This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly. Contact us

Scientific Notation

Learning goals

  • Write a number as a×10na \times 10^{n} with 1a<101 \le a < 10
  • Explain why the coefficient range makes each positive number's form unique
  • Move the point left for a large number, right for a small one
  • Read a negative exponent as small, never as negative
  • Compare magnitudes by exponent first, coefficient only to break a tie
  • Multiply and divide by combining coefficients and exponents, then renormalize

What scientific notation is

A number is in scientific notation when it is written in the form

a×10n,a \times 10^{n},

where the coefficient aa satisfies 1a<101 \le a < 10 and the exponent nn is an integer (it may be positive, zero, or negative). The two pieces do two separate jobs. The coefficient aa carries the significant digits, the actual sequence of meaningful figures in the number. The power 10n10^n carries the magnitude, the size, telling you where the decimal point really sits. Pulling these apart is the whole point: 4.2×1094.2 \times 10^9 and 4.2×1094.2 \times 10^{-9} share the same digits (4.24.2) and differ only in size.

A power of ten with a positive exponent is a 11 followed by that many zeros, so 103=100010^3 = 1000. A power of ten with a negative exponent is the reciprocal of the matching positive power, 10n=110n10^{-n} = \frac{1}{10^n}, so 103=1103=11000=0.00110^{-3} = \frac{1}{10^3} = \frac{1}{1000} = 0.001.

A single digit sitting in a place-value chart is already a number in this form. In the chart below you choose the digit and the column it occupies. The readout then names that digit’s value as the digit multiplied by a power of ten, which is the shape scientific notation uses.

Pick the digit 33 and walk it from the ones column out to the thousands. The value climbs 33, 3030, 300300, 30003000, which is 3×1003 \times 10^0, then 3×1013 \times 10^1, 3×1023 \times 10^2, 3×1033 \times 10^3. The digit is the coefficient and the column supplies the power of ten. Now change the digit without moving it, and watch the power of ten hold still while the value changes. A coefficient such as 1.51.5 or 4.834.83 does the same job, with more significant digits to carry.

Where the coefficient stops and the power of ten begins

The 3 sits in the hundreds place. So it is worth 3 times 10², which is 300. A place-value chart with four columns: thousands, hundreds, tens and ones, each showing its place value. One digit sits in one column, and the column it occupies is outlined. Use the controls below the figure to move the digit between columns or to change the digit. ones 1 tens 10 hundreds 100 thousands 1,000 x10 x10 x10 3
Digit Column

The 3 sits in the hundreds place. So it is worth 3 times 10², which is 300.

One digit and four columns. Wherever the digit sits, its value is that digit times a power of ten, the shape scientific notation uses; each step left multiplies the value by ten and each step right divides it by ten.

Why the coefficient stays between 1 and 10

The rule 1a<101 \le a < 10 looks fussy, but it is there for a real reason: without it, the same number could be written many different ways. Take 30003000. Every line below equals 30003000:

3000=3×103=30×102=0.3×104=300×101.3000 = 3 \times 10^3 = 30 \times 10^2 = 0.3 \times 10^4 = 300 \times 10^1.

All four are true, yet only the first has a coefficient in the range 1a<101 \le a < 10. Restricting the coefficient to a single nonzero digit before the decimal point means aa is at least 11 but less than 1010. Requiring that range picks out exactly one of these forms as the official one. That is what makes scientific notation a unique way to write each positive number. So two people who convert 30003000 correctly always get the identical expression, 3×1033 \times 10^3.

Why exactly one power of ten makes the coefficient land in [1,10)[1, 10)#

Start with 62006200. Dividing and multiplying by 1010 generates a ladder of candidate coefficients, ,  6200,  620,  62,  6.2,  0.62,  \ldots,\; 6200,\; 620,\; 62,\; 6.2,\; 0.62,\; \ldots, each one a tenth of the entry before it. Walk along the list: 6262 is still too big, and 0.620.62 has already dropped under 11. Only 6.26.2 lands at or above 11 while staying below 1010. Reaching 6.26.2 from 62006200 took three divisions by 1010, so the exponent is 33 and 6200=6.2×1036200 = 6.2 \times 10^3.

Take any positive number and ask which powers of ten you could factor out of it. Multiplying or dividing a number by 1010 slides its decimal point one place. Dividing by 1010 moves the point one step left and shrinks the number tenfold. Multiplying by 1010 moves the point one step right and grows the number tenfold. So the candidate coefficients you can reach, ,  a×10,  a,  a÷10,  \ldots, \;a \times 10,\; a,\; a \div 10,\; \ldots, each differ from the next by a single factor of ten.

Now look at the interval from 11 up to (but not including) 1010. It is exactly one factor of ten wide: its right end, 1010, is ten times its left end, 11. Because each candidate coefficient is ten times the one below it, the candidates step right past 1,10,100,1, 10, 100, \ldots one at a time. So exactly one of them can land at or above 11 while still staying below 1010. Land any lower and the value is under 11; land any higher and it is 1010 or more. Either way you are in a different interval.

That single landing spot is the coefficient aa, and the number of factors of ten you moved to reach it is the exponent nn. Since there is one and only one such spot, there is one and only one way to write the number as a×10na \times 10^n with 1a<101 \le a < 10. Nothing here depended on 62006200, because every positive number has the same list of candidates and the same single entry inside the interval.

So 30×10230 \times 10^2 is a perfectly correct equation, and it does equal 30003000. But 30×10230 \times 10^2 is not proper scientific notation, because the coefficient 3030 is not less than 1010. The same goes for 0.3×1040.3 \times 10^4, whose coefficient 0.30.3 is less than 11.

Large numbers: a positive exponent

The decimal point has to end up with exactly one nonzero digit in front of it. The exponent then comes from counting how far the point moved to reach that spot.

Start with 150,000,000150{,}000{,}000. Its decimal point is at the far right (a whole number’s point sits after the last digit). Slide it left until just one digit, the leading 11, stands before it:

150,000,000.    1.5×10?150{,}000{,}000. \;\longrightarrow\; 1.5 \times 10^{?}

Counting the hops, the point moves 88 places to the left to get from after the final zero to between the 11 and the 55. Each leftward hop is a division by 1010, and there were 88 of them. So to keep the value unchanged you must multiply back by 1010 eight times, that is by 10810^8:

150,000,000=1.5×108.150{,}000{,}000 = 1.5 \times 10^{8}.

The exponent is positive because the original number is large (at least 1010), and it equals the number of places the point moved left. The check is quick: 10810^8 is 11 followed by eight zeros, and 1.5×100,000,000=150,000,0001.5 \times 100{,}000{,}000 = 150{,}000{,}000, the number you started with.

Worked example 1 Write 48,30048{,}300 in scientific notation

The decimal point starts after the final 00, as the form 48,300.48{,}300. shows. Move the point left until a single nonzero digit sits in front, which means placing it just after the 44:

48,300.    4.830048{,}300. \;\longrightarrow\; 4.8300

Count the hops the point made: from after the last 00 to between the 44 and the 88 is 44 places. Trailing zeros that fall after the last nonzero digit are dropped from the coefficient, since 4.83004.8300 and 4.834.83 are the same number. So the coefficient is 4.834.83. The point moved 44 places left, so the exponent is 44:

48,300=4.83×104.48{,}300 = 4.83 \times 10^{4}.

The coefficient 4.834.83 is between 11 and 1010, as required, and 4.83×10,000=48,3004.83 \times 10{,}000 = 48{,}300 checks out.

Check your understanding

Write 52,00052{,}000 in scientific notation.

Answer choices

Small numbers: a negative exponent

Numbers smaller than 11 work the same way. But now the decimal point moves the other direction, to the right, and the exponent comes out negative.

Take 0.000420.00042. To get one nonzero digit in front of the point, slide the point right until it sits just after the 44:

0.00042    4.2×10?0.00042 \;\longrightarrow\; 4.2 \times 10^{?}

The point moves 44 places to the right to travel from its start to between the 44 and the 22. Each rightward hop is a multiplication by 1010, and there were 44 of them. So to leave the value unchanged you must divide back by 1010 four times, that is multiply by 10410^{-4}:

0.00042=4.2×104.0.00042 = 4.2 \times 10^{-4}.

The negative exponent is not a sign that the number itself is negative. The number 0.000420.00042 is positive; it is simply small, between 00 and 11. The minus sign on the exponent means “reciprocal,” exactly as you proved for negative exponents: 104=1104=110,000=0.000110^{-4} = \frac{1}{10^4} = \frac{1}{10{,}000} = 0.0001, and 4.2×0.0001=0.000424.2 \times 0.0001 = 0.00042. A negative exponent always marks a number between 00 and 11, never a number below zero.

Decimal point movement and the sign of the exponentFor a large number the point moves left and the exponent is positive; for a small number the point moves right and the exponent is negative; the size of the exponent is the number of places moved.Large number (at least 10): point moves left150,000,000=1.5 × 10⁸8 places left, exponent +8Small number (below 1): point moves right0.00042=4.2 × 10⁻⁴4 places right, exponent −4
The exponent is a signed hop count. Land the point after the first nonzero digit: moving it left to get there gives a positive exponent (large numbers), moving it right gives a negative one (small numbers), and a number already in [1, 10) needs zero hops.

Worked example 2 Write 0.03070.0307 in scientific notation

The number is between 00 and 11, so expect a negative exponent. Slide the decimal point right until one nonzero digit stands in front of it, which means placing it just after the 33:

0.0307    3.070.0307 \;\longrightarrow\; 3.07

The leading zeros before the 33 are placeholders. They vanish once the point is repositioned, and the zero between the 33 and the 77 stays because it sits among the significant digits. Count the hops: the point moves 22 places to the right to get from the start of 0.03070.0307 to just after the 33. Moving right gives a negative exponent of that size:

0.0307=3.07×102.0.0307 = 3.07 \times 10^{-2}.

Check it: 102=1100=0.0110^{-2} = \frac{1}{100} = 0.01, and 3.07×0.01=0.03073.07 \times 0.01 = 0.0307.

Check your understanding

Write 0.000690.00069 in scientific notation.

Answer choices

Converting back to standard form

Going the other way, from scientific notation to an ordinary number, you read the exponent as a direction and a distance for the decimal point.

Take 6.02×1056.02 \times 10^{5}. Multiplying by 10510^{5} makes the number a hundred thousand times bigger, so the point travels 55 places right. Starting from 6.026.02 there are only two digits after the point, so three extra zeros fill the remaining places:

6.02×105=602,000.6.02 \times 10^{5} = 602{,}000.

Now take 7.4×1037.4 \times 10^{-3}. Here 103=0.00110^{-3} = 0.001 is tiny, so multiplying by it must shrink the coefficient, and the point travels 33 places left, padding with zeros:

7.4×103=0.0074.7.4 \times 10^{-3} = 0.0074.

In both cases the direction followed the size. A positive exponent grows the number, so move the point right that many places, filling empty places with zeros. A negative exponent shrinks it, so move the point left that many places.

Worked example 3 Write 9.1×1069.1 \times 10^{6} and 2.5×1042.5 \times 10^{-4} as ordinary numbers

For 9.1×1069.1 \times 10^{6}, the +6+6 moves the point 66 places right. After the 9.19.1 there is one digit past the point, so five zeros fill the rest:

9.1×106=9,100,000.9.1 \times 10^{6} = 9{,}100{,}000.

For 2.5×1042.5 \times 10^{-4}, the 4-4 moves the point 44 places left, which pushes the 22 into the fourth decimal place and pads the gap with zeros:

2.5×104=0.00025.2.5 \times 10^{-4} = 0.00025.

Check your understanding

Write 3.6×1023.6 \times 10^{-2} as an ordinary number.

Answer choices

Comparing magnitudes at a glance

Compare 8.1×1048.1 \times 10^{4} and 3.5×1063.5 \times 10^{6}. The exponents are 44 and 66, and 6>46 > 4, so 3.5×1063.5 \times 10^{6} is the larger number, even though its coefficient 3.53.5 is the smaller of the two. The coefficient 8.18.1 cannot close that gap. It is only about twice 3.53.5, while 10610^{6} is a hundred times 10410^{4}.

The power of ten carries the magnitude. So as long as both coefficients sit in the standard range 1a<101 \le a < 10, the number with the larger exponent is larger. You only look at the coefficients to break a tie when the exponents are equal.

Why a larger exponent wins when both coefficients are in [1,10)[1, 10)#

Compare 1.2×1031.2 \times 10^{3} with 9.6×1029.6 \times 10^{2}, where the smaller exponent carries much the bigger coefficient, and the exponents are as close as they can get. Since 1.21.2 is at least 11, the first number is at least 1×103=10001 \times 10^{3} = 1000. Since 9.69.6 is below 1010, the second is under 10×102=100010 \times 10^{2} = 1000. The two bounds meet exactly at 10001000, so 9.6×102<10001.2×1039.6 \times 10^{2} < 1000 \le 1.2 \times 10^{3}. By hand that reads 960<1200960 < 1200.

Compare a×10ma \times 10^{m} and b×10nb \times 10^{n}, where both coefficients satisfy 1a<101 \le a < 10 and 1b<101 \le b < 10, and suppose m>nm > n, so mm is at least n+1n + 1.

The first number is at least its smallest possible value, which is when aa is as small as allowed, a=1a = 1. So a×10m1×10m=10ma \times 10^{m} \ge 1 \times 10^{m} = 10^{m}.

The second number is below its ceiling: since b<10b < 10, we have b×10n<10×10n=10n+1b \times 10^{n} < 10 \times 10^{n} = 10^{n+1}. And because mn+1m \ge n + 1, that ceiling 10n+110^{n+1} is at most 10m10^{m}.

Chain these together. The second number is strictly less than 10n+110m10^{n+1} \le 10^{m}, while the first number is at least 10m10^{m}:

b×10n<10n+110ma×10m.b \times 10^{n} < 10^{n+1} \le 10^{m} \le a \times 10^{m}.

So b×10n<a×10mb \times 10^{n} < a \times 10^{m}: the number with the larger exponent is larger, no matter what the coefficients are. That holds because keeping each coefficient under 1010 stops the smaller-exponent number from ever catching up. Nothing in that chain used the values 1.21.2 and 9.69.6: it needed only the two range conditions and m>nm > n. When the exponents are equal, the powers of ten match, so the comparison falls back to the coefficients alone.

The proof needs both coefficients to be properly normalized. If you allowed 30×10230 \times 10^{2}, its inflated coefficient could beat a larger exponent, which is one more reason the rule 1a<101 \le a < 10 matters.

Worked example 4 Order 4×1054 \times 10^{5}, 9×1049 \times 10^{4}, and 2×1052 \times 10^{5} from smallest to largest

Sort by exponent first. Two numbers share the exponent 55 and one has exponent 44, so the exponent-44 number is the smallest of the three outright:

9×104<4×105and9×104<2×105.9 \times 10^{4} < 4 \times 10^{5} \quad\text{and}\quad 9 \times 10^{4} < 2 \times 10^{5}.

For the two that tie at 10510^{5}, the exponents match, so compare the coefficients: 2<42 < 4. That makes 2×1052 \times 10^{5} smaller than 4×1054 \times 10^{5}. Putting it together:

9×104<2×105<4×105.9 \times 10^{4} < 2 \times 10^{5} < 4 \times 10^{5}.

Multiplying and dividing in scientific notation

Scientific notation also makes multiplication and division of awkward numbers manageable, because the laws of exponents do the heavy lifting.

Take (2×103)×(4×102)(2 \times 10^{3}) \times (4 \times 10^{2}). Reordering the factors puts the coefficients side by side and the powers of ten side by side: 2×4=82 \times 4 = 8, and 103×102=10510^{3} \times 10^{2} = 10^{5}, so the product is 8×1058 \times 10^{5}. The exponents added because the first factor carried three tens and the second carried two, which is five tens in all.

To multiply, multiply the coefficients and add the exponents, since 10m×10n=10m+n10^{m} \times 10^{n} = 10^{m+n} by the product rule. To divide, divide the coefficients and subtract the exponents, since 10m10n=10mn\frac{10^{m}}{10^{n}} = 10^{m-n} by the quotient rule. After either operation, the new coefficient might fall outside 1a<101 \le a < 10, so you renormalize. If it is 1010 or more, shift one factor of ten back into the power, raising the exponent by 11. If it is below 11, borrow one factor of ten, lowering the exponent by 11.

Worked example 5 Compute (3×104)×(2×105)(3 \times 10^{4}) \times (2 \times 10^{5})

Group the coefficients together and the powers of ten together, which you may do because multiplication can be reordered freely:

(3×104)×(2×105)=(3×2)×(104×105).(3 \times 10^{4}) \times (2 \times 10^{5}) = (3 \times 2) \times (10^{4} \times 10^{5}).

Multiply the coefficients, and add the exponents with the product rule:

=6×104+5=6×109.= 6 \times 10^{4+5} = 6 \times 10^{9}.

The coefficient 66 already satisfies 16<101 \le 6 < 10, so no renormalizing is needed and the answer is 6×1096 \times 10^{9}.

Worked example 6 Compute (5×106)×(4×103)(5 \times 10^{6}) \times (4 \times 10^{3}) and fix the coefficient

Multiply the coefficients and add the exponents:

(5×106)×(4×103)=(5×4)×106+3=20×109.(5 \times 10^{6}) \times (4 \times 10^{3}) = (5 \times 4) \times 10^{6+3} = 20 \times 10^{9}.

The coefficient 2020 is not less than 1010, so 20×10920 \times 10^{9} is not yet proper scientific notation. Rewrite 2020 as 2×102 \times 10, then merge that extra factor of ten into the power using the product rule:

20×109=(2×101)×109=2×101+9=2×1010.20 \times 10^{9} = (2 \times 10^{1}) \times 10^{9} = 2 \times 10^{1+9} = 2 \times 10^{10}.

Now the coefficient 22 is in range, so the final answer is 2×10102 \times 10^{10}.

Worked example 7 Compute 8.4×1072×103\dfrac{8.4 \times 10^{7}}{2 \times 10^{3}}

Split the quotient into a coefficient part and a power-of-ten part:

8.4×1072×103=8.42×107103.\frac{8.4 \times 10^{7}}{2 \times 10^{3}} = \frac{8.4}{2} \times \frac{10^{7}}{10^{3}}.

Divide the coefficients, and subtract the exponents with the quotient rule:

=4.2×1073=4.2×104.= 4.2 \times 10^{7-3} = 4.2 \times 10^{4}.

The coefficient 4.24.2 is between 11 and 1010, so the answer 4.2×1044.2 \times 10^{4} is already in proper form.

Check your understanding

Compute (6×103)×(3×105)(6 \times 10^{3}) \times (3 \times 10^{5}), written in proper scientific notation.

Answer choices

Common mistakes

Practice

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)

Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.

Free Response Questions (FRQ)

Longer questions in parts, to be worked out on paper. Progressive hints, the answer on its own so you can check yourself and try again, then the full worked solution, plus a rubric to mark your own work against.

Free response Work it out on paper 5 questions Start →
More practice (optional)

Extra sets, as hard as the Challenge set. Each one opens on its own page.

More resources (optional)

Other explanations of this lesson, if you want a second take.

A bit of history (Optional)

Suppose you want to name a number bigger than anything real. Picture a one with a hundred zeros behind it. Written out in full it swallows a whole line and tells a reader almost nothing about its size. So what do you call it?

Edward Kasner was a mathematician who enjoyed explaining his subject to ordinary readers. On a walk around 1920 he asked his nine-year-old nephew for a word. The boy, Milton Sirotta, said such a number should be called a googol. The name has stuck to it ever since.

Now look at what the notation does to the same monster. A googol is 1×101001 \times 10^{100}. The coefficient holds one digit and the exponent holds the magnitude. The whole quantity fits in a few marks on the page.

Once you pull those two pieces apart, no number is too enormous to compare with another.