Special Factorizations: Star problems
Ten optional challenges to stretch your reasoning. Work on paper, use hints when you need them, and check the answer or full solution when you are ready. You can skip these problems and continue the course.
- 1 of 3 stars: Stretch
- 2 of 3 stars: Challenge
- 3 of 3 stars: Deep challenge
Stars indicate difficulty within this set.
0 of 10 completed · 0 skipped
Progress saved in this browser.
Progress can't be saved in this browser, so your choices last for this visit only.
-
Problem 1 Four factors and one small addition
Difficulty: 1 of 3 stars, Stretch
Prove that is a perfect square for every integer . Give an explicit expression whose square it equals, including when is negative.
Builds on Difference of Squares, Factoring by Grouping
- Hint 1
Pair the first factor with the last, and the two middle factors with each other.
- Hint 2
The two resulting quadratic expressions differ by . Write them as and .
Answer
.
Full solution
Pairing the outside factors gives , while pairing the inside factors gives
The linear term matches in both products.
Their average is , so the two products are and .
The original expression therefore becomes
Substituting back proves the identity for every real , not just positive integers.
When is an integer, is also an integer, so its square is a perfect square.
A negative creates no exception: the identity still holds and the square of a negative integer is still a perfect square.
The choice of is explained by the grouping: it exactly cancels the square of the half-gap between the paired products.
Answer
.
Key idea
Look for pairs of factors with the same sum so that their products differ by a constant.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 2 Two cube quotients
Difficulty: 1 of 3 stars, Stretch
Positive real numbers satisfy and . Find all ordered pairs for which
Prove that every pair you find satisfies the original equation.
Builds on Sum and Difference of Cubes, Sums and Products of Roots
- Hint 1
Factor the sum and difference of cubes before substituting any numbers.
- Hint 2
After cancellation, the difference of the two quotients is . Combine the resulting product with .
Answer
or .
Full solution
The denominators are nonzero: positivity gives , and the problem states .
The cube factorizations yield
Subtracting cancels the square terms and leaves .
Thus the given equation is equivalent to .
The sum and product now identify as roots of
Since their sum is , the only ordered pairs are and .
Both pairs consist of unequal positive numbers and therefore lie in the original domain.
For either order, the first quotient is and the second is
Their difference is , as required.
Factoring first exposes the product information that the unsimplified cube expressions conceal.
Answer
or .
Key idea
Special factorizations can turn apparently cubic information into a simple sum-and-product reconstruction.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 3 A denominator with three radicals
Difficulty: 1 of 3 stars, Stretch
Express
in the form , where are rational. Give exact values and show your rationalization steps.
Builds on Rationalizing Denominators, Difference of Squares
- Hint 1
Treat as one block and as another block.
- Hint 2
After the first conjugate, the denominator is . A second conjugate will make it rational.
Answer
, , , .
Full solution
Group the denominator as and multiply numerator and denominator by .
The denominator becomes
This quantity is positive, so the conjugate factor is not zero.
Now multiply by in both numerator and denominator.
The new denominator is
The numerator is
Expand and simplify the radical products: and
The numerator is therefore .
Division by gives the stated rational coefficients.
The two stages work because each conjugate eliminates one chosen sum, even though the first stage does not remove every radical.
Answer
, , , .
Key idea
With three radicals, rationalize in blocks; a useful first step need not finish the job.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 4 Which symmetric factorization is possible?
Difficulty: 2 of 3 stars, Challenge
For a real number , seek real numbers such that the identity
holds for every real .
Find all possible , and for each such list every possible ordered pair . Include boundary cases where two listed formulas give the same pair.
Builds on Squares of Binomials, Difference of Squares, Factoring by Grouping
- Hint 1
View the right-hand side as a difference of squares before expanding.
- Hint 2
Compare constant terms and coefficients of . First split into the two possibilities for .
Answer
For every : . For there are also . No pairs for ; a zero square root gives one pair, not two.
Full solution
The right-hand side is
Equality for every real requires and .
These conditions are also sufficient, because they make the two expanded expressions identical.
If , then .
Real choices exist precisely when , and they are
If , then .
These choices exist precisely when , with
No other can satisfy the constant-term condition.
Thus gives two pairs, gives the single pair , and gives four pairs.
At , the first branch gives and the second gives , for three pairs.
There are no solutions for .
Keeping zero square roots as single choices avoids double-counting at the boundaries.
Answer
For every : . For there are also . No pairs for ; a zero square root gives one pair, not two.
Key idea
An identity for every input becomes a coefficient system; its real solutions require explicit square-sign checks.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 5 Composite but never a square
Difficulty: 2 of 3 stars, Challenge
For a positive integer , let .
(a) Prove that is composite by finding two integer factors greater than .
(b) Prove that is never a perfect square.
Builds on Squares of Binomials, Difference of Squares
- Hint 1
For part (a), compare with and use a difference of squares.
- Hint 2
For part (b), compare with and the next integer square. Check the smallest value of separately.
Answer
is composite and is never a perfect square.
Full solution
Add and subtract a suitable square:
The smaller factor is , and the larger is
Both are integers greater than , proving that is composite.
For square values, use a different nearby square:
When , the gap to the next integer square is
Therefore
There is no perfect square strictly between consecutive integer squares.
The remaining case is , which gives , strictly between and .
Thus no positive integer gives a square.
Different square comparisons serve different purposes: one produces factors, while the other excludes square values.
Answer
is composite and is never a perfect square.
Key idea
Choose a nearby square to fit the goal: factorization and square exclusion may need different choices.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 6 Recover the two radicands
Difficulty: 2 of 3 stars, Challenge
Find all ordered pairs of positive integers satisfying
Prove that your list is complete; do not merely guess a way to simplify the right-hand radical. All square roots are nonnegative real square roots.
Builds on Squares of Binomials, Fractional Exponents and Radicals, Sums and Products of Roots
- Hint 1
Square once and use the integers and to describe the result.
- Hint 2
Isolate and square again. If , the resulting equation would express as a rational number.
Answer
or .
Full solution
Let and , both positive integers.
Squaring the original equation gives , hence
Squaring again yields
If , this equation would express as a ratio of integers, contradicting its irrationality.
To recall why is irrational, a reduced positive fraction with square would give .
The prime would divide ; substituting would then show it also divides , a contradiction.
Thus .
The first squared equation now gives , so .
Therefore are the roots of
Their sum forces the two ordered pairs and .
For either pair, the left side is , a positive number whose square is .
It therefore equals the specified nonnegative square root on the right.
This final sign check verifies the original equation after the two squarings.
Answer
or .
Key idea
When matching a radical to a sum of square roots, justify the rational and irrational parts separately and verify the final sign.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 7 Do not divide away a family
Difficulty: 2 of 3 stars, Challenge
Find all ordered pairs of real numbers satisfying
Prove that your list is complete.
Builds on Sum and Difference of Cubes, Sums and Products of Roots
- Hint 1
Factor and use the second equation to simplify the quadratic factor.
- Hint 2
You should reach . Treat separately from .
Answer
, , , , , and .
Full solution
The sum-of-cubes identity and transform the first equation into
Equivalently,
We must consider both factors; division by could remove valid solutions.
If , then .
The second equation becomes , giving
This yields the first two ordered pairs.
If , then , so or .
For sum , the numbers are roots of , yielding .
For sum , the equation is , yielding .
All six pairs have square sum .
In the first branch their cube sum and their sum are both zero.
In the second, the identity gives
Thus every pair works, and the exhaustive factor split proves completeness.
Answer
, , , , , and .
Key idea
A common factor may describe an entire solution family; split into cases before canceling it.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 8 Two cubes, one difference
Difficulty: 3 of 3 stars, Deep challenge
Find all pairs of positive integers with such that . Prove that no pair is missing.
Builds on Sum and Difference of Cubes, Factoring Quadratics
- Hint 1
Let . Express the difference of cubes in terms of and , and obtain an upper bound for .
- Hint 2
The difference is even, so and have the same parity. Use the even divisors of below , then solve or eliminate each case.
Answer
or .
Full solution
Let .
Factoring gives
Since , the right-hand side exceeds .
Thus , so .
Also, an integer cube has the same parity as its base.
The even difference means have the same parity, and therefore is even.
Now is an even positive divisor of and is at most .
The only possibilities are .
If , the equation reduces to , so positivity gives .
If , division by gives , or
The right-hand side is divisible by and the left is not, so this case is impossible.
If , the equation becomes , giving .
Finally, and
The bound and divisor list make the search complete.
Answer
or .
Key idea
In an integer equation, factor first, bound a small difference, and only then enumerate cases.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 9 When a cubic expression has a minimum
Difficulty: 3 of 3 stars, Deep challenge
Fix a real number . Real numbers may vary subject to . Consider
For each of the cases , , and , determine whether has a least possible value. If it does, find that value and all equality cases. If it does not, prove that can be made arbitrarily negative.
Builds on Sum and Difference of Cubes, Factoring by Grouping, Squares of Binomials
- Hint 1
Try factoring by . The remaining quadratic expression can be written using the three squares .
- Hint 2
For negative , try , , , where can be as large as needed.
Answer
If , minimum only at . If , every permitted triple gives . If , there is no minimum; is unbounded below.
Full solution
Expanding and canceling the mixed cubic terms verifies
The second factor equals half the sum of the three squared differences.
Under the sum constraint, therefore,
If , every square is nonnegative, so .
Equality holds exactly when all three differences vanish.
The constraint then forces , which does give .
If , the factored expression is zero for every allowed triple; equality of the variables is not necessary.
If , use the family , , .
Its sum is always , and the squared differences add to .
Consequently .
The coefficient is negative, so taking positive sufficiently large makes this value less than any specified negative number.
Thus there is no least value in this case.
The sign of the fixed sum controls the entire conclusion.
Answer
If , minimum only at . If , every permitted triple gives . If , there is no minimum; is unbounded below.
Key idea
A cubic expression can become a signed sum of squares after the right factorization.
- Hint 1
-
Problem 10 A parameter that vanishes
Difficulty: 3 of 3 stars, Deep challenge
Let be pairwise distinct real numbers, and let be any real number. Evaluate
Your answer must hold for every permitted choice of the four numbers. Prove it by algebra.
Builds on Factoring by Grouping, Difference of Squares, Algebraic Fractions
- Hint 1
Use the common denominator . Watch the signs when reversing a difference.
- Hint 2
After expanding in , its squared and linear terms cancel. Group the remaining numerator first by .
Answer
The expression always equals .
Full solution
Pairwise distinctness makes every denominator nonzero.
Let
Rewriting all three fractions over gives the numerator
The minus sign in the middle term comes from
Expand only the squares first.
The coefficient of is
The coefficient of is
Hence is independent of and equals .
Group this remaining expression by powers of :
Factoring now yields
Thus the original sum is .
Every division used a nonzero difference, and no restriction on was needed.
The calculation explains both why the parameter disappears and why the remaining value is constant.
Answer
The expression always equals .
Key idea
When several fractions have related difference factors, a common denominator can expose systematic cancellation.
- Hint 1