Scientific Notation
Learning goals
- Write a number as with
- Explain why the coefficient range makes each positive number's form unique
- Move the point left for a large number, right for a small one
- Read a negative exponent as small, never as negative
- Compare magnitudes by exponent first, coefficient only to break a tie
- Multiply and divide by combining coefficients and exponents, then renormalize
What scientific notation is
A number is in scientific notation when it is written in the form
where the coefficient satisfies and the exponent is an integer (it may be positive, zero, or negative). The two pieces do two separate jobs. The coefficient carries the significant digits, the actual sequence of meaningful figures in the number. The power carries the magnitude, the size, telling you where the decimal point really sits. Pulling these apart is the whole point: and share the same digits () and differ only in size.
A power of ten with a positive exponent is a followed by that many zeros, so . A power of ten with a negative exponent is the reciprocal of the matching positive power, , so .
A single digit sitting in a place-value chart is already a number in this form. In the chart below you choose the digit and the column it occupies. The readout then names that digit’s value as the digit multiplied by a power of ten, which is the shape scientific notation uses.
Pick the digit and walk it from the ones column out to the thousands. The value climbs , , , , which is , then , , . The digit is the coefficient and the column supplies the power of ten. Now change the digit without moving it, and watch the power of ten hold still while the value changes. A coefficient such as or does the same job, with more significant digits to carry.
Where the coefficient stops and the power of ten begins
The 3 sits in the hundreds place. So it is worth 3 times 10², which is 300.
Why the coefficient stays between 1 and 10
The rule looks fussy, but it is there for a real reason: without it, the same number could be written many different ways. Take . Every line below equals :
All four are true, yet only the first has a coefficient in the range . Restricting the coefficient to a single nonzero digit before the decimal point means is at least but less than . Requiring that range picks out exactly one of these forms as the official one. That is what makes scientific notation a unique way to write each positive number. So two people who convert correctly always get the identical expression, .
Why exactly one power of ten makes the coefficient land in #
Start with . Dividing and multiplying by generates a ladder of candidate coefficients, , each one a tenth of the entry before it. Walk along the list: is still too big, and has already dropped under . Only lands at or above while staying below . Reaching from took three divisions by , so the exponent is and .
Take any positive number and ask which powers of ten you could factor out of it. Multiplying or dividing a number by slides its decimal point one place. Dividing by moves the point one step left and shrinks the number tenfold. Multiplying by moves the point one step right and grows the number tenfold. So the candidate coefficients you can reach, , each differ from the next by a single factor of ten.
Now look at the interval from up to (but not including) . It is exactly one factor of ten wide: its right end, , is ten times its left end, . Because each candidate coefficient is ten times the one below it, the candidates step right past one at a time. So exactly one of them can land at or above while still staying below . Land any lower and the value is under ; land any higher and it is or more. Either way you are in a different interval.
That single landing spot is the coefficient , and the number of factors of ten you moved to reach it is the exponent . Since there is one and only one such spot, there is one and only one way to write the number as with . Nothing here depended on , because every positive number has the same list of candidates and the same single entry inside the interval.
So is a perfectly correct equation, and it does equal . But is not proper scientific notation, because the coefficient is not less than . The same goes for , whose coefficient is less than .
Large numbers: a positive exponent
The decimal point has to end up with exactly one nonzero digit in front of it. The exponent then comes from counting how far the point moved to reach that spot.
Start with . Its decimal point is at the far right (a whole number’s point sits after the last digit). Slide it left until just one digit, the leading , stands before it:
Counting the hops, the point moves places to the left to get from after the final zero to between the and the . Each leftward hop is a division by , and there were of them. So to keep the value unchanged you must multiply back by eight times, that is by :
The exponent is positive because the original number is large (at least ), and it equals the number of places the point moved left. The check is quick: is followed by eight zeros, and , the number you started with.
Worked example 1 Write in scientific notation
The decimal point starts after the final , as the form shows. Move the point left until a single nonzero digit sits in front, which means placing it just after the :
Count the hops the point made: from after the last to between the and the is places. Trailing zeros that fall after the last nonzero digit are dropped from the coefficient, since and are the same number. So the coefficient is . The point moved places left, so the exponent is :
The coefficient is between and , as required, and checks out.
Check your understanding
Write in scientific notation.
Put the decimal point after the first nonzero digit, so the coefficient is (a single digit before the point). Then count how many places the point moved left, from after the last zero in to between the and the . That is places.
The coefficient must satisfy , which rules out (coefficient too big) and (coefficient too small).
Small numbers: a negative exponent
Numbers smaller than work the same way. But now the decimal point moves the other direction, to the right, and the exponent comes out negative.
Take . To get one nonzero digit in front of the point, slide the point right until it sits just after the :
The point moves places to the right to travel from its start to between the and the . Each rightward hop is a multiplication by , and there were of them. So to leave the value unchanged you must divide back by four times, that is multiply by :
The negative exponent is not a sign that the number itself is negative. The number is positive; it is simply small, between and . The minus sign on the exponent means “reciprocal,” exactly as you proved for negative exponents: , and . A negative exponent always marks a number between and , never a number below zero.
Worked example 2 Write in scientific notation
The number is between and , so expect a negative exponent. Slide the decimal point right until one nonzero digit stands in front of it, which means placing it just after the :
The leading zeros before the are placeholders. They vanish once the point is repositioned, and the zero between the and the stays because it sits among the significant digits. Count the hops: the point moves places to the right to get from the start of to just after the . Moving right gives a negative exponent of that size:
Check it: , and .
Check your understanding
Write in scientific notation.
The number is between and , so the decimal point moves right and the exponent is negative. Slide the point to just after the first nonzero digit, the , to get the coefficient . Then count the hops: from to is places right.
The exponent is negative because the number is small, not because it is below zero. The coefficient is not allowed (it is or more).
Converting back to standard form
Going the other way, from scientific notation to an ordinary number, you read the exponent as a direction and a distance for the decimal point.
Take . Multiplying by makes the number a hundred thousand times bigger, so the point travels places right. Starting from there are only two digits after the point, so three extra zeros fill the remaining places:
Now take . Here is tiny, so multiplying by it must shrink the coefficient, and the point travels places left, padding with zeros:
In both cases the direction followed the size. A positive exponent grows the number, so move the point right that many places, filling empty places with zeros. A negative exponent shrinks it, so move the point left that many places.
Worked example 3 Write and as ordinary numbers
For , the moves the point places right. After the there is one digit past the point, so five zeros fill the rest:
For , the moves the point places left, which pushes the into the fourth decimal place and pads the gap with zeros:
Check your understanding
Write as an ordinary number.
The exponent is negative, so the number is small: move the decimal point places to the left, padding with a zero.
The value is a small positive number. A negative exponent shrinks the coefficient; it does not make the result negative, so is wrong.
Comparing magnitudes at a glance
Compare and . The exponents are and , and , so is the larger number, even though its coefficient is the smaller of the two. The coefficient cannot close that gap. It is only about twice , while is a hundred times .
The power of ten carries the magnitude. So as long as both coefficients sit in the standard range , the number with the larger exponent is larger. You only look at the coefficients to break a tie when the exponents are equal.
Why a larger exponent wins when both coefficients are in #
Compare with , where the smaller exponent carries much the bigger coefficient, and the exponents are as close as they can get. Since is at least , the first number is at least . Since is below , the second is under . The two bounds meet exactly at , so . By hand that reads .
Compare and , where both coefficients satisfy and , and suppose , so is at least .
The first number is at least its smallest possible value, which is when is as small as allowed, . So .
The second number is below its ceiling: since , we have . And because , that ceiling is at most .
Chain these together. The second number is strictly less than , while the first number is at least :
So : the number with the larger exponent is larger, no matter what the coefficients are. That holds because keeping each coefficient under stops the smaller-exponent number from ever catching up. Nothing in that chain used the values and : it needed only the two range conditions and . When the exponents are equal, the powers of ten match, so the comparison falls back to the coefficients alone.
The proof needs both coefficients to be properly normalized. If you allowed , its inflated coefficient could beat a larger exponent, which is one more reason the rule matters.
Worked example 4 Order , , and from smallest to largest
Sort by exponent first. Two numbers share the exponent and one has exponent , so the exponent- number is the smallest of the three outright:
For the two that tie at , the exponents match, so compare the coefficients: . That makes smaller than . Putting it together:
Multiplying and dividing in scientific notation
Scientific notation also makes multiplication and division of awkward numbers manageable, because the laws of exponents do the heavy lifting.
Take . Reordering the factors puts the coefficients side by side and the powers of ten side by side: , and , so the product is . The exponents added because the first factor carried three tens and the second carried two, which is five tens in all.
To multiply, multiply the coefficients and add the exponents, since by the product rule. To divide, divide the coefficients and subtract the exponents, since by the quotient rule. After either operation, the new coefficient might fall outside , so you renormalize. If it is or more, shift one factor of ten back into the power, raising the exponent by . If it is below , borrow one factor of ten, lowering the exponent by .
Worked example 5 Compute
Group the coefficients together and the powers of ten together, which you may do because multiplication can be reordered freely:
Multiply the coefficients, and add the exponents with the product rule:
The coefficient already satisfies , so no renormalizing is needed and the answer is .
Worked example 6 Compute and fix the coefficient
Multiply the coefficients and add the exponents:
The coefficient is not less than , so is not yet proper scientific notation. Rewrite as , then merge that extra factor of ten into the power using the product rule:
Now the coefficient is in range, so the final answer is .
Worked example 7 Compute
Split the quotient into a coefficient part and a power-of-ten part:
Divide the coefficients, and subtract the exponents with the quotient rule:
The coefficient is between and , so the answer is already in proper form.
Check your understanding
Compute , written in proper scientific notation.
Multiply the coefficients and add the exponents: and , giving . The coefficient is at least , so renormalize by writing and folding the extra ten into the power.
The proper form is ; has a coefficient that is too large.