Compound Interest

Learning goals

  • Contrast linear simple interest with exponential compounding
  • Apply A=P(1+r)tA = P(1+r)^t to find a balance or a needed principal
  • Divide the rate by nn and multiply the exponent by nn
  • Convert a percent to its decimal rate first
  • Reach A=PertA = Pe^{rt} by letting the periods grow without bound

Simple interest: the same amount every year

The plainest way to pay interest is to base it only on the original deposit, called the principal. Suppose you deposit 1000 dollars at 5%5\% simple interest. Every year the account earns 5%5\% of the original 1000 dollars, which is 1000×0.05=501000 \times 0.05 = 50 dollars, whether it is the first year or the tenth. After 33 years the interest is 3×50=1503 \times 50 = 150 dollars, so the balance is 11501150 dollars.

Now write that so it works for any deposit and rate. If a principal PP earns a yearly rate rr, then each year it earns the same fixed amount PrPr. This is simple interest. After tt years the total interest is

I=Prt,I = P r t,

and the balance is the principal plus that interest,

A=P+Prt=P(1+rt).A = P + Prt = P(1 + rt).

The rate rr is always the decimal form of the percent, so a rate of 5%5\% means r=0.05r = 0.05. Because the yearly increase never changes, simple interest grows in a straight line: equal steps in time add equal amounts of money.

Compound interest: interest on its own interest

Many savings accounts do not work that way. At the end of each period the interest is added to the balance, and the next period’s interest is figured on that larger balance. The interest starts earning interest. This is compound interest, and it changes the arithmetic from adding to multiplying.

Track the same 1000 dollars at 5%5\%, but now compounded once a year. After the first year the balance is the principal plus 5%5\% of it, which is 1000+50=10501000 + 50 = 1050. For the second year the 5%5\% applies to 10501050, not to the original 10001000, so the account earns 1050×0.05=52.501050 \times 0.05 = 52.50 and the balance becomes 1102.501102.50. The extra 2.502.50 beyond simple interest’s flat 5050 is interest earned on the first year’s interest, and that gap only widens as the years pile up.

The key move is that each year multiplies the balance by the same factor. Adding 5%5\% to a balance is the same as multiplying it by 1.051.05, because B+0.05B=1.05BB + 0.05B = 1.05B. That single observation turns the year-by-year story into a clean formula.

Why annual compounding gives A=P(1+r)tA = P(1+r)^t#

Start with a principal PP and an annual rate rr, compounded once a year. During the first year the account earns interest PrPr, so the balance climbs to P+PrP + Pr. Factor out the common PP: one year multiplies the balance by 1+r1 + r, leaving P(1+r)P(1+r).

Nothing about the second year is different except where it begins. Its starting balance is P(1+r)P(1+r), and one more year multiplies that by the same factor 1+r1 + r, so the balance becomes P(1+r)(1+r)=P(1+r)2P(1+r)(1+r) = P(1+r)^2. The third year repeats the move exactly, giving P(1+r)3P(1+r)^3, and after tt whole years the factor 1+r1 + r has been applied tt times in a row:

A=P(1+r)t.A = P(1 + r)^t.

The exponent counts the years precisely because each year contributes one more factor of 1+r1 + r, no more and no less. Equal steps in tt multiply the balance by the constant 1+r1 + r, which is exactly the pattern of an exponential function from the previous lesson: f(t)=P(1+r)tf(t) = P(1+r)^t with base 1+r1 + r. Since r>0r > 0 makes that base greater than 11, it is exponential growth, which is why a compounded balance eventually outruns any straight line.

Simple versus compound growth of 1000 dollars over 10 yearsSimple interest is a straight line from (0, 1000) to (10, 2000); compound interest is an upward-bending curve from (0, 1000) to about (10, 2594), staying above the line after the start.balance (dollars)0246810years1000150020002500compoundsimple100025942000
The same 1000 dollars at 10 percent for 10 years. Simple interest adds a flat 100 dollars a year, so it climbs in a straight line to 2000. Compound interest multiplies by 1.10 each year, so it curves upward, reaching about 2594. The two start together and then the curve pulls away, because compound interest earns interest on its own interest.

Worked example 1 A balance compounded annually

You deposit 800800 dollars in an account paying 4%4\% compounded annually. What is the balance after 33 years?

Convert the rate to a decimal, r=0.04r = 0.04, and read off the pieces of the formula: P=800P = 800, r=0.04r = 0.04, and t=3t = 3. Since compounding is annual, apply A=P(1+r)tA = P(1+r)^t directly:

A=800 (1+0.04)3=800 (1.04)3.A = 800\,(1 + 0.04)^3 = 800\,(1.04)^3.

Now raise the factor to the third power. Squaring gives 1.042=1.08161.04^2 = 1.0816, and one more factor gives 1.043=1.1248641.04^3 = 1.124864, so

A=800×1.124864=899.8912.A = 800 \times 1.124864 = 899.8912.

Rounded to the nearest cent, the balance is 899.89899.89 dollars. Simple interest would have given only 800(1+0.04×3)=896800(1 + 0.04 \times 3) = 896 dollars, so compounding is worth an extra 3.893.89 dollars over these three years, all of it interest earned on earlier interest.

Check your understanding

You invest 500500 dollars at 10%10\% compounded annually. What is the balance after 22 years?

Answer choices

Because the formula is just multiplication, you can also run it backward to find the deposit needed to reach a goal. If A=P(1+r)tA = P(1+r)^t, then dividing both sides by (1+r)t(1+r)^t isolates the principal:

P=A(1+r)t.P = \frac{A}{(1+r)^t}.

Worked example 2 Working out the deposit you need

How much must you deposit today, at 6%6\% compounded annually, to have exactly 50005000 dollars in 22 years?

Here the unknown is the principal PP, while A=5000A = 5000, r=0.06r = 0.06, and t=2t = 2 are known. Rearrange the formula to solve for PP by dividing:

P=A(1+r)t=5000(1.06)2.P = \frac{A}{(1+r)^t} = \frac{5000}{(1.06)^2}.

Compute the denominator first, 1.062=1.12361.06^2 = 1.1236, and then divide:

P=50001.1236≈4449.98.P = \frac{5000}{1.1236} \approx 4449.98.

You need to deposit about 4449.984449.98 dollars now. Notice that no logarithm was needed: the unknown was a plain factor, not the exponent, so ordinary division finished the job. Pulling an unknown out of the exponent is a different task, and it waits for the next lesson.

Check your understanding

You want 30003000 dollars in 22 years at 8%8\% compounded annually. Using 1.082=1.16641.08^2 = 1.1664, about how much must you deposit now?

Answer choices

Compounding several times a year

Most accounts do not wait a whole year to compound. They might do it every six months, every quarter, or every month.

Worked example 3 Quarterly compounding

You invest 10001000 dollars at 8%8\% compounded quarterly for 11 year. What is the balance, and how does it compare with annual compounding?

Compounding quarterly splits the year into 44 periods. Each period pays only one quarter of the yearly rate, 0.084=0.02\dfrac{0.08}{4} = 0.02, and over 11 year there are 44 of those periods, so the factor 1.021.02 is applied 44 times:

A=1000(1+0.084)4⋅1=1000 (1.02)4.A = 1000\left(1 + \frac{0.08}{4}\right)^{4\cdot 1} = 1000\,(1.02)^4.

Raising 1.021.02 to the fourth power gives 1.024=1.082432161.02^4 = 1.08243216, so

A=1000×1.08243216≈1082.43.A = 1000 \times 1.08243216 \approx 1082.43.

The balance is about 1082.431082.43 dollars. Compounding just once a year would have given 1000(1.08)=10801000(1.08) = 1080 dollars, so splitting the same 8%8\% into four quarterly steps earns an extra 2.432.43 dollars. More frequent compounding pays a little more, because interest starts earning interest sooner.

Two things changed in that calculation, and both are worth naming so the idea works for any account. Compounding nn times a year means each period is only a fraction of a year, so it pays only a fraction of the yearly rate, namely rn\dfrac{r}{n} (here 0.084\dfrac{0.08}{4}). And over tt years there are ntnt periods in total (here 4×1=44 \times 1 = 4), not tt. Each period still multiplies the balance by “one plus its own rate,” and there are ntnt of them, so the factor (1+rn)\left(1 + \dfrac{r}{n}\right) is applied ntnt times:

A=P(1+rn)nt.A = P\left(1 + \frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}.

Read the two edits carefully, because both are easy to drop. The rate inside the parentheses is divided by nn, and the exponent is multiplied by nn. Quarterly compounding for 33 years, for instance, means n=4n = 4 and t=3t = 3, so the exponent is 4×3=124 \times 3 = 12, not 33.

Check your understanding

A sum is compounded monthly at 6%6\% for 33 years. Which expression gives the balance AA?

Answer choices

Worked example 4 Transferring the method: monthly compounding

You invest 10001000 dollars at 12%12\% compounded monthly for 22 years. What is the balance?

Monthly means n=12n = 12, so each month pays 0.1212=0.01\dfrac{0.12}{12} = 0.01, and over 22 years there are nt=12×2=24nt = 12 \times 2 = 24 periods. Substitute into the formula:

A=1000(1+0.1212)12⋅2=1000 (1.01)24.A = 1000\left(1 + \frac{0.12}{12}\right)^{12\cdot 2} = 1000\,(1.01)^{24}.

Raising 1.011.01 to the 2424th power needs a calculator’s power key: 1.0124≈1.269734651.01^{24} \approx 1.26973465. Keep those digits until the last step, so

A≈1000×1.26973465=1269.73465.A \approx 1000 \times 1.26973465 = 1269.73465.

The balance is about 1269.731269.73 dollars. The steps are exactly the ones from the quarterly example, just with a different nn and tt.

Squeezing the periods: continuous compounding and the number e

If compounding four times a year beats once a year, what about a hundred times, or a million? Push the idea to its limit and compound not just every day but every instant. You might expect a balance compounded infinitely often to blow up to infinity, but it does not. It climbs toward a definite ceiling, and that ceiling introduces one of the most important numbers in mathematics.

To see the ceiling with clean numbers, strip away the principal and rate and ask what happens to the factor (1+1m)m\left(1 + \dfrac{1}{m}\right)^{m} as mm grows. Choosing a rate of 100%100\%, so r=1r = 1, makes the compounding factor exactly (1+1m)m\left(1 + \dfrac{1}{m}\right)^{m}, the pattern that defines ee. Here is what the arithmetic gives:

mm(1+1m)m\left(1 + \tfrac{1}{m}\right)^{m}
1122
222.252.25
552.488322.48832
10102.593742.59374
1001002.704812.70481
1,0001{,}0002.716922.71692
10,00010{,}0002.718152.71815

The values keep rising, but by smaller and smaller amounts, and they crowd toward a single number near 2.718282.71828. That limiting value is named ee:

e≈2.71828…e \approx 2.71828\ldots

This is the base of the exponential function exe^x mentioned at the end of the previous lesson, and compound interest is where it is born.

Now bring the principal and rate back. The same idea holds when nn in A=P(1+rn)ntA = P\left(1 + \frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt} grows without bound: the growth factor approaches erte^{rt}, the same limit as above but built from a general rate rr instead of r=1r = 1. Restoring the principal, the balance approaches PertPe^{rt}. This limiting case is continuous compounding, and its formula is

A=P ert.A = P\,e^{rt}.
Balances converging to the continuous ceilingAs compounding moves through annual, semiannual, quarterly, monthly, and daily schedules (the numbers 1, 2, 4, 12, and 365, shown in order but not to scale), the balance rises toward a dashed horizontal line at 1061.84 dollars and never crosses it.balance after 1 year (dollars)106010611062continuous ceiling 1061.841060.0012412365compounding schedule (not to scale)
One year on 1000 dollars at 6 percent, compounded more and more often. Annual compounding gives 1060.00; quarterly, monthly, and daily each earn a bit more, but the gains shrink and the balances press up against the continuous ceiling of 1061.84 dollars. The five schedules are ordered left to right by frequency, spaced evenly for readability rather than by their numeric value.

Worked example 5 Annual, quarterly, monthly, and continuous side by side

Take 10001000 dollars at 6%6\% for 11 year and compare four compounding schedules. Each uses the same P=1000P = 1000, r=0.06r = 0.06, and t=1t = 1; only the frequency nn changes.

Compounded annually, n=1n = 1:

A=1000 (1.06)1=1060.00.A = 1000\,(1.06)^1 = 1060.00.

Quarterly and monthly follow the same steps as the earlier worked examples, just with r=0.06r = 0.06:

ScheduleRate per period, r/nr/nPeriods, ntntBalance
Quarterly0.0150.015441061.361061.36
Monthly0.0050.00512121061.681061.68

Compounded continuously, use A=PertA = Pe^{rt} with e0.06≈1.061837e^{0.06} \approx 1.061837 (a calculator’s exe^x key gives this directly):

A=1000 e0.06≈1000×1.061837≈1061.84.A = 1000\,e^{0.06} \approx 1000 \times 1.061837 \approx 1061.84.

Line them up: 1060.00<1061.36<1061.68<1061.841060.00 < 1061.36 < 1061.68 < 1061.84. Each jump in frequency adds a bit more, but the additions shrink, and every finite schedule stays below the continuous value 1061.841061.84 dollars. That continuous amount is the ceiling all the others are climbing toward.

Check your understanding

As the number of periods mm grows without bound, the factor (1+1m)m\left(1 + \frac{1}{m}\right)^{m} gets closer and closer to which value?

Answer choices

A natural next question is how long an investment takes to double, which means solving (1+r)t=2(1 + r)^t = 2 for the exponent tt. That needs a new tool, the logarithm, covered in the next lesson; every quantity solved for in this lesson is a balance AA or a principal PP, never an exponent.

Common mistakes

Practice

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)

Progressively harder sets of questions. Each opens on its own page.

Core practice

Practice problems at the level of the course, to be worked out on paper. Hints one at a time, then the answer or the full worked solution, with your progress kept in this browser.

Core practice Work it out on paper 10 problems Start →
More practice (optional)

Extra sets, as hard as the Challenge set. Each one opens on its own page.

More resources (optional)

Other explanations of this lesson, if you want a second take.

Go deeper (optional)

You can skip this and keep going. Read it if you want to know more.

Why the compounding factor approaches e to the rt

The core lesson writes e≈2.71828…e \approx 2.71828\ldots as the number the table approaches. Formally, that number is defined as a limit:

e=lim⁡m→∞(1+1m)m.e = \lim_{m \to \infty}\left(1 + \frac{1}{m}\right)^{m}.

Now start from A=P(1+rn)ntA = P\left(1+\frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt} and watch what happens as nn grows without bound, for any fixed positive rate rr (every rate in this lesson is positive; a rate of exactly 00 never needs this argument, since it earns nothing to compound). By the power-of-a-power rule, the growth factor factors as

(1+rn)nt=[(1+rn)n]t.\left(1 + \frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt} = \left[\left(1 + \frac{r}{n}\right)^{n}\right]^{t}.

Set m=nrm = \dfrac{n}{r}, so that rn=1m\dfrac{r}{n} = \dfrac{1}{m} and n=mrn = mr. Since r>0r > 0, mm grows without bound exactly when nn does. The inner bracket becomes

(1+1m)mr=[(1+1m)m]r.\left(1 + \frac{1}{m}\right)^{mr} = \left[\left(1 + \frac{1}{m}\right)^{m}\right]^{r}.

As nn grows without bound so does mm, and the inner piece (1+1m)m\left(1 + \frac{1}{m}\right)^{m} marches toward ee, the same limit computed in the core lesson but starting from a general rate rr instead of r=1r = 1. So the bracket approaches ere^{r}, and the whole growth factor approaches (er)t=ert\left(e^{r}\right)^{t} = e^{rt}. Restoring the principal, the balance approaches PertPe^{rt}, exactly the continuous-compounding formula stated in the lesson.

A bit of history (optional)

Buying a lease (a long-term right to use land or a building) in 1600 raised a hard question: what is a payment twenty years from now worth today? That is this lesson’s formula run backward. Running it backward means dividing by a growth factor raised to the twentieth power, and there was no shortcut. You multiplied by hand, twenty times over, and one slip anywhere ruined the page.

Richard Witt did the multiplying once and printed the answers. His book of 1613, published in London, is the first in English devoted entirely to compound interest. Page after page holds the growth factor raised to power after power, worked out to seven decimal places. A buyer pricing a lease no longer had to work anything out; he looked up one number and divided by it.

Two things here are worth a moment. His tables hold exactly the (1+r)t(1 + r)^t of this lesson, and his backward question is the one you answered when you solved for the principal. When he published, charging interest on interest was still widely held to be wrong; Witt argued for it in plain trade terms, and his tables proved more lasting than the argument against them.