Negative and Zero Exponents
Learning goals
- Show why the quotient rule forces to equal one
- Read as the reciprocal of the matching positive power
- Evaluate a zero or negative power to a definite number
- Separate the sign of the exponent from the sign of the base
- Extend the exponent laws to every integer exponent for a nonzero base
The gap left by the quotient rule
The quotient rule says that to divide powers of the same base you subtract the exponents: . Last lesson we only allowed , so the answer always had a positive exponent and matched the “repeated multiplication” definition. But nothing stops you from writing a quotient where the exponents are equal or where the bottom is larger.
Take . The exponents are equal, so the rule produces . Take . The bottom is larger, so the rule produces . Neither nor means anything yet under the old definition.
We could declare these expressions off-limits, or we could define them so the quotient rule keeps holding. The second choice is far better, because each quotient above is also an ordinary fraction we can simplify directly. That simplification tells us the only value the new power is allowed to have.
Zero as an exponent
Start with the equal-exponent case, which forces the meaning of a zero exponent. The expression has the same thing on top and bottom, and any nonzero number over itself is . So the value is settled before any exponent rule is used:
Now read the same quotient through the quotient rule, which subtracts the exponents:
The left sides are identical, so the right sides must be equal: . The same argument runs with any nonzero base, which gives the definition.
Why for every base #
Take the quotient of with itself, and evaluate it both ways. First, directly: is , and divided by is . Second, through the quotient rule: subtracting the exponents makes that same quotient .
One quotient cannot have two different values, so follows from the arithmetic alone. Neither the nor the did any work of its own. The argument needed only a nonzero base and the same power above and below.
Take any nonzero number and any positive whole-number exponent . Look at the quotient of with itself, and evaluate it two ways.
First, directly. The numerator and denominator are the same number, and a nonzero number divided by itself is :
Second, through the quotient rule, which subtracts the exponents:
Both expressions are the value of the one quotient , so they are equal to each other. That forces
The base had to be nonzero for the very first step, since is not (it is not any number). So holds for every base except , and is left undefined.
There is a second way to see it that needs no algebra, just the staircase of powers. Each time the exponent drops by one, the value is divided by the base, because you remove one factor. Watch the powers of come down:
Every step to the right divides by : from to , from to , from to . To stay on the pattern, the next step must divide by as well, and . The slot below is , so , in perfect agreement with the algebra.
Check your understanding
What is ?
Any nonzero base raised to the power equals . One way to see it: is directly, but the quotient rule makes the same quotient .
A zero exponent means no factors of the base, and a product of no factors is , not .
Negative exponents
Now push past zero. The case has a larger exponent on the bottom, and the quotient rule produces a negative exponent, . As before, the same quotient is also an ordinary fraction we can simplify by cancelling, and that pins down the value.
Write top and bottom as factors and cancel the three ‘s they share:
Three factors cancel from both, leaving nothing on top but and two factors of on the bottom. So the plain arithmetic gives , while the quotient rule gives , and the two must agree:
A negative exponent is an instruction to take the reciprocal of the matching positive power. The reciprocal of a number is divided by that number. The minus sign in the exponent flips the power between the numerator and the denominator; it does nothing to the sign of the value. The base has to be something other than zero, because would ask you to divide by zero.
Why for every base #
Divide by , where the bottom carries three more factors of than the top does. Through the quotient rule, subtracting the exponents gives . Directly, expand and cancel: the two factors on top cancel two of the five below, leaving three factors of under a .
One quotient cannot have two different values, so . The , the and the were not special. Every factor on top cancels because there are fewer of them, and the base only had to be nonzero.
Now take a nonzero base and a positive whole-number exponent . Build a quotient whose exponents differ by exactly , with the larger exponent on the bottom: divide by for any positive .
Through the quotient rule, subtract the exponents:
Directly, expand and cancel. The numerator has factors of and the denominator has factors of . So all factors on top cancel with of the factors on the bottom, leaving above and the remaining factors below:
Both readings describe the same quotient, so they are equal:
The base must be nonzero so the cancelling is honest (each ) and so the reciprocal is not a division by zero. Reading the equation in reverse is just as useful: , so a reciprocal power can always be rewritten with a negative exponent.
The staircase confirms this too. Keep dividing by the base as the exponent drops below zero, starting from and :
Each step right still divides by : , then , then . The values never turn negative; they turn into fractions, shrinking toward zero, which is exactly what reciprocals of growing powers do.
Check your understanding
Write as a fraction.
A negative exponent means the reciprocal of the matching positive power, so flip under a .
The value is positive: the minus sign moves the power to the denominator, it does not make the number negative, so is not .
Evaluating zero and negative powers
To turn a negative power into a plain number, do two separate jobs in order. First take the reciprocal the minus sign calls for, then evaluate the positive power that remains. Keeping the steps apart is what prevents the usual sign slip.
Worked example 1 Evaluate , , and
For , the negative exponent flips it to a reciprocal, then evaluate the cube:
For , a zero exponent on a nonzero base is outright:
For , take the reciprocal of :
When the base is a fraction, taking its reciprocal simply turns the fraction upside down.
Worked example 2 Evaluate and
A power of asks for one reciprocal and nothing more, so it just flips the base over.
For , take the reciprocal of :
Dividing by gives , so a base smaller than raised to a negative power comes out larger than . For , flip the fraction first, then square it:
Flipping the base turns the into a , which is the quickest route for a fraction raised to a negative power.
Check your understanding
Evaluate as a fraction.
The negative exponent takes the reciprocal of , and .
The value is a small positive fraction, not a negative number, so is not .
The sign of the base is a separate question
A negative exponent and a negative base are two different things that beginners often blur together. The exponent’s minus sign decides whether you take a reciprocal; the base’s minus sign decides whether the factors carry a negative.
Consider . The parentheses make the base, and the exponent calls for the reciprocal of . First square the base, where two negatives cancel to a positive, then take the reciprocal:
The answer is positive , even though both the base and the exponent wore a minus sign. An odd power keeps the base’s sign, so . That value is negative, but it is negative because the base is negative and the power is odd, never because the exponent is negative.
Every law still holds
The whole reason these definitions were chosen is that they keep the laws of exponents intact. Those laws now hold for a nonzero base and every integer exponent, rather than only the positive ones. Both and were defined to be exactly the values the quotient rule forces.
Worked example 3 Show two ways
First use the product rule, adding the exponents straight through, including the negative one:
Now check it the long way, with no negative-exponent rule at all. Rewrite as its reciprocal first, then multiply the fractions:
Both routes land on . The product rule still says “add the exponents,” and adding gives the same answer as grinding through the arithmetic.
The quotient rule now works with no restriction on which exponent is larger, because a negative result is a legitimate power. So , with the rule applied in one clean step instead of the side condition we needed before.
Worked example 4 Simplify to a single power with a positive exponent (with )
The base is shared, so subtract the exponents, even though the bottom one is larger:
That is already a single power, but a negative exponent is usually rewritten with a positive one by moving the power to the denominator:
So . Reading it directly agrees: two factors of over five factors cancel two pairs, leaving three factors of on the bottom.
Check your understanding
Write as a single power of with a positive exponent.
Add the exponents with the product rule, keeping the sign on the .
The negative exponent then moves the power to the denominator. The form asked for a positive exponent, so is rewritten as .