of m+n factors of a is, by the same definition, am+n.
∎
In words: to multiply powers of the same base, keep the base and add the exponents.
Worked example 1Write 52×56 as a single power
Both powers share the base 5, so the product rule applies: keep the base and add the exponents.
52×56=52+6=58.
If you ever doubt it, expand: two 5‘s times six 5‘s is eight 5‘s in a row, which is 58. You
would only multiply it out to a plain number if the problem asked you to evaluate it.
The same rule handles a string of three or more powers, because you can combine them two at a time. So
32×33×34=32+3+4=39: add up every exponent at once. Since the exponents add,
you can split a power apart whenever it helps, writing 27 as 23×24 or as
25×22.
Check your understanding
Write 45×43 as a single power of 4.
The bases match, so keep the base 4 and add the exponents.
45×43=45+3=48
You add the exponents, you do not multiply them, and the base stays 4 rather than becoming 16.
The quotient rule: divide by subtracting exponents
Division undoes multiplication, so dividing two powers of the same base takes copies of the base away
instead of piling them up. Look at 2325 and expand the top and bottom into factors:
2325=2×2×22×2×2×2×2.
Every 2 on the bottom cancels a 2 on the top, because 22=1. Three factors cancel
from each, leaving
2325=2×2×22×2×2×2×2=2×2=22.
Five factors with three cancelled leaves 5−3=2 of them, so the answer is 22. The exponent of
the answer is the difference of the two exponents.
Start with 4246, where the base 4 is shared and is not zero. The top is six copies of
4 and the bottom is two copies of 4, and each factor below cancels one above since
44=1:
4246=4×44×4×4×4×4×4=4×4×4×4=44.
Two of the six factors on top are used up, so 6−2=4 of them survive, which is why the exponents
subtract.
Nothing in those steps depended on the particular numbers 4, 6 and 2, so run the same argument
with letters. Take a base a that is not zero (so the division makes sense) and two whole-number
exponents with m>n. Write the quotient with each power expanded into factors. The numerator is m
copies of a and the denominator is n copies of a:
anam=na×⋯×aa×⋯×am.
Each factor of a in the denominator cancels one factor of a in the numerator, since
aa=1. There are n factors below, so n of the factors above are cancelled. Because
m is larger than n, there are factors left over on top. The number left over is m−n:
anam=m−na×⋯×a=am−n.
A product of m−n factors of a is am−n by the definition, which proves the rule.
∎
In words: to divide powers of the same base, keep the base and subtract the exponent of the
denominator from the exponent of the numerator. Notice the proof needed m>n, so that something
is left after cancelling, and it needed a=0, so that aa=1 is honest. For now we
keep m>n, which always leaves a positive exponent.
Worked example 2Simplify 7479
The base 7 is shared, and the top exponent is larger than the bottom one, so subtract.
7479=79−4=75.
To see it directly, nine 7‘s over four 7‘s cancels four pairs, leaving five 7‘s on top, which is
75.
The quotient rule subtracts exponents, but what if the bottom exponent equals the top one, as in
2323, or is even larger? Subtracting would give an exponent of 0 or a negative
number. So far a power has only meant “multiply the base this many times,” which makes no sense for
0 or a negative count. That is a real and interesting gap, and the very next lesson, on zero and
negative exponents, is devoted to filling it.
Check your understanding
Simplify 6268 to a single power of 6.
Same base, and the numerator exponent is larger, so subtract the exponents.
6268=68−2=66
Eight factors of 6 with two cancelled leaves six factors, which is 66.
The power rule: a power of a power multiplies exponents
The third situation is a power raised to another power, like (23)2. The outer exponent 2 says to
use 23 as a factor twice, so write it out and then count the factors of 2:
Start with (72)5, a power that is itself raised to a power. The outer exponent 5 says to use the
quantity 72 as a factor five times. Each of those five copies is itself two factors of 7:
Five groups of two factors each hold 2×5=10 factors of 7 altogether, which is why these
exponents multiply rather than add.
Nothing in that count depended on the particular numbers 7, 2 and 5, so run it again with
letters. Take a base a and whole-number exponents m and n. The outer exponent n means to use
the quantity am as a factor n times:
(am)n=n copies of amam×am×⋯×am.
Each one of those copies is itself m factors of a. So you have n groups, and every group holds
m factors of a. The total number of factors of a is therefore m added to itself n times,
which is m×n:
A product of m×n factors of a is am×n, so (am)n=am×n.
∎
In words: to raise a power to a power, keep the base and multiply the two exponents. This is the
rule most often confused with the product rule, so hold the two apart: in 23×24 the powers
sit side by side. There the exponents add to give 27, while in (23)4 one power is raised
to another and the exponents multiply to give 212.
Worked example 3Simplify (104)3
This is a power raised to a power, so multiply the exponents.
(104)3=104×3=1012.
Reading it the long way confirms the count: 104 used three times is three groups of four factors of
10. Those groups hold twelve factors in all, so the answer is 1012.
Spreading a power across a product or a quotient
The last two laws are about what happens when the base is itself a product or a quotient. Consider
(2×5)3. The exponent 3 asks for three copies of the base 2×5 multiplied together.
Because multiplication can be reordered freely (a property you met early on), you can gather all the
2‘s and all the 5‘s:
So the exponent lands on each factor separately. The same regrouping works for a quotient, since a
fraction raised to a power multiplies that many copies of the fraction. Check that on
(32)2, which is 32×32=94, and
94 is exactly 3222.
Power of a product and of a quotient: (ab)n=anbn and (ba)n=bnan#
Take (3×7)2, a power whose base is itself a product. The exponent 2 asks for two copies of
3×7 multiplied together. Multiplication can be reordered, so the two 3‘s gather together
and the two 7‘s gather together:
(3×7)2=(3×7)(3×7)=32(3×3)×72(7×7)=9×49=441.
The base 3×7 is 21, and 212 is also 441, so the exponent landed on each factor
separately.
Nothing in that regrouping depended on the particular numbers 3, 7 and 2, so run it again with
letters. By the definition, (ab)n is n copies of ab multiplied together:
(ab)n=n copies(ab)(ab)⋯(ab).
Multiplication can be reordered and regrouped however you like. So collect the n copies of a into
one group and the n copies of b into another:
(ab)n=n(a⋯a)×n(b⋯b)=anbn.
The quotient works the same way, with b=0. On numbers, (54)3 multiplies
three copies of 54, which puts three 4‘s on top and three 5‘s on the bottom and gives
12564. Raising ba to the n multiplies n copies of the fraction, and
multiplying fractions multiplies the numerators and the denominators separately. So n factors of a
collect on top and n factors of b collect on the bottom:
(ba)n=nba×⋯×ba=nb×⋯×ba×⋯×an=bnan.
∎
In words: a power of a product is the product of the powers. Likewise a power of a quotient is
the quotient of the powers, provided the denominator is not zero. This is what lets you rewrite
something like 63 by splitting the base:
since 6=2×3, you get 63=(2×3)3=23×33=8×27.
Each law just rebundles the same factors: powers side by side add their counts, a power of a power multiplies them, and a power of a product splits onto each factor.
Check your understanding
Which expression equals (3×4)2?
A power of a product puts the exponent on each factor separately.
(3×4)2=32×42
Both sides equal 144: the left is 122=144, and the right is 9×16=144.
Putting the laws together
Most real simplifications use more than one law in turn. Work from the
inside out, just as the order of operations tells you, resolving any power-of-a-power before you
combine side-by-side powers.
Worked example 4Simplify 35(32)4 to a single power of 3
Resolve the power of a power on top first, using the power rule (multiply the exponents):
(32)4=32×4=38.
The expression is now 3538, a single base over a single base, so apply the quotient rule
(subtract the exponents):
3538=38−5=33.
So 35(32)4=33.
Worked example 5Simplify 23×24×52 as far as the laws allow
The two powers of 2 share a base, so the product rule combines them:
23×24=23+4=27.
That leaves 27×52. The bases 2 and 5 are different, so the product rule cannot pool
them. The law that does reach across different bases is the power of a product read backwards,
an×bn=(ab)n, and it needs the same exponent on each. Here the exponents 7 and 2
differ, so the two complete powers cannot be combined into a single power of one base. You can still
regroup the factors, since 27×52=25×(22×52)=25×102. That
trades one prime base for a composite one, so the prime-power form 27×52 is the one to
keep:
23×24×52=27×52.
You could go further only by evaluating to a plain number, 128×25=3200.
Common mistakes
Practice
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.
Longer questions in parts, to be worked out on paper. Progressive hints, the answer on its
own so you can check yourself and try again, then the full worked solution, plus a rubric
to mark your own work against.
An astronomer in 1600 could lose a whole day to one long multiplication. A slip in the middle spoiled
the page. The only check was to do the work again.
John Napier was a Scottish landowner. He gave twenty years to that problem. His answer came out in
1614. Hand every number an exponent of its own, he said, and call it a logarithm. Two numbers are
then multiplied by adding their logarithms and looking the total up in a table.
The engine under that is the rule you proved here. Two powers of the same base keep that base and add
their counts. A product turns into a sum. Division runs the same way, so a hard division turns into a
subtraction.
The trick lasted more than three hundred years. Every engineer carried a slide rule, a ruler whose
marks are set out by logarithms, until the pocket calculator came. All of it rests on the small step
you began from: add the exponents.