This site is a work in progress. New lessons are added regularly. Contact us

Ratios

Learning goals

  • Write a comparison as a ratio, and say why order matters
  • Scale both parts by the same number to get an equivalent ratio
  • Simplify a ratio by dividing both parts by their GCF
  • Distinguish part-to-part from part-to-whole, where the whole sums the parts
  • Split a total by counting parts, valuing one, then scaling
  • Compare two ratios by writing each as a fraction

What a ratio is

A ratio compares two quantities by division: how much of one there is for each amount of the other. The ratio of 22 cups of flour to 33 cups of sugar is written

2:3,2 : 3,

read “two to three.” The same comparison can also be written as the fraction 23\frac{2}{3}. That link to fractions is what makes ratios easy: scaling, simplifying and comparing work here exactly as they do for fractions.

Two cautions come with the definition. First, order matters. The ratio of flour to sugar is 2:32 : 3, but the ratio of sugar to flour is 3:23 : 2. Whatever quantity you name first is written first. Second, a ratio is not a total. Saying flour to sugar is 2:32 : 3 does not claim there are exactly 22 and 33 cups. It says that for every 22 cups of flour there are 33 cups of sugar. You might really have 44 and 66 cups, or 2020 and 3030, and the comparison is still 2:32 : 3.

Equivalent ratios

Doubling a recipe keeps the flavor, and doubling both parts of a ratio keeps the comparison. Use twice as much of the 2:32 : 3 mixture: the flour goes from 22 cups to 2×2=42 \times 2 = 4, and the sugar from 33 cups to 3×2=63 \times 2 = 6. Those 44 cups of flour form two groups of 22, and the 66 cups of sugar form two groups of 33. Each group of flour still faces a group of sugar, so 4:64 : 6 makes the same comparison as 2:32 : 3.

Because a ratio is a comparison and not a count, multiplying or dividing both quantities by the same nonzero number leaves it unchanged. Ratios related this way are called equivalent ratios:

2:3  =  4:6  =  6:9  =  20:30.2 : 3 \;=\; 4 : 6 \;=\; 6 : 9 \;=\; 20 : 30.

Each one describes the same relationship, just measured in larger or smaller batches. The picture below shows the first two. For every 22 flour squares there are 33 sugar squares; doubling every square to 44 and 66 keeps the two colors in step.

Equivalent ratios 2:3 and 4:6 shown as rows of squaresTop row: 2 filled squares then 3 outlined squares, labeled 2 to 3. Bottom row: 4 filled squares then 6 outlined squares, labeled 4 to 6. The two rows show the same comparison.floursugar2 : 34 : 6
Each flour square is paired with sugar in the ratio 2:3. Doubling both rows to 4:6 keeps the pairing identical, so 2:3 and 4:6 are equivalent.

This is exactly the rule for equivalent fractions. Writing the ratio 2:32 : 3 as 23\frac{2}{3}, scaling both parts is the same step that turns 23\frac{2}{3} into 46\frac{4}{6}.

Why scaling both parts keeps the ratio#

Take the ratio 7:117 : 11 and scale both parts by 33, which gives 21:3321 : 33. As a fraction that is 2133\frac{21}{33}, and the 33 is still sitting in both parts: 21=3×721 = 3 \times 7 and 33=3×1133 = 3 \times 11. Cancel that shared 33 and the fraction becomes 711\frac{7}{11}, so 21:3321 : 33 is the comparison 7:117 : 11 over again.

Nothing there depended on the numbers 77, 1111 and 33. Write the ratio a:ba : b as the fraction ab\frac{a}{b}. For that fraction to make sense, bb must not be zero. Scaling both parts by the same nonzero number kk gives the ratio ka:kbka : kb, which as a fraction is kakb\frac{ka}{kb}. The factor kk now appears in both the top and the bottom, and a common factor on the top and bottom of a fraction cancels:

kakb=ab.\frac{ka}{kb} = \frac{a}{b}.

So ka:kbka : kb and a:ba : b are the same comparison. The same reasoning runs in reverse for division: if both parts share a common factor, dividing it out lands on an equivalent ratio.

You can scale the recipe ratio yourself. The top bar below is one batch of the 2:32 : 3 mixture, cut into 55 equal parts, one for each part of that ratio. In that bar, 22 parts are shaded for flour and the other 33 are left for sugar. The bar under it is the same batch, and you choose how finely it is cut.

Cut each part into three and count what you get: 66 shaded parts against 99 unshaded, which is the ratio 6:96 : 9 from the list above. Cut into four instead and it is 8:128 : 12. The edge of the shaded region never moves while you do this. The steady edge is the claim in the proof made visible: these are one relationship measured in bigger batches, not different mixtures. The readout counts the shaded part against the whole batch rather than against the sugar. Comparing against the whole batch is the second kind of comparison, taken up later in this lesson.

Why cutting a batch finer does not change the mixture

2/5 = 4/10. Each part is cut into two, so 4 of 10 parts are shaded. That is 4 shaded against 6 unshaded, the ratio 4 to 6. The shaded length has not moved. Two bars of the same width. The top bar is cut into 5 equal parts with 2 shaded. The bottom bar shows the same shaded length cut into finer parts. Use the controls below the figure to change how fine the cut is. 2 5 4 10
Cut each part into

2/5 = 4/10. Each part is cut into two, so 4 of 10 parts are shaded. That is 4 shaded against 6 unshaded, the ratio 4 to 6. The shaded length has not moved.

The same batch twice. The top bar holds 2 shaded parts of flour to 3 unshaded parts of sugar, and the bottom bar is that same batch with every part cut into as many pieces as you choose.

Simplifying a ratio

A ratio is in lowest terms (or simplest form) when its two parts share no common factor larger than 11. To get there, divide both parts by their greatest common factor, the same move you use to reduce a fraction. Simplest form is handy because it is the smallest whole-number version of the comparison. So two ratios are equivalent exactly when they reduce to the same lowest terms.

Worked example 1 Simplify the ratio 12:1812 : 18

Find the greatest common factor of the two parts. The factors of 1212 are 1,2,3,4,6,121, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12 and the factors of 1818 are 1,2,3,6,9,181, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18, so the largest they share is 66.

Divide both parts by 66:

12:18=(12÷6):(18÷6)=2:3.12 : 18 = (12 \div 6) : (18 \div 6) = 2 : 3.

Since 22 and 33 share no common factor beyond 11, the ratio 12:1812 : 18 in lowest terms is 2:32 : 3.

Check your understanding

Simplify the ratio 10:1510 : 15.

Answer choices

Part-to-part and part-to-whole

When a whole is split into groups, there are two different comparisons you can make, and confusing them is the single most common ratio mistake. A part-to-part ratio compares one group to another group. A part-to-whole ratio compares one group to the total.

Suppose a class has 22 boys for every 33 girls. The part-to-part ratio of boys to girls is 2:32 : 3. To find the whole, add the parts: 2+3=52 + 3 = 5 students in every batch of 22 boys and 33 girls. So the part-to-whole ratio of boys to all students is 2:52 : 5, and as a fraction boys make up 25\frac{2}{5} of the class, not 23\frac{2}{3}. The denominator of a part-to-whole fraction is always the sum of all the parts.

A 5-part bar showing 2 boys to 3 girlsOne bar divided into 5 equal cells: 2 filled cells for boys followed by 3 outlined cells for girls, so boys are 2 of 5 parts.boys (2)girls (3)5 parts in all
A 2:3 ratio of boys to girls means 5 parts in all. Boys are 2 of the 5 parts, so they are 2/5 of the whole group, while the part-to-part ratio stays 2:3.

Check your understanding

In a bag of marbles, the ratio of red to blue is 3:53 : 5. What fraction of the marbles are red?

Answer choices

Using a ratio to find an amount

A ratio lets you find one quantity from the other once you know a single actual amount. The key is the scale factor: the number you multiply a part of the ratio by to reach the real amount. Because both parts scale by the same factor, finding it for one part hands you the other.

Worked example 2 Scale a recipe

A recipe mixes flour to sugar in the ratio 3:23 : 2. If you use 99 cups of flour, how much sugar do you need?

Compare the flour you have to the flour in the ratio. It went from 33 to 99, so the scale factor is

9÷3=3.9 \div 3 = 3.

Multiply both parts of the ratio by that same factor of 33:

3:2=(3×3):(2×3)=9:6.3 : 2 = (3 \times 3) : (2 \times 3) = 9 : 6.

So you need 66 cups of sugar.

Worked example 3 Split a total in a ratio

Two friends share $20 in the ratio 2:32 : 3. How much does each friend get?

First count the total parts: 2+3=52 + 3 = 5. The $20 is divided into 55 equal parts, so one part is worth

20÷5=4 dollars.20 \div 5 = 4 \text{ dollars}.

Now give each friend their number of parts. The first friend gets 22 parts and the second gets 33 parts:

2×4=8and3×4=12.2 \times 4 = 8 \qquad \text{and} \qquad 3 \times 4 = 12.

So they receive $8 and $12. Check the split by adding the shares: 8+12=208 + 12 = 20, which matches the total, so the work is right.

Comparing two ratios

Call one ratio “stronger” than another when it has more of the first quantity for each unit of the second. To decide which of two ratios is stronger, write each ratio as a fraction and compare the fractions. The cleanest way is a common denominator, exactly as when you compare any two fractions.

Worked example 4 Which is the stronger ratio, 3:43 : 4 or 5:75 : 7?

Write each ratio as a fraction. A common denominator for 44 and 77 is 2828, so rewrite both with that denominator:

34=2128,57=2028.\frac{3}{4} = \frac{21}{28}, \qquad \frac{5}{7} = \frac{20}{28}.

Now the comparison is just two like fractions. Since 21>2021 > 20, we have 2128>2028\frac{21}{28} > \frac{20}{28}, so the ratio 3:43 : 4 is stronger than 5:75 : 7.

Check your understanding

A ratio of cats to dogs is 4:34 : 3. If there are 1212 cats, how many dogs are there?

Answer choices

Common mistakes

Practice

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)

Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.

Free Response Questions (FRQ)

Longer questions in parts, to be worked out on paper. Progressive hints, the answer on its own so you can check yourself and try again, then the full worked solution, plus a rubric to mark your own work against.

Free response Work it out on paper 5 questions Start →
More practice (optional)

Extra sets, as hard as the Challenge set. Each one opens on its own page.

More resources (optional)

Other explanations of this lesson, if you want a second take.

A bit of history (Optional)

Ask a Greek geometer for the ratio of two lengths. You would not get a number back. He did not have one to give. Greek numbers were whole numbers, and two lengths almost never divide evenly. So a ratio stayed what this lesson says it is: a comparison, and not a total.

That left a hard question. If neither ratio is a number, how can you claim that two of them are equal? Eudoxus, a Greek thinker of about 350 BCE, answered it with copies. Lay ten of the first quantity against three of the second. See which pile wins. Then run the same contest on the other ratio. If every contest comes out the same way, the two ratios are one ratio.

The test never measures anything, and it never needs to. It only scales both parts and compares. Two thousand years later, the builders of the real numbers reached for that idea again. You used it yourself here: 2:32 : 3 and 4:64 : 6 are one ratio, because scaling both parts changed nothing.