Laws of Exponents
Learning goals
- Combine powers of the same base by adding exponents to multiply and subtracting exponents to divide
- Simplify a power raised to another power by multiplying the exponents
- Spread an exponent across a product or a quotient
- Recognize that no exponent law combines into a single power
The one definition everything rests on
Every rule below is read straight off the definition of a power from the previous lesson. Start with a case you can check by hand: is , which multiplies out to . Counting copies of the base works the same way for any base and whole-number exponent ,
Each law below counts these copies in the same way, when powers are multiplied, divided, or raised to another power. Throughout this lesson the exponents are whole numbers ( or more), and the bases are ordinary numbers you have already met.
The product rule: multiply by adding exponents
Suppose you multiply two powers that share the same base, say . Replace each power by its factors and count what you get:
Three ‘s sitting next to four ‘s is just seven ‘s in a row, so the answer is . Notice that : the exponent of the answer is the sum of the two exponents.
The product rule: #
Nothing in the count above depended on the particular base or exponents used, so run the same argument with letters. Take any base and two whole-number exponents and . By the definition of a power, is factors of multiplied together, and is factors of multiplied together.
When you multiply by , you set those two groups of factors side by side in one long product. Multiplication lets you drop the inner grouping, so nothing separates them:
The combined product is one run of ‘s, and its length is copies followed by copies, which is copies in all. A product of factors of is, by the same definition, .
In words: to multiply powers of the same base, keep the base and add the exponents.
Worked example 1 Write as a single power
Both powers share the base , so the product rule applies: keep the base and add the exponents.
If you ever doubt it, expand: two ‘s times six ‘s is eight ‘s in a row, which is . You would only multiply it out to a plain number if the problem asked you to evaluate it.
The same rule handles a string of three or more powers, because you can combine them two at a time. So : add up every exponent at once. Since the exponents add, you can split a power apart whenever it helps, writing as or as .
Check your understanding
Write as a single power of .
The bases match, so keep the base and add the exponents.
You add the exponents, you do not multiply them, and the base stays rather than becoming .
The quotient rule: divide by subtracting exponents
Division undoes multiplication, so dividing two powers of the same base takes copies of the base away instead of piling them up. Look at and expand the top and bottom into factors:
Every on the bottom cancels a on the top, because . Three factors cancel from each, leaving
Five factors with three canceled leaves of them, so the answer is . The exponent of the answer is the difference of the two exponents.
The quotient rule: when and #
Nothing in the canceling above depended on the particular base or exponents used, so run the same argument with letters. Take a base that is not zero (so the division makes sense) and two whole-number exponents with . Write the quotient with each power expanded into factors. The numerator is copies of and the denominator is copies of :
Each factor of in the denominator cancels one factor of in the numerator, since . There are factors below, so of the factors above are canceled. Because is larger than , there are factors left over on top. The number left over is :
A product of factors of is by the definition, which proves the rule.
In words: to divide powers of the same base, keep the base and subtract the exponent of the denominator from the exponent of the numerator. Notice the proof needed , so that something is left after canceling, and it needed , so that is honest. For now we keep , which always leaves a positive exponent.
Worked example 2 Simplify
The base is shared, and the top exponent is larger than the bottom one, so subtract.
To see it directly, nine ‘s over four ‘s cancels four pairs, leaving five ‘s on top, which is .
The quotient rule subtracts exponents, but what if the bottom exponent equals the top one, as in , or is even larger? Subtracting would give an exponent of or a negative number. So far a power has only meant “multiply the base this many times,” which makes no sense for or a negative count. That is a real and interesting gap, and the very next lesson, on zero and negative exponents, is devoted to filling it.
Check your understanding
Simplify to a single power of .
Same base, and the numerator exponent is larger, so subtract the exponents.
Eight factors of with two canceled leaves six factors, which is .
The power rule: a power of a power multiplies exponents
The third situation is a power raised to another power, like . The outer exponent says to use as a factor twice, so write it out and then count the factors of :
Two groups of three factors each is factors in all, so the answer is . This time the exponents multiply.
The power rule: #
Nothing in the count above depended on the particular base or exponents used, so run the same argument with letters. Take a base and whole-number exponents and . The outer exponent means to use the quantity as a factor times:
Each one of those copies is itself factors of . So you have groups, and every group holds factors of . The total number of factors of is therefore added to itself times, which is :
A product of factors of is , so .
In words: to raise a power to a power, keep the base and multiply the two exponents. This is the rule most often confused with the product rule, so hold the two apart: in the powers sit side by side. There the exponents add to give , while in one power is raised to another and the exponents multiply to give .
Worked example 3 Simplify
This is a power raised to a power, so multiply the exponents.
Reading it the long way confirms the count: used three times is three groups of four factors of . Those groups hold twelve factors in all, so the answer is .
Check your understanding
Simplify to a single power of .
This is a power raised to a power, so multiply the exponents.
Adding the exponents instead would give , but that is the rule for two powers standing side by side, not one power raised to another.
Spreading a power across a product or a quotient
The last two laws are about what happens when the base is itself a product or a quotient. Consider . The exponent asks for three copies of the base multiplied together. Because multiplication can be reordered freely (a property you met early on), you can gather all the ‘s and all the ‘s:
So the exponent lands on each factor separately. The same regrouping works for a quotient, since a fraction raised to a power multiplies that many copies of the fraction. Check that on , which is , and is exactly .
Power of a product and of a quotient: and #
Nothing in the regrouping above depended on the particular numbers used, so run the same argument with letters. By the definition, is copies of multiplied together:
Multiplication can be reordered and regrouped however you like. So collect the copies of into one group and the copies of into another:
The quotient works the same way, with . Raising to the multiplies copies of the fraction, and multiplying fractions multiplies the numerators and the denominators separately. So factors of collect on top and factors of collect on the bottom:
In words: a power of a product is the product of the powers. Likewise a power of a quotient is the quotient of the powers, provided the denominator is not zero. This is what lets you rewrite something like by splitting the base: since , you get .
Check your understanding
Which expression equals ?
A power of a product puts the exponent on each factor separately.
Both sides equal : the left is , and the right is .
Check your understanding
Simplify .
A power of a quotient puts the exponent on the numerator and the denominator separately.
Check it directly: , and is also .
Putting the laws together
Most real simplifications use more than one law in turn. Work from the inside out, just as the order of operations tells you, resolving any power-of-a-power before you combine side-by-side powers.
Worked example 4 Simplify to a single power of
Resolve the power of a power on top first, using the power rule (multiply the exponents):
The expression is now , a single base over a single base, so apply the quotient rule (subtract the exponents):
So .
Worked example 5 Simplify as far as the laws allow
The two powers of share a base, so the product rule combines them:
That leaves . The bases and are different, so the product rule cannot pool them, and the power of a product read backwards needs a shared exponent, which and are not, so that route is closed too. Neither law reaches a single power from here. You could still trade factors around, since , but that is still two powers multiplied together, not one, so it is no closer to a single power than where you started. Leave it as :
You would only evaluate it to a plain number, , if the problem asked for one.
Check your understanding
Simplify .
No exponent law combines this sum into a single power, so evaluate each power and add.
No single power of equals , so and are both the product rule applied where it does not belong.