Ratios
Learning goals
- Write a comparison as a ratio, and say why order matters
- Scale both parts by the same number to get an equivalent ratio
- Simplify a ratio by dividing both parts by their GCF
- Distinguish part-to-part from part-to-whole, where the whole sums the parts
- Split a total by counting parts, valuing one, then scaling
- Compare two ratios by writing each as a fraction
What a ratio is
A ratio compares two quantities by division: how much of one there is for each amount of the other. The ratio of cups of flour to cups of sugar is written
read “two to three.” The same comparison can also be written as the fraction . That link to fractions is what makes ratios easy: scaling, simplifying and comparing work here exactly as they do for fractions.
Two cautions come with the definition. First, order matters. The ratio of flour to sugar is , but the ratio of sugar to flour is . Whatever quantity you name first is written first. Second, a ratio is not a total. Saying flour to sugar is does not claim there are exactly and cups. It says that for every cups of flour there are cups of sugar. You might really have and cups, or and , and the comparison is still .
Equivalent ratios
Doubling a recipe keeps the flavor, and doubling both parts of a ratio keeps the comparison. Use twice as much of the mixture: the flour goes from cups to , and the sugar from cups to . Those cups of flour form two groups of , and the cups of sugar form two groups of . Each group of flour still faces a group of sugar, so makes the same comparison as .
Because a ratio is a comparison and not a count, multiplying or dividing both quantities by the same nonzero number leaves it unchanged. Ratios related this way are called equivalent ratios:
Each one describes the same relationship, just measured in larger or smaller batches. The picture below shows the first two. For every flour squares there are sugar squares; doubling every square to and keeps the two colors in step.
This is exactly the rule for equivalent fractions. Writing the ratio as , scaling both parts is the same step that turns into .
Why scaling both parts keeps the ratio#
Take the ratio and scale both parts by , which gives . As a fraction that is , and the is still sitting in both parts: and . Cancel that shared and the fraction becomes , so is the comparison over again.
Nothing there depended on the numbers , and . Write the ratio as the fraction . For that fraction to make sense, must not be zero. Scaling both parts by the same nonzero number gives the ratio , which as a fraction is . The factor now appears in both the top and the bottom, and a common factor on the top and bottom of a fraction cancels:
So and are the same comparison. The same reasoning runs in reverse for division: if both parts share a common factor, dividing it out lands on an equivalent ratio.
You can scale the recipe ratio yourself. The top bar below is one batch of the mixture, cut into equal parts, one for each part of that ratio. In that bar, parts are shaded for flour and the other are left for sugar. The bar under it is the same batch, and you choose how finely it is cut.
Cut each part into three and count what you get: shaded parts against unshaded, which is the ratio from the list above. Cut into four instead and it is . The edge of the shaded region never moves while you do this. The steady edge is the claim in the proof made visible: these are one relationship measured in bigger batches, not different mixtures. The readout counts the shaded part against the whole batch rather than against the sugar. Comparing against the whole batch is the second kind of comparison, taken up later in this lesson.
Why cutting a batch finer does not change the mixture
2/5 = 4/10. Each part is cut into two, so 4 of 10 parts are shaded. That is 4 shaded against 6 unshaded, the ratio 4 to 6. The shaded length has not moved.
Simplifying a ratio
A ratio is in lowest terms (or simplest form) when its two parts share no common factor larger than . To get there, divide both parts by their greatest common factor, the same move you use to reduce a fraction. Simplest form is handy because it is the smallest whole-number version of the comparison. So two ratios are equivalent exactly when they reduce to the same lowest terms.
Worked example 1 Simplify the ratio
Find the greatest common factor of the two parts. The factors of are and the factors of are , so the largest they share is .
Divide both parts by :
Since and share no common factor beyond , the ratio in lowest terms is .
Check your understanding
Simplify the ratio .
The greatest common factor of and is , so divide both parts by .
No common factor beyond remains, so is lowest terms.
Part-to-part and part-to-whole
When a whole is split into groups, there are two different comparisons you can make, and confusing them is the single most common ratio mistake. A part-to-part ratio compares one group to another group. A part-to-whole ratio compares one group to the total.
Suppose a class has boys for every girls. The part-to-part ratio of boys to girls is . To find the whole, add the parts: students in every batch of boys and girls. So the part-to-whole ratio of boys to all students is , and as a fraction boys make up of the class, not . The denominator of a part-to-whole fraction is always the sum of all the parts.
Check your understanding
In a bag of marbles, the ratio of red to blue is . What fraction of the marbles are red?
Red and blue are the two parts, so the whole has parts.
The is the part-to-part ratio of red to blue, not the part-to-whole fraction.
Using a ratio to find an amount
A ratio lets you find one quantity from the other once you know a single actual amount. The key is the scale factor: the number you multiply a part of the ratio by to reach the real amount. Because both parts scale by the same factor, finding it for one part hands you the other.
Worked example 2 Scale a recipe
A recipe mixes flour to sugar in the ratio . If you use cups of flour, how much sugar do you need?
Compare the flour you have to the flour in the ratio. It went from to , so the scale factor is
Multiply both parts of the ratio by that same factor of :
So you need cups of sugar.
Worked example 3 Split a total in a ratio
Two friends share $20 in the ratio . How much does each friend get?
First count the total parts: . The $20 is divided into equal parts, so one part is worth
Now give each friend their number of parts. The first friend gets parts and the second gets parts:
So they receive $8 and $12. Check the split by adding the shares: , which matches the total, so the work is right.
Comparing two ratios
Call one ratio “stronger” than another when it has more of the first quantity for each unit of the second. To decide which of two ratios is stronger, write each ratio as a fraction and compare the fractions. The cleanest way is a common denominator, exactly as when you compare any two fractions.
Worked example 4 Which is the stronger ratio, or ?
Write each ratio as a fraction. A common denominator for and is , so rewrite both with that denominator:
Now the comparison is just two like fractions. Since , we have , so the ratio is stronger than .
Check your understanding
A ratio of cats to dogs is . If there are cats, how many dogs are there?
The cats went from to , so the scale factor is . Multiply both parts by .
So there are dogs.