Negative and Zero Exponents

Learning goals

  • Show why the quotient rule forces a0a^0 to equal one
  • Read a−na^{-n} as the reciprocal of the matching positive power
  • Evaluate a zero or negative power to a definite number
  • Separate the sign of the exponent from the sign of the base
  • Extend the exponent laws to every integer exponent for a nonzero base

The gap left by the quotient rule

The quotient rule says that to divide powers of the same nonzero base you subtract the exponents: aman=am−n\dfrac{a^m}{a^n} = a^{m-n}, for a≠0a \neq 0. Last lesson we only allowed m>nm > n, so the answer always had a positive exponent and matched the “repeated multiplication” definition. But nothing stops you from writing a quotient where the exponents are equal or where the bottom is larger.

Take 2323\dfrac{2^3}{2^3}. The exponents are equal, so the rule produces 23−3=202^{3-3} = 2^0. Take 2325\dfrac{2^3}{2^5}. The bottom is larger, so the rule produces 23−5=2−22^{3-5} = 2^{-2}. Neither 202^0 nor 2−22^{-2} means anything yet under the old definition.

We could declare these expressions off-limits, or we could define them so the quotient rule keeps holding. The second choice is far better, because each quotient above is also an ordinary fraction we can simplify directly. That simplification tells us the only value the new power is allowed to have.

Zero as an exponent

Start with the equal-exponent case, which forces the meaning of a zero exponent. The expression 2323\dfrac{2^3}{2^3} has the same thing on top and bottom, and any nonzero number over itself is 11. So the value is settled before any exponent rule is used:

2323=88=1.\frac{2^3}{2^3} = \frac{8}{8} = 1.

Now read the same quotient through the quotient rule, which subtracts the exponents:

2323=23−3=20.\frac{2^3}{2^3} = 2^{3-3} = 2^0.

The left sides are identical, so the right sides must be equal: 20=12^0 = 1. The same argument runs with any nonzero base, which gives the definition.

Why a0=1a^0 = 1 for every base a≠0a \neq 0#

Take the quotient of 343^4 with itself, and evaluate it both ways. First, directly: 343^4 is 8181, and 8181 divided by 8181 is 11. Second, through the quotient rule: subtracting the exponents makes that same quotient 34−4=303^{4-4} = 3^0.

3434=8181=1and3434=34−4=30.\frac{3^4}{3^4} = \frac{81}{81} = 1 \qquad \text{and} \qquad \frac{3^4}{3^4} = 3^{4-4} = 3^0.

One quotient cannot have two different values, so 30=13^0 = 1 follows from the arithmetic alone. Neither the 33 nor the 44 did any work of its own. The argument needed only a nonzero base and the same power above and below.

Take any nonzero number aa and any positive whole-number exponent nn. Look at the quotient of ana^n with itself, and evaluate it two ways.

First, directly. The numerator and denominator are the same number, and a nonzero number divided by itself is 11:

anan=1.\frac{a^n}{a^n} = 1.

Second, through the quotient rule, which subtracts the exponents:

anan=an−n=a0.\frac{a^n}{a^n} = a^{n-n} = a^0.

Both expressions are the value of the one quotient anan\dfrac{a^n}{a^n}, so they are equal to each other. That forces

a0=1.a^0 = 1.

The base aa had to be nonzero for the very first step, since 00\dfrac{0}{0} is not 11 (it is not any number). So a0=1a^0 = 1 holds for every base except 00, and 000^0 is left undefined.

There is a second way to see it that needs no algebra, just the staircase of powers. Each time the exponent drops by one, the value is divided by the base, because you remove one factor. Watch the powers of 22 come down:

24=16,23=8,22=4,21=2.2^4 = 16, \quad 2^3 = 8, \quad 2^2 = 4, \quad 2^1 = 2.

Every step to the right divides by 22: from 1616 to 88, from 88 to 44, from 44 to 22. To stay on the pattern, the next step must divide 22 by 22 as well, and 2÷2=12 \div 2 = 1. The slot below 212^1 is 202^0, so 20=12^0 = 1, in perfect agreement with the algebra.

Check your understanding

What is 707^0?

Answer choices

Negative exponents

Now push past zero. The case 2325\dfrac{2^3}{2^5} has a larger exponent on the bottom, and the quotient rule produces a negative exponent, 23−5=2−22^{3-5} = 2^{-2}. As before, the same quotient is also an ordinary fraction we can simplify by canceling, and that pins down the value.

Write top and bottom as factors and cancel the three 22‘s they share:

2325=2×2×22×2×2×2×2=2×2×22×2×2×2×2=12×2=122.\frac{2^3}{2^5} = \frac{2 \times 2 \times 2}{2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2} = \frac{\cancel{2} \times \cancel{2} \times \cancel{2}}{\cancel{2} \times \cancel{2} \times \cancel{2} \times 2 \times 2} = \frac{1}{2 \times 2} = \frac{1}{2^2}.

Three factors cancel from both, leaving nothing on top but 11 and two factors of 22 on the bottom. So the plain arithmetic gives 122\dfrac{1}{2^2}, while the quotient rule gives 2−22^{-2}, and the two must agree:

2−2=122=14.2^{-2} = \frac{1}{2^2} = \frac{1}{4}.

A negative exponent is an instruction to take the reciprocal of the matching positive power. The reciprocal of a number is 11 divided by that number. The minus sign in the exponent flips the power between the numerator and the denominator; it does nothing to the sign of the value. The base has to be something other than zero, because 10n\tfrac{1}{0^n} would ask you to divide by zero.

Why a−n=1ana^{-n} = \dfrac{1}{a^n} for every base a≠0a \neq 0#

Divide 424^2 by 454^5, where the bottom carries three more factors of 44 than the top does. Through the quotient rule, subtracting the exponents gives 42−5=4−34^{2-5} = 4^{-3}. Directly, expand and cancel: the two factors on top cancel two of the five below, leaving three factors of 44 under a 11.

4245=4×44×4×4×4×4=14×4×4=143=164.\frac{4^2}{4^5} = \frac{4 \times 4}{4 \times 4 \times 4 \times 4 \times 4} = \frac{1}{4 \times 4 \times 4} = \frac{1}{4^3} = \frac{1}{64}.

One quotient cannot have two different values, so 4−3=1434^{-3} = \tfrac{1}{4^3}. The 44, the 22 and the 33 were not special. Every factor on top cancels because there are fewer of them, and the base only had to be nonzero.

Now take a nonzero base aa and a positive whole-number exponent nn. Build a quotient whose exponents differ by exactly nn, with the larger exponent on the bottom: divide ama^m by am+na^{m+n} for any positive mm.

Through the quotient rule, subtract the exponents:

amam+n=am−(m+n)=a−n.\frac{a^m}{a^{m+n}} = a^{m-(m+n)} = a^{-n}.

Directly, expand and cancel. The numerator has mm factors of aa and the denominator has m+nm + n factors of aa. So all mm factors on top cancel with mm of the factors on the bottom, leaving 11 above and the remaining nn factors below:

amam+n=a×⋯×a⏞ma×⋯×a⏟m+n=1a×⋯×a⏟n=1an.\frac{a^m}{a^{m+n}} = \frac{\overbrace{a \times \cdots \times a}^{m}}{\underbrace{a \times \cdots \times a}_{m+n}} = \frac{1}{\underbrace{a \times \cdots \times a}_{n}} = \frac{1}{a^n}.

Both readings describe the same quotient, so they are equal:

a−n=1an.a^{-n} = \frac{1}{a^n}.

The base must be nonzero so the canceling is honest (each aa=1\tfrac{a}{a} = 1) and so the reciprocal 1an\tfrac{1}{a^n} is not a division by zero. Reading the equation in reverse is just as useful: 1an=a−n\dfrac{1}{a^n} = a^{-n}, so a reciprocal power can always be rewritten with a negative exponent.

The staircase confirms this too. Keep dividing by the base as the exponent drops below zero, starting from 21=22^1 = 2 and 20=12^0 = 1:

21=2,20=1,2−1=12,2−2=14,2−3=18.2^1 = 2, \quad 2^0 = 1, \quad 2^{-1} = \tfrac{1}{2}, \quad 2^{-2} = \tfrac{1}{4}, \quad 2^{-3} = \tfrac{1}{8}.

Each step right still divides by 22: 1÷2=121 \div 2 = \tfrac{1}{2}, then 12÷2=14\tfrac{1}{2} \div 2 = \tfrac{1}{4}, then 14÷2=18\tfrac{1}{4} \div 2 = \tfrac{1}{8}. The values never turn negative; they turn into fractions, shrinking toward zero, which is exactly what reciprocals of growing powers do.

Why the values stay positive as the exponent drops past zeroSeven powers of two from exponent 3 down to exponent negative 3. Each step right divides the value by two: 8, 4, 2, 1, then one half, one quarter, one eighth. A label notes the values stay positive and that exponent zero gives 1.2³2²2¹2⁰2⁻¹2⁻²2⁻³84211/21/41/8÷2÷2÷2÷2÷2÷2values stay positive; the exponent only flips a power into its reciprocal
One unbroken staircase: each step right divides by the base. To the left of the marked exponent zero the values are whole-number powers shrinking toward one; to its right, where the exponent has gone negative, the values keep halving into smaller positive reciprocals. The values stay positive throughout; only the exponent goes negative.

Check your understanding

Write 3−23^{-2} as a fraction.

Answer choices

Evaluating zero and negative powers

To turn a negative power into a plain number, do two separate jobs in order. First take the reciprocal the minus sign calls for, then evaluate the positive power that remains. Keeping the steps apart is what prevents the usual sign slip.

Worked example 1 Evaluate 2−32^{-3}, 505^0, and 10−210^{-2}

For 2−32^{-3}, the negative exponent flips it to a reciprocal, then evaluate the cube:

2−3=123=18.2^{-3} = \frac{1}{2^3} = \frac{1}{8}.

For 505^0, a zero exponent on a nonzero base is 11 outright:

50=1.5^0 = 1.

For 10−210^{-2}, take the reciprocal of 10210^2:

10−2=1102=1100=0.01.10^{-2} = \frac{1}{10^2} = \frac{1}{100} = 0.01.

When the base is a fraction, taking its reciprocal simply turns the fraction upside down.

Worked example 2 Evaluate (12)−1\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right)^{-1} and (23)−2\left(\tfrac{2}{3}\right)^{-2}

A power of −1-1 asks for one reciprocal and nothing more, so it just flips the base over.

For (12)−1\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right)^{-1}, take the reciprocal of 12\tfrac{1}{2}:

(12)−1=1(12)1=112=2.\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right)^{-1} = \frac{1}{\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right)^{1}} = \frac{1}{\tfrac{1}{2}} = 2.

Dividing 11 by 12\tfrac{1}{2} gives 22, so a positive base smaller than 11 raised to a negative power comes out larger than 11. For (23)−2\left(\tfrac{2}{3}\right)^{-2}, flip the fraction first, then square it:

(23)−2=(32)2=3222=94.\left(\tfrac{2}{3}\right)^{-2} = \left(\tfrac{3}{2}\right)^{2} = \frac{3^2}{2^2} = \frac{9}{4}.

Flipping the base turns the −2-2 into a +2+2, which is the quickest route for a fraction raised to a negative power.

Check your understanding

Evaluate 10−310^{-3} as a fraction.

Answer choices

The sign of the base is a separate question

A negative exponent and a negative base are two different things that beginners often blur together. The exponent’s minus sign decides whether you take a reciprocal; the base’s minus sign decides whether the factors carry a negative.

Consider (−2)−2(-2)^{-2}. The parentheses make −2-2 the base, and the −2-2 exponent calls for the reciprocal of (−2)2(-2)^2. First square the base, where two negatives cancel to a positive, then take the reciprocal:

(−2)−2=1(−2)2=1(−2)×(−2)=14.(-2)^{-2} = \frac{1}{(-2)^2} = \frac{1}{(-2)\times(-2)} = \frac{1}{4}.

The answer is positive 14\tfrac{1}{4}, even though both the base and the exponent wore a minus sign. An odd power keeps the base’s sign, so (−2)−3=1(−2)3=1−8=−18(-2)^{-3} = \dfrac{1}{(-2)^3} = \dfrac{1}{-8} = -\dfrac{1}{8}. That value is negative, but it is negative because the base is negative and the power is odd, never because the exponent is negative.

Check your understanding

Evaluate (−3)−2(-3)^{-2}.

Answer choices

Every law still holds

The whole reason these definitions were chosen is that they keep the laws of exponents intact. Those laws now hold for a nonzero base and every integer exponent, rather than only the positive ones. Both a0a^0 and a−na^{-n} were defined to be exactly the values the quotient rule forces.

Worked example 3 Show 23×2−5=142^3 \times 2^{-5} = \tfrac{1}{4} two ways

First use the product rule, adding the exponents straight through, including the negative one:

23×2−5=23+(−5)=2−2=122=14.2^3 \times 2^{-5} = 2^{3 + (-5)} = 2^{-2} = \frac{1}{2^2} = \frac{1}{4}.

Now check it the long way, with no negative-exponent rule at all. Rewrite 2−52^{-5} as its reciprocal first, then multiply the fractions:

23×2−5=8×125=832=14.2^3 \times 2^{-5} = 8 \times \frac{1}{2^5} = \frac{8}{32} = \frac{1}{4}.

Both routes land on 14\tfrac{1}{4}. The product rule still says “add the exponents,” and adding 3+(−5)=−23 + (-5) = -2 gives the same answer as grinding through the arithmetic.

The quotient rule now works with no restriction on which exponent is larger, because a negative result is a legitimate power. So 3236=32−6=3−4=134=181\dfrac{3^2}{3^6} = 3^{2-6} = 3^{-4} = \dfrac{1}{3^4} = \dfrac{1}{81}, with the rule applied in one clean step instead of the side condition m>nm > n we needed before.

Worked example 4 Simplify a2a5\dfrac{a^2}{a^5} using only a positive exponent (with a≠0a \neq 0)

The base is shared, so subtract the exponents, even though the bottom one is larger:

a2a5=a2−5=a−3.\frac{a^2}{a^5} = a^{2-5} = a^{-3}.

That is already a single power, but a negative exponent is usually rewritten with a positive one by moving the power to the denominator:

a−3=1a3.a^{-3} = \frac{1}{a^3}.

So a2a5=1a3\dfrac{a^2}{a^5} = \dfrac{1}{a^3}. Reading it directly agrees: two factors of aa over five factors cancel two pairs, leaving three factors of aa on the bottom.

Check your understanding

Write 52×5−45^2 \times 5^{-4} using only a positive exponent.

Answer choices

Common mistakes

Practice

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)

Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.

Core practice

Practice problems at the level of the course, to be worked out on paper. Hints one at a time, then the answer or the full worked solution, with your progress kept in this browser.

Core practice Work it out on paper 10 problems Start →
More practice (optional)

Extra sets, as hard as the Challenge set. Each one opens on its own page.

More resources (optional)

Other explanations of this lesson, if you want a second take.

A bit of history (optional)

What could it mean to use a number as a factor zero times, or negative three times?

Nicolas Chuquet, a doctor in France with a serious interest in numbers, wrote a manuscript about them in 1484. In it, every power carried a small raised counter, much like the ones you write today. He let that counter be zero, and he let it be negative, and worked with the results as ordinary quantities.

The manuscript stayed unprinted for centuries after Chuquet wrote it.

This lesson gives one reason those meanings must hold: the quotient rule leaves no freedom at all about a0a^0 or a−na^{-n}, so those meanings are forced rather than chosen.